In regard to safety, one of the key questions from Chief Justice Roberts was that if, as the abortionists claim, partial-birth abortion is safer because it requires fewer insertions of instruments into the woman's body, why would it not then also follow that the safest method is live birth altogether, with the killing of the child outside the womb?This is precisely what some Anti-life activists, such as Peter Singer, envision:
The pro-abortion side did not have an answer to that specific question...
From his book "Practical Ethics", we read
"Human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons." But animals are self-aware, and therefore, "the life of a newborn is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee." Source.Pray that the Supreme Court uses its God-given intellect and reason to see that the Partial Birth Abortion Ban is, in fact, constitutional.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep your comments civil and respectful!