Friday, March 23, 2007

March 25-31, Fertility Care Week

From Archbishop Burke:
This coming March 25-31 has been designated by FertilityCare Centers of America Inc. as Worldwide FertilityCare Week. I write about Worldwide FertilityCare Week for two reasons. First of all, many married couples in the archdiocese experience difficulties in conceiving and bearing a child. Because the gift of children is the crown of marital love, couples who suffer from some form of infertility bear a particularly heavy cross. As archbishop, I desire to be close to them and to offer them care which respects their individual health, and the integrity of their relationship with each other and of their act of human procreation.

Secondly, I want to celebrate the strong presence of FertilityCare Centers in the Archdiocese of St. Louis. There are 10 FertilityCare Centers in the Archdiocese of St. Louis, whose work is coordinated by K. Diane Daly, RN, CFCE, director of the archdiocesan Office of Natural Family Planning, and Ann M. Prebil, RN, BSN, CFCE. Daly and Prebil have their office in the Department of Fertility Care Services at St. John’s Mercy Medical Center, 11700 Studt Road, Suite C. Their telephone number is (314) 991-0327.
* * *
It is important, therefore, that we begin and accompany all of our efforts to assist couples suffering from infertility with prayer to God. Recently, I was able to celebrate the Holy Mass for a number of couples who are seeking to conceive and bring to birth a child. At the conclusion of the Mass, I blessed each couple with the relic of St. Gianna Beretta Molla, who has been a particularly powerful intercessor on behalf of couples experiencing any kind of difficulty in childbearing. St. Gianna, who died on April 28, 1962, and her husband Pietro, who is still living, had experienced many sorrows in conceiving and giving birth to their children...

At the beginning of each day, I revere a relic of St. Gianna and pray for all of the couples who are suffering with infertility. I also pray for all those who assist them. Please join me in my prayer for the couples in the archdiocese who are desiring to have a baby and for those who care for them.

Fr Fessio to Stay at Ave Maria, New Job

Less than 24 hours after the beloved provost of Ave Maria University was fired, he was back on the job Thursday night — this time wearing a new hat.

Father Joseph Fessio will become a “designated theologian in residence” who will maintain a room on campus, assume teaching responsibilities and make further plans for student study abroad, Fessio and university officials said.

“I’m back and I’m glad,” Fessio said.

But Fessio said he was never given a reason why he was asked to resign Wednesday, other than administrative differences.

Gospel for Friday, 4th Week of Lent

From: John 7:1-2, 10, 25-30

Jesus Goes Up to Jerusalem During the Feast of Tabernacles

[1] After this Jesus went about in Galilee; He would not go about in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill Him. [2] Now the Jews' feast of Tabernacles was at hand. [10] But after His brethren had gone up to the feast, then He also went up, not publicly but in private.

[25] Some of the people of Jerusalem therefore said, "Is not this the man whom they seek to kill? [26] And here He is, speaking openly, and they say nothing to Him! Can it be that the authorities really know that this is the Christ? [27 Yet we know where this man comes from; and when the Christ appears, no one will know where He comes from. [28] So Jesus proclaimed, as He taught in the temple, "You know where I come from? But I have not come of My own accord; He who sent Me is true, and Him you do not know. [29] I know Him, for I come from Him, and He sent Me." [30] So they sought to arrest Him; but no one laid hands on Him, because His hour had not yet come.
________________________

Commentary:

1-2. The Jewish custom was for closer relatives to be called "brothers", brethren (cf. notes on Matthew 12:46-47 and Mark 6:1-3). These relatives of Jesus followed Him without understanding His teaching or His mission (cf. Matthew 3:31); but because He worked such obvious miracles in Galilee (cf. Matthew 15:32-39; Mark 8:1-10, 22-26) they suggest to Him that He show Himself publicly in Jerusalem and throughout Judea. Perhaps they wanted Him to be a big success, which would have indulged their family pride.

2. The name of the feast recalls the time the Israelites spent living under canvas in the wilderness (cf. Leviticus 23:34-36). During the eight days the feast lasted (cf. Nehemiah 8:13-18), around the beginning of autumn, the Jews commemorated the protection God had given the Israelites over the forty years of the Exodus. Because it coincided with the end of the harvest, it was also called the feast of ingathering (cf. Exodus 23:16).

10. Because He had not arrived in advance of the feast (which was what people normally did), the first caravans would have reported that Jesus was not coming up, and therefore the members of the Sanhedrin would have stopped planning anything against Him (cf. 7:1). By going up later, the religious authorities would not dare make any move against Him for fear of hostile public reaction (cf. Matthew 26:5). Jesus, possibly accompanied by His disciples, arrives unnoticed at Jerusalem, "in private", almost in a hidden way. Half-way through the feast, on the fourth or fifth day, He begins to preach in the temple (cf. 7:14).

27. In this chapter we often see the Jews disconcerted, in two minds. They argue with one another over whether Jesus is the Messiah, or a prophet, or an impostor (verse 12); they do not know where He gets His wisdom from (verse 15); they are short-tempered (verses 19-20); and they are surprised by the attitudes of the Sanhedrin (verse 26). Despite the signs they have seen (miracles, teaching) they do not want to believe that Jesus is the Messiah. Perhaps some, thinking that He came from Nazareth and was the son of Joseph and Mary, cannot see how this fits in with the notion usually taken from Isaiah's prophecy (Isaiah 53:1-8) about the Messiah's origin being unknown--except for His coming from the line of David and being born in Bethlehem (cf. Matthew 2:5 which quotes Micah 5:2; cf. John 7:42). In fact Jesus did fulfill those prophetic predictions, though most Jews did not know it because they knew nothing about His virginal birth in Bethlehem or His descent from David. Others must have known that He was of the house of David and had been born in Bethlehem, but even so they did not want to accept His teaching because it demanded a mental and moral conversion which they were not ready to make.

28-29. Not without a certain irony, Jesus refers to the superficial knowledge these Jews had of Him: however, He asserts that He comes from the Father who has sent Him, whom only He knows, precisely because He is the Son of God (cf. John 1:18).

30. The Jews realized that Jesus was making Himself God's equal, which was regarded as blasphemy and, according to the Law, was something punishable by death by stoning (cf. Leviticus 24:15-16, 23).

This is not the first time St. John refers to the Jews' hostility (cf. John 5:10), nor will it be the last (8:59; 10:31-33). He stresses this hostility because it was a fact and perhaps also to show that Jesus acts freely when, to fulfill the Father's will He gives Himself over to His enemies when His "hour" arrives (cf. John 18:4-8). "He did not therefore mean an hour when He would be forced to die, but one when He would allow Himself to be put to death. For He was waiting for the time in which He should die, even as He waited for the time in which He should be born" (St. Augustine, "In Ioann. Evang., 31, 5).
_________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Mental Prayer for Friday after the Fourth Sunday of Lent

Christ Before Herod

Mental Prayer Meditation Helps

Presence of God

Grace I Ask: Grant me a pure heart, so that you might never remain silent to my soul.

Mental Picture (cf. Luke 23: 8-11) : Loud, boister­ous, irate for having been called at this early hour, the pleasure-loving court of the Fox, Herod, assemble. The deeds of the Wonder Worker had even reached their ears... a chance to see some of His magic. The rowdy crowd subsides as the king addresses the composed defendant. "Do a trick for us!... Come now!... Are you a fool!... Fool!... Of course; bring the white cloak of the fool... This simpleton can't even talk." And Christ remained silent.

My Personal Application: What is going through the mind of Christ as He stands here in front of Herod and the court? How does He feel? Herod is a king ; but a king who has thoughts only for this world. Christ is a king whose kingdom is not of this world. Herod and the court make a fool of Christ. He came to save men. He is God who came to show us how to live right. He is wise and Herod and all men who are like him say, "He is a fool." He loves us all more than we can say, and men say... "a fool." Where do I stand? What do I say?

I Speak to Christ: My Lord and King, help me to understand how you felt before Herod; how you felt every time anyone called your teaching and your life foolish. I stand with you. I know some men will call my life foolish - but you show me the way. I follow.

Thought for Today: Passion of Christ, strengthen me.
________________
Adapted from Mental Prayer, Challenge to the Lay Apostle
by The Queen's Work,(© 1958)

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Valid Confessions?

From page 8 of the March St Stanislaus Kostka Church Bulletin (PDF file):
March 31 - Lenten Communal Penance Service
As a part of our preparations to celebrate the Resurrection of Jesus with renewed spirits, our Parish will conduct a Lenten Penance Service on Saturday, March 31st at 5:30 p.m. In addition to our pastor, several priests will be available to hear individual confessions.

I sent an email to Mr. Bozek asking if these additional priests are, in fact, 1) Roman Catholic, 2) from this archdiocese, and 3) if they have the requisite faculties to hear confession and grant absolution.

Certainly these will not be priests from this archdiocese, will they? It would seem that any priest who facilitates in the exercise of the sacraments at a suppressed parish and at the direction of an excommunicated and schismatic priest would be subject to some canonical ecclesiastical penalties. It should be understood that Marek Bozek cannot validly absolve anyone in the Sacrament of Penance, nor can he validly confirm anyone in the Sacrament of Confirmation (that too is listed in the bulletin), nor can he validly officate at weddings (also in the bulletin)...(See Archbishop Burke's December 2005 column on the schism here.

Maybe Bozek will answer the email...Maybe it's time to go to St Stans to see who might be aiding and abetting this schism.


Commonweal Promotes Electing of Bishops

In the Commonweal article, The Case for Electing Bishops, by Adam A. J. DeVille, it is claimed that "the system is totally unreliable." Which system? That system, in which the country's papal nuncio produces a terna - a list of three candidates for the episcopacy - which is sent to Rome for review by the Holy Father and from which he may make a decision.

Why is it asserted that "the system is totally unreliable?" DeVille points to the recent debacle in Poland as a prime example:

The whole affair undermines trust in the Roman system, which obviously failed to scrutinize Wielgus closely enough, and then, when exposed, still tried to force him on the local church of Warsaw. If the Roman curia knew about his past and did not care, it is guilty of malfeasance; if it did not know of his past, it is guilty of incompetence. In either case it shows that the system is totally unreliable.

While some very valid points are made by DeVille, it seems a bit of a stretch to assume that the system is "totally unreliable". In fact, one might equally claim that the system is good but there are too many "totally unreliable" people who are involved - and that is the reason for the failures.

DeVille proceeds to enlighten his readers with a short history lesson on how the current method of appointing bishops came to pass, never failing, however, to steer his readers in a particular direction:

Papal appointment of bishops has never been defined as a matter of dogma. Neither theologians nor bishops and popes in council have even bothered to come up with a theological justification for it. Such a system of appointment is both theologically unsupported and ecumenically intolerable.

"Theologically unsupported and ecumenically intolerable"? Strong words - used, it seems, to persuade others to question the authority or the decisions of the Holy Father and to generate dissatisfaction with the current methodology and to press for a more "democratic" system more appealing to groups of spoiled children.

DeVille admits that:
There are of course no panaceas: no system is perfect. But just about any system would be better than the current one, at least for mature local churches in stable sociopolitical contexts.

It must be noted that these "mature local churches in stable sociopolitical contexts" exclude those in China and Cuba...Some might claim that they also include those in the Americas as well - as anyone who has watched a televised USCCB meeting can attest. One need only look at who is elected to head the Liturgy committee, for example, when other, more worthy candidates were available.

Popular election, of course, does not guarantee that every bishop will be a saint. And popular elections can be abused to produce infelicitous results. Observers of current Anglican troubles will tell you that popular election can and does result in bishops who are so far apart from other bishops on major issues as to be in de facto schism. That, clearly, is not a path Catholics should take.

And even with papal oversight, this would generate all sorts of problems, particularly if the Holy Father refuses to accept the "bishop-elect". God knows we do not need to follow the PCUSA down its path.

DeVille tells us of a system which:
...would quietly prevent the election of a popular but heterodox local figure, which could precipitate a division between the local and universal church. Such a system would also help ensure that Rome never again appoints severely flawed bishops to a local church...

With heterdox or ill-informed Catholics overwhelmingly outnumbering faithful Catholics, it is difficult to see how such a system could work.

Lastly, readers are advised that the Code of Canon Law contains provisions for the faithful to elect their leaders:

For its part, the 1983 Code of Canon Law, pertaining to the Latin Church, also contains provisions for diocesan synods (see canons 460-68), which, though rarely convoked in the Western church, have a venerable history and solid precedent and could certainly be brought back to life again as electoral assemblies. There is one other canon in this Code that is especially relevant but often overlooked: canon 377 notes that "the Supreme Pontiff freely appoints bishops or confirms those lawfully elected"...

It is claimed that, given more of a voice in the selection process of a local bishop, the people, can have "leadership worthy of their trust and obedience."

While there are bishops who, based on their own actions and statements, do not "deserve" our trust, nonetheless, they do deserve our obedience, at least to the extent that their demands and directives are lawful and congruent with the teachings and disciplines of the Church.

Personally, I have more trust in good bishops and faithful Catholics keeping the Holy Father and curial officials updated so that wise decisions can be made rather than engaging in a "democratic" voting exercise for bishop...What's failed in the past, among other things, is that questionable nuncios (Jadot) were not recalled before extensive damaged was inflicted upon the Church and that others were using the system to push through proteges who not the best of candidates for leading the faithful toward heaven.

I think what we need is much more prayer and the daily offering of our sufferings to our Lord.

A specila tip of the hat to J.J., who provided the article...

Cardinal Francis George: Sending Mixed Messages?

Priest concerned over Chicago cardinal's remarks on pro-abortion politicians receiving Communion
Matt C. Abbott
March 19, 2007

Father J. Patrick Serna, pastor of St. Michael the Archangel Parish in the Diocese of Corpus Christi, Texas, provided me with the following observations regarding Cardinal Francis George's recent remarks on pro-abortion politicians receiving the Holy Eucharist. (The cardinal's remarks can be found in a scan of a March 18-31, 2007 Catholic New World story at the end of this column. Only the first few sentences of the story are available on the paper's Web site.)

MO Gov Pulls Funding from Planned Parenthood Abortion Clinics

Missouri Governor Matt Blunt: "Patients should not have to go to an abortion clinic to access life saving tests," Blunt said. "Today I put an end to taxpayer dollars going to Planned Parenthood in Springfield and Joplin through the Show Me Healthy Women Program. This ensures women may access important preventative care without contributing to abortion providers' goal of facilitating the destruction of innocent life."



March 31 - Catholic Homeschooling Conference

Holly Pierlot will speak at the St. Louis Catholic Homeschool Association's 2007 Catholic Homeschool Conference on Saturday, March 31, at the Cardinal Rigali Pastoral Center in Shrewsbury.

The annual conference is intended to introduce Catholic families to the possibilities of home schooling.

Pierlot is a home-schooling mother of five and author of the book "A Mother's Rule of Life: How to Bring Order to Your Home and Peace to Your Soul."

At the conference, a curriculum fair and vendors' area will offer Catholic home-schooling materials.

Registration before Monday is $25 a person, $35 a married couple and $8 a high school student with paying parent. Continental breakfast and box lunch are included. Registration after Monday will be $30 a person or $45 a married couple. Register online at www.stlouiscatholichomeschool.com.

For more information or for registration information by mail, call Kathy Harkins at 314-918-0639.

Heterosexuals Moving to SF Castro District - Oh My!

To walk down San Francisco's Castro Street -- where men casually embrace on sidewalks in the shadow of an enormous rainbow flag -- the neighborhood's status as "gay Mecca" seems obvious.

But up and down the enclave that has been a symbol of gay culture for more than three decades, heterosexuals are moving in...
* * *
But some gay and lesbian residents of the Castro are worried that the culture and history of their world-famous neighborhood could be lost in the process, and they have started a campaign to preserve its character. The city, meanwhile, is spending $100,000 on a plan aimed at keeping the area's gay identity intact.

Heterosexuals "are welcome as long as they understand this is our community," said Adam Light, a leader in the Castro Coalition...

Fr Joseph Fessio "Out" at Ave Maria University

The sudden and unexpected departure of popular Ave Maria University Provost Joseph Fessio on Wednesday left students and faculty stunned and upset.

Fessio, once a student of the current pope, was asked to resign his position immediately Wednesday.
* * *
Fessio’s dismissal came one day after recent statements he made were published in an article in the California Catholic Daily titled, “Hey, Hey, Baby Gay! What Do You Do? What Do You Say?”

His statements were also published on March 2 on the personal Web site of one of the country’s preeminent evangelist leaders, the Rev. R. Albert Mohler Jr.

In the article, Mohler suggested that there was a “possibility that a biological basis for homosexuality may be proven,” the Associated Press reported. Mohler’s argument was endorsed by Fessio.

According to the California Catholic Daily article, “research strongly suggests that sexual preference is biologically determined in animals, and possibly in humans.”

“Same-sex activity is considered disordered,” Fessio said. “If there are ways of detecting diseases or disorders of children in the womb, and a way of treating them that respected the dignity of the child and mother, it would be a wonderful advancement of science.”

University officials wouldn’t comment on the article. It is unclear if Fessio’s statements were connected to his dismissal.

Gospel for Thursday, 4th Week of Lent

From: John 5:31-47

Christ Defends His Action (Continuation)

(Jesus said to the Jews,) [31] "If I bear witness to Myself, My testimony is not true; [32] there is another who bears witness to Me, and I know that the testimony which he bears to Me is true. [33] You sent to John, and he has borne witness to the truth. [34] Not that the testimony which I receive is from man; but I say this that you may be saved. [35] He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for a while in his light. [36] But the testimony which I have is greater than that of John; for the works which the Father has granted Me to accomplish, these very works which I am doing, bear Me witness that the Father has sent Me. [37] And the Father who sent He has Himself borne witness to Me. His voice you have never heard, His form you have never seen; [38] and you do not have His word abiding in you, for you do not believe Him whom He has sent. [39] You search the Scriptures, because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness to Me; [40] yet you refuse to come to Me that you may have life. [41] I do not receive glory from men. [42] But I know that you have not the love of God within you. [43] I have come in My Father's name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive. [44] How can you believe, who receive glory from one another and do not seek the glory that comes from the only God? [45] Do not think that I shall accuse you to the Father; it is Moses who accuses you, on whom you set your hope. [46] If you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote of Me. [47] But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?"
_________________________

Commentary:

31-40. Because Jesus is Son of God, His own word is self-sufficient, it needs no corroboration (cf. 8:18); but, as on other occasions, He accommodates Himself to human customs and to the mental outlook of His hearers: He anticipates a possible objection from the Jews to the effect that it is not enough for a person to testify in his own cause (cf. Deuteronomy 19:15) and He explains that what He is saying is endorsed by four witnesses--John the Baptist, His own miracles, the Father, and the Sacred Scriptures of the Old Testament.

John the Baptist bore witness that Jesus was the Son of God (1:34). Although Jesus had no need to have recourse to any man's testimony, not even that of a great prophet, John's testimony was given for the sake of the Jews, that they might recognize the Messiah. Jesus can also point to another testimony, better than that of the Baptist--the miracles He has worked, which are, for anyone who examines them honestly, unmistakable signs of His divine power, which comes from the Father; Jesus' miracles, then, are a form of witness the Father bears concerning His Son, whom He has sent into the world. The Father manifests the divinity of Jesus on other occasions--at His Baptism (cf. 1:31-34); at the Transfiguration (cf. Matthew 17:1-8), and later, in the presence of the whole crowd (cf. John 12:28-30).

Jesus speaks to another divine testimony--that of the Sacred Scriptures. These speak of Him, but the Jews fail to grasp the Scriptures' true meaning, because they read them without letting themselves be enlightened by Him whom God has sent and in whom all the prophecies are fulfilled: "The economy of the Old Testament was deliberately so orientated that it should prepare for and declare in prophecy the coming of Christ, Redeemer of all men, and of the Messianic Kingdom (cf. Luke 24:44; John 5:39, 1 Peter 1:10), and should indicate it by means of different types (cf. 1 Corinthians 10:11). [...] Christians should accept with veneration these writings which give __expression to a lively sense of God, which are a storehouse of sublime teaching on God and of sound wisdom on human life, as well as a wonderful treasury of prayers; in them, too, the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way" (Vatican II, "Dei Verbum", 15).

41-47. Jesus identifies three obstacles preventing His hearers from recognizing that He is the Messiah and Son of God--their lack of love of God, their striving after human glory and their prejudiced interpretation of sacred texts. His defense of His own actions and of His relationship with the Father might lead His adversaries to think that He was looking for human glory. But the testimonies He has adduced (the Baptist, the miracles, the Father and the Scriptures) show clearly that it is not He who is seeking His glory, and that the Jews oppose Him not out of love of God or in defense of God's honor, but for unworthy reasons or because of their merely human outlook.

The Old Testament, therefore, leads a person towards recognizing who Jesus Christ is (cf. John 1:45; 2:17, 22; 5:39, 46; 12:16, 41); yet the Jews remain unbelievers because their attitude is wrong: they have reduced the Messianic promises in the sacred books to the level of mere nationalistic aspirations: this outlook, which is in no way supernatural, closes their soul to Jesus' words and actions and prevents them from seeing that the ancient prophecies are come true in Him (cf. 2 Corinthians 3:14-16).
______________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Mental Prayer for Thursday After the Fourth Sunday of Lent

Christ Before Pilate

Mental Prayer Meditation Helps

Presence of God

Grace I Ask: Lord, give me the grace in this meditation to be strong, so that fear of what people think will never prevent me from doing what I know is right.

Mental Picture (cf. Matt. 27:11-26): Dawn is just breaking... Christ before the petty Roman gover­nor... the judge of the living and the dead before
an unimportant Roman official. A few leading questions reveal Christ's innocence. "Crucify Him!"... that cry cannot be silenced. If I free Him, I will have the people against me. Caesar will not like another disturbance among the people. I will scourge Him then. "Crucify Him!"... "Crucify Him!"... "Jesus or Barabbas?" "Crucify Him!"... "I am innocent of the blood of this just man...I find no cause in Him."... "Crucify Him!"... and he gave Him up to be crucified.

My Personal Application: Do I face the truth even though it is difficult? Or do I, like Pilate, look for some way out, even to the point of offending God? When Christ demands the difficult of me, do I refuse because of what others might think of me, and then proceed to try to salve my conscience? Does the "respect" of the "crowd" govern my life and the practice of my religion?

I Speak to Christ: Lord, it is so easy to yield to the argument that everybody is doing it! And so difficult to do right when I imagine others will make fun of me. Let Pilate be an example to me... give me strength to do what is right, no matter how much others will ridicule me, or think less of me.

Thought for Today: Am I innocent of the blood of this just man?
________________
Adapted from Mental Prayer, Challenge to the Lay Apostle
by The Queen's Work,(© 1958)

Head of Human Genome Project: "Homosexuality Is Not Hardwired"

Francis S. Collins, one of the world's leading scientists who works at the cutting edge of DNA research, concluded that "there is an inescapable component of heritability to many human behavioral traits." However, he adds, "for virtually none of them, is heredity ever close to predictive."
. . .
The heritability estimates for personality traits were varied: General Cognitive Ability (50%), Extroversion (54%), Agreeableness (42%), Conscientiousness (49%), Neuroticism (48%), Openness (57%), Aggression (38%) and Traditionalism (54%).
. . .
Dr. Collins succinctly reviewed the research on homosexuality and offers the following:

"An area of particularly strong public interest is the genetic basis of homosexuality. Evidence from twin studies does in fact support the conclusion that heritable factors play a role in male homosexuality. However, the likelihood that the identical twin of a homosexual male will also be gay is about 20% (compared with 2-4 percent of males in the general population), indicating that sexual orientation is genetically influenced but not hardwired by DNA, and that whatever genes are involved represent predispositions, not predeterminations [emphasis in original]."

The heritability estimates for homosexuality is substantially lower than General Cognitive Ability, Extroversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, Openness, Aggression and Traditionalism!
at NARTH here.

Fr. Paul Mankowski,SJ: Remarks on the gospel of judas

A week ago, we Jesuits of the Pontifical Biblical Institute were informed in the course of a regular community meeting that our main lecture hall would be in use on March 20 at the request of a former faculty member (Salesian Father Frank Moloney) for the public launch of a novel he had co-authored with Jeffrey Archer. The Rector apologized in advance for any inconvenience caused by the event itself and for any ructions caused by attendant publicity.

That publicity -- both before and after the event -- gave rise to lurid headlines ("Pope Gives Blessing to Gospel of Jeffrey Archer") and nonsense of other kinds as well. Here's the lede from the Times of London:

Jesus never turned water into wine, He did not walk on the water and He never calmed the storm on the Sea of Galilee, according to a new 'Gospel' published today with Vatican approval and co-authored by Jeffrey Archer.
The following points are offered in correction of errors of fact, emphasis, or interpretation given in the English-speaking media.
Fr. Mankowski does a great job, in clear and easy-to-understand language, of exposing yet another attempt to redefine or re-write the Gospels.

Judas - Again, and Just in Time for Lent

Curiosity prompts novelist to write new version of Judas' story
By Cindy Wooden
Catholic News Service

ROME (CNS) -- Curiosity about the New Testament figure of Judas and a feeling that his reputation as the worst sinner in history "isn't fair, isn't right" led British novelist Jeffrey Archer to attempt a new version of the story.

Archer, presenting "The Gospel According to Judas by Benjamin Iscariot" at a March 20 press conference in Rome, said he is a practicing Anglican who wanted his new book to be backed up by solid biblical scholarship.

So he convinced Father Francis J. Moloney, provincial of the Salesians in Australia and a former president of the Catholic Biblical Association of America, to collaborate.
He probably didn't need much convincing - he's supposedly well educated, you see...But he want the ignorant sheeple to accept his version, and many do; especially when one is frequently encouraged by "scholarly" priests to discount what is in the New Testament...to "make it up as we go along"...

Both Archer and Father Moloney doubt that Judas committed suicide, a story recounted only in the Gospel of St. Matthew.
Well then, if it's only in the Gospel of Matthew, we certainly can't take it seriously. After all, we do need corroborating evidence to attempt to prove that Matthew is telling the truth, do we not?

Are we to understand that, what the gospel asserts as true, is in fact, not true - in direct contradiction to Dei Verbum?

The Benjamin Iscariot in Archer's title is Judas' fictitious son, who – years after the death of Jesus – finds his father living in an ascetic community near the Dead Sea. His father reluctantly gives his version of what happened to Jesus and the son writes it down.

Father Moloney told reporters in Rome that none of the things in Archer's account that differ from the accounts of the New Testament can be certain.
Coming next, Jesus ascended into the skies via his alien spacecraft...

Perhaps these "scholars" are members of the Ursuline Church in Linz, Germany (previously posted here) which featured an art exhibition "Requiem for a friend Judas Iskarioth"...and to many people, St Judas Iscariot...

The remainder of the article contains a lot of baloney from Moloney...read it at your own risk.

Archbishop Chaput: We need to stop pornography, now

A friend recently quipped to me that if Americans were as good at the “war on terror” as we are in our “war on common sense,” the world would be a much safer place. He was talking about our country’s increasingly confused attitudes toward sex.

Last week offered a good example. In an interview with the Chicago Tribune, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, said that “I believe that homosexual acts between individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts. I do not believe the United States is well-served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way.”

Note that Pace did not say that, “homosexual persons are evil.” He said that homosexual acts are wrong. And of course he’s right. We might question the general’s choice to comment in the context he did, but not his content. He simply stated the Western moral tradition. We should respect his courage for saying it...

USCCB Official Charged with Theft-Over $60K

Austin police have issued an arrest warrant for Leo Anchondo, a former Austin Catholic leader who rose from his position helping immigrants in Central Texas to working for immigration reform on a national stage.

Anchondo, 34, is accused of stealing more than $60,000 from Immigrant Concerns, an office within the Catholic Charities of Central Texas, said Helen Osman, a spokeswoman for the diocese. He left his job as director of that office in 2005 to become national manager of the Justice for Immigrants campaign created by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Gospel for Wednesday, 4th Week of Lent

From: John 5:17-30

The Cure of a Sick Man at the Pool at Bethzatha (Continuation)

[17] But Jesus answered them, "My Father is working still, and I am working." [18] This was why the Jews sought all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath but also called God His Father, making Himself equal with God.

Christ Defends His Action

[19] Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of His own accord, but only what He sees the Father doing; for whatever He does, that the Son does likewise. [20] For the Father loves the Son, and shows Him all that He Himself is doing; and greater works than these will He show Him, that you may marvel. [21] For as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom He will. [22] The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, [23] that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him. [24] Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life; he does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.

[25] "Truly, truly, I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. [26] For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has granted the Son also to have life in Himself, [27] and has given Him authority to execute judgment, because He is the Son of Man. [28] Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear His voice [29] and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment.

[30] "I can do nothing on My own authority; as I hear, I judge; and My judgment is just, because I seek not My own will but the will of Him who sent Me."
_____________________
Commentary:

17-18. "My Father is working still, and I am working": we have already said that God is continually acting. Since the Son acts together with the Father, who with the Holy Spirit are the one and only God, our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, can say that He is always working. These words of Jesus contain an implicit reference to His divinity: the Jews realize this and they want to kill Him because they consider it blasphemous. "We all call God our Father, who is in Heaven (Isaiah 63:16; 64:8). Therefore, they were angry, not at this, that He said God was His Father, but that He said it in quite another way than men. Notice: the Jews understand what Arians do not understand. Arians affirm the Son to be not equal to the Father, and that was why this heresy was driven from the Church. Here, even the blind, even the slayers of Christ, understand the works of Christ" (St. Augustine, "In Ioann. Evang., 17, 16). We call God our Father because through grace we are His adopted children; Jesus calls Him His Father because He is His Son by nature. This is why He says after the Resurrection: "I am ascending to My Father and your Father" (John 20:17), making a clear distinction between the two ways of being a son of God.

19. Jesus speaks of the equality and also the distinction between Father and Son. The two are equal: all the Son's power is the Father's, all the Son does the Father does; but they are two distinct persons: which is why the Son does what He has seen the Father do.

These words of our Lord should not be taken to mean that the Son sees what the Father does and then does it Himself, like a disciple imitating his master; He says what He says to show that the Father's powers are communicated to the Son through generation. The word "see" is used because men come to know things through the senses, particularly through the sight; to say that the Son sees what the Father does is a way of referring to all the powers which He receives from Him for all eternity (cf. St. Thomas Aquinas, "Comm. on St. John, in loc.").

20-21. When He says that the Father shows the Son "all that He Himself is doing", this means that Christ can do the same as the Father. Thus, when Jesus does things which are proper to God, He is testifying to His divinity through them (cf. John 5:36).

"Greater works": this may be a reference to the miracles Jesus will work during His lifetime and to His authority to execute judgment. But THE miracle of Jesus was His own resurrection, the cause and pledge of our own (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:20ff), and our passport to supernatural life. Christ, like His Father, has unlimited power to communicate life. This teaching is developed in verses 22-29.

22-30. Authority to judge has also been given by the Father to the Incarnate Word. Whoever does not believe in Christ and in His word will be condemned (cf. 3:18). We must accept Jesus Christ's lordship; by doing so we honor the Father; if we do not know the Son we do not know the Father who sent Him (verse 23). Through accepting Christ, through accepting His word, we gain eternal life and are freed from condemnation. He, who has taken on human nature which He will retain forever, has been established as our judge, and His judgment is just, because He seeks to fulfill the Will of the Father who sent Him, and He does nothing on His own account: in other words, His human will is perfectly at one with His divine will; which is why Jesus can say that He does not do His own will but the Will of Him who sent Him.

22. God, being the Creator of the world, is the supreme Judge of all creation. He alone can know with absolute certainty whether the people and things He has created achieve the end He has envisaged for them. Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word, has received divine authority (cf. Matthew 11:27; 28:18; Daniel 7:14), including the authority to judge mankind. Now, it is God's will that everyone should be saved: Christ did not come to condemn the world but to save it (cf. John 12:47). Only someone who refuses to accept the divine mission of the Son puts himself outside the pale of salvation. As the Church's Magisterium teaches: "He claimed judicial power as received from His Father, when the Jews accused Him of breaking the Sabbath by the miraculous cure of a sick man. [...] In this power is included the right of rewarding and punishing all men, even in this life" (Pius XI, "Quas Primas, Dz-Sch 3677"). Jesus Christ, therefore, is the Judge of the living and the dead, and will reward everyone according to his works (cf. 1 Peter 1:17).

"We have, I admit, a rigorous account to give of our sins; but who will be our judge? The Father [...] has given all judgment to the Son. Let us be comforted: the eternal Father has placed our cause in the hands of our Redeemer Himself. St. Paul encourages us, saying, Who is [the judge] who is to condemn us? It is Jesus Christ, who died [...] who indeed intercedes for us (Romans 8:34). It is the Savior Himself, who, in order that He should not condemn us to eternal death, has condemned Himself to death for our sake, and who, not content with this, still continues to intercede for us in Heaven with God His Father" (St. Alphonsus Liguori, "The Love of Our Lord Jesus Christ Reduced To Practice", Chapter 3).

24. There is also a close connection between hearing the word of Christ and believing in Him who sent Him, that is, in the Father. Whatever Jesus Christ says is divine revelation; therefore, accepting Jesus' words is equivalent to believing in God the Father: "He who believes in Me, believes not in Me, but in Him who sent Me.... For I have not spoken on My own authority; the Father who sent Me has Himself given Me the commandment what to say and what to speak" (John 12:44, 49).

A person with faith is on the way to eternal life, because even in this earthly life he is sharing in divine life, which is eternal; but he has not yet attained eternal life in a definitive way (for he can lose it), nor in a full way: "Beloved, we are God's children now; it does not yet appear what we shall be, but we know that when He appears we shall be like Him" (1 John 3:2). If a person stays firm in the faith and lives up to its demands, God's judgment will not condemn him but save him.

Therefore, it makes sense to strive, with the help of grace, to live a life consistent with the faith: "If men go to so much trouble and effort to live here a little longer, ought they not strive so much harder to live eternally?" (St. Augustine, "De Verb. Dom. Serm.", 64).

25-30. These verse bring the first part of our Lord's discourse to a close (it runs from 5:19 to 5:47); its core is a revelation about His relationship with His Father. To understand the statement our Lord makes here we need to remember that, because He is a single (divine) person, a single subject of operations, a single I, He is expressing in human words not only His sentiments as a man but also the deepest dimension of His being: He is the Son of God, both in His generation in eternity by the Father, and in His generation in time through taking up human nature. Hence Jesus Christ has a profound awareness (so profound that we cannot even imagine it) of His Sonship, which leads Him to treat His Father with a very special intimacy, with love and also with respect; He is aware also of His equality with the Father; therefore when He speaks about the Father having given Him life (verse 26) or authority (verse 27), it is not that He has received part of the Father's life or authority: He has received absolutely all of it, without the Father losing any.

"Do you perceive how their equality is shown and that they differ in one respect only, namely, that one is the Father, while the other is the Son? The _expression `He has given' implies this distinction only, and shows that all other attributes are equal and without difference. From this it is clear that He does everything with as much authority and power as the Father and is not endowed with power from some outside source, for He has life as the Father has" (St. John Chrysostom, "Hom. on St. John", 39, 3).

One of the amazing things about these passages of the Gospel is how Jesus manages to express the sentiments of God-Man despite the limitations of human language: Christ, true God, true man, is a mystery which the Christian should contemplate even though he cannot understand it: he feels bathed in a light so strong that it is beyond understanding, yet fills his soul with faith and with a desire to worship his Lord.
_____________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Mental Prayer for Wednesday after the Fourth Sunday of Lent

Peter's Denial

Mental Prayer Meditation Helps

Presence of God

Grace I Ask: To understand and feel the sorrow that fills Christ during His Passion.

Mental Picture (cf. Luke 22:54-62): Peter follows Christ at a distance to the courtyard of the high priest - watches Him being unjustly tried. Lying witnesses come forward... Jesus says nothing. Finally He speaks; Peter watches a guard step up, hit Him in the face. Jesus, hands tied behind His back, answers: "If I have said something wrong, accuse me of it; but if not, why did you strike me"?" Christ's courage... and Peter saw it all. Outside. Peter hears the servants around the fire talking about this criminal Jesus and His twelve riff-raff followers. A maid looks at Peter and says, "Look, this is one of them." Peter denies it. Three times he denies that he knows Christ. The swears and curses of his last denial are hardly finished when Jesus turns, and looks at Peter. Peter goes away, weeping bitterly.

My Personal Application: In the garden, Christ had warned Peter: "Watch and pray, lest you enter into temptation." Peter had slept instead.

Now, afraid of a little servant girl, Peter denies that he even knew Christ. That very night he had told Jesus, "I will follow you to prison and to death!" What was Christ thinking when He turned to look at Peter? What sorrow he caused Christ! How often I, like Peter, have denied Christ and added to His sorrow, by being afraid to do before others what was right.

I Speak to Christ: Lord, how sorry I am for having been such a fair-weather friend! How often I have told you I would be loyal to you, then was too much a coward to stand up before others for my friendship with you. I will not add to your sorrows again. Help me, for I am weak.

Thought for Today: Passion of Christ, strengthen me!
________________
Adapted from Mental Prayer, Challenge to the Lay Apostle
by The Queen's Work,(© 1958)

Local Women Led Liturgies

"Catholic" Action Network (CAN) has posted the most recent Women Led "liturgy" - the Stations of the Cross - which were held, according to both CAN and the Women's Ordination Conference, at St Cronan's "Catholic" Church in St Louis.

CAN posts this:
Women Led-Liturgies
an opportunity for Catholic women (especially those called to ordination) to lead prayer
Saturday, February 17th 2007
St. Cronan's parish: 1202 S Boyle Ave (map here)

Check out our Liturgies:
September 2006.
December 2006.
January 2007.
February 2007.
March 2007.
What should be quite repugnant to the sensibilities of any Catholic who has any belief in the Church which Christ instituted for us, is that these individuals persist in distorting nearly all that is Catholic. Take a look at their "Stations of the Cross," for instance:

Stations of the cross
Adapted from Women’s Ordination Conference

Women Led Prayer
March 17, 2007
Sponsored by Justice for Women in the Catholic Church
Catholic Action Network
---------------------
Please Enter in Silence

Call to Worship: Please stand

[snip]

Voice 3, A woman called to ordination today: Mine was an ordinary childhood, you could say. Born just before the American entry into World War II, I still have vivid memories of blackouts… food rationing… letters from an uncle who fought in the Pacific… my mother’s trauma as she learned of President Roosevelt’s death. As an only child, I was shy. But I loved books and found friendship in them. I found friendship in my faith, as well. It was my father who first taught me to pray before bedtime. And my parents brought me to Mass every Sunday, though the Latin sounded like gibberish to my young mind. And yet… there was something… Mystery that drew me in. I remember statues covered in purple during Lent, incense wafted aloft. I remember visiting churches on Holy Thursday evening. And, as a teenager, I can remember being wrapped in the hovering silence of a darkened church before Midnight Mass. Then suddenly, trumpets would sound, lights would come on full, and joyful strains of familiar hymns would fill the church. Christ was born! Liturgy mattered to me. But it would be many years before I would come to know how very much it mattered.
. . .
I was forty years old when I fell head over heels in love with the liturgy of the church. How did it happen? One event built on another, without my ever realizing it: an inspiring priest, the recognized need, finally, for something more, something deeper and truer, despite marriage and three beautiful children. Within months of becoming head of the parish liturgy committee, I participated in workshop after workshop. What excitement! What connection to my deepest longings! One morning I literally woke up and knew that I had to study theology… and that ministry would become a way of life for me. And, from the time I walked into my first theology class, I felt I had come home.

People I served in parishes confirmed what I knew to be true. “You have found your calling!” “Who says women can’t be ordained priests!” (This statement was made before Pope John Paul II clearly pronounced that the church had no authority to ordain women.) It was then that liturgy became the source of my deepest joy… and my deepest pain. The church I love denied me my heart’s greatest desire, and the calling of the Spirit.
. . .
This anonymous voice is contrasted with St Therese of Lisieux and the priest-imposter Ludmila Javarova,a Czechoslovakian woman who claims to have been ordained by some renegade bishop. It's more than presumtuous to include St Therese's remarks in something such as this as though she would approve.

THE STRUGGLE: STATIONS OF THE CROSS

Lector: A reading from the Prophet Isaiah (42:1-4, with “he” made plural)
. . .
The Third Station: Jesus Falls the First Time

Response: O Christ, Vulnerable One, we adore you and bless you; by your holy cross, help us transform our world.

A woman called today: How can I ever forget the excruciating pain? After 8 full years in parish ministry, suddenly there was no place open for me. I felt like my heart had been ripped out! In the end, the God who had led me this far, was still with me. A few dear friends supported me in my return to studies to complete my M.Div, and my spiritual strengthening.
. . .
Closing: Let us sign one another with God’s power of compassion poured out, of life out of death and proclaim.
“My friend, receive the sign of the cross on your forehead. It is Christ who now strengthens you with this sign of his love. Learn to know and follow him.”
This charade was supposed to have occurred at St Cronan's...it isn't difficult to imagine that this is the case. After all, looking over its website one finds all sorts of things, such as:
Scripture Reflection
from LGBT Perspectives
Tuesday 3/20 -- 7:00p
Parish Center Lower Level
What a parish!

A Warning to the Entire Continent (Chiesa)

The Sentence Against Theologian Jon Sobrino Is Aimed at an Entire Continent
In pointing out the errors in two books, the Vatican wanted above all to warn their readers: the bishops, priests, and laypeople of Latin America. It is the prelude to Benedict XVI’s upcoming visit to Brazil. At the center of it all is the question on who is the real Jesus
by Sandro Magister

Recommended Reading: Bishop Fisher on Conscience and Authority

Zenit has an excellent article here.

"Struggling to Recover a Catholic Sense"

VATICAN CITY, MARCH 3, 2007 (Zenit.org).- Here is the text Auxiliary Bishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney, Australia, delivered at the conference sponsored by the Pontifical Academy for Life and held in the Vatican last Friday and Saturday. The theme of the conference was "The Christian Conscience in Support of the Right to Life."
Our dissenting brothers and sisters who choose to separate themselves from the Church by mistakenly appealing to a malformed or defective conscience in rejecting the Church's teachings on abortion, euthanasia, sodomy and homosexuality, embryonic stem cell research, artificial contraception, etc., would do well to read this article with an open and uncluttered mind, in a spirit of Christian docility.

Orange County Priest who Celebrated Latin Mass, Dead at 77

Father Daniel Johnson, a champion of pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic traditions and the centuries-old Tridentine Mass, has died. He was 77.

Johnson died Sunday at a Duarte hospital after a long illness.

"He was a pioneer in reforming liturgical reform," said Michael J. Sundstedt, a longtime parishioner at St. Mary's by the Sea in Huntington Beach, where Johnson served as pastor for 25 years before retiring in 2004.
. . .
Although regarded as stodgy and closed-minded in some quarters, he was a hero to Southern California Catholics who disliked the "peace hugs" and "hootenanny music" of modern services, parishioners said.
. . .
Emphasizing tradition and decorum, Johnson discouraged parishioners from snapping photos at baptisms and weddings — and he resisted Vatican II reforms that allowed people to receive Communion in their hands...
. . .
[By a decision of Bishop Tod Brown] The Diocese of Orange stopped offering Tridentine Masses at St. Mary's by the Sea after Johnson left. But the Latin service will be briefly resurrected there for his funeral Mass, church officials said. The date hasn't been set.
May the soul of Fr. Johnson rest in peace.

Gospel for Tuesday, 4th Week of Lent

From: John 5:1-16

The Cure of a Sick Man at the Pool at Bethzatha

[1] After this there was a feast of the Jews, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. [2] Now there is in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate a pool, in Hebrew called Bethzatha, which has five porticoes. [3] In these lay a multitude of invalid, blind, lame, paralyzed. [5] One man was there, who had been ill for thirty-eight years. [6] When Jesus saw him and knew that he had been lying there for a long time, He said to him, "Do you want to be healed?" [7] The sick man answered Him, "Sir, I have no man to put me into the pool when the water is troubled, and while I am going another steps down before me." [8] Jesus said to him, "Rise, take up your pallet, and walk." [9] And at once the man was healed, and he took up his pallet and walked.

Now that day was the Sabbath. [10] So the Jews said to the man who was cured, "It is the Sabbath, it is not lawful for you to carry your pallet." [11] But he answered them, "The man who healed me said to me, `Take up your pallet, and walk.'" [12] They asked him, "Who is the man who said to you, `Take up your pallet, and walk'?" [13] Now the man who had been healed did not know who it was, for Jesus had withdrawn, as there was a crowd in the place. [14] Afterward, Jesus found him in the temple, and said to him, "See, you are well! Sin no more, that nothing worse befall you." [15] The man went away and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had healed him. [16] And this was why the Jews persecuted Jesus, because He did this on the Sabbath.
_______________________

Commentary:

1. We cannot be certain what festival this was; it probably refers to the Passover, known the world over at the time as the national festival of the Jewish people. But it could refer to another festival, Pentecost, perhaps.

2. This pool was also called the "Probatic" pool because it was located on the outskirts of Jerusalem, beside the Probatic Gate or Sheep Gate (cf. Nehemiah 3:1-32; 12:39) through which came the livestock which was going to be sacrificed in the temple. Around the end of the nineteenth century the remains of a pool were discovered: excavated out of rock, it was rectangular in shape and was surrounded by four galleries or porches, with a fifth porch dividing the pool into two.

3-4. The Fathers teach that this pool is a symbol of Christian Baptism; but that whereas the pool of Bethzatha cured physical ailments, Baptism cures those of the soul; in Bethzatha's case only one person was cured, now and again; shown through the medium of water (cf. Chrysostom, "Hom. on St. John", 36, 1).

The Sixto-Clementine edition of the Vulgate includes here, as a second part of verse 3 and all of verse 4: "waiting for the moving of the water; [4] For an angel of the Lord went down at certain seasons into the pool, and troubled the water' whoever stepped in first after the troubling of the water was healed of whatever disease he had." The New Vulgate, however, omits this passage, assigning it to a footnote, because it does not appear in important Greek codexes and papyri, nor in many ancient translations.

14. The man may have come to the temple to thank God for his cure. Jesus goes over to him and reminds him that the health of the soul is more important than physical health.

Our Lord uses holy fear of God as motivation in the struggle against sin: "Sin no more, that nothing worse may befall you". This holy fear is born out of respect for God our Father; it is perfectly compatible with love. Just as children love and respect their parents and try to avoid annoying them partly because they are afraid of being punished, so we should fight against sin firstly because it is an offense against God, but also because we can be punished in this life and, above all, in the next.

16-18. The Law of Moses established the Sabbath as a weekly day of rest. Through keeping the Sabbath the Jews felt they were imitating God, who rested from the work of creation on the seventh day. St. Thomas Aquinas observes that Jesus rejects this strict interpretation: (The Jews), in their desire to imitate God, did nothing on the Sabbath, as if God on that day had ceased absolutely to act. It is true that He rested on the Sabbath from His work of creating new creatures, but He is always continually at work, maintaining them in existence. [...] God is the cause of all things in the sense that He also maintains them in existence; for if for one moment He were to stop exercising His power, at that very moment everything that nature contains would cease to exist" ("Comm. on St. John, in loc.").

"My Father is working still, and I am working": we have already said that God is continually acting. Since the Son acts together with the Father, who with the Holy Spirit are the one and only God, our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, can say that He is always working. These words of Jesus contain an implicit reference to His divinity: the Jews realize this and they want to kill Him because they consider it blasphemous. "We all call God our Father, who is in Heaven (Isaiah 63:16; 64:8). Therefore, they were angry, not at this, that He said God was His Father, but that He said it in quite another way than men. Notice: the Jews understand what Arians do not understand. Arians affirm the Son to be not equal to the Father, and that was why this heresy was driven from the Church. Here, even the blind, even the slayers of Christ, understand the works of Christ" (St. Augustine, "In Ioann. Evang., 17, 16). We call God our Father because through grace we are His adopted children; Jesus calls Him His Father because He is His Son by nature. This is why He says after the Resurrection: "I am ascending to My Father and your Father" (John 20:17), making a clear distinction between the two ways of being a son of God.
_________________________

Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Monday, March 19, 2007

Mental Prayer for Tuesday After the Fourth Sunday of Lent

Jesus Is Captured: Judas

The Passion of Christ-Its Meaning

Mental Prayer Meditation Helps

Presence of God

Grace I Ask: A deeper understanding and love of Christ - and sorrow with Christ in sorrow, who is going to His death for my sins.

Mental Picture (cf. Matt. 26:41-50): Night... the shadowy grove of olive trees... in the distance the white houses of Jerusalem and the golden roof of the temple glimmer in the moonlight. The Apostles are asleep; Jesus is praying. Into the garden comes Judas at the head of a band of soldiers. He walks right up to Jesus and points Him out to them by a sign of friendship... such a hateful hypocrite, a coward, a traitor! Jesus begins to speak: will He damn Judas on the spot for such treachery? He begins: "Friend..."; Christ is calling him friend. Then He says, "Judas, don't you realize the terrible thing you are doing in betraying me? Judas, stop and think! Repent before it is too late." Desperately our Lord tries to save Judas... He forgets about the wrong done to Himself; He is thinking of the harm Judas is doing to his own soul.

My Personal Application: What went on inside Christ when Judas turned Him over to the sol­diers? Not to abandon a friend even when he abandons you or betrays you, is a mark of tremen­dous, disinterested love. Such was Christ's love for Judas. Such is Christ's love for me, too, for I have betrayed Him each time I have sinned.

I Speak to Christ: Dearest Lord, how can I help but admire you when you show yourself such a true friend? How wrong I've been, like Judas, to betray you by my sins. Help me to do better - ­I will do better - from now on.

Thought for Today: "He was betrayed into the hands of sinners."
________________
Adapted from Mental Prayer, Challenge to the Lay Apostle
by The Queen's Work,(© 1958)

Fr Tom Euteneuer on EWTN Radio

This just in (and updated):
Father Tom Euteneuer will be on EWTN Radio on Open Line Tuesday, March 20, with Barbara McGuigan on the internet.

The show starts at 2:00 Central Time and lasts until 3:00 pm.

Visist www.ewtn.com then click on radio.

An Update on The Morality of Contraception

From Dr Jeff Mirus at CatholicCulture:

Thanks to Fr. Thomas Euteneur of Human Life International, we have what we might call a teaching moment on contraception. Fr. Euteneur has taken on talk show host Sean Hannity, who is known as a generally conservative thinker who utterly fails to grasp the fundamentals of sexual morality. Well, he is hardly alone.

...If you need a basic analysis of the issue to help open the eyes of someone who just doesn't see what all the fuss is about, I think you'll find the column useful: Contraception: Why It's Wrong.
For a bit of background on the Hannity/Euteneuer issue, click here.

It's also interesting to note that I came across this post from Feb 2006:
During the 2004 campaign, John Kerry was subjected to bitter invective from religious leaders and pundits for his stance on abortion. Raymond Burke, the Roman Catholic archbishop of St. Louis, went so far as to forbid Kerry Communion in his diocese, and Fox News commentator Sean Hannity opined that if Kerry couldn't support a major tenet of his religion "... he can go to another church." [emphasis added]
As Jeff Mirus states, it is indeed a teaching moment. And how many times have we been advised that we must help in the "New Evangelization" and the "Re-Evangelization" of our lost brothers and sisters...America, as Fr. Hardon put it, will cease to exist, if we do not return this country to its Christian roots and foundation.

Why Is Contraception Wrong?

Dr Jeff Mirus has an interesting article on the subject here.

And for those who are Fr. John Hardon fans, might I suggest a few of his articles, such as:
Contraception: Fatal to the Faith and to Eternal Life,

Contraception Feeds Social Decline,

Either Stop Contraception or Destroy the Family.

He has so many more insightful articles - all worth reading with an attentive mind.

Gospel for the Solemnity: St. Joseph, Husband of the Blessed Virgin Mary

From: Matthew 1:16, 18-21, 24a

The Ancestry of Jesus Christ (Continuation)

[16] And Jacob, (was) the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, ofwhom Jesus was born, who is called Christ.

The Virginal Conception of Jesus, and His Birth

[18] Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When His mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child of the Holy Spirit; [19] and her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to send her away quietly. [20] But as he considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, "Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit; [21] she will bear a son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins." [24a] When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him.
__________________________

Commentary:

16. Jewish genealogies followed the male line. Joseph, being Mary's husband, was the legal father of Jesus. The legal father is on a par with the real father as regards rights and duties. This fact provides a sound basis for recognizing St. Joseph as Patron of the whole Church, since he was chosen to play a very special role in God's plan for our salvation; with Joseph as his legal father, Jesus the Messiah has David as his successor.

Since it was quite usual for people to marry within their clan, it can be concluded that Mary belonged to the house of David. Several early Fathers of the Church testify to this--for example, St. Ignatius of Antioch, St. Irenaeus, St. Justin and Tertullian, who base their testimony on an unbroken oral tradition.

It should also be pointed out that when St. Matthew comes to speak of the birth of Jesus, he uses an ___expression which is completely different from that used for the other people in the genealogy. With these words the text positively teaches that Mary conceived Jesus while still a virgin, without the intervention of man.

18. St. Matthew relates here how Christ was conceived (cf. Luke 1:25-38): "We truly honor and venerate (Mary) as Mother of God, because she gave birth to a person who is at the same time both God and man" ("St. Pius V Catechism", I, 4, 7).

According to the provisions of the Law of Moses, engagement took place about one year before marriage and enjoyed almost the same legal validity. The marriage proper consisted, among other ceremonies, in the bride being brought solemnly and joyously to her husband's house (cf. Deuteronomy 20:7).

From the moment of engagement onwards, a certificate of divorce was needed in the event of a break in the relationship between the couple.

The entire account of Jesus' birth teaches, through the different fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah 7:14 (which is expressly quoted in verses 22-23) that: 1) Jesus has David as His ancestor since Joseph is His legal father; 2) Mary is the Virgin who gives birth according to the prophecy; 3) the Child's conception without the intervention of man was miraculous.

19. "St. Joseph was an ordinary sort of man on whom God relied to do great things. He did exactly what the Lord wanted him to do, in each and every event that went to make up his life. That is why Scripture praises Joseph as `a just man'. In Hebrew a just man means a good and faithful servant of God, someone who fulfills the divine will (cf. Genesis 7:1; 18:23-32; Ezekiel 18:5ff.; Proverbs 12:10), or who is honorable and charitable toward his neighbor (cf. Tobias 7:6; 9:6). So a just man is someone who loves God and proves his love by keeping God's commandments and directing his whole life towards the service of his brothers, his fellow men" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 40).

Joseph considered his spouse to be holy despite the signs that she was going to have a child. He was therefore faced with a situation he could not explain. Precisely because he was trying to do God's will, he felt obliged to put her away; but to shield her from public shame he decided to send her away quietly.

Mary's silence is admirable. Her perfect surrender to God even leads her to the extreme of not defending her honor or innocence. She prefers to suffer suspicion and shame rather than reveal the work of grace in her. Faced with a fact which was inexplicable in human terms she abandons herself confidently to the love and providence of God. God certainly submitted the holy souls of Joseph and Mary to a severe trial. We ought not to be surprised if we also undergo difficult trials in the course of our lives. We ought to trust in God during them, and remain faithful to Him, following the example they gave us.

20. God gives His light to those who act in an upright way and who trust in His power and wisdom when faced with situations which exceed human understanding. By calling him the son of David, the angel reminds Joseph that he is the providential link which joins Jesus with the family of David, according to Nathan's messianic prophecy (cf. 2 Samuel 7:12). As St. John Chrysostom says: "At the very start he straightaway reminds him of David, of whom the Christ was to spring, and he does not wish him to be worried from the moment he reminds him, through naming his most illustrious ancestor, of the promise made to all his lineage" ("Hom. on St. Matthew", 4).

"The same Jesus Christ, our only Lord, the Son of God, when He assumed human flesh for us in the womb of the Virgin, was not conceived like other men, from the seed of man, but in a manner transcending the order of nature, that is, by the power of the Holy Spirit, so that the same person, remaining God as He was from eternity, became man, which He was not before" ("St. Pius V Catechism", I, 4, 1).

21. According to the Hebrew root, the name Jesus means "savior". After our Lady, St. Joseph is the first person to be told by God that salvation has begun.

"Jesus is the proper name of the God-man and signifies `Savior'--a name given Him not accidentally, or by the judgment or will of man, but by the counsel and command of God" [...]. All other names which prophecy gave to the Son of God--Wonderful, Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace (cf. Isaiah 9:6)--are comprised in this one name Jesus; for while they partially signified the salvation which He was to bestow on us, this name included the force and meaning of all human salvation" ("St. Pius V Catechism", I, 3, 5 and 6).
________________________

Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Mental Prayer for Monday After the Fourth Sunday of Lent

The Agony in the Garden - Thy Will Be Done

The Passion of Christ-Its Meaning

Mental Prayer Meditation Helps

Presence of God

Grace I Ask: O God, help me to say always, "Thy will be done."

Mental Picture (cf. Matt. 26:36-46): Midnight... deserted spot in a grove of olive trees... I see a haggard man on the ground, clinging to a rock for support. Suddenly, I see a chalice suspended in the air before the man. It tilts forward and in it both He and I see... a knotted scourge... a filthy blindfold... inch-long thorns shaped like a crown... three jagged spikes. A voice fills the night, "My Son, will you suffer these for men?" And the trembling man responds, "Father, if it be possible, let this chalice pass... but not my will, but thine be done." He knows entirely what His Father wants Him to suffer, and He freely chooses to do His Father's will... for me... for my sins.

My Personal Application: Do I remember way back when I meditated on why I was made and saw God's will for me? And do I remember my sins when I disobeyed God's will? Now I see the price Christ had to pay for sin. This was not easy for Christ. Yet by His willingness He re­pairs for my unwillingness - for the many times I turned away from what I knew was right.

I Speak to Christ: My suffering Savior, help me always to conform my will to yours. When temp­tation is strong, when sin is ever so enticing, when my will is drawn so strongly to sin, give me the grace to say, "Not my will, but thine be done."

Thought for Today: "Not my will, but thine be done."
________________
Adapted from Mental Prayer, Challenge to the Lay Apostle
by The Queen's Work,(© 1958)

The 4th Sunday of Lent-Contrition

"`Father, I have sinned against Heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to be called your son.'" " St. Luke, 15:21.

Most of you have heard of the great Italian poet, Dante, who was a member of the Third Order of St. Francis. His masterpiece, The Divine Comedy, is an account of his trip through heaven, hell and purgatory. An artist by the name of Dore has painted some of the scenes described by Dante. The artist has one especially striking scene showing Dante and his companion approaching the entrance of Purgatory. There stands a stalwart warden-angel with flaming sword, refusing entrance to all who are unworthy. Leading up to the entrance are three steps. These represent the three steps most necessary for a good confession, namely, contrition, confession and satisfaction. Dante describes them:
"Thither did we draw nigh, and that first stair
"Was of white marble, polished so and clean,
"It mirrored all my features as they were.
"The second darker than dusk perverse was seen,
"Of stone all rugged, rough and coarse in grain,
"With many a crack, its length and breadth between.
"The third, which o'er the other towers amain
"Appeared as if of fiery porphyry,
"Like blood that gushes crimson from the vein."

What an apt picture of confession. The first step is of polished marble which shows a man to himself. It opens his eyes to his true spiritual con­dition. It tears away his mask. It shows him how he has offended God and why he should be sorry.

The second step, "darker than dusk," rugged, coarse and cracked, repre­sents confession of sin, the tearing up of the roots of sin, the rending and groaning which the revealing of our sins so often requires.

The third step, satisfaction, is like the letting of blood. It is the offering of oneself in reparation. It is accepting and performing the penance. Up these three steps one makes his way to true repentance.

Contrition, the first step, means a hatred of sin and a true grief of the soul for having offended God. The word "contrition" comes from the Latin which means "to grind" or "to wear away." Contrition grinds the heart in sorrow.

There are two kinds of contrition - perfect and imperfect. Perfect sorrow for sin springs from a pure love of God. Imperfect contrition arises from a fear of God and His punishments. Perfect contrition fills us with sorrow and hatred of sin because sin offends Almighty God, who is all good in Himself and all good to us. Imperfect contrition makes us hate sin because by it we lose heaven and deserve hell.

All of us should know the act of contrition. Follow me as I repeat it:
"O my God, I am heartily sorry for having offended Thee. And I detest all my sins, because I dread the loss of heaven and the pains of hell. But most of all because they offend Thee, my God, who art all good and deserving of all my love."

The first part is imperfect contrition - we are sorry because we dread the loss of heaven and the pains of hell. The second part is perfect contri­tion - we are sorry because we have offended the all-good God. With confession either kind of contrition is sufficient. It goes without saying that perfect sorrow should always be our aim.

By way of illustration: Suppose a little boy disobeys seriously enough to deserve a spanking. When his mother discovers his disobedience, he starts to cry. If he cries because" he is afraid of a spanking, he has imperfect sorrow. If he cries because he has offended his mother who has always been so good to him, he has something like perfect sorrow.

I cannot overemphasize the value and importance of making an act of perfect contrition frequently, even "daily. Just as the daily examination of conscience helps us to realize our sinfulness, so the daily act of perfect contrition helps us to be sorry for our sins.

But this practice of a daily prayer of perfect sorrow has another all-­important value. It puts us in the state of grace. How necessary that is in a day when sudden death is possible at every moment and every corner. Every evening repeat with meaning and sincerity your act of contrition, adding always the resolution that you will go to confession when the opportunity offers.

Still another advantage of this practice is that it makes our good works and merits worthwhile in the sight of God. On the contrary, good works performed in the state of sin are not worthwhile. You benefit nothing for the next life from the good you do while in the state of mortal sin. No wonder our Lord tells us today in the parable of the Prodigal Son: "'...It was fitting to make merry and be glad, for this your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found.'"

No wonder Dante pictured contrition as the first step on the way to being restored to the friendship of God.

Be careful and conscientious but not worried about your sorrow for your sins. We have offended an all-good God. We ask His pardon. Do this every day. Do it sincerely. Then every day you will more likely do God will.
____________________
Adapted from Talks on the Sacraments
by Fr. Arthur Tonne,OFM (© 1947)

Gospel for the 4th Sunday of Lent

From Luke 15:1-3; 11-32

Parables of God's Mercy

[1] Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear Him (Jesus). [2] And the Pharisees and the scribes murmured, saying, "This man receives sinners and eats with them."

The Prodigal Son

[3] So He told them this parable:. . . [11] "There was a man who had two sons; [12] and the younger of them said to his father, `Father, give me the share of property that falls to me.' And he divided his living between them. [13] Not many days later, the younger son gathered all he had and took his journey into a far country, and there he squandered his property in loose living. [14] And when he had spent everything, a great famine arose in that country, and he began to be in want. [15]So he went and joined himself to one of the citizens of that country, who sent him into his fields to feed swine. [16] And he would gladly have fed on the pods that the swine ate; and no one gave him anything. [17] But when he came to himself he said, `How can many of my father's hired servants have bread enough and to spare, but I perish here with hunger! [18] I will arise and go to my father, and I will say to him, "Father, I have sinned against Heaven and before you; [19] I am no longer worthy to be called your son; treat me as one of your hired servants.'" [20] And he arose and came to his father. But while he was yet at a distance, his father saw him and had compassion, and ran and embraced him and kissed him. [21] And the son said to him, `Father, I have sinned against Heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to be called your son.' [22] But the father said to his servants, `Bring quickly the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet; [23] and bring the fatted calf and kill it, and let us eat and make merry; [24] for this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found.' And they began to make merry.

[25] "Now his elder son was in the field; and as he came and drew near to the house, he heard music and dancing. [26] And he called one of the servants and asked what this meant. [27] And he said to him, `Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fatted calf, because he has received him safe and sound.' [28] But he was angry and refused to go in. His father came out and entreated him, [29] but he answered his father, `Lo, these many years I have served you, and I never disobeyed your command; yet you never gave me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends. [30] But when this son of yours came, who has devoured your living with harlots, you killed for him the fatted calf!' [31] And he said to him, `Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours. [32] It was fitting to make merry and be glad, for this your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found.'"
_______________________

Commentary:

1-32. Jesus' actions manifest God's mercy: He receives sinners in order to convert them. The scribes and Pharisees, who despised sinners, just cannot understand why Jesus acts like this; they grumble about Him; and Jesus uses the opportunity to tell these Mercy parables. "The Gospel writer who particularly treats of these themes in Christ's teaching is Luke, whose Gospel has earned the title of `the Gospel of mercy'" ([Pope] John Paul II, "Dives In Misericordia", 3).

In this chapter St. Luke reports three of these parables in which Jesus describes the infinite, fatherly mercy of God and His joy at the conversion of the sinner.

The Gospel teaches that no one is excluded from forgiveness and that sinners can become beloved children of God if they repent and are converted. So much does God desire the conversion of sinners that each of these parables ends with a refrain, as it were, telling of the great joy in Heaven over a sinner who repents.

1-2. This is not the first time that publicans and sinners approach Jesus (cf. Matthew 9:10). They are attracted by the directness of the Lord's preaching and by His call to self-giving and love. The Pharisees in general were jealous of His influence over the people (cf. Matthew 26:2-5; John 11:47) a jealousy which can also beset Christians; a severity of outlook which does not accept that, no matter how great his sins may have been, a sinner can change and become a saint; a blindness which prevents a person from recognizing and rejoicing over the good done by others. Our Lord criticized this attitude when He replied to His disciples' complaints about others casting out devils in His name: "Do not forbid him; for no one who does a mighty work in My name will be able soon after to speak evil of Me" (Mark 9:39). And St. Paul rejoiced that others proclaimed Christ and even overlooked the fact they did so out of self-interest, provided Christ was preached (cf. Philippians 1:17-18).

11. This is one of Jesus' most beautiful parables, which teaches us once more that God is a kind and understanding Father (cf. Matthew 6:8; Romans 8:15; 2 Corinthians 1:3). The son who asks for his part of the inheritance is a symbol of the person who cuts himself off from God through sin. "Although the word `mercy' does not appear, this parable nevertheless expresses the essence of the divine mercy in a particularly clear way" ([Pope] John Paul II, "Dives In Misericordia", 5).

12. "That son, who receives from the father the portion of the inheritance that is due him and leaves home to squander it in a far country `in loose living', in a certain sense is the man of every period, beginning with the one who was the first to lose the inheritance of grace and original justice. The analogy at this point is very wide-ranging. The parable indirectly touches upon every breach of the covenant of love, every loss of grace, every sin" ("Dives In Misericordia", 5).

14-15. At this point in the parable we are shown the unhappy effects of sin. The young man's hunger evokes the anxiety and emptiness a person feels when he is far from God. The prodigal son's predicament describes the enslavement which sin involves (cf. Romans 1:25; 6:6; Galatians 5:1): by sinning one loses the freedom of the children of God (cf. Romans 8:21; Galatians 4:31; 5:13) and hands oneself over the power of Satan.

17-21. His memory of home and his conviction that his father loves him cause the prodigal son to reflect and to decide to set out on the right road. "Human life is in some way a constant returning to our Father's house. We return through contrition, through the conversion of heart which means a desire to change, a firm decision to improve our life and which, therefore, is expressed in sacrifice and self-giving. We return to our Father's house by means of that sacrament of pardon in which, by confessing our sins, we put on Jesus Christ again and become His brothers, members of God's family" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ is Passing By", 64).

20-24. God always hopes for the return of the sinner; He wants him to repent. When the young man arrives home his father does not greet him with reproaches but with immense compassion, which causes him to embrace his son and cover him with kisses.

20. "There is no doubt that in this simple but penetrating analogy the figure of the father reveals to us God as Father. The conduct of the father in the parable and his whole behavior, which manifests his internal attitude, enables us to rediscover the individual threads of the Old Testament vision of mercy in a synthesis which is totally new, full of simplicity and depth. The father of the prodigal son is FAITHFUL TO THIS FATHERHOOD, FAITHFUL TO THE LOVE that he had always lavished on his son. This fidelity is expressed in the parable not only by his immediate readiness to welcome him home when he returns after having squandered his inheritance; it is expressed even more fully by that joy, that merrymaking for the squanderer after his return, merrymaking which is so generous that it provokes the opposition and hatred of the elder brother, who had never gone far away from his father and had never abandoned the home.

"The father's fidelity to himself [...] is at the same time expressed in a manner particularly charged with affection. We read, in fact, that when the father saw the prodigal son returning home `he had COMPASSION, ran to meet him, threw his arms around his neck and kissed him.' He certainly does this under the influence of a deep affection, and this also explains his generosity towards his son, that generosity which so angers the elder son" ("Dives In Misericordia", 6).

"When God runs towards us, we cannot keep silent, but with St. Paul we exclaim, "ABBA PATER": `Father, my Father!' (Romans 8:15), for, though He is the creator of the universe, He doesn't mind our not using high-sounding titles, nor worry about our not acknowledging His greatness. He wants us to call Him Father; He wants us to savor that word, our souls filling with joy [...].

"God is waiting for us, like the father in the parable, with open arms, even though we don't deserve it. It doesn't matter how great our debt is. Just like the prodigal son, all we have to do is open our heart, to be homesick for our Father's house, to wonder at and rejoice in the gift which God makes us of being able to call ourselves His children, of really being His children, even though our response to Him has been so poor" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 64).

25-30. God's mercy is so great that man cannot grasp it: as we can see in the case of the elder son, who thinks his father loves the younger son excessively, his jealousy prevents him from understanding how his father can do so much to celebrate the recovery of the prodigal; it cuts him off from the joy that the whole family feels. "It's true that he was a sinner. But don't pass so final a judgment on him. Have pity in your heart, and don't forget that he may yet be an Augustine, while you remain just another mediocrity" ([St] J. Escriva, "The Way", 675).

We should also consider that if God has compassion towards sinners, He must have much much more towards those who strive to be faithful to Him. St. Therese of Lisieux understood this very well: "What joy to remember that our Lord is just; that He makes allowances for all our shortcomings, and knows full well how weak we are. What have I to fear then? Surely the God of infinite justice who pardons the prodigal son with such mercy will be just with me `who am always with Him'?" ("The Story of a Soul", Chapter 8).

32. "Mercy, as Christ has presented it in the parable of the prodigal son, has THE INTERIOR FORM OF THE LOVE that in the New Testament is called AGAPE. This love is able to reach down to every prodigal son, to every human misery, and above all to every form of moral misery, to sin. When this happens, the person who is the object of mercy does not feel humiliated, but rather found again and `restored to value'. The father first and foremost expresses to him his joy, that he has been `found again' and that he has `returned to life'. This joy indicates a good that has remained intact: even if he is a prodigal, a son does not cease to be truly his father's son; it also indicates a good that has been found again, which in the case of the prodigal son was his return to the truth about himself" ("Dives In Misericordia", 6).
___________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.