Thursday, March 19, 2009

Dr Edward Peters: If Robert McElvaine hasn't violated Canon 1369, who has?

Dr Peters writes:
About a year ago, WaPo made room for Joe "the-bishops-be-damned" Feuerherd's rant against the American episcopate for its articulation of pro-life ethics in politics.

I said then that Feueherd's contempt must not be allowed to go unchecked. The US bishops let the insults pass. But now, Feuerherdian contempt has been taken to a new level by Robert McElvaine.

Read why I believe that McElvaine’s column in the Washington Post has violated Canon 1369, and why I am calling for a canonical penal process to be undertaken against him, here:

No comments: