Wednesday, March 01, 2006

St Stanislaus and The Congregation for the Clergy

Either this is new or several of us have missed it at the "news" site linked by St. Stanislaus.
Interpretation of the "Vatican Ruling" of Nov. 11, 2004

The Decree issued by the Congregation for the Clergy in November 2004 was reviewed by the attorneys for the Parish. They agreed that it was not a decision based upon the merits (facts) of the case as presented in the petition for relief. It merely referred to the fact that the Congregation for the Clergy arbitrarily chose not to recognize the Board of Directors as the legitimate representatives of the people and therefore any petition filed by the Directors through attorney Krasnicki would not be recognized.

The cover letter, which is not a legal document or part of the Decree, went beyond that document and gratuitously stated that the Parish should follow the order of Abp. Burke.

As such neither the Decree nor the cover letter can be relied upon as an order of the Holy See upholding Abp. Burke’s decision as so often proclaimed by the Archdiocese.
If memory serves, both the Archdiocese and others referred to the fact that the Board was not considered the legitimate representative of the people of the parish, so this amazing discovery by the St. Stanislaus lawyers is a bit late, and dated...

But then, that's not the important part of this "newsflash" from St Stanislaus...the pertinent parts, it seems, are these, laced as they are with special codewords:
1) ...the Congregation for the Clergy arbitrarily chose not to recognize the Board...
2) The cover letter...went beyond that document...
3) The cover letter...gratuitously stated...
4) ...neither the Decree nor the cover letter can be relied upon...

This appears to be another display of disdain for the authority of, not only Archbishop Burke, but also that of the Holy See. Sad...

Yawn....

Cardinal McCarrick and Interfaith Leaders Call for Comprehensive Immigration Reform

I'd be more apt to listen to this man if he'd be forthcoming with his "Task Force" report on Catholic-in-name-only politicians who support every form of abortion, homosexuality and sodomy, murderous embryonic experimentation, and euthanasia of the sick and elderly and the scandal they cause by committing sacrilege in receiving Holy Communion, while professing to be faithful Catholics...Do you think one of the reasons the Holy Father hasn't yet accepted his resignation is because his Emminence is so diligently working on the task force report?

Perhaps, if the USCCB would do more to encourage Catholics to be truly Catholic, the good Cardinal and the other bishops could spend more time, not in the political arena, but as true shepherds, nourishing the faithful from the wellspring of Christ's Church. Now there's a novel idea...

More on...Catholic Democrats' Statement Defending Pro-Abortion Stance

From an email from Austin Ruse of Culture & Cosmos:
________________________
By Mark Adams

Apparently responding to Catholic bishops who spoke out in 2004 about the obligations of Catholics in public life to oppose legal abortion, 55 Catholic Democratic members of Congress have released a "Statement of Principles." Though the letter attempts to declare the signatories strong support for the dignity of life the document refuses to call for outlawing abortion and instead declares that "we acknowledge and accept the tension that comes with being in disagreement with the Church in some areas."

The letter declares that "we are proud to be part of the living Catholic tradition -- a tradition that promotes the common good, expresses a consistent moral framework for life." Yet the letter implies that the defense of unborn human life is a religious issue and that supporting legislation against abortion would constitute a violation of the religious freedom of others. The letter states, "As legislators, we are charged with preserving the Constitution, which guarantees religious freedom for all Americans. In doing so, we guarantee our right to live our own lives as Catholics, but also foster an America with a rich diversity of faiths."

Using a rhetorical strategy that has become increasingly common among pro-abortion politicians wishing to give a moderate appearance to their position, the letter refers to the "undesirability of abortion" and says "we do not celebrate its practice." But the letter implies that the key to ending abortion lies in increased funding for a variety of government programs and says nothing about overturning Roe v. Wade which essentially guarantees unfettered access to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. "Each of us is committed to reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies and creating an environment with policies that encourage pregnancies to be carried to term. We believe this includes promoting alternatives to abortion, such as adoption, and improving access to children's healthcare and child care, as well as policies that encourage paternal and maternal responsibility."

The letter also advances many of the arguments of the "seamless garment" theory which places a plethora of issues on the same plane of importance as abortion. "That commitment is fulfilled in different ways by legislators but includes: reducing the rising rates of poverty; increasing access to education for all; pressing for increased access to health care; and taking seriously the decision to go to war. Each of these issues challenges our obligations as Catholics to community and helping those in need."

The letter elicited the effusive praise of Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne who called it a "remarkable document." Catholic League president William Donohue was highly critical of the letter. "[T]here is not a word in the statement that commits these Catholics to work towards a change in the Democratic Party’s Platform on abortion. Thus, even the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion is not so undesirable that it must be opposed."

Culture of Life Foundation
1413 K Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington DC 20005
Phone: (202) 289-2500
Fax: (202) 289-2502
E-mail: clf@culture-of-life.org
Website: http://www.culture-of-life.org
###

The Catholic League's William Donohue weighs in here, stating:
“Perhaps the most convincing evidence that this statement is a sham is the fact that Rep. Rosa DeLauro is the point person for this effort. There has never been an abortion she couldn’t justify, including the killing of an innocent child who is 80-percent born. Indeed, she previously served as the executive director of EMILY’s List, the richest pro-abortion organization in the country. So with her at the helm, the ‘Statement of Principle’ is nothing more than a ‘Statement of Politics.’ Thus, the Abortion Albatross remains securely in place.”
Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer, President of Human Life International (HLI), responded to the "Statement of Principles":
"On the Eve of Ash Wednesday the day that marks the beginning of the Lenten Season 'Catholic' House Democrats choose to play the role of Judas in a passion play that ends with the crucifixion of the unborn child."

Why some Catholics are fleeing Memphis

An acquaintance from Memphis has seriously been considering leaving the area to return to St. Louis, primarily because the Church is in such disarray. Under the leadership of Bishop Terry Steib, things seem to have gone from bad to worse and for the sake of this man's faith and the faith and salvation of his family, he may be returning home to St. Louis.

Dom notes some of the problems in Memphis here.
Bishop J. Terry Steib of Memphis is quickly acquiring a reputation as one of the most gay-friendly bishops in the US.

Now, on March 11, Steib continues his gay outreach crusade by bringing in Fr. James Schexnayder of the National Association of Catholic Diocesan Lesbian and Gay Ministries (NACDLGM) to conduct workshops for clergy....
I fully support the man and his family in his decision to leave Memphis in the knowledge that compromises of the Faith are not allowed by Archbishop Burke as they are in so many other dioceses...Please keep this man and his family in your prayers and do not neglect to pray for Bishop Steib and other clergy who are inclined to disregard the Church's teaching on homosexuality, chastity, or any number of other things.

Local Stem Cell Research discussions

The Immaculate Conception Parish Bulletin (on page 5), in promoting its weekly Lenten Inspiration Quest speakers, presents to the faithful, Sr. Jean deBlois' talk, "The Stem Cell Controversy", in the following manner, which says, in part:
Become more informed on the critical issue of stem cell research and get answers from an extremely qualified Catholic authority on ethics...(my emphasis)
First, what is Inspiration Quest? From the ICD web site, we read:
Inspiration Quest, (often abbreviated “IQ”) is an adult Christian learning series at Immaculate Conception Parish which offers a wonderful variety of speakers and events, once each month throughout the year, and weekly during the Lenten season. The overall idea for this series is to educate and inspire Catholic adults who seek to deepen their understanding and appreciation of our faith.

Inspiration Quest events are currently held in the Church. Each event begins at 7:30 p.m. and is over by 9:00 p.m. There is no charge and no registration. A freewill offering is taken up to offset expenses. Childcare is provided by reservation. We welcome everyone to attend IQ and are also open to parishioners who would like to be part of the planning and hosting of these events as members of the IQ Committee.
There have been some great speakers in the past, such as Fr. Eugene Morris. However, there have been some events that others might classify as questionable, at least from a Catholic perspective. Such an example is the following - a speaker selection which has raised a number of questions, especially in the area of presenting the authentic Catholic teaching regarding the Missouri Stem Cell initiative:
Thursday, March 23, 2006 7:30 - 9:00 p.m.
"The Stem Cell Controversy"
A Presentation and Discussion led by Jean deBlois, C.S.J.

Become more informed on the critical issue of stem cell research and get answers from an extremely qualified Catholic authority on ethics. Jean deBlois is a Sister of St. Joseph of Carondelet currently engaged as Director of the Master of Arts in Health Care Mission program at Aquinas Institute of Theology in St. Louis. In her former life she was a registered nurse working in critical care. She asked to study theology because of the many ethical issues she encountered in the area of health. She received an MA in theology from the University of San Francisco in 1979 and then went on to continue her studies, receiving a Ph.D. in moral theology and medical ethics from the Catholic University of America in 1988. She had the great privilege of studying with and being mentored by Charles Curran. She is particularly interested in end of life decision making, the effects of advancing technologies on the delivery of health care, professional ethics, the relevance of Catholic social teaching to Catholic health care today, and environmental ethics. (all emphasis mine)
Before I begin, three red flags pop up immediately:

1. She belongs to the Sisters of St Joseph of Carondelet
2. She teaches at Aquinas Institute
3. She had the "privilege" of being "mentored" by Fr. Charles Curran.

Now, I understand that the above three items could be construed as engaging in 'rash judgment', objectively a sin against the Eighth Commandment of the Decalogue. However, I merely noted that my internal warning system was activated (red flags), not that any "guilt by association" was being imputed. But these warning signs can be buttressed by other items. For instance, in this 2004 article from Women for Faith and Family, we read:
In a 1993 article, "Anencephaly and the Management of Pregnancy",1 Sister Jean deBlois, CSJ, then-senior associate for clinical ethics at The Catholic Health Association, proposed anencephaly as a case where "the pregnancy may be terminated at any time". Although Sister deBlois acknowledged that "there is no life-threatening maternal pathology", she cited the increased physical risks during labor and delivery, the "emotional trauma suffered by a couple upon diagnosis of anencephaly", and the lack of mental development in the baby as justification for "inducing labor to end the pregnancy".

Employing the principles of proportionality and "double effect", she maintained that "the resulting fetal death is indirect" and thus not an abortion. Sister deBlois further stated that because "human life involves more than simply biologic life", and infants with anencephaly lack "psychological, social, and creative capacities", such babies "can never acquire the quality of viability, properly understood". Thus, she maintained, "once the diagnosis is made, there seems to be no purpose in maintaining the pregnancy".

Anencephaly was thus singled out as a special case from other lethal birth defects because of the presumed lack of mental function. According to Sister deBlois's rationale, Catholic hospitals would then be ethically allowed to perform early induction delivery -- an acknowledged abortion procedure used for terminating babies with birth defects -- as a kind of termination of life support rather than abortion.

Whatever the semantics, Sister deBlois's position was a radical departure from the Church's condemnation of direct termination of pregnancy based on the condition of the unborn baby. Especially because some ethicists consider anencephaly as analogous to the controversial "vegetative state", this position unfortunately also furthered the contention that a presumed lack of mental function overrides the obligation to provide for the basic needs of a person by justifying even the interruption of a process as natural as pregnancy.
The excerpts certainly need no commentary from me as they are quite clear regarding Sister deBlois' position. But there is more. While this article dealt with a beginning of life issue, let's take a look at an end-of-life issue, specifically, The Pope's Address on Feeding and the "Vegetative" State (again from Women for Faith and Family):
Pope John Paul II in a March 20 address to the International Congress "Life-Sustaining Treatments and Vegetative State: Scientific Advances and Ethical Dilemmas", [in] affirming the obligation to feed and care for patients considered in PVS, [said,]
"The sick person in a 'vegetative state', awaiting recovery or a natural end, still has the right to basic health care (nutrition, hydration, cleanliness, warmth, etc.), and to the prevention of complications related to his confinement to bed. He also has the right to appropriate rehabilitative care and to be monitored for clinical signs of eventual recovery".
[However,] Sister Jean deBlois, C.S.J., director of a master's degree program for health care executives at Aquinas Institute in St. Louis, said that the pope's statement places "an unnecessary and unfounded burden on family members faced with treatment decisions on behalf of their loved ones" and that "artificial nutrition and hydration... holds no comparison to a meal".
She is also quoted as saying:
"When someone suffers an illness or injury that puts them in a persistent vegetative state, they have put their first foot on the path to eternal life. When we remove artificial nutrition and hydration, we open the door and say, 'Have a wonderful journey'". (Sister Jean deBlois, ethicist, Aquinas Institute, Spring, 2004)
"Have a wonderful journey, while we starve and dehydrate you to death?" Is this for real? And coming from a "Catholic" ethicist? Truly, unbelievable and directly contrary to the Holy Father's words.

Now, having reviewed the above we come to July, 2005, and we read that the Archdiocese has closed its doors to the Aquinas Institute Theology discussions which were taking place at the Rigali Center:
Lecture series forced to leave Catholic center
Discussions featured controversial issues.

ST. LOUIS - The St. Louis archdiocese has closed its doors on a popular round-table discussion series on Catholic theology, forcing organizers to find a new home.

The latest discussion, held earlier this month, focused on the debate over stem cell research, with the lecturer, Sister Jean deBlois, explaining the church’s ethical and moral problems with such research. But deBlois’ lecture appears to have been the last on church property.
We are not privy to the actual reasons for this action by the Archdiocese, but there seems to a pattern which might suggest that there are grave problems, at least from an authentic Catholic perspective.

As Providence would have it, a recent discussion of Sister deBlois' talk was posted on the CatholicStLouis yahoo group, which is accessible from the main page of this blog. Apparently, if I understand it correctly, the good sister's talk was not about the intrinsic evil associated with cloning and embryonic stem cell research but she approached it from a social justice or distributive justice perspective - a position which obscures the grave immorality of embryonic stem cell research. It would seem that attempting to discuss this issue from such a perspective minimizes the Catholic position as discussed by Archbishop Burke in his article here.

While it is stated at the CatholicStLouis site that Sister deBlois did uphold some of the teachings of the Church, it seems that if a Catholic parish is going to have a discussion of the stem cell issue, it should at least be presented in full accord with the Church's teaching on the matter and in a way consonant with the presentation made by Archbishop Burke. It seems that using the Social Justice perspective to oppose cloning/embryonic stem cell research is flawed. If, as the bulletin states, the faithful should "become more informed on the critical issue of stem cell research and get answers from an extremely qualified Catholic authority on ethics", is it not reasonable for the faithful to expect to be given the cold, hard facts and the truth as the Church wishes us to have them, rather than Sister's opinions and theories? For what it is worth, I understand that the Archdiocese has been advised and we await further information.

Gospel for Ash Wednesday

From: Matthew 6:1-6, 16-18

An Upright Intention in Almsgiving, Prayer and Fasting

(Jesus said to His disciples,) [1] "Beware of practising your piety before men in order to be seen by them; for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in Heaven. [2] "Thus, when you give alms, sound no trumpet before you, as thehypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be praised by men. Truly, I say to you, they have their reward. [3] But when you give alms, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, [4] so that your alms may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

[5] "And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by men. Truly, I say to you, they have their reward. [6] But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

[16] "And when you fast, do not look dismal, like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces that their fasting may be seen by men. Truly, I say to you, they have their reward. [17] But when you fast, anoint your head and wash your face, [18] that your fasting may not be seen by men but by your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you."
______________________

Commentary:

1-18. "Piety", here, means good works (cf. note on Matthew 5:6). Our Lord is indicating the kind of spirit in which we should do acts of personal piety. Almsgiving, fasting and prayer were the basic forms taken by personal piety among the chosen people--which is why Jesus refers to these three subjects. With complete authority He teaches that true piety must be practised with an upright intention, in the presence of God and without any ostentation. Piety practised in this way implies exercising our faith in God who sees us--and also in the safe knowledge that He will reward those who are sincerely devout.

5-6. Following the teaching of Jesus, the Church has always taught us to pray even when we were infants. By saying "you" (singular) our Lord is stating quite unequivocally the need for personal prayer--relating as child to Father, alone with God.

Public prayer, for which Christ's faithful assemble together, is something necessary and holy; but it should never displace obedience to this clear commandment of our Lord: "When you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father".

The Second Vatican Council reminds us of the teaching and practice of the Church in its liturgy, which is "the summit toward which the activity of the Church is directed; it is also the fount from which all her power flows [...]. The spiritual life, however, is not limited solely to participation in the liturgy. The Christian is indeed called to pray with others, but he must also enter into his bedroom to pray to his Father in secret; furthermore, according to the teaching of the Apostle, he must pray without ceasing (1 Thessalonians 5:17)" ("Sacrosanctum Concilium", 10 and 12).

A soul who really puts his Christian faith into practice realizes that he needs frequently to get away and pray alone to his Father, God. Jesus, who gives us this teaching about prayer, practised it during His own life on earth: the holy Gospel reports that He often went apart to pray on His own: "At times He spent the whole night in an intimate conversation with His Father. The Apostles were filled with love when they saw Christ pray" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 119; cf. Matthew 14:23; Mark 1:35; Luke 5:16; etc.). The Apostles followed the Master's example, and so we see Peter going up to the rooftop of the house to pray in private, and receiving a revelation (cf. Acts 10:9-16). "Our life of prayer should also be based on some moments that are dedicated exclusively to our conversation with God, moments of silent dialogue" ("ibid", 119).

16-18. Starting from the traditional practice of fasting, our Lord tells us the spirit in which we should exercise mortification of our senses: we should do so without ostentation, avoiding praise, discreetly; that way Jesus' words will not apply to us: "they have their reward"; it would have been a very bad deal. "The world admires only spectacular sacrifice, because it does not realize the value of sacrifice that is hidden and silent" ([St] J. Escriva, "The Way", 185).
______________________

Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Ash Wednesday

Why is this day thus named?

Because on this day the Church blesses ashes, and places them on the heads of her faithful children, saying: "Remember man, thou art dust, and unto dust thou shaft return."

Why is this done?

St. Charles Borromeo gives us the following reasons for this practice: that the faithful may be moved to sincere humility of heart; that the heavenly blessing may descend upon them, by which they, being really penitent, will weep with their whole soul for their sins, remembering how earth was cursed because of sin, and that we have all to return to dust; that strength to do true penance may be given the body, and that our soul may be endowed with divine grace to persevere in penance.

With such thoughts let the ashes be put upon your head, while you ask in all humility and with a contrite heart, for God’s mercy and grace.

Is the practice of putting ashes upon our heads pleasing to God?

It is, for God Himself commanded the Israelites to put ashes on their heads for a sign of repentance. (Jer. XXV. 34.) Thus did David (Ps, CI. 10.) who even strewed ashes on his bread; the Ninivites, (Jonas III. 5.) Judith, (Jud, IX. 1.) Mardochai, (Esth. IV 1.) Job, (JobXLII. 6.) etc. The Christians of the earliest times followed this practice as often as they did public penance for their sins.

Why from this day until the end of Lent are the altars draped in violet?

Because, as has been already said, the holy season of Lent is a time of sorrow and penance for sin, and the Church desires externally to demonstrate by the violet with which she drapes the altar, by the violet vestments worn by the priests, and by the cessation of the organ and festive singing, that we in quiet mourning are bewailing our sins; and to still further impress the spirit of penance upon us, there is usually only a simple crucifix or a picture of Christ's passion, left visible upon the altar, and devoutly meditating upon it, the heart is mostly prepared for contrition.

In the Introit of this day's Mass the Church uses the following words to make known her zeal for penance, and to move

INTROIT: God to mercy: Thou hast mercy upon all, O Lord, and hatest none of the things which Thou hast made, winking at the sins of men for the sake of repentance, and sparing them; for thou art the Lord our God. (Wisd. XI. 24. 25.) Have mercy on me, O God, have mercy on me; for my soul trusteth in thee. (Ps. LVI. 2.) Glory be to the Father, etc.

COLLECT: Grant to thy faithful, O Lord, that they may begin the venerable solemnities of fasting with suitable piety, and perform them with tranquil devotion. Through Jesus Christ, our Lord, etc.

LESSON :(Joel II. 12-19) Thus with the Lord: Be converted to me with all your heart, in fasting, and in weeping, and in mourning. And rend your hearts and not your garments, and turn to the Lord your God; for he is gracious and merciful, patient and rich in mercy, and ready to repent of the evil. Who knoweth but he will return, and forgive, anal leave a blessing behind him, sacrifice and libation to the Lord your God? Blow the trumpet in Sion: sanctify a fast; call a solemn assembly; gather together the people; sanctify the Church; assemble the ancients; gather together the little ones, and them that suck at the breasts; let the bridegroom go forth from his bed, and the bride out of her bride-chamber. Between the porch and the altar the priests, the Lord's ministers, shall weep; and shall say: Spare, O Lord, spare thy people; and give not thine inheritance to reproach, that the heathens should rule over them. Why should they say among the nations: Where is their God? The Lord hath been zealous for his land, and hath spared his people. And the Lord answered, and said to his people: Behold, I will send you corn, and wine, and oil, and you shall be filled with them; and I will no more make you a reproach among the nations, with the Lord Almighty.

EXPLANATION : The Prophet Joel exhorts the Jews to sorrow and penance for their sins, that they evade the expected judgment to be sent by God upon the city of Jerusalem. He required of them to show their repentance not merely by rending their garments, a sign of mourning with the Jews, but by a truly contrite heart. The Church wishes us to see plainly from this lesson of the prophet what qualities our penance should possess, if we desire reconciliation with God, forgiveness of our sins, and deliverance at the Last Day, which qualities are not merely abstinence from food and amusements, but the practice of real mortification of our evil inclinations, thus becoming with our whole heart converted to God.

GOSPEL :(Matt. VI. 16-21) At that time, Jesus said to his disciples: When you fast, be not as the hypocrites, sad. For they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Amen I say to you, they have received their reward. But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thy head and wash thy face, that thou appear not to men to fast, but to thy Father who is in secret, and thy Father who seeth in secret will repay thee. Lay not up to yourselves treasures on earth, where the rust and moth consume, and where thieves break through and steal. But lay up to yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither the rust nor moth doth consume, and where thieves do not break through nor steal. For where thy treasure is, there is thy heart also.

EXPLANATION : Jesus forbids us to seek the praises of men when performing good works, (fasting is a good work,) and still worse it would be to do good as the Pharisees, through hypocrisy. He also warns us against avarice and the desire for temporal riches, urging us to employ our temporal goods, in giving alms, and doing works of charity, thus laying up treasures in heaven, which are there rewarded and will last there forever. "What folly", says St. Chrysostom, "to leave our goods where we cannot stay, instead of sending them before us where we are going — to heaven!"'

_____________________________
From Explanation of the Epistles and Gospels by Fr. Leonard Goffine [(c) 1880]

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

An Express-Lane Belief System?

Thanks to Jeff Miller (The Curt Jester) for linking to this:

Mammon. Because You Deserve to Enjoy Life -- Guilt Free.

Conscience - some help for the confused

"He who does the will of my Father in heaven shall enter the kingdom of heaven." St. Matthew, 7:21.

Quite a few years ago there lived in a country section of southern Cal­ifornia a poor but worthy Spanish-American family. The good mother took seriously sick and after a major operation, she passed away, leaving a fam­ily of eight children. The oldest was a girl of seventeen, a thin wraith of a creature. Upon her frail shoulders fell the burden of caring for the motherless family. She took up the task with courage, keeping the children clean, well fed, and regularly attending school.

A social worker complimented her on this good work. But the girl replied: "I can't take any credit for something I have to do."

"But, my dear," objected the visitor, "you don't have to. You could get out of it."

She who was playing the role of substitute mother paused for a moment and then exclaimed: "Yes, that's true. But what about the 'have to' that's inside of me?"

The 'have to' inside of us is what we call conscience. We don't have to prove that we have a conscience, because everyone knows it is there. Since it is so tremendously important in moral life, we must understand its nature and workings.

I. In reality, conscience is not a voice whispering to us:
A. It is our mind judging whether an action is right or wrong. It is an act of the mind which applies the moral law to ourselves in a particular case. The speedometer tells me that I am going beyond the speed limit. Conscience tells me that I am thereby endangering my life and the life of others, which is wrong.

B. Conscience not only knows the law; it applies the law.

C. Law is outside of us; conscience is inside us.

D. Conscience works frequently every day, whether we realize it or not. It works in unimportant as well as important affairs:
1. It does not make one big, complete decision for life or even for a year or one day. It keeps on making decisions or judgments as each action comes up.

2. Before the action conscience tells us to do the good, and avoid the evil.

3. After the act conscience praises the good, and condemns the bad.

II. Sometimes this power of judging works correctly; at other times, incorrectly.
A. Normally your conscience may be:
1. Right, when it judges as good that which is really good, and bad that which is really bad. A false conscience does the opposite.

2. Certain, when the individual has no reasonable fear that his judgment is wrong. In this connection the moral teachings of the Catholic Church are very definite and certain. Outside the Church there is doubt about almost everything.

3. Doubtful, if it hesitates in deciding whether an action is good or bad. The doubter is bound to find out for certain.

4. Perplexed, when there are two certain laws and the mind does not know which to obey. Someone is sick at home on Sunday morning. Shall I go to Mass or take care of the sick? An informed Catholic will know that he should take care of the sick. A perplexed person does not know what to do. Another reason here for learning your religion.
B. An abnormal conscience may be:
1. Lax, when it allows what is really forbidden, when it considers mortal sins as venial sins, when it considers as no sin that which is really wrong.

2. Dead, when a long-continued habit of sin, or the intentional stifling of the promptings of conscience, have made this judg­ment weak and helpless. Deliver us, 0 Lord, from a deadened conscience. And deliver Thy Church from so-called Catholics with the conscience of a corpse!

3. Scrupulous, when it makes big sins out of little sins, makes sins out of things which are not sins, or insists on confessing sins which have been confessed before. Only absolute obedience to one's confessor can cure this spiritual sickness.

III. Since this judgment of the mind regarding right and wrong is so important, it is necessary to know and follow some rules of conscience:
A. In general:
1. Always act according to your conscience. To do what you think is wrong, even though it is right, would be to commit sin.

2. Follow your conscience only when you are sure the action is good.
B. In particular:
1. Always obey a right conscience.

2. If a false conscience is certain and we do not suspect it is false, follow it; if it is false through your own fault, then correct it first.

3. Clear up doubts by asking someone who knows. If you cannot clear up the doubt, take the safer course.

4. A lax or deadened conscience must be corrected by thought, prayer, and the sacraments.

5. A scrupulous conscience is cured by absolute obedience to one's confessor.
Conscience is really the mind telling us "you must" or "you must not." By attentive listening to sermons, by reading faithful Catholic papers, magazines and books, by prayer and frequent confession and Communion, by attending missions and retreats, you can make and keep your conscience clear and correct. Then follow its promptings at all costs.

We all want to enter the kingdom of heaven. Jesus tells us that we will if we do the will of His Father in heaven. Your conscience is the best help in doing God's will.

Like the girl who took the burden of the family upon her own frail shoulders, realize the presence and heed the promptings of the voice within you which says: "You have to."
_________________________
Adapted from:
Prayers, Precepts and Virtues by Fr. Arthur Tonne (1949)

An Update on the Dissenting Canadian Priests

An email update from LifeSiteNews:
Please note that LifeSiteNews.com coverage of the open letter by 19 Quebec priests dissenting to Catholic teaching on homosexuality has been updated with a link to the full letter in French. In the coming days we will provide an English translation.

Also note that unlike mainstream press coverage of the issue, only LifeSiteNews.com named all the priests who signed the letter.

See the article which now includes a link to the full open letter here:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/feb/06022706.html

The article states, in part, and which to some degree validates some previous comments made here :
Canon Lawyer Peter Vere told LifeSiteNews.com that the situation is now beyond local bishops and that the faithful should contact the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to express their concerns. Noting that the story on the dissent has made international news, Vere said, "It's no longer just a scandal for a particular diocese. It is a scandal for lay people who are legitimately confused by the antics of these priests, who will likely mistake silence (on the part of the bishops) for consent."

"At this point I would encourage people to write the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) because it no longer concerns priests or bishops but concerns a direct attack on the faith and morals of the Catholic Church," Vere added.

To send respectful communications:
Mail or fax (most effective):
Cardinal William Levada
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
Piazza del S. Uffizio, 11, 00193 Roma, Italy
Fax: 06.69.88.34.09

To email the CDF:
Cardinal William Levada
E-mail: cdf@cfaith.va
I expect Dr Ed Peters will have something to say on this matter as well before too long.

Embryos are human beings, Pope insists

When will this be printed in your parish bulletin?

I received the "Statement" below via email this evening and thought that, perhaps, some major outpouring of the Holy Spirit had come over those in Congress who profess to be Catholic...But alas, I was mistaken. Each of these Representatives needs, at the very minimum, a copy of the Catholic Answers' Voters Guide. Of course, unless I have misread this "Statement", I can only conclude that these professed Catholics are merely tryiing to gain the support of other Catholics solely for their own re-election bids this November. I am also confident that if I were to send this to my pastor (anonymously, of course), he would not hesitate to have it inserted in the bulletin or, at least, have it available to others.
House Democrats Release Historic Catholic Statement of Principles

Expresses Commitment to Dignity of Life and Belief that Government Has 'Moral Purpose'

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A majority of Catholic Democrats in the U.S. House led by Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro (Conn.-3) today released a statement of principles. Signed by 55 House Democrats, the statement documents how their faith influences them as lawmakers, making clear their commitment to the basic principles at the heart of Catholic social teaching and their bearing on policy - whether it is increasing access to education for all or pressing for real health care reform, taking seriously the decision to go to war, or reducing poverty. Above all, the document expresses the signers' commitment to the dignity of life and their belief that government has moral purpose.

The full text of the statement and the complete list of signers follow.

Statement of Principles
By Fifty-Five Catholic Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives

As Catholic Democrats in Congress, we are proud to be part of the living Catholic tradition -- a tradition that promotes the common good, expresses a consistent moral framework for life and highlights the need to provide a collective safety net to those individuals in society who are most in need. As legislators, in the U.S. House of Representatives, we work every day to advance respect for life and the dignity of every human being. We believe that government has moral purpose.

We are committed to making real the basic principles that are at the heart of Catholic social teaching: helping the poor and disadvantaged, protecting the most vulnerable among us, and ensuring that all Americans of every faith are given meaningful opportunities to share in the blessings of this great country. That commitment is fulfilled in different ways by legislators but includes: reducing the rising rates of poverty; increasing access to education for all; pressing for increased access to health care; and taking seriously the decision to go to war. Each of these issues challenges our obligations as Catholics to community and helping those in need.

We envision a world in which every child belongs to a loving family and agree with the Catholic Church about the value of human life and the undesirability of abortion; we do not celebrate its practice. Each of us is committed to reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies and creating an environment with policies that encourage pregnancies to be carried to term. We believe this includes promoting alternatives to abortion, such as adoption, and improving access to children's healthcare and child care, as well as policies that encourage paternal and maternal responsibility.

In all these issues, we seek the Church's guidance and assistance but believe also in the primacy of conscience. In recognizing the Church's role in providing moral leadership, we acknowledge and accept the tension that comes with being in disagreement with the Church in some areas. Yet we believe we can speak to the fundamental issues that unite us as Catholics and lend our voices to changing the political debate -- a debate that often fails to reflect and encompass the depth and complexity of these issues.

As legislators, we are charged with preserving the Constitution, which guarantees religious freedom for all Americans. In doing so, we guarantee our right to live our own lives as Catholics, but also foster an America with a rich diversity of faiths. We believe the separation of church and state allows for our faith to inform our public duties.

As Catholic Democrats who embrace the vocation and mission of the laity as expressed by Pope John Paul II in his Apostolic Exhortation, Christifideles Laici, we believe that the Church is the "people of God," called to be a moral force in the broadest sense. We believe the Church as a community is called to be in the vanguard of creating a more just America and world. And as such, we have a claim on the Church's bearing as it does on ours.

Rosa L. DeLauro
David R. Obey
Wm. Lacy Clay
Hilda L. Solis
James R. Langevin
Bart Stupak
Anna Eshoo
Bill Pascrell
Gene Taylor
Raul M. Grijalva
Carolyn McCarthy
John B. Larson
Ed Pastor
Joe Baca
William Delahunt
Tim Ryan
Silvestre Reyes
Mike Thompson
Linda T. Sanchez
Charles A. Gonzalez
Xavier Becerra
Diane Watson
Michael H. Michaud
Nydia Velazquez
Jim Marshall
Frank Pallone
John T. Salazar
James P. McGovern
George Miller
Tim Holden
James L. Oberstar
Dale E. Kildee
Patrick J. Kennedy
Cynthia McKinney
James P. Moran
Michael Capuano
Richard E. Neal
Mike Doyle
Peter A. DeFazio
Maurice Hinchey
Dennis A. Cardoza
Joseph Crowley
Jim Costa
Lucille Roybal-Allard
Loretta Sanchez
Robert Brady
Marty Meehan
Grace Napolitano
Luis V. Gutierrez
Jose Serrano
Stephen Lynch
Edward J. Markey
Nancy Pelosi
Lane Evans
They forgot to add, "And don't forget, support us in the upcoming election - we want to get a head start on any bishops who prefer to touch on the "non-negotiable" issues of which we, in conscience, disagree."

What do they say?
In all these issues, we seek the Church's guidance and assistance but believe also in the primacy of conscience.
What fantasy land does this come from? Since when do these "Catholic" politicians (for the most part) seek the Church's guidance and assistance? And regarding the oft used phrase "the primacy of conscience", irrespective of whether it is well-formed or malformed, it means to them that they are free to ignore the Church's teaching on any number of issues, except those which satisfy their own agendas (votes)...Pathetic, really. I'm so not looking forward to this election season when when we will be bombarded with claims about just how "Catholic" these people profess to be. May God have mercy on us! And pray for our bishops and priests as preparations are being made once again for the forthcoming spiritual battles.

Not that it means that much, but this email came from the group "Catholics" for Faithful Citizenship, a group which seems to have a problem with the hierarchy of truths of the Church and the non-negotiable issues as discussed by several faithful bishops, including our own, Archbishop Burke.

Archbishop expects 'discussion' on letter

Unbelievable!!! As previously posted here, 19 Catholic priests, wrote an open letter defying the Church's teaching on homosexuality. By definition, they are embracing heresy. Yet, in furthering such scandalous behavior, Sherbrooke Archbishop André Gaumond, who is also the president of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, said:
"I'm not very happy with the means, to have a public declaration, a public article in the newspaper on a Sunday morning to say, 'We priests are not in accord with our church.'. . .I'm not very happy with that, but it's not a reason to throw them out of the church."
Pray, tell then, good Bishop, what is a good reason? Why, it could have just as easily have been said: Let's let them continue to corrupt souls and lead Catholics on the road to hell. Why, it would be "pastorally insensitive" to rebuke them and call them to task for their heretical actions...After all, we want to give a false appearance of unity when in reality there is none....

Well, your Excellency, while you may not be "very happy" with your priests, what, then does constitute a valid reason to boot heretics?

Let's call like it is, folks! Let us recall, with proper reflection, these words of Pope John Paul II in Ad Tuendam Fidem and the purpose for which he was making these changes:
TO PROTECT THE FAITH of the Catholic Church against errors arising from certain members of the Christian faithful, especially from among those dedicated to the various disciplines of sacred theology, we, whose principal duty is to confirm the brethren in the faith (Lk 22:32), consider it absolutely necessary to add to the existing texts of the Code of Canon Law and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, new norms which expressly impose the obligation of upholding truths proposed in a definitive way by the Magisterium of the Church, and which also establish related canonical sanctions.

The first paragraph states: “With firm faith, I also believe everything contained in the word of God, whether written or handed down in Tradition, which the Church either by a solemn judgment or by the ordinary and universal Magisterium sets forth to be believed as divinely revealed.”(4) This paragraph appropriately confirms and is provided for in the Church’s universal legislation, in canon 750 of the Code of Canon Law(5) and canon 598 of the Code of the Canons of the Eastern Churches.(6)

The third paragraph states: “Moreover I adhere with submission of will and intellect to the teachings which either the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops enunciate when they exercise their authentic Magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim these teachings by a definitive act.”(7) This paragraph has its corresponding legislative expression in canon 752 of the Code of Canon Law(8) and canon 599 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches.(9)

3. The second paragraph, however, which states “I also firmly accept and hold each and everything definitively proposed by the Church regarding teaching on faith and morals,”(10) has no corresponding canon in the Codes of the Catholic Church. This second paragraph of the Profession of faith is of utmost importance since it refers to truths that are necessarily connected to divine revelation. These truths, in the investigation of Catholic doctrine, illustrate the Divine Spirit’s particular inspiration for the Church’s deeper understanding of a truth concerning faith and morals, with which they are connected either for historical reasons or by a logical relationship.

4. Moved therefore by this need, and after careful deliberation, we have decided to overcome this lacuna in the universal law in the following way:

A) Canon 750 of the Code of Canon Law will now consist of two paragraphs; the first will present the text of the existing canon; the second will contain a new text. Thus, canon 750, in its complete form, will read:

Canon 750 – § 1. Those things are to be believed by divine and catholic faith which are contained in the word of God as it has been written or handed down by tradition, that is, in the single deposit of faith entrusted to the Church, and which are at the same time proposed as divinely revealed either by the solemn Magisterium of the Church, or by its ordinary and universal Magisterium, which in fact is manifested by the common adherence of Christ’s faithful under the guidance of the sacred Magisterium. All are therefore bound to avoid any contrary doctrines.

§ 2. Furthermore, each and everything set forth definitively by the Magisterium of the Church regarding teaching on faith and morals must be firmly accepted and held; namely, those things required for the holy keeping and faithful exposition of the deposit of faith; therefore, anyone who rejects propositions which are to be held definitively sets himself against the teaching of the Catholic Church.
Have not these men by such an open letter contradicting or calling into question a teacing of the Church on the grave immorality of homosexual activity not placed themselves outside of the Church? Does not such open dissent require an equally open and public call for repentance and repudiation of the letter? For what reason is there a need to discuss this? Surely one cannot claim that this dissent or rejection of Catholic teaching is somehow occult?

I wonder if perhaps we are witnessing, yet not properly realizing it, a repeat of 1968 all over again where we had uncorrected, and in some places, encouraged rejection of Humanae Vitae?

The updated story on this episcopal failure to publicly correct these priests is here.

Lest I forget in my state of profound angst and disbelief, we need to pray for these priests and for these bishops...Perhaps God will grant them the graces they need to act in conformity with His will and in accord with the teachings of the Church!

Joe Scheidler Wins Unanimous Supreme Court Ruling against N.O.W

Praise be to God!!!
CHICAGO, February 28, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Longtime Chicago pro-life activist, Joseph Scheidler, has again won in the Supreme Court in a twenty-year-old case brought against him by the National Organization for Women, the leading US radical feminist activist organization. The Supreme Court ruled 8-0 that the charge of extortion could not be applied to pro-life demonstrations outside abortion facilities.
Article here, CWNews has it here, Yahoo here.

If you missed the 2006 Convocation at St Stanislaus..

...featuring the Call to Action Vice President and FOSIL representative, "Catholic" Action Network brings to St. Louis another anti-Catholic conference titled "The Journey from Apartheid to a Radically Reformed Catholic Church", featuring none other than the esteemed, and excommunicated Dr. Patricia Fresen who serves as the director of formation for the "Roman Catholic" Women "Priests" Program based in Germany and Austria.

Dr. Fresen was "forced" to leave her Dominican community after her "ordination to the priesthood" in August 2003.

As a sign, no doubt, of Divine Providence, this conference is being held on April 1 - April Fools Day...

More here.

Campaign Begins Against Stem Cell Cloning Lies

A coalition of social conservatives — including legislators, anti-abortion groups and some religious organizations — kicked off on Monday its campaign to defeat a likely ballot proposal aimed at protecting some forms of embryonic stem-cell research.

[State Rep. Jim ]Lembke and other group members contended that the ballot proposal was really about "cash, not cures" — a slap at the Missouri Coalition for Life Saving Cures, the group of business leaders, politicians and research facilities that is behind the ballot proposal.
The other Saturday, I had to make a trip to the Post Office. As I was walking to the front entrance, I saw a woman stopping people to sign some petition. I asked her the nature of the petition and was told it for the "Life Saving Cures/Cloning Ban." I told her and a man who was looking it over that the petition was based on a specious lie, that it did not ban human cloning, and that humans would be sacrificed to the altars of "pseudo-scientific research", and money.

The petition gatherer told me she had another on some tobacco tax, which I declined. After entering the Post Office and getting to the counter, I asked the clerk why, in violation of the law, they permitted petition gatherers on the property. I was told that they had called the O'Fallon Missouri police department (illustrious public servants who are incapable of even directing traffic) and that they were unable to do anything about it. About all those cops can do is run a radar gun and write tickets - when it comes to enforcing other laws, it appears that they are a notch or two below the Keystone cops.

Anyway, as I left I saw the woman who was previously gathering petitions, climb into a minivan with Illinois plates apparently getting ready to leave the area. I wonder why the "Life Destroying while Searching for Cures" group resorts to outsiders (non-Missourians) to gather their petitions? Maybe they work for less?

The Post-Dispatch article continues:
The supporting coalition is busy collecting the signatures needed to get on the November ballot a proposed state constitutional amendment that would protect allow all embryonic stem-cell research allowed under federal law. The coalition says the protection is necessary because of repeated efforts by social conservatives to persuade the state Legislature to ban such research, especially a procedure called somatic cell nuclear transfer. (SCNT)
There are, indeed, efforts to ban cloning which is the direct murder of an innocent human being. It is not necessarily "social conservatives" who are opposed, but those who believe in and follow the natural moral law. It is beyond any doubt that both reproductive and therapeutic cloning immorally generate a new human life - a living human being, a person. But therapeutic cloning is worse in that this new human life is created solely for the purpose of destroying it at the embryonic stage, in his or her earliest moments of life.

We are constantly bombarded with the lies and distortions by "St. Jack" Danforth and his band of cronies that opposition to this ballot initiative is no less than the denial of a cure to persons with serious diseases or other sufferings. Yet not one example can be offered by them to support such a specious claim. These "compassionate" individuals do not appear to understand the immorality of the act of destroying a life to achieve their stated end or goal. They must, in effect, reject the biological and scientific facts that these human lives are human.

With respect to SCNT:
"This is human cloning, and they’re ["St Jack" and the Missouri Life Saving Cures group] lying to the public," said Jaci Winship, executive director of Missourians Against Human Cloning. She and other members of the group flew around the state to hold several news conferences kicking off their campaign.
. . .
Donn Rubin, chairman of the Missouri Coalition for Life Saving Cures, contended that it was the opponents who were circulating falsehoods. "This argument about profits is absurd and insulting," he said.
Yes, it is absurd and insulting to those who have the brains and the intellect to understand what is behind this whole initiative. There are reasons why the ballot initiative is wording in such a way as to deliberately deceive the public and altruism is nowhere to be found. Whether or not these people realize it or not, the practice of human cloning creates a class of human beings whose inherent dignity is despised and rejected and who become mere slaves, property in effect, to satisfy our whims and desires. We deprive them of their most basic rights.

In the words of Father Pacholczyk, "[t]herapeutic cloning sanctions the direct and explicit exploitation of one human being by another, in this case, the exploitation of the weak by the powerful" (Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk, Stem Cell Research, Cloning and Human Embryos, Washington, D.C.: Family Research Council)

The Post Dispatch article is here.

Other information (and credit) for this post came from Archbishop Burke's Column, Safeguarding Human Life: The Very Beginning, available at the St Louis Review or here.

Resignation of Abp. Fiorenza (Houston) Accepted

VATICAN CITY, FEB 28, 2006 (VIS) - The Holy Father:

- Accepted the resignation from the pastoral care of the archdiocese of Galveston-Houston, U.S.A., presented by Archbishop Joseph Anthony Fiorenza, upon having reached the age limit. He is succeeded by Coadjutor Archbishop Daniel N. DiNardo.

Willful Ignorance or Something Else...

A recent column in the Post left me wondering if people are really so out of touch with reality. I am unclear if this column may have been an attempt at comedy or satire, and if so, I saw neither humor nor satire in it. As a matter of fact, if the author is even slightly serious and truthful, we need to pray for his conversion and the conversion of his family and friends. Having just discovered that acting on one's homosexual inclinations is sinful, he says:
...I suddenly was concerned about my friend [Dean]. Not only is he a heavy smoker, which is bad, but he’s gay, which apparently is a sin. Between the ride on the lung-cancer express and the openly sinful behavior, my friend might be bumming a smoke off of Satan any day now. I figured I couldn’t waste time. I dialed the phone.

“I’ve been reading about this in the paper. People say it’s a sin. Did you know it’s a sin?”

“Yeah.”

“And that doesn’t bother you?”

“I’m Catholic. Everything’s a sin,” Dean replied. “Being gay is the least of my worries.”
Lovely...the homosexual who happens to be "Catholic", unconcerned about his immortal soul because this is a religion where everything is a sin. Perhaps, everything he is doing or failing to do is sinful, but that clarification is never made. His attempts to convince his friend that he should try and change his homosexual lifestyle were truly lame, much like the column in general. He ends his writing unconcerned with either his friend's immortal soul or his own:
The reason I like Dean is that he is who he is. If he changed into something else, I might not like him as much. So, I guess he’ll end up trading Marlboros with Beelzebub after all. Actually, I could probably use some company down there anyway.
It will take much prayer, conutless acts of reparations and sacrifices, and unending works of mercy, all with God's infinite graces, to change hearts and minds of the untold pagans of this once Christian nation. For the faithful, the work is before us and we cannot be complacent nor can we procrastinate.

The complete article, "Friends don’t let friends stay gay…right?," is here.

Gospel for Tuesday, 8th Week in Ordinary Time

From: Mark 10:28-31

Poverty and Renunciation (Continuation)

[28] Peter began to say to Him (Jesus), "Lo, we have left everything and followed You." [29] Jesus said, "Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or lands, for My sake and for the Gospel, [30] who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions, and in the age to come eternal life. [31] But many that are first will be last, and the last first."
_______________________

Commentary:

28-30. Jesus Christ requires every Christian to practise the virtue of poverty: He also requires us to practise real and effective austerity in the possession and use of material things. But of those who have received a specific call to apostolate--as in the case, here, of the Twelve--He requires absolute detachment from property, time, family, etc. so that they can be fully available, imitating Jesus Himself who, despite being Lord of the universe, became so poor that He had nowhere to lay His head (cf. Matthew 8:20). Giving up all these things for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven also relieves us of the burden they involve: like a soldier shedding some encumbrance before going into action, to be able to move with more agility. This gives one a certain lordship over all things: no longer the slave of things, one experiences that feeling St. Paul referred to: "As having nothing, and yet possessing everything" (2 Corinthians 6:10). A Christian who sheds his selfishness in this way has acquired charity and, having charity, he has everything: "All are yours; you are Christ's; and Christ is God's" (1 Corinthians 3:22-23).

The reward for investing completely in Christ will be fully obtained in eternal life: but we will also get it in this life. Jesus says that anyone who generously leaves behind his possessions will be rewarded a hundred times over in this life.

He adds "with persecutions" (v. 30) because opposition is part of the reward for giving things up out of love for Jesus Christ: a Christian's glory lies in becoming like the Son of God, sharing in His cross so as later to share in His glory: "provided we suffer with Him in order that we may also be glorified with Him (Romans 8:17); "all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted' (2 Timothy 3:12).

29. These words of our Lord particularly apply to those who by divine vocation embrace celibacy, giving up their right to form a family on earth. By saying "for My sake and for the Gospel" Jesus indicates that His example and the demands of His teaching give full meaning to this way of life: "This, then, is the mystery of the newness of Christ, of all that He is and stands for; it is the sum of the highest ideals of the Gospel and of the Kingdom; it is a particular manifestation of grace, which springs from the paschal mystery of the Savior and renders the choice of celibacy desirable and worthwhile on the part of those called by our Lord Jesus. Thus, they intend not only to participate in Christ's priestly office, but also to share with Him His very condition of living" (Paul VI, "Sacerdotalis Coelibatus", 23).
________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Monday, February 27, 2006

Defending Human Embryonic Life - Essay

This is a lengthy essay but well worth taking the time to read it. The first paragraph states:
This essay addresses the moral status of the human embryo. It asserts that on the basis of biology and metaphysics, the human embryo should be accorded full moral status, that is, inviolability. While this is also the position afforded it by the Catholic Church on the basis of divine revelation and elsewhere, the case will not be argued on that basis in this brief. Instead it will provide a critique of the so-called “intermediate” or “special status” which has been proposed by some ethicists including several of the members of the President’s Council on Bioethics. In so doing it will demonstrate why anything other than full moral status for the human embryo is biologically and philosophically untenable.
The full article from Catholic Online.

Alter Christus - Lenten Graces: the Spirit of Compunction

With the beginning of the holy season of Lent all priestly hearts are stirred to renewed zeal for the salvation of souls. We are roused by holy Church's warning in her liturgy of the 1st Sunday: "Ecce nunc tempus acceptabile... Exhibeamus nosmetipsos sicut Dei ministros in multa patientia", etc. And we have resolved to plead with God by increased prayer and penance, with men by our more pressing and frequent exhortations... But what of our own share in the graces of Lent? Those very activities of our ministry will no doubt also profit us largely. Yet we should try and gather in, during Lent, some specific fruit of purification and transformation for our own soul. Perhaps we may seek this, very effectively, in cultivating the spirit of compunction.

ITS MEANING AND IMPORTANCE

Lent is often associated in our mind primarily with the idea of external penance and expiation for sin; yet this is not its main purpose. It ought to have also another, a deeper meaning for us, - bring us a greater grace, viz. a true spirit of compunction. The liturgy of Lent strikes that note unceasingly; it is the habitual object of its petitions and prayers. "Parce, Domine, parce populo tuo; ne in aeternum irascaris nobis." "Attende, Domine, et miscrere, quia peccavimus tibi."

Let us take that lesson to heart eagerly. For there is danger of our making too little of it in our spiritual life: modern asceticism stresses but little the importance of compunction as the foundation of holiness. Abbot Marmion - and Faber before him - do not hesitate to attribute to this the failure of so many good souls in their quest after perfection.

Yet when we reflect on the meaning of compunction and all it implies, it is not difficult to realize how vital it is for all solid piety. The central idea of compunction is given very aptly by Marmion: "a disposition of the soul which makes it abide in a state of habitual contrition". Many other elements will follow in the wake of a deep inner dis­position of compunction: with the habitual sorrow and regret for having offended God, there comes into the soul an ever-growing hatred of sin, a never-satiated desire to atone for it, a recoil, as it were, from all dangerous attractions to sin, a holy fear of all that may again lead us away from God, a supernatural sorrow for all the wrongs done to Him by the sins of the world, with a great longing to see His honour and glory restored, and - perhaps chiefly - a boundless confidence in the mercy of God, with a great tenderness in our love of God because it is a forgiven love.

Such must have been the dispositions of St Peter, of Mary Magdalen, after their conversion: contrition in them became a life-long compunction, and this made saints of them. So it has proved for countless souls, even for souls whose" conversion" was but from minor offences against God, as for St Aloysius Gonzaga.

Would that we could live in that spirit of compunction and ground ourselves more and more in it. We need it at every stage of the spiritual life: not only after our falls, to secure a lasting conversion; but all along the road of pro­gress, because it keeps us in our true relation to God and in many ways helps us on to more intimate union with Him: it makes us realize that we have never done penance enough, thwarts our habitual tendencies to pride and self-sufficiency, detaches us from the vanities of the world, develops in us positive feelings of deep humility and leads to true devotion and piety. "Da te ad cordis compunctionem et invenies devotionem. "

The eastern schools of Christian spirituality have always recommended the frequent and whole-hearted repetition of the words: "Jesus, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner" - not only for beginners, but as the surest means of finding union with God. Have we ever tried it?

* How little perhaps we have realized the sanctifying effects a deeper compunction would have on our spiritual life? - Let us strive earnestly after it, during this Lent especially.

To pray for it is the first and chief means to obtain com­punction, as it is for every other grace. We have many opportunities for this in the special liturgical prayers of Lent. "Deus, qui sperantibus in te misereri potius eligis quam irasci : da nobis digne flere mala quae fecimus, ut tuae consolationis gratiam invenire mereamur" (Sabb. p. dom. IV Quadrag. : or. super populum ).

Next, we must dispose our souls to receive that grace in greater and greater abundance. True, the intense and overwhelming compunction of the Saints seems to be a very special gift of the Holy Ghost; but even with God's ordinary graces we can always grow in the sorrowing for our sins and in the accompanying feelings of humility and penance and love. To this end, we should frequently meditate on the great­ness and holiness of God, contrasting it with our own nothingness and sinfulness; on the Secred Passion of our Savior, etc.

Then, let us look out for all occasions to develop in us that spirit of compunction: be very earnest in our acts of contri­tion (in our examinations of conscience and confessions); take in a spirit of expiation the crosses and hardships and humiliations we meet in our daily life and ministry; humble ourselves when we hear the confessions of sinners ("I would do much worse if God did not preserve me!" ); finally, say in a spirit of sincerity the many prayers of the missal and breviary which express these feelings. . .

* Let us say our next Mass with special attention to all the prayers that breathe humble compunction, from the Confiteor at the foot of the altar to the "Placeat tibi...sacrificium quod indignus obtuli"; similarly for the Psalms and prayers of tomorrow's breviary; - and let us make the experiment of adding the motive of atonement to as many of our actions as possible in the course of the day... If we persevere in this practice we shall not be long in discovering there a rich vein of solid spiritual gold: "Cor contritum et humiliatum non despicies...Auditui meo dabis gaudium et laetitiam."
__________________________
Adapted from Alter Christus, Meditations for Priests by F.X. L'Hoir, S.J. (1958)
Meditation 15.


###
Please pray for our priests and pray for vocations to the priesthood.

Pride - Another definition

Pride is inordinate self-­love, an exaltation of the conditional and relative self into an absolute.

It tries to gratify the thirst for the infinite by giving to one's own finitude a pretension to divinity.

In some, pride blinds the self to its weakness and becomes "hot" pride; in others, it recognizes its own weakness and overcomes it by a self-exaltation which becomes "cold" pride.

Pride kills docility and makes a man incapable of ever being helped by God. The limited knowledge of the puny mind pretends to be final and absolute.

In the face of other intellects it resorts to two tech­niques, either the technique of omniscience, by which it seeks to convince others how much it knows, or the technique of nescience, which tries to convince others how little they know.

When such pride is unconscious, it becomes almost incurable, for it identifies truth with its truth. Pride is an admission of weakness; it secretly fears all competition and dreads all rivals.

It is rarely cured when the person himself is vertical - i.e., healthy and prosperous - but it can be cured when the patient is horizontal - sick and disillusioned. That is why catastrophes are necessary in an era of pride to bring men back again to God and the salvation of their souls.
_____________________

I read this is a new book, (actually an older book from 1949) and I felt it was one of those passages worth sharing. The title and author of this book? Later...

Abp. Levada: Openly gay priests make it tough to represent Christ

Is this not an understatement or what? I am glad, though, that, as Prefect of the CDF, he discussed this in his homily (although ther are few direct quotes):
ROME (CNS) -- Cardinal-designate William J. Levada said a priest who publicly announces he is homosexual makes it difficult for people to see the priest as representing Christ, the bridegroom of his bride, the [C]hurch.

A public declaration of homosexuality places a priest "at odds with the spousal character of love as revealed by God and imaged in humanity," said the U.S. cardinal-designate, who is prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Cardinal-designate Levada made his remarks during a Feb. 26 homily as he presided over a Mass for the installation of the new rector of Rome's Pontifical North American College.

In his homily, Cardinal-designate Levada reflected on the challenges priests face today and on the Sunday Scripture readings, which described God's love for his people as the love of a husband for a wife and described Jesus as the bridegroom of the [C]hurch.
Before I forget it, once again, someone at Catholic News Service, apparently inept with regard to Church terms, uses lowercase "c" to describe the Church - much like a secular news reporter might do. I sent an email to Cindy Wooden to ask about this. I'm prepared for a lame excuse...I think, however, it is an indication of just how one views the Church and the failure to properly recognize the Church in news articles such as this reveals a great deal. (stepping off soapbox)....

Anyway, perhaps it's a sign of things to come in rading of such statements from Cardinal-designate Levada.

Full article here.

The Curt Jester's Latest: Dissidentyne

Introducing the latest and most refreshing and relativistic gum - Dissidentyne. Up to now every brand of gum the flavor...


Order some now for your favorite heretic, apostate, or schismatic...Supplies may be limited...(At least, we can hope and pray).

Time for more than "Fraternal Correction"?

Quebec priests challenge same-sex stand
MONTREAL -- In an unusual public dissent with their leaders, 19 Quebec Roman Catholic priests published yesterday an open letter taking issue with the church's opposition to both same-sex marriage and the ordination of active gays into the priesthood.

Does the church "have the last word on the mysteries of political, social, family and sexual life?" the 980-word letter asks. "In these matters, the official teaching of the Church has shown itself more than once to be wrong."
. . .
Disputing the Vatican's position that homosexual acts are "intrinsically immoral and contrary to the natural law," the letter notes that humans have endlessly strived throughout history to redefine what is natural to them.
All throughout history since the fall of man through Adam, man has been attempting, with Satan's encouragement, to "redfine" virtue and vice. The fact that these priests have openly opposed the Church's teaching demands swift and resolute punishment in an equally open manner so as to mitigate and repair the grave scandal these priests have given.

As always, we cannot forget to pray for the conversion of these priests and others who may have been adversely affected by their open defiance of Church teaching.

Article here.

Gospel for Monday, 8th Week in Ordinary Time

From: Mark 10:17-27

The Rich Young Man

[17] And as He (Jesus) was setting out on His journey, a man ran up and knelt before Him, and asked Him, "Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?" [18] And Jesus said to him, "Why do you call Me good? No one is good but God alone. [19] You know the commandments: `Do not kill, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and mother.'" [20] And he said to Him, "Teacher, all these I have observed from my youth." [21] And Jesus looking upon him loved him, and said to him, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you have, and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in Heaven; and come, follow Me." [22] At that saying his countenance fell, and he went away sorrowful; for he had great possessions.

Poverty and Renunciation

[23] And Jesus looked around and said to His disciples, "How hard it will be for those who have riches to enter the Kingdom of God!" [24] And the disciples were amazed at His words. But Jesus said to them again, "Children, how hard it is for those who trust in riches to enter the Kingdom of God!" [25] It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God." [26] And they were exceedingly astonished, and said to Him, "Then who can be saved?" [27] Jesus looked at them and said, "With men it is impossible, but not with God; for all things are possible with God."
___________________

Commentary:

17-18. As Matthew 19:16 makes clear, the young man approaches Jesus as an acknowledged teacher of the spiritual life, in the hope that He will guide him towards eternal life. It is not that Christ rejects the praise He is offered: He wants to show the depth of the young man's words: He is good, not because He is a good man but because He is God, who is Goodness Itself. So, the young man has spoken the truth, but he has not gone far enough. Hence the enigmatic nature of Jesus' reply and its profundity. The young man's approach is upright but too human; Jesus tries to get him to see things from an entirely supernatural point of view. If this man is to really attain eternal life he must see in Christ not just a good master but the divine Savior, the only Master, the only one who, because He is God, is Goodness Itself. Cf. note on Mt. 19:16-22.

19. Our Lord has not come to abolish the Law but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:17). The commandments are the very core of the Law and keeping them is necessary for attaining eternal life. Christ brings these commandments to fulfillment in a double sense. First, because He helps us discover their full implications for our lives. The light of Revelation makes it easy for us to grasp the correct meaning of the precepts of the Decalogue--something that human reason, on its own, can only achieve with difficulty. Second, His grace gives us strength to counter our evil inclinations, which stem from Original Sin. The commandments, therefore, still apply in the Christian life: they are like signposts indicating the way that leads to Heaven.

21-22. Our Lord knows that this young man has a generous heart. This is why He treats him so affectionately and invites him to greater intimacy with God. But He explains that this means renunciation--leaving his wealth behind so as to give his heart whole and entire to Jesus. God calls everyone to holiness, but holiness is reached by many different routes. It is up to every individual to take the necessary steps to discover which route God wants him to follow. The Lord sows the seed of vocation in everyone's soul, to show him the way to go to reach the goal of holiness, which is common to all.

In other words, if a person does not put obstacles in the way, if he responds generously to God, he feels a desire to be better, to give himself more generously. As fruit of this desire he seeks to know God's will; he prays to God to help him, and asks people to advise him. In responding to this sincere search, God uses a great variety of instruments. Later, when a person thinks he sees the way God wants him to follow, he may still not take the decision to go that way: he is afraid of the renunciation it involves: at this point he should pray and deny himself if the light--God's invitation--is to win out against human calculation. For, although God is calling, man is always free, and therefore, he can respond generously or be a coward, like the young man we are told about in this passage. Failure to respond generously to one's vocation always produces sadness.

21. "In its precise eloquence", John Paul II points out, commenting on this passage, "this deeply penetrating event expresses a great lesson in a few words: it touches upon substantial problems and basic questions that have in no way lost their relevance. Everywhere young people are asking important questions--questions on the meaning of life, on the right way to live, on the scale of values: `What must I do...?' `What must I do to share in everlasting life?'...To each of you I say therefore: heed the call of Christ when you hear him saying to you: `Follow Me!' Walk in My path! Stand by My side! Remain in My love! There is a choice to be made: a choice for Christ and His way of life, and His commandment of love.

"The message of love that Christ brought is always important, always relevant. It is not difficult to see how today's world, despite its beauty and grandeur, despite the conquests of science and technology, despite the refined and abundant material goods that it offers, is yearning for more truth, for more love, for more joy. And all of this is found in Christ and in His way of life.... Faced with problems and disappointments, many people will try to escape from their responsibility: escape in selfishness, escape in sexual pleasure, escape in drugs, escape in violence, escape in indifference and cynical attitudes. But today, I propose to you the option of love, which is the opposite of escape. If you really accept that love from Christ, it will lead you to God. Perhaps in the priesthood or religious life; perhaps in some special service to your brothers and sisters: especially to the needy, the poor, the lonely, the abandoned, those whose rights have been trampled upon, or those whose basic needs have not been provided for. Whatever you make of your life, let it be something that reflects the love of Christ" ("Homily on Boston Common").

22. "The sadness of the young man makes us reflect. We could be tempted to think that many possessions, many of the goods of this world, can bring happiness. We see instead in the case of the young man in the Gospel that his many possessions had become an obstacle to accepting the call of Jesus to follow Him. He was not ready to say "yes" to Jesus and "no" to self, to say "yes" to love and "no" to escape. Real love is demanding. I would fail in my mission if I did not clearly tell you so. For it was Jesus--Jesus Himself--who said: `You are My friends if you do what I command you' (John 15:14). Love demands effort and a personal commitment to the will of God. It means discipline and sacrifice, but it also means joy and human fulfillment.

"Dear young people: do not be afraid of honest effort and work; do not be afraid of the truth. With Christ's help, and through prayer, you can answer His call, resisting temptations and fads, and every form of mass manipulation. Open your hearts to the Christ of the Gospels--to His love and His truth and His joy. Do not go away sad!...

"Follow Christ! You who are single or who are preparing for marriage. Follow Christ! You who are young or old. Follow Christ! You who are sick or aging; who are suffering or in pain. You who feel the need for healing, the need for love, the need for a friend--follow Christ!

"To all of you I extend--in the name of Christ--the call, the invitation, the plea: `Come and follow Me'" (John Paul II, "Homily on Boston Common").

23-27. The reaction of the rich young man gives our Lord another opportunity to say something about the way to use material things. In themselves they are good: they are resources God has made available to people for their development in society. But excessive attachment to things is what makes them an occasion of sin. The sin lies in "trusting" in them, as if they solve all life's problems, and turning one's back on God. St. Paul calls covetousness idolatry (Colossians 3:5). Christ excludes from the Kingdom of God anyone who becomes so attached to riches that his life is centered around them. Or, more accurately, that person excludes himself.

Possessions can seduce both those who already have them and those who are bent on acquiring them. Therefore, there are--paradoxically--poor people who are really rich, and rich people who are really poor. Since absolutely everyone has an inclination to be attached to material things, the disciples see salvation as an impossible goal: "Then who can be saved?" No one, if we rely on human resources. But God's grace makes everything possible. Cf. note on Matthew 6:11.

Also, not putting our trust in riches means that everyone who does have wealth should use it to help the needy. This "demands great generosity, much sacrifice and unceasing effort on the part of the rich man. Let each one examine his conscience, a conscience that conveys a new message for our times. Is he prepared to support out of his own pocket works and undertakings organized in favor of the most destitute? Is he ready to pay higher taxes so that the public authorities can intensify their efforts in favor of development?" (Paul VI, "Populorum Progressio", 47).
__________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Sunday, February 26, 2006

Catholic couple clashes with church over gay rights

Charlie and Maria Girsch aren't your typical parents. In their 20s, he was a Roman Catholic priest; she was a teacher and a nun. They fell in love and chose to marry.

Now, love looms tall again to test the St. Paul couple's strong ties to Catholicism. The church has toughened its stand against Catholics in same-sex relationships. And one of the couple's six children is gay.
"We are caught between the child we love and the church we grew up in," Charlie Girsch says.

At the Cathedral of St. Paul, people wearing rainbow-colored sashes — considered a political statement in support ofpeople in gay relationships— are refused communion. And the diocesan leader, Archbishop Harry Flynn, now supports a proposed amendment to the Minnesota constitution that would ban not only gay marriage but also many advantages that union brings.

As a sash-wearing parent, Charlie Girsch has been denied communion himself. He and his wife rallied with others last summer to createCatholic Rainbow Parents, a group that has grown to 30 or more moms and dads of adult gays who oppose the church's stand.
Still fighting the Church, it appears. Perhaps, they would be better served to contact Dr. Joe Nicolosi at the National Association of Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). This would be the path to take rather than that of rebelling against the Church which cannot change it s teachings.

More here.

Hat Tip to Darla M for the link.

Gospel for the 8th Sunday in Ordinary Time

From: Mark 2:18-22

A Discussion on Fasting

[18] Now John's disciples and the Pharisees were fasting; and people came and said to Him (Jesus): "Why do John's disciples and the disciples of the Pharisees fast, but Your disciples do not fast?" [19] And Jesus said to them, "Can the wedding guests fast while the bridegroom is with them? As long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast. [20] The days will come, when the bridegroom is taken away from them, and then they will fast in that day. [21] No one sews a piece of unshrunk cloth on an old garment; if he does, the patch tears away from it, the new from the old, and a worse tear is made. [22] And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; if he does, the wine will burst the skins, and the wine is lost, and so are the skins; but new wine is for fresh skins."
_____________________

Commentary:

18-22. Using a particular case, Christ's reply tells about the connection between the Old and New Testaments. In the Old Testament the Bridegroom has not yet arrived; in the New Testament He is present, in the person of Christ. With Him began the Messianic Times, a new era distinct from the previous one. The Jewish fasts, therefore, together with their system of religious observances, must be seen as a way of preparing the people for the coming of the Messiah. Christ shows the difference between the spirit He has brought and that of the Judaism of His time. This new spirit will not be something extra, added on to the old; it will bring to life the perennial teachings contained in the older Revelation. The newness of the Gospel--just like new wine--cannot fit within the molds of the Old Law.

But this passage says more: to receive Christ's new teaching people must inwardly renew themselves and throw off the straight-jacket of old routines.

19-20. Jesus describes Himself as the Bridegroom (cf. also Luke 12:35; Matthew 25:1-13; John 3:29), thereby fulfilling what the Prophets had said about the relationship between God and His people (cf. Hosea 2:18-22; Isaiah 54:5ff). The Apostles are the guests at the wedding, invited to share in the wedding feast with the Bridegroom, in the joy of the Kingdom of Heaven (cf. Matthew 22:1-14).

In verse 20 Jesus announces that the Bridegroom will be taken away from them: this is the first reference He makes to His passion and death (cf. Mark 8:31; John 2:19; 3:14). The vision of joy and sorrow we see here epitomizes our human condition during our sojourn on earth.
_________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Saturday, February 25, 2006

Cardinal George's Resignation Is Sought by Advocacy Group

An advocacy group called for Cardinal Francis George to resign Saturday after reports that the top official of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago ignored for months a review board's advice to remove a priest accused of molesting three boys.
The "advocacy group" is not named...Any guesses on which group it is?

Link.

Patrick Madrid debates Bishop Thomas Gumbleton on gays in the priesthood

This is a two part streaming audio and post on Patrick site here.
How weird it is that I, a layman, had to debate a Catholic bishop on the issue of the problem of homosexuality in the priesthood. It's weird because I was defending the Catholic Church's perennial teaching about this issue and Bishop Gumbleton was taking the position that there being homosexuals in the priesthood is not a problem.

It was a brief debate, all of 20 minutes (including commercial breaks), but it was enough time to see the two massively different approaches to this issue that Bishop Gumbleton and I took.
I have not yet listened to these MP3's yet, but I can imagine that Gumbleton never stood a chance, taking a position contrary to the Church. We must continue to pray for him and for all those led astray by his heterdoxy.

Protests at 'Love Won Out' Conference

Organizers [of the "Love Won Out"] say the turnout of 1,700 was the largest of their 37 U.S. conferences. Organizers said people came from 28 states.

...no matter how kind the organizers said family members should be, their point was not lost. They all stressed that a gay lifestyle is a sin. The speeches breezed right over normally divisive topics without challenge because the opposition was largely outside in the cold. As conventioneers arrived in the morning, more than 350 protesters waited with handmade signs. . .

A few young women chanted at cars, "Two-Four-Six-Eight, how do you know your wife is straight?"

"It’s ridiculous the church thinks we need therapy," said Warren Lacey, 65, of St. Louis. He carried a sign, "God Made Me Gay." Lacey said he’s known since about age 5 that he was attracted to males. "It’s part of your nature. It’s not a decision to be made. It’s part of you."
. . .
Elena Pahl, 21, of St. Louis, said she was standing with the protesters Saturday because she doesn’t like the message the convention was sending. "They call (being gay) a disease," Pahl said. "I’m a pretty active Christian and I don’t appreciate that view."
No matter how one tries to dice and slice it, the fact remains that an attraction to homosexuality is objectively disordered and that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered." They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved. (CCC 2357)

Homosexual persons are called to live a life of chastity, just as every other person.

Article is here.

Another kind of "Catholic"? Hardly...

The full headline reads:
Another kind of Catholic: Breakaway groups reject Vatican teachings on issues such as priestly celibacy and divorce

The article is full full of examples and eupemisms of those professing a "faith" in something other than our Lord. Whatever it is, it is clearly not the faith as handed down to us from the time of Christ and the Apostles. Yet, confusion reigns as many continue to call thems "Catholic". But there is no such thing as a Catholic who rejects the teachings of Christ or His Church...If they can be called "Christian" is even open to debate for they have, it seems, come to adore themselves rather than the Creator. Their wills and desires supercede the will of the Almighty.
''Our motto is love without judgment, and that's piqued some curiosity,'' said [Terry] Villaire, a former Roman Catholic priest who's now a bishop in an independent Catholic movement...Villaire's small but growing 40-person congregation, made up mostly of former Roman Catholics, meets every Sunday at a Unity church on the Intracoastal Waterway in a shady Fort Lauderdale suburb.
"Most of us were born and raised as Catholics, and in good conscience I still see myself as Catholic," said Villaire, who conducted Mass in green and white clerical robes and a red silk miter.
Most may have been born Catholic, but it's obvious they were not raised as Catholics. This is just another example of a seemingly endless list of evidence of failed catechesis of the past decades.

One can only wonder why would they wish to call themselves "Catholic" when being Catholic is exactly that which they oppose? Is this not indicative of some sort of mental dysfunction?

The article from the Miami Herald is here.