Wednesday, April 25, 2007

More on the Ill-Advised Decision of Cardinal Glennon Children's Foundation

*** See Updated Links News and Video Links Below ***

Archbishop Burke is completely correct in his assessment of the situation of the Cardinal Glennon Children's Foundation (CGCF)to have Sheryl Crow appear at the fundraiser, the "Bob Costas Gala."

From a KTVI Fox Channel 2 report:
Cardinal Glennon is a Catholic hospital, but Burke believes Sheryl Crow's stance on abortion and embryonic stem cell research are in direct opposition to the teachings of the Catholic church. He calls her views morally evil.

Notice that Fox says that He calls her views morally evil? Abortion and ESCR are morally evil. The Church reminds us that abortion and embryonic stem cell research are both intrinsically evil. Those who can still make use of the natural light of moral reason know this as well. The Archbishop, who with so many others fought and prayed for the defeat of the deceptive and dangerous Amendment 2, has no other choice than to reject this effort by the CGCF to include a performer whose positions on life issues are so morally bankrupt and opposed to the natural moral law.
Allen Allred, the chairman of the planning committee for the gala since it started, and a practicing Catholic, says he's stunned.

"I'm saddened by what's taken place. I'm disappointed," Allred says. "None of this money benefits the Catholic church. This money benefits kids. This is not a think tank, and this is not a seminar on ideology. We don't look at the ideological issues du jour to decide if this is an appropriate person to help us help kids."
It's always easy for one to make a claim of being a "practicing Catholic." Allred's assertion that abortion and embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) are "issues du jour" are preposterous and demonstrate the mental vacuity of so many "practicing Catholics." Since the group is not a "think tank", are the members required to check their minds at the door? One can only wonder where he and others have been for the past year during the Amendment 2 debates and discussions. Perhaps some were too enamored with the Sheryl Crow ad supporting the Amendment to pay attention to Archbishop Burke or to reality?

In addition, Allred's claim that "This money benefits kids," rings hollow - Crow is a woman who advocates the murder of the most innocent. Even if she were to perform for free, it is unconscionable that a professed Catholic would align himself with a supporter of infanticide in order to gain money for those who were fortunate enough to escape the horrors of the abortuary.

People who promote and perpetuate scandalous behavior are a disgrace to all that is decent, upright, and virtuous. Cardinal Glennon hospital should disavow its association with Sheryl Crow until such time as she repents of her support of infanticide, and Allred and others should seek meaningful spiritual direction since they are oblivious of what it means to be Catholic.

The FOX 2 News Report is here and another video of Archbishop Burke is here.

Please remember Archbishop Burke in your prayers as he will surely be castigated and ridiculed for being a faithful shepherd - and pray also for those "practicing Catholics" who seem to have lost their senses and their faith. And poor, pathetic Sheryl Crow needs our prayers as well for her conversion - Remember, nothing is impossible for God!

*** More Links ***

From KSDK Channel 5 (with video links): Archbishop Protests Sheryl Crow's Charity Appearance

From KMOV Channel 4 (with video links): Archbishop says Bob Costas' fundraiser is "evil"

New Senior Adult Day Program in St. Charles

Helpful information:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT
Cardinal Ritter Senior Services
Phone: 314-962-7501
Fax: 314-962-7140
www.ccstl.org/crss

Cardinal Ritter Senior Services to open new Senior Adult Day Program in St. Charles

St. Charles MO - Cardinal Ritter Senior Services in cooperation with the parish of St. Robert Bellarmine will open a new Senior Adult Day Program starting June 4, 2007 in the recently closed St. Robert Bellarmine School in St. Charles.

The goals of this Adult Enrichment Program are to assist families that are caring for senior adults, who cannot be left alone during the day. The program will also help with functional levels, enhance self image, prevent early nursing home placement and provide respite for the caregiver.

For more information or to enroll your loved one call 314-962-7501

Cardinal Ritter Senior Services is an agency of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St. Louis and has been providing high quality senior adult services since 1965.
###




The Priest at Prayer, April 26

The Priest and the Eternal Truths
Holiness of the Priesthood

First Meditation


The Priest as the "Man of God"

I. How numerous the recommendations and precepts given to the priests of the Old Law for their sanctifi­cation!

"They are men set apart for their God, and must never bring reproach on his name; they burn incense to the Lord, offer their God his consecrated loaves, and shall they not be holy?" (Lev. 21:6)

"He that has any blemish shall not be allowed to offer his God the consecrated loaves, nor to come forward and do him service."-(Lev. 21:17,18)

What precautions God orders Moses to take lest the people should approach Mount Sinai, the throne of God's Majesty! How many purifications were imposed, interior and exterior, even to remain at the foot of the mountain!

If we stop to compare priesthood with priesthood, ministry with ministry, holiness with holiness: that of Sinai with that of our Altars; perhaps in our dread and amazement we shall cry out with Manue, Samson's father: Morte moriemur, quia vidimus Dominum­ - "This is certain death, we have seen the Lord." (Judges 13:22)

II. If the soul of any just man is God's throne, how much the more must I, a priest, be God's temple pure and undefiled!

The first place of worship in a parish is not the parish church but the parish priest; his heart and lips are the Ark where one must find the divine Law; his body is the Tabernacle where the Body and Blood of Christ is reserved each day; and his consecrated hands are the altar-stone on which is offered every morning the only Victim pleasing to God.

If so chaste and pure had to be the womb where the Son of God took our flesh and dwelt for nine months, how pure must be the body and soul where He takes up His abode every day? If so holy the breasts that suckled the Infant-God, what must be the lips purpled each day with the Blood of the Lamb of God?

His sepulchre shall be glorious, says Isaias, prophesy­ing of the stone sepulchre that enclosed the dead Body of Christ for two days. What then shall be demanded of my body wherein the eternally glorified Christ so fre­quently makes His dwelling? Will cleanliness be required only of lifeless matter? or will there be shifts and changes in God's love for holiness?

Will it be a matter of indifference to God whether He dwell in a heart that is holy or in a heart that is impure, simply because I am a priest?

III. The Crusades were the great enterprise of the Middle Ages.

For this. purpose God raised up or awakened great souls: Peter the Hermit, Godfrey, the flower of the nobility, men of valor. From every nation they flocked, as to a banquet, and left their bones on the hills and deserts of Asia. What treasures were spent! What hero­ism! What generous blood! And for the sole purpose of rescuing the empty Tomb of Christ, and of making it a place of prayer for all the Christian nations.

The enterprise most worthy, most noble and glorious for me, a priest, will be a life-time struggle against all seductions both from within and from without; routing in my soul all the hosts of the evil spirit, preserving pure this heart of mine, which is not an empty tomb, but a shrine elected by my Lord Jesus Christ for Himself.

Resolution
I shall frequently repeat the Domine, non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum; and perhaps the continual sense of my unworthiness will be a fire purifying me from my faults and imperfections.
_________________________
Adapted from The Priest at Prayer
by Fr. Eugenio Escribano, C.M. (© 1954)
Translated by B.T. Buckley, C.M.


###
Please pray for our priests and pray for vocations to the priesthood!

Archbishop Burke Resigns from Board of Cardinal Glennon Children's Foundation


From the Post Dispatch:
Citing singer Sheryl Crow's stance on abortion, Archbishop Raymond Burke said today he has resigned from the board of the Cardinal Glennon Children's Foundation, the fundraising arm of Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center, in protest over Crow's participation in an upcoming fundraiser.
* * *
Burke said Crow is "well-known as an abortion activist."
Crow also appeared on ads last fall supporting passage of Missouri's Cloning & Killing Amendment, otherwise known as Amendment 2...

More recently Crow has received unwelcome notoriety by advocating that people only use one sqaure of toilet paper when they use the facilities, apparently in order to save the planet.

A Press Release is here with video and a Q&A section for further listening and reading at the Archdiocesan website.

Q. Why is the Archbishop concerned about Sheryl Crow performing?
A. Sheryl Crow is an outspoken abortion advocate and campaigned for the passage of Amendment 2, which created the right to clone human beings and destroy human beings, as embryos, for research. She continues to speak on behalf of legislation in support of abortion and destructive embryonic stem cell research.

Her performance for the SSM Cardinal Glennon Medical Center is contrary to the identity and mission of the Catholic institution. In addition, the Church sees the action as giving scandal, which is defined as “an attitude or behavior which leads another to evil”. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 2284)

Scandal becomes a grave offense if the action leads another to commit a grave offense. Her performance will give the appearance that the Church is not consistent in its belief and practice for the protection of innocent human life.

According to the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, it is the responsibility of the Archbishop “to ensure the moral and religious identity of the health care ministry in whatever setting it is carried out in the (arch)diocese.” (General Introduction)

Q. Why is the Archbishop withdrawing from the Board of Governors of the Cardinal Glennon Children’s Foundation?

The Archbishop believes he cannot be publicly associated with the event taking place. He has made his objections known to the Board, and he feels by remaining as a member of the board, he would be lending his support to the event.


Post Dispatch Link

TwinCities.com: Conservative Bishop to Succeed Flynn

Revealing headline, eh? But is it not the duty of the media to warn the people of "dangers" ahead? Dangers, as in being graced by a Bishop who teaches, sanctifies, and governs as is his duty and in communion with the Holy Father?

Roman Catholic Bishop John Nienstedt of New Ulm, Minn., a theological conservative who has taken on Hollywood, stem-cell research and people who make too much noise in church, was named Tuesday to succeed Archbishop Harry Flynn.
* * *
While Flynn and others lauded him as an able administrator and liturgist, some of his actions have rankled his own priests and parishioners in the diocese he has led since August 2001.
Rankled his own priests? Not if they were obedient and faithful...
As bishop in New Ulm, Nienstedt prohibited cohabitating couples from being married in Catholic churches. He barred female pastoral administrators from leading prayers at a semiannual leadership event. He once disciplined a priest for holding joint ecumenical services with a Lutheran congregation after the Catholic church had been destroyed by a tornado.

Kenneth Irrgang, a retired priest who clashed with Nienstedt when he was bishop in New Ulm, predicted that Nienstedt will meet resistance among the 654 active priests in the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.

"I expect disaster there. I don't think those priests are going to accept him," said Irrgang, who now lives in St. Cloud. "He's a micromanager. He has to control everything. He hews the line from the Vatican without any question whatsoever. He's not a very good people person."

"He hews the line from the Vatican without any question whatsoever." As our Lord made abundantly clear, "He who hears you, hears Me, and he who rejects you rejects Me." Some make it sound as if obedience to lawful ecclesiastical authority is so medieval. And others are, no doubt, setting the stage for confrontation. Which reminds me: I wonder if that obedient priest, Fr Robert Altier, obedient even in the face of difficulties with Abp. Flynn, will be released from his forced exile and allowed to resume his duties and fulfill his calling to proclaim the truth? Perhaps this is an answer to so many prayers...

More Pagan "Rosary" Stuff

Here is one called A Pagan's Rosary and another Sacred Grove which has such "rosaries" or "bead prayers" as the: Peace on Earth Rosary. Wile there is notihng inherently wrong with this - it's actually quite a good thing to pray the Rosary asking for peace on earth - this ain't your typical "rosary"...

On the first bead say the The Earth Mother Blessing

Blessed Be Thy beauty and abundance, Mother Earth~
O Green and verdant Goddess, Who brings all things to birth ~
Blessed Be Thy meadows where fragrant herbs are growing~
Thy woodlands and Thy groves where sylvan streams are flowing~
Blessed Be Thy valleys, Thy mountains and Thy trees~
Thy azure atmosphere mirrored in Thy sparkling seas~
Hold us in Thy healing hands and touch both heart and mind
Bestowing peace and wisdom we look within to find.

Enjoy...

Serving Mammon rather than God

Tim Townsend of the Post-Dispatch asks "Did SLU sell its Jesuit soul for a sports arena?"

St. Louis University, a Jesuit school proud of its Catholic heritage, celebrated a legal victory last week that affirmed it is not controlled by the Catholic church or by its Catholic beliefs.

Catholic beliefs?

The Missouri Supreme Court agreed with the school in handing down a decision that the city of St. Louis did not violate state and federal constitutions by granting the university $8 million in tax increment financing for its new arena.

Opponents of the $80 million arena sued the school in 2004, halting construction.
* * *
In a 6-1 decision, the court said SLU "is not controlled by a religious creed."
How long has it been since SLU had any "religious creed"?

Know who filed the suit against SLU?

As the suit, filed by the Masonic Temple Association, made its way to the Missouri Supreme Court, SLU argued that it was not controlled by the Catholic church, or even by the ideals of the Society of Jesus (or Jesuits), but by its mostly lay board of trustees.

It seems the Masons were actually doing Catholics a favor, but alas, they misjudged their "Jesuit" adversaries.

Maybe Catholics parents who send their children to school there should be suing SLU for fraud - better, Catholics might think long and hard about sending any of their children there, if they want to receive a Catholic education.

Perhaps, though, the argument is over semantics, such as the meaning of the word "control"...Reading the article, this word seems to jump off the page...

He said all 28 Jesuit colleges and universities in the U.S. are governed with a board like SLU's. Most Jesuit universities began including lay people on their boards in the wake of the Second Vatican Council reforms of the 1960s. SLU introduced laity to its board in 1967 and says it was the first Catholic university to do so.
Surely, this was due to the rebellion from the magisterium in favor of "academic freedom" as documented in the Land O'Lakes Statement and not Vatican Council II (except insofar as one might engage in mental gymnastics and wordsmithing such as "how Catholic higher education could participate in the evangelization of the world that was called for by the Second Vatican Council").

Even though I despise the communist inspired ACLU, it does make a very lucid and revealing point about the matter:
In a friend-of-the-court brief filed on behalf of the Masonic Temple Association, the American Civil Liberties Union said it was "surprising the University would sell its heritage for $8 million."

Hasn't SLU, like many others, been selling off bits and pieces of its Catholic heritage for decades?

Nevertheless, SLU tells us why in its brief:
In the end, SLU was philosophical about the ways the traditional mission of a Catholic university has changed. "Many of the institutions identified as Catholic in the nineteenth century, including St. Louis University, have undergone changes over time," the school said in its brief. "They have adapted themselves, their corporate structures and their missions to serve a largely secular world."

They have "adapted" themselves, and their missions...to serve the "secular world" - rather than God....But then, how many "Jesuit" institutions of higher learning have done the same? How many other so-called Catholic colleges and universities march in lockstep? Fortunately, we are seeing a welcome rebirth of colleges and universities which are, by choice, Catholic. May these be blessed by God for their fidelity while the others are bowing before the world.

St Ignatius, pray for us and for your lost and confused brothers.

VIDEO - Homosexual Propaganda Fed to Elementary School Children

From LifeSiteNews:
NEW YORK, April 24, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In a press release this morning, Stephen Bennett, a man who once lived the "gay" lifestyle and has since founded a ministry to assist people to leave the destructive lifestyle, alerted the media to a video clip demonstrating what he calls first-hand homosexual activist "brainwashing" of elementary school children. The video available on the Internet on Youtube.com follows a Massachusetts school's fourth annual gay and lesbian pride day activities.

The video contains actual classroom footage showing teachers imposing pro-homosexual propaganda on children as young as six. Beyond that the video captures a pre-gay pride day staff meeting where one teacher, an African American, asks if teachers are to tell children whose parents oppose homosexuality that they should nonetheless accept it as a good, to which an affirmative answer is given.
* * *
Stephen Bennett told LifeSiteNews.com in an interview that he was "horrified" and "had tears in my eyes" after seeing the video. "It's so heartbreaking to see little kids brainwashed," he said.

Stressing that the video must been seen by all concerned parents, Bennett said, "this is what is happening to America's children -- without many parents even knowing a thing. This is a crime against our children. Let the children be children!"
Of course it is criminal but it's apparently legal to abuse children's minds and innocence so that they can become homosexual activists later in life or, at least, demonstrate complacency when it comes to unnatural and immoral sexual activities.

The Youtube video clips are here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mil2ohzJ6gs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spz5yN5I2wU&mode=related&...

Click here for the LifeSiteNews article.
===========================================
IMPORTANT 4/27/07

**** YouTube Pulls Videos ****
Details and Video access here

Gospel for April 25, Feast: St. Mark, Evangelist

From: Mark 16:15-20

Jesus Appears to the Eleven. The Apostle's Mission

[15] And He (Jesus) said to them (the Eleven), "Go into all the world and preach the Gospel to the whole creation. [16] He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned. [17] And these signs will accompany those who believe; in My name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; [18] they will pick up serpents, and if they drink any deadly thing, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover."

The Ascension

[19] So then the Lord Jesus, after He had spoken to them, was taken up into Heaven, and sat down at the right hand of God.

The Apostles Go Forth and Preach

[20] And they went forth and preached everywhere, while the Lord worked with them and confirmed the message by the signs that attended it. Amen.
________________________
Commentary:

15. This verse contains what is called the "universal apostolic mandate" (paralleled by Matthew 28:19-20 and Luke 24:46-48). This is an imperative command from Christ to His Apostles to preach the Gospel to the whole world. This same apostolic mission applies, especially to the Apostles' successors, the bishops in communion with Peter's successor, the Pope.

But this mission extends further: the whole "Church was founded to spread the Kingdom of Christ over all the earth for the glory of God the Father, to make all men partakers in redemption and salvation.... Every activity of the Mystical Body with this in view goes by the name of `apostolate'; the Church exercises it through all its members, though in various ways. In fact, the Christian vocation is, of its nature, a vocation to the apostolate as well. In the organism of a living body no member plays a purely passive part, sharing in the life of the body it shares at the same time in its activity. The same is true for the body of Christ, the Church: the whole body achieves full growth in dependence on the full functioning of each part' (Ephesians 4:16). Between the members of this body there exists, further, such a unity and solidarity (cf. Ephesians 4:16) that a member who does not work at the growth of the body to the extent of his possibilities must be considered useless both to the Church and to himself.

"In the Church there is diversity of ministry but unity of mission. To the apostles and their successors Christ has entrusted the office of teaching, sanctifying and governing in His name and by His power. But the laity are made to share in the priestly, prophetical and kingly office of Christ; they have therefore, in the Church and in the world, their own assignment in the mission of the whole people of God" (Vatican II, "Apostolicam Actuositatem", 2).

It is true that God acts directly on each person's soul through grace, but it must also be said that it is Christ's will (expressed here and elsewhere) that men should be an instrument or vehicle of salvation for others.

Vatican II also teaches this: "On all Christians, accordingly, rests the noble obligation of working to bring all men throughout the whole world to hear and accept the divine message of salvation" ("ibid.", 3).

16. This verse teaches that, as a consequence of the proclamation of the Good News, faith and Baptism are indispensable pre-requisites for attaining salvation. Conversion to the faith of Jesus Christ should lead directly to Baptism, which confers on us "the first sanctifying grace, by which Original Sin is forgiven, and which also forgives any actual sins there may be; it remits all punishment due for sins; it impresses on the soul the mark of the Christian; it makes us children of God, members of the Church and heirs to Heaven, and enables us to receive the other Sacraments" ("St. Pius X Catechism", 553).

Baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation, as we can see from these words of the Lord. But physical impossibility for receiving the rite of Baptism can be replaced either by martyrdom (called, therefore, "baptism of blood") or by a perfect act of love of God and of contrition, together with an at least implicit desire to be baptized: this is called "baptism of desire" (cf. "ibid.", 567-568).

Regarding infant Baptism, St. Augustine taught that "the custom of our Mother the Church of infant Baptism is in no way to be rejected or considered unnecessary; on the contrary, it is to be believed on the ground that it is a tradition from the Apostles" ("De Gen., Ad Litt.", 10, 23, 39). The new "Code of Canon Law" also stresses the need to baptize infants: "Parents are obliged to see that their infants are baptized within the first few weeks. As soon as possible after the birth, indeed even before it, they are to approach the parish priest to ask for the Sacrament for their child, and to be themselves duly prepared for it" (Canon 867).

Another consequence of the proclamation of the Gospel, closely linked with the previous one, is that "the Church is necessary", as Vatican II declares: "Christ is the one mediator and way of salvation; He is present to us in His body which is the Church. He Himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse to enter it, or to remain in it" ("Lumen Gentium", 14; cf. "Presbyterorum Ordinis", 4; "Ad Gentes", 1-3; "Dignitatis Humanae", 11).

17-18. In the early days of the Church, public miracles of this kind happened frequently. There are numerous historical records of these events in the New Testament (cf., e.g., Acts 3:1-11; 28:3-6) and in other ancient Christian writings. It was very fitting that this should be so, for it gave visible proof of the truth of Christianity. Miracles of this type still occur, but much more seldom; they are very exceptional. This, too, is fitting because, on the one hand, the truth of Christianity has been attested to enough; and, on the other, it leaves room for us to merit through faith. St. Jerome comments: "Miracles were necessary at the beginning to confirm the people in the faith. But, once the faith of the Church is confirmed, miracles are not necessary" ("Comm. In Marcum, in loc."). However, God still works miracles through saints in every generation, including our own.

19. The Lord's ascension into Heaven and His sitting at the right hand of the Father is the sixth article of faith confessed in the Creed. Jesus Christ went up into Heaven body and soul, to take possession of the Kingdom He won through His death, to prepare for us a place in Heaven (cf. Revelation 3:21) and to send the Holy Spirit to His Church (cf. "St. Pius X Cathechism", 123).

To say that He "sat at the right hand of God" means that Jesus Christ, including His humanity, has taken eternal possession of Heaven and that, being the equal of His Father in that He is God, He occupies the place of highest honor beside Him in His human capacity (cf. "St. Pius V Catechism", I, 7, 2-3). Already in the Old Testament the Messiah is spoken of as seated at the right hand of the Almighty, thereby showing the supreme dignity of Yahweh's Annointed (cf. Psalm 110:1). The New Testament records this truth here and also in many other passages (cf. Ephesians 1:20-22; Hebrews 1:13).

As the "St. Pius V Catechism" adds, Jesus went up to Heaven by His own power and not by any other. Nor was it only as God that He ascended, but also as man.

20. Inspired by the Holy Spirit, the evangelist attests that the words of Christ have already begun to be fulfilled by the time of writing. The Apostles, in other words, were faithfully carrying out the mission of our Lord entrusted to them. They begin to preach the Good News of salvation throughout the known world. Their preaching was accompanied by the signs and wonders the Lord had promised, which lent authority to their witness and their teaching. Yet, we know that their apostolic work was always hard, involving much effort, danger, misunderstanding, persecution and even martyrdom--like our Lord's own life.

Thanks to God and also to the Apostles, the strength and joy of our Lord Jesus Christ has reached as far as us. But every Christian generation, every man and woman, has to receive the preaching of the Gospel and, in turn, pass it on. The grace of God will always be available to us: "Non est abbreviata manus Domini" (Isaiah 59:1), the power of the Lord has not diminished.
__________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

The Priest at Prayer, April 25

The Priest and the Eternal Truths
Esteem for the Priestly Vocation

Third Meditation


Reverence for my Priesthood

I. The world, Christ's enemy, has at all times devised ways and means of destroying faith in Christ, of spurning His precepts and ruining His Church. It has tried to do away with Christ and His work by persecu­tion, heresy, immoral propaganda, scorn, etc.; but so far it has invented hothing more simple and effective than the dishonoring of the priest. Very simple indeed, and no need for any great display of learning or power: just the calumnies and facile irony of a facile literature; but so effective, that what subtle heresiarchs or implacable tyrants failed to achieve, namely, the uprooting of the Faith among the people, was within a very short time and over vast territories obtained by the simple expedient of burying the priest in the mire of contempt.

So needful to my divine vocation is appreciation and esteem, in order to give the work of God a firm footing!

II. Great indeed would be my guilt if this contempt, so destructive for the Faith, were to begin from my own lack of self-esteem.

The loss of any priest has its roots perhaps in the priest's loss of esteem for his own state. He casts a covetous eye upon other walks of life, which appear to him worthier of honor, nobler, and happier; he begins to feel discontented with his lot; he gradually comes to think of his priesthood as a crushing burden. . . .

In such a frame of mind how can a priest fail to experience a loathing for his many ministerial duties? How will he contrive to conduct himself with the dignity and composure required of him?

If you do not respect yourself, who will respect you? What reverence will you command if in your own esteem you rank so low?

It is possible that if a patient and thorough investiga­tion were made in any country, town, or parish where the clergy are treated with disdain or positively ill­treated, we should discover that it all originated from the lack of appreciation and even contempt in which certain priests held their own priestly dignity. And once again would be literally fulfilled the words: Perditio tua ex te! "It is thy own undoing." (Osee 13:9)

III. And how must I esteem myself?

I. Higher than a king. Over the estates of my realm the sun never sets, never a slanting ray touches them. The limits of my kingdom are the height of heaven and eternity, the depths of the gates of hell. A king can lose his crown, not I my priestly character. A king will grant to his loyal subjects estates, titles, and distinctions; I can give entry into the Kingdom of Heaven.

How must I esteem myself?

2. Mightier than an angel; who may inspire, direct, reproach the soul God confided to his keeping, but his action is only on the surface; while I, in forgiving sin, heal the soul's deepest wounds; and in the other Sacra­ments I infuse the grace of God and refashion the soul to God's image and likeness.

How should I esteem myself?

3. Like unto God; for like Him I impart grace; like Him I pardon. Grace has been given through Jesus Christ. Who can forgive sin but only God?

I thank Thee, O Lord, for having given such dignity and such power to men.

Resolutions

1. I shall always see that my conduct bears the priestly stamp; I shall be a priest in private and in public, in the street, and in the church; always and everywhere. Shall I be like the actor who sometimes plays the role of a king, but only on the stage? Shall I be a priest only at the altar? No, I shall preserve the dignity befitting my state always, wherever I may be.

2. I shall hold all priests in affectionate and respect­ful regard; and if I think their lives sometimes fall short of the mark, I shall, at least, esteem them all for the dignity of their calling.

3. I shall never withhold from them those tokens of reverence that so many good lay people never refuse to the priest.
_________________________
Adapted from The Priest at Prayer
by Fr. Eugenio Escribano, C.M. (© 1954)
Translated by B.T. Buckley, C.M.


###
Please pray for our priests and pray for vocations to the priesthood!

June 3-Fr. Eugene Morris on “Where the Pope is, there is the Church”


Credo of the Catholic Laity
Is Proud to Present

Father Eugene Morris

Speaking on the Topic

“Where the Pope is, there is the Church”

Credo is proud to welcome to our lectern Father Eugene Morris, S.T.L, S.T.D.

A priest of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, Father Morris has served at several parishes in St. Louis and was a full time teacher at St. Mary’s High School. In 1999 Father Morris was invited to pursue further studies at the Pontifical Athenaeum of St. Anslem in Rome. He completed a licentiate in Sacramental Theology in 2001 and returned to St. Louis to begin work at Kenrick Glennon Seminary. He spent two years as the associate director of Cardinal Glennon College and five years as director of worship at Kenrick-Glennon while teaching sacramental/liturgical theology at Kenrick Glennon.

Currently he is the Episcopal Vicar for and Director of the Office of the Permanent Diaconate of the Archdiocese, Director of the St. Maximilian Kolbe House of Discernment and assistant professor of theology at Kenrick Glennon Seminary.

Join us on Sunday, June 3rd at 6:00 p.m. for a delicious dinner at the Crown Plaza Hotel, 7750 Carondelet Blvd. in Clayton.

Meals include Tossed Garden Salad, Vegetables, Dinner Roll & Butter, Beverage and Dessert. Cost $is 20.00 per person. Free inside parking at the 7777 Bonhomme Garage. Use the Orange Level Bridge to the hotel.

Send your check, payable to Credo of the Catholic Laity to
Howard Brandt
4386 Honeydew Lane
St. Louis Mo. 63128

Entree choices are Roast Beef Bordelaise or Grilled Salmon with Dill Sauce.
Please indicate your entree choice with your payment.

For more information e-mail Howard at hcbrandt@att.net or call him at 314-894-6003.

Great pictures of the new Sacred Heart Shrine at the Cathedral Basilica

Mark Abeln has posted some great pics on the construction of the Sacred Heart Shrine being installed in the west transept of the Cathedral Basilica at the direction of Archbishop Burke with the design by architect Duncan Stroik of Notre Dame University.

Visit his site, he's done a great job with some great pictures of different church in the Archdiocese.

The "Christian Goddess" Rosary


Every Wednesday, the sanctuary of Ebenezer is open from 7:00 - 8:00 PM. Goddess Rosary Beads will be available for use during that time. Prayers and suggested meditations will be on hand as well as incense, candles and bells. Community spoken Goddess Rosary will be conducted at twenty minute intervals: 7:10, 7:30 and 7:50 PM. You may come and go as you wish, and use the prayer stations at any time. In an attempt to use Biblical, century-old images and developing connections with the Holy Other, the Goddess rosary is grounded in traditions of the Christian Church and the proclamation of the gospel which is a vision of release from bondage for a new creation. Midweek is a good time for you to re-center your hectic paced week and allow the sacred to surround and embrace you!

Come share this spiritual and awe-filled experience.
More apostates of Christianity? Here's a typical comment:
WOW - coming from RC tradition I thought I'd never return to the Rosary. But here it is and here SHE IS. Blessed be, Mairly

Honey, you haven't returned to the Rosary so don't kid yourself!

Here's a prayer from the website to replace the Hail Mary:

Hail Goddess full of grace.
Blessed are you
and blessed are all the fruits
of your womb.
For you are the MOTHER of us all.
Hear us now [hear us ROAR - my addition]
and in all our needs.
O blessed be, O blessed be. Amen
(adapted from Carol Christ)

Europe's Atheists Seize Pulpit

Our good friend J_Joe was kind enough to send this WSJ article (subscription required) to us...It's really quite depressing in that the continent of Europe, by rejecting and denying God, will be utterly crushed under the weight of its own iniquity. We are all too familiar with the future of Godless societies and nations.

CAEN, France -- With 40 minutes to go before show time, the 500-seat Alexis de Tocqueville auditorium was already packed. A fan set up a video camera in the front row. A sound engineer checked the microphones.

The star: Michel Onfray, celebrity philosopher and France's high priest of militant atheism. Dressed entirely in black, he strode onto the stage and looked out at the reverential audience for his weekly two-hour lecture series, "Hedonist Philosophy," which is broadcast on a state radio station. "I could found a religion," he said.

Mr. Onfray, 48 years old and author of 32 books, stands in the vanguard of a curious and increasingly potent phenomenon in Europe: zealous disbelief in God.
And this "disbelief" has spread throughout Europe...The Pope has urgently requested that the European Union ackowledge its Christian heritage in its constitution, but even that is too much for the European leaders.

Karen Armstrong, a former Catholic nun and prominent British author on religion, calls the trend [combative and confrontational atheism] "missionary secularism." She says it mimics the ardor of Christianity, Islam and Marxism, all of which have at their core an urge to convert nonbelievers to their worldview.
Interesting that Karen lumps the "ardor" of Christianity with that of Islam and Marxism and now, atheism...and a conversion of one's "worldview".

And Onfray claims that atheism is facing its "final battle" against "theological hocus-pocus." He's trying to rally others to the urgency of his message. And there is plenty of support.

In Germany, a wealthy furniture manufacturer is funding a "think tank of Enlightenment," a group of scientists and others committed to debunking religion. It is named after Giordano Bruno, a 16th-century philosopher and cosmologist who was burnt at the stake as a heretic.

In Italy, one fervent nonbeliever has gone to the European Court of Human Rights with a claim that the Roman Catholic Church is guilty of fraud: Jesus, he says, never existed.
The adage that those who fail to understand history are doomed to repeat it comes to mind here. Frauds and mental defectives accusing the Church of fraud and they seek pseudo-juridical approval of their claims. How pathetic! When we will we hear the claim that Mohammed never existed and that Islam is fraudulent? And what about Marx, Lenin and others?

...Terry Sanderson, president of Britain's National Secular Society, an organization that was founded in the 19th century ... has now gained a new vibrancy. Membership has doubled in the past four years, to around 7,000, says Mr. Sanderson. For converts from Christianity, the society provides a certificate of "de-baptism." "Make it official!" urges the society's Web site, www.secularism.org.uk.

Now a piece of paper removes the "indelible mark" of Baptism...and these people claim to possess faculties of intelligence and reason.

Mr. Onfray, the French philosopher, says he believed in God as a child in the same way as he "believed in Santa Claus." His impoverished parents, a farm laborer and a cleaning lady, put him in a church-run home for orphans when he was 10. He developed a loathing of Christianity and now embraces what he calls "ethical hedonism." He's not married but has had the same female companion for 30 years. He says they have a "hedonist contract," which does not require monogamy. But, he says, hedonism is not "about cigars, vintage Bordeaux and expensive cars."

"To enjoy and make others enjoy without doing ill to yourself or to others, this is the foundation of all morality," he says, citing an 18th-century French writer, Nicolas Chamfort.

After nearly 20 years teaching philosophy at a Catholic high school, Mr. Onfray in 2002 set up an experimental college in the Normandy town of Caen, near the beaches of the 1944 D-Day landing. Called the Université Populaire de Caen, it has no exams, no degrees and consists of public lectures by Mr. Onfray and a few friends.
This man was allowed to teach his corrupt and poisonous brand of philosophy (and presumably his "ethical hedonsism) in a Catholic high school for twenty years? Is it no wonder that so many so-called Catholic educated children have literally been robbed of their faith? Does a true follower of Christ, who is also charged with the continuing education of Catholic children allow such heretics or apostates to teach in a Catholic school? Of course not. Who then permits it? One who is in union with Satan.

May God protect us all from this plague!

Bishop Braxton: No Preparation, No Confirmation

Woman, 20, is denied access to confirmation in Paderborn

Belleville Bishop Edward K. Braxton set off a flurry of e-mail messages among priests and diocesan insiders when he told a 20-year-old Catholic woman she had not studied enough to allow him to confer the sacrament of confirmation.

The ensuing controversy regarding the woman's unsuccessful attempt on April 10 to be confirmed at St. Michael's Church in Paderborn raised questions about Braxton's ministerial style among some Catholics, criticism that was offset by a statement from the diocesan chancellor's office citing community praise for the bishop's interaction with parishioners.

The controversy also resulted in a statement from Braxton to St. Michael's pastor, the Rev. James Voelker, and by inference to all diocesan pastors, that they need to ensure that those who seek confirmation, whether adults or young people, should first receive the necessary educational and spiritual preparation.
* * *
Nicole Schilling, of New Athens, where she attends church at a different parish, and nine of her relatives heard the bishop's decision moments before the ceremony and angrily left the event, said Voelker. Schilling, an employee of King's House in Belleville, a religious retreat run by the Oblates of Mary Immaculate, did not bring a required baptismal certificate and was not known to the pastor of her home parish, Braxton said in a statement.



If one is not properly disposed to receive the sacraments, then he or she must not receive them. Kudos to Bishop Braxton!

Dates for the Long-Awaited Motu Proprio

Since every other prognosticator has failed in pinpointing a date for the release of Pope Benedict XVI's Motu Proprio granting more freedom to celebrate the 'Tridentine' Mass using the Missal of 1962, I figured I'd joined them.

My picks are:

April 30 - Memorial, Current Liturgical Calendar
May 5 - Feast Day, Previous Calendar
July 14 - Quo Primum, the promulgation of the Tridentine Mass

Vatican Confirms Laicization of Belleville Priest

A Roman Catholic priest from the Diocese of Belleville has been "dismissed from the clerical state," or defrocked, by Pope Benedict XVI, Bishop Edward Braxton announced Monday.

The priest, the Rev. Robert Vonnahmen, is the first to be forced out of the priesthood by the Vatican in the diocese's 120-year history.
More here.

The Christian Altar- Part 1

Some interesting history follows in answer to these questions. Some of this I learned in a Sacramental and Liturgical Theology class. Much I did not know. Nevertheless, it provides the reader with a much deeper sense and appreciation of the Sacrifice of the Holy Mass, the central act of Catholic worship.
________________________
Why does the study of the externals of the Mass begin with an explanation of the meaning and scope of the liturgy? What does the word mean? To what did it refer in the Old Law? What divisions of public worship does the Christian liturgy embrace? What is the liturgy?

What features of the Old Testament liturgy are described in the Book of Exodus? How does the Church exercise her right to legislate in regard to the liturgy today?

What does the Latin word "altus" mean? How and where were the primitive altars of the Old Law erected? How is the custom continued today? In what two ways is the Christian altar commemorative? What was the first Christian altar? Where may we see two wooden-table altars that are believed to have come down from apostolic times?

Why did the altar retain the character of a wooden table during the early centuries? What type of table altar was used in the catacombs? What advantage did it offer?

Why does the Church discriminate in favor of stone altars? What and where were the first stone altars? How were they made? Of what form were the altars which were erected in churches and chapels?

How did the "confessio" style of altar originate? Describe it. Why were the relics of the martyrs left undisturbed? Why is St. Peter's in Rome the most famous basilica in the world?

Of what three parts does a fixed altar consist? How must a fixed altar be constructed? How is it consecrated? How may it lose the consecration? Where is the sepulchre placed? In a consecrated church, which altar should be fixed? What is a portable altar or altar stone? What is the symbolism of the crosses? By what ceremony does the priest honor the relics during the Mass? How do missionaries carry altar stones from place to place?
__________________________

Since the words "liturgy," "liturgical," and "liturgist" will appear' frequently in this study of the externals of the Mass, and for the further reason that these "externals" themselves are subject to liturgical rules and prescriptions, we shall give a brief explanation of the meaning and scope of the liturgy and its relation to Catholic worship.

DEFINITION: Liturgy comes from two Greek words meaning public and work - hence a public work or service. In Old Testament times it referred to the temple service which was conducted by the priests for and in the name of the people.

The Christian liturgy has developed from its beginning at the Last Supper into a complex system which embraces the Mass, the Divine Office, the sacraments, the sacramentals, the celebration of the liturgical year, and various blessings and processions. The liturgy then, is the very life of the Church - the public and official worship of the Mystical Body of Christ.

LITURGY OF THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS: In the Book of Exodus, which relates the "going out" of the Israelites from Egypt, we read how God made a covenant with His people, set up an altar, and instituted a priesthood and liturgy. He prescribed every detail of the worship which was to be offered to Him and gave Moses explicit instructions in regard to the taber­nacle, the Ark of the Covenant, the golden candlestick with its seven lamps, the altar of incense, the brazen laver, the oil of unction, and the holy vestments of Aaron. God then directed that Beseleel and Ooliab should make all these things as He had commanded (Exodus XXV to XXXI).

Today (*) the Church in the exercise of her divine mission makes definite demands and requirements in regard to the altar, the tabernacle, the sacred vessels and vestments, in fact, everything ordered by ecclesiastical law for the becoming celebration of the Mass. The origin and history of these accessories of divine worship, their liturgical and symbolical significance, together with an explanation of the rules which govern their use, will be the subjects of these lessons.

THE CHRISTIAN ALTAR: The word altar comes from the Latin "altus," which means "high." The primitive altars of the Old Law, which were of neces­sity very simple, consisted of heaps of earth or stones built upon mounds or on the tops of hills. The Patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob erected altars on heights and in localities that were hallowed by memorable events or sanctified by special manifestations of the presence of God. The Christians did not depart from this custom but raised their altars higher than the other parts of the church. The Christian altar is also commemorative in two essential characteristics: It is a table recalling the Last Supper at which our Lord instituted the Holy Euchar­ist; and it is a tomb recalling the days when the holy Sacrifice was celebrated in the catacombs over the tombs of the martyrs.

The first Christian altar was the long, narrow, wooden table in the Cenacle, the dining room where our Lord and His apostles partook of the Last Supper. It is piously believed that this table is still preserved in the Basilica of St. John Lateran in Rome. It is rough and discolored by age and only on rare occasions is it exposed for veneration. In the Church of St. Pudentiana, which was form­erly the house of Senator Pudens and his wife Priscilla, there are fragments of another wooden table on which, according to tradition, St. Peter celebrated Mass. This table is now encased in a marble altar and is reserved for the use of the Holy Father.

WOODEN-TABLE ALTARS: The altar retained the character of a table during the first five centuries. Because of the almost continuous persecution of the Christians, it was necessary to celebrate Mass in crypts, private homes, in the open air, and finally in the burial vaults of the catacombs. A fresco (wall paint­ing) in the catacomb of St. Callistus shows a tripod table at which a celebrant stands offering the holy Sacrifice. These small tables seem to have been in com­mon use in the narrow corridors of the catacombs. Since the danger of discovery was always imminent, they could easily be moved about from place to place. The use of movable wooden tables, while never the rule, was discontinued in favor of the stone altar during the fourth century.

STONE ALTARS: Whenever it was practical, stone altars were used for the celebration of the Mass. The Church discriminated in favor of stone because of its durability and monumental character, and for the further reason that in the holy Scriptures it is frequently referred to as a symbol of our Lord. St. Paul says ". . . and the rock was Christ" (I Cor. 10:4). St. Peter, recalling the prophecy of Isaias, writes of Him as ". . . the stone which the builders. rejected, the same is made the head of the corner" (I Peter 2:7). The first stone altars were the tombs of the martyrs who were interred in the catacombs. These altars were made by cutting an arch-like niche in the tufa or soft stone wall above the burial place.

The sepulchres rose about three feet from the floor and often con­tained the remains of two or more persons. A slab of marble called a "mensa" or table was placed horizontally across the top of the tomb. On feast days and other anniversaries, Mass was celebrated there in honor of those who had died for the faith. One of the first forms of stone altars erected in churches and chapels above ground, consisted of a square or oblong slab of stone supported by columns from one to six in number.

THE "CONFESSIO": About the sixth century there came into existence a new type of altar which grew out of the custom of depositing the bodies of the martyrs under the altars of the churches. Such an altar was called a "confessio" because it was the resting place of a confessor of the faith - a saint who had given his life confessing Christ. In appearance these altars resembled stone chests. The front panel was an ornamental grating through which the fully ex­tended body of the saint might be seen. The altar slab rested over the tomb.

Before this time there was a universal sentiment against disturbing the relics of the martyrs, and whenever the Church wished to honor one of its saints an altar was placed directly over the tomb or as near to it as possible. A basilica - a judgment hall, a court room, or literally a king's house - was then erected over the altar.

The most famous basilica of this type is St. Peter's in Rome. The body of St. Peter, which has never been disturbed, lies below the floor level and at some distance from the high altar. Since the fourth century this has been the most highly venerated martyr's shrine in the Western Church. "The cult of relics" also led to the custom of erecting more than one altar in the same church.

FIXED AND PORTABLE ALTARS: A fixed altar consists of three parts: (1) A table or top of stone; (2) The support, which may be either solid masonry or stone columns; and (3) The sepulchre for the entombment of the relics. The table or altar slab must be joined permanently to the base, with which it is con­secrated as a whole. The base, or at least the columns which support the table, must also be of stone. If the table or "mensa" is separated from the lower structure, the altar loses its consecration. Either the table or the base must contain a sepulchre for the relics of the saints. In a consecrated church, at least one, preferably the main altar, should be fixed.

A portable altar is a simple, small, consecrated stone slab. It can then be inserted in an altar table and removed without losing the consecration. A port­able altar is also called an altar stone. An altar stone usually measures about ten by twelve inches and need only be large enough to hold the sacred Host and a greater part of the bases of the chalice and ciborium. Five Greek crosses are cut in its upper surface, one at each corner and one in the center, reminders of the five sacred wounds of our Lord. Near the front edge is the sepulchre or cavity in which the relics of the saints are sealed. This is the spot which the priest kisses so frequently.

Army chaplains, missionaries, and priests who are obliged to travel long distances..., often carry with them a Mass kit, which contains an altar stone which is described as "about the size of two hands." The old missionaries' expression, "carrying one's sacristy in one's saddle-bags" orig­inated from the custom of strapping a Mass kit upon a horse's back.
_________________________
Adapted from Altar and Sanctuary, An Exposition of the Externals of the Mass
by Angela A. Glendenin (© 1939)
Published by the Catholic Action Committee
The Catholic Action Series of Discussion Club Textbooks

Gospel for Tuesday, 3rd Week of Easter

From: John 6:30-35

The Discourse on the Bread of Life (Continuation)

[30] So they said to Him (Jesus), "Then what sign do You do, that we may see, and believe You? What work do You perform? [31] Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, `He gave them bread from Heaven to eat.'" [32] Jesus then said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from Heaven; My Father gives you the true bread from Heaven. [33] For the bread of God is that which comes down from Heaven, and gives life to the world." [34] They said to Him, "Lord, give us this bread always."

[35] Jesus said them, "I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me shall
not hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst."
_______________________

Commentary:

28-34. This dialogue between Jesus and His hearers is reminiscent of the episode of the Samaritan woman (cf. John 4:11-15). On that occasion Jesus was speaking about water springing up to eternal life; here, He speaks of bread coming down from Heaven to give to the world. There, the woman was asking Jesus if He was greater than Jacob; here the people want to know if He can compare with Moses (cf. Exodus 16:13). "The Lord spoke of Himself in a way that made Him seem superior to Moses, for Moses never dared to say that he would give food which would never perish but would endure to eternal life. Jesus promises much more than Moses. Moses promised a kingdom, and a land flowing with milk and honey, good health and other temporal blessings [...], plenty for the belly, but food which perishes; whereas Christ promised food which never perishes but which endures forever" (St. Augustine, "In Ioann. Evang.", 25:12).

These people know that the manna--food which the Jews collected every day during the journey through the wilderness (cf. Exodus 16:13ff)-- symbolized messianic blessings; which was why they asked our Lord for a dramatic sign like the manna. But there was no way they could suspect that the manna was a figure of a great supernatural messianic gift which Christ was bringing to mankind--the Blessed Eucharist. In this dialogue and in the first part of the discourse (verses 35-47), the main thing Jesus is trying to do is bring them to make an act of faith in Him, so that He can then openly reveal to them the mystery of the Blessed Eucharist--that He is the bread "which comes down from Heaven, and gives life to the world" (verse 33). Also, St. Paul explains that the manna and the other marvels which happened in the wilderness were a clear prefiguring of Jesus Christ (cf. 1 Corinthians 10:3-4).

The disbelieving attitude of these Jews prevented them from accepting what Jesus revealed. To accept the mystery of the Eucharist, faith is required, as [Pope] Paul VI stressed: "In the first place we want to remind you that the Eucharist is a very great mystery; strictly speaking, to use the words of sacred liturgy, it is `the mystery of faith'. This is something well known to you but it is essential to the purpose of rejecting any poisonous rationalism. Many martyrs have witnessed to it with their blood. Distinguished Fathers and Doctors of the Church in unbroken succession have taught and professed it. [...] We must, therefore, approach this mystery, above all, with humble reverence, not following human arguments, which ought to be hushed, but in steadfast adherence to divine revelation" ("Mysterium Fidei").

35. Going to Jesus means believing in Him, for it is through faith that we approach our Lord. Jesus uses the metaphor of food and drink to show that He is the one who really meets all man's noblest aspirations: "How beautiful is our Catholic faith! It provides a solution for all our anxieties, calms our minds and fills our hearts with hope" ([St] J. Escriva, "The Way", 582).
_________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Monday, April 23, 2007

The Priest at Prayer, April 24

The Priest and the Eternal Truths
Esteem for the Priestly Vocation

Second Meditation


Graces of Ordination

I. Let us consider the scene in which St. John records one of the phases of the institution of the priesthood. Appearing to His Apostles, the Risen Christ says to them:
Peace be to you; as the Father hath sent me, I also send you.
And having said this, he breathed upon them, and said to them: Receive the Holy Ghost; whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained.­ (John 20:21-22)

The symbolical gesture of breathing upon the Apostles clearly recalls, and even imitates, the first creating of the human soul: He breathed upon his face the breath of life. But on this occasion the breath of life is the very Spirit of God infused into the Apostles and into all ordained priests, not so much for their own benefit as for them to transmit - as Adam transmitted physical life - to all those who were to become throughout the centuries children of God, children born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (John 1:13)

II. Consider some of the graces which that Life-giving breath of Christ has imparted to you.

In the first place, by way of remote preparation for the priesthood, it gave you perhaps from early childhood a marked bent towards the clerical state; it gently and powerfully steered your will and all your propensities towards the priesthood.

Eventually, when the significance of your acts dawned upon you, you found your soul engraved by the Finger of God with your vocation's noblest aim - you wanted to work for the salvation of others, and your heart kept on saying perhaps with St. Paul:
"For my own part, I will gladly spend and be spent on your souls' behalf, though you should love me too little for loving you too well." (2 Cor. 12:15)

Thus, without effort, almost without understanding the meaning of it, you found yourself enriched with the divine germ of those beautiful qualities and virtues that one day were to wreathe your glorious priestly diadem.

III. Recount the graces you have received through the Sacrament of Holy Orders.

Besides Sanctifying grace there is the Sacramental grace: divine enlightenment and assistance forthcoming to you whenever there was a sacred ministerial duty imposing a difficulty upon you, or an obstacle to surmount for the right fulfilment of your manifold obligations.

Turn over and over in your mind, in particular, the sovereign powers wherewith you have been invested:
the divine commission to preach the word of God;
your unfettered handling of the Body and Blood of Christ;
the announcing and communicating to sinners of the grace of reconciliation. . . .
Quid retribuam Domino pro omnibus quae retribuit mihi...?

RESOLUTION
Dear Lord, I who am so profuse in my compliments and tokens of gratitude towards my neighbour for the smallest kindness, have I ever spent so much as a quarter of an hour pondering over and thanking Thee for the gift of my priesthood?

From now on not a day will pass without my doing this, at least in my morning and evening prayers.
_________________________
Adapted from The Priest at Prayer
by Fr. Eugenio Escribano, C.M. (© 1954)
Translated by B.T. Buckley, C.M.


###
Please pray for our priests and pray for vocations to the priesthood!

Federal Judge: Government Hostility Towards Church Justified

Federal Judge: Catholic Church’s Position Against Homosexual Adoptions Justifies Government Hostility Towards Church
Mon, Apr 23, 2007

ANN ARBOR, MI – In its brief filed last week with the U. S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Thomas More Law Center urged the court to reverse a federal judge’s ruling that an anti-Catholic resolution of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors was constitutionally justified because the Church opposed adoptions by homosexual couples.

District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel, a President Carter appointee and one-time counsel for the National Organization for Women (NOW), ruled that the Board resolution condemning Catholic moral teaching on homosexuality and urging the Archbishop of San Francisco and Catholic Charities of San Francisco to defy Church directives does not violate the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Thomas More Law Center, a national Christian legal advocacy group based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, is appealing the ruling on behalf of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights and two Catholic residents of San Francisco.

Playing Games - "Spot the Liturgical Abuse"...



. . .or "Find the Bishop". . . or even "Clue, for Catholics". . .

In reality, unfortunately,
The photo above shows Rochester Bishop Matt Clark doing a Lenten dorm liturgy with the U of Rochester chaplain.

But, rather than figuring out the game being played here, Diogenes asks a deeper question, "What are bishops for?"

...the point is this: while today's bishop has the same indispensable place in the ecclesiology of doctrine that his twelfth (or first) century counterpart had -- that is, as a successor of the apostles -- his role as a real-world conduit of that doctrine has vanished. A world in which almost no one had access to the mind of the Church independently of his bishop has become a world in which almost everyone has that access. Sure, Bishops Burke and Finn and Bruskewitz will give us the right stuff, but so can thousands of other Catholics. We rejoice when we find a bishop who's both interested in Church teaching and holds the right opinions about it, but we no more depend on bishops as a class than we depend on cabbies or aerobics instructors for conveying the vera doctrina.
Click here for the post at Catholic World News.

Mental Prayer Meditations and more

For the past year I have devoted (or at least tried to devote) enough time to post the daily meditation from the book, Mental Prayer, Challenge to the Lay Apostle by The Queen's Work,(© 1958). I made the observation that recently that I was beginning to repeat previous meditations and decided to replace those with meditations of another sort.

For those who would like to review the Mental Prayer meditations from the past year, click here. Also, If I have missed any, and you wish me to post it, please don't hesitate to ask.

As far as the new meditations, I am beginning with excerpts from "The Priest at Prayer" by Fr. Eugenio Escribano, a Spanish Vincentian priest who died in 1951.

These meditations are taken from his work, Meditaciones Sacerdotales which was published in 1928 and translated and published in English in 1954. The first volume of his Meditaciones Sacerdotales was held in such regard that several Spanish Bishops of the time recommended it to their clergy. The Preface relates that Fr. Escribano's writings strengthened the spiritual life of the clergy who were to be called to martyrdom in during the Spanish Civil War.

While the meditations are clearly for priests, the principles can be used by all, as all of us are called to a life of holiness, to be a faithful disciple of Jesus Christ.

And there are yet other reflections and meditations forthcoming from which Mental Prayer, Challenge to the Lay Apostle might have developed, at least in some measure.

These reflections will be based on the book, Sodality Director's Manual: Or, a collection of instructions for sodalities of the Blessed Virgin, by F.X. Schouppe, S.J., and published in 1882. Since Mental Prayer, Challenge to the Lay Apostle was also a Sodality book, this seems to be a natural continuation, as it were, and the "instructions" are excellent.

For more information (history, ideals, rules, etc.) on the Sodality of Our Lady, please click here.
The Sodality of Our Lady, an association formed by the Society of Jesus and approved by the Holy See, is a religious body which aims at fostering in its members an ardent devotion, reverence and filial love towards the Blessed Virgin Mary, and through this devotion and the protection of so good a Mother, it seeks to make the faithful, gathered together under her name, good Catholics sincerely bent on sanctifying themselves, each in his own state of life, and zealous, as far as their condition in life permits, to save and sanctify their neighbour and to defend the Church of Jesus Christ against the attacks of the wicked. (From Article I of the Common Rules for Sodalities of Our Lady)

The essential aims of the Sodality are personal holiness and Catholic Action - including working for the salvation and sanctification of one's neighbor, and the spread of the Faith and the defense of the Church.

I hope and pray that these future reflections, meditations, and instructions will be beneficial to all of us.

Jesuit Magazine Article Signals End of a Taboo?

“La Civiltà Cattolica” Breaks the Silence – On Romano Amerio
He was the most authoritative and erudite representative of criticism of the Church in the name of Tradition, but for decades the discussion of his thought was barred. The magazine of the Rome Jesuits has broken the taboo. Authorized from on high
by Sandro Magister

Gospel for Monday, 3rd Week of Easter

Optional Memorial: St George, Martyr
Optional Memorial: St Adalbert, Bishop and Martyr


From: John 6:22-29

The People Look for Jesus


[22] On the next day the people who remained on the other side of the sea saw that there had been only one boat there, and that Jesus had not entered the boat with His disciples, but that His disciples had gone away alone. [23] However, boats from Tiberias came near the place where they ate the bread after the Lord had given thanks. [24] So when the people saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they themselves got into the boats and went to Capernaum, seeking Jesus.

The Discourse on the Bread of Life

[25] When they found Him on the other side of the sea, they said to Him, "Rabbi, when did You come here?" [26] Jesus answered them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. [27] Do not labor for the food which perishes, but the food which endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you; for on Him has God the Father set His seal." [28] Then they said to Him, "What must we do, to be doing the works of God?" [29] Jesus answered them, "This is the work of God, that you believe in Him He has sent."
______________________

Commentary:

26. Our Lord begins by pointing out that their attitudes are wrong: if they have the right attitude they will be able to understand His teaching in the eucharistic discourse. "You seek me", St. Augustine comments, "for the flesh, not for the spirit. How many seek Jesus for no other purpose than that He may do them good in this present life! [...] Scarcely ever is Jesus sought for Jesus' sake" ("In Ioann.
Evang.", 25, 10).

This verse marks the beginning of the discourse on the bread of life which goes up to verse 59. It opens with an introduction in the form of a dialogue between Jesus and the Jews (verses 26-34), in which our Lord reveals Himself as the bringer of the messianic gifts. Then comes the first part of the discourse (verses 35-47), in which Jesus presents Himself as the Bread of Life, in the sense that faith in Him is food for eternal life. In the second part (verses 48-59) Christ reveals the mystery of the Eucharist: He is the Bread of Life who gives Himself sacramentally as genuine food.

27. Bodily food helps keep us alive in this world; spiritual food sustains and develops supernatural life, which will last forever in Heaven. This food, which only God can give us, consists mainly in the gift of faith and sanctifying grace. Through God's infinite love we are given, in the Blessed Eucharist, the very author of these gifts, Jesus Christ, as nourishment for our souls.

"On Him has God the Father set His seal": our Lord here refers to the authority by virtue of which He can give men the gifts He has referred to: for, being God and man, Jesus' human nature is the instrument by means of which the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity acts. St. Thomas Aquinas comments on this sentence as follows: "What the Son of Man will give He possesses through His superiority over all other men in His singular and outstanding fullness of grace. ...When a seal is impressed on wax, the wax receives the complete form of the seal. So it is that the Son received the entire form of the Father. This occurred in two ways; eternally (eternal generation), which is not referred to here because the seal and the sealed are different in nature from one another; what is referred to here is the other manner, that is, the mystery of the Incarnation, whereby God the Father impressed on human nature the Word, who is the reflection and the very stamp of God's nature, as Hebrews 1:3 says" ("Commentary on St. John, in loc.").
___________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

The Priest at Prayer, April 23

The Priest and the Eternal Truths
Esteem for the Priestly Vocation

First Meditation


God's Choice of Me

I
I have a vocation; that was the conviction which prompted me to become a priest, and allowed the door­keepers of the sanctuary to give me admission.

I have a vocation. God, the God who called each star in the vault of the sky by its own name, called me; He looked upon my lowliness; He made my inmost being ring with His irresistible Voice.

A vocation is "A disposition whereby Divine Provi­dence, in accordance with His Own Good Pleasure, chooses and reserves certain men for the work of His ministry, and bestows upon them the requisite qualities and graces."

Christ can therefore say to me what He said to the Apostles:
You have not chosen me; but I have chosen you. (John 15:16)

Peace be to you. As the Father hath sent me, I also send you. (John 20:21.)

Blessed be Thou, Lord, whose secret word sowed in my soul the seeds of my entire priestly life. Let them not perish. Let them bring forth full fruit in due season.

II
But, just for a moment, let us suppose that God did not really call me, that I stole my way into the sanctuary.

Whatever the facts, natural and human, or even sinful, that determined my submission to Holy Orders, I must agree that God alone can mark the center of my soul with His indelible Seal; only a Hand like His can probe so deep; only God, the one true Giver of the Sacraments, imprinted upon me - because such was His Good Pleasure - the sacramental seal or Character that makes me His Priest for ever.

I have every right then to adapt St. Paul's utter­ance : "I am a priest of Jesus Christ, by the Will of God."

My God, I bow to Thy sovereign Ordinance.
I will gladly exhibit this Seal of Thine.
May heaven and earth acknowledge it and exclaim:
"He is a priest of Christ!"

III
God's choice fell on me! Why?

My qualities of mind and character gave me no advantage over other men of my own age, place and condition. In God's eyes I was nothing more than the least of them. So many others would have been found with more talent, more drive for high endeavour, more balance and practical wisdom!

And with regard to innocence of life and capacity for virtue, frankly, I must confess, after tearing away the mask of self-conceit, that, with so many misdemeanours and evil habits staining my soul at the time of my presentation for Holy Orders, I deserved to become a vessel of wrath rather than a vessel of election.

The only merits and aptitudes I see in myself, O God, are the hidden designs of Thine incomprehensible Mercy!

IV
Samuel the Prophet said certain words to young Saul which conveyed a hint of the royal dignity God had chosen him for; and Saul, a comely and daring youth, falls back with genuine astonishment and exclaims:
"Me? a man of Benjamin, the smallest of Israel's tribe? sprung from a clan that is named last among the clans of Benjamin? What means this greeting thou hast given me?" (1 Kings 9:21.)

And what shall I say, I who have been chosen by God Himself to be a friend and brother to my Lord Jesus Christ, dispenser of His Mysteries, voice of His doctrine and precepts, and almoner among men of His ineffable gifts?

Resolution
Humbly prostrate before the Divine Majesty, I shall often consider myself unworthy of His baffling choice of me. Well might the faithful say of me what was said of Saul by his fellow countrymen:
"Can such a man as this bring us victory?" (1 Kings 10:27)
_________________________
Adapted from The Priest at Prayer
by Fr. Eugenio Escribano, C.M. (© 1954)
Translated by B.T. Buckley, C.M.

More on Women Deaconesses

For what it's worth, others far more "intelligent" and charitable than I have commented on the history and the evidence to which Phyllis Zagano appeals for her position.

Fr William Most, a most trustworthy theologian, says, in part, in his discourse on women priests and the diaconate:
Conclusion on Deaconesses
We conclude that there never was an ordination in the strict sense of the Sacrament of Holy Orders for women as deaconesses. To conclude that there was, we would have to suppose a contradiction between two General Councils. We cannot do that. So Chalcedon was speaking in a broader sense, which is easily possible in view of the undeveloped and unclear theology of the day regarding deacons.That,as we said,is not surprising, since even today some, improperly, question whether male deacons receive the Sacrament of Orders.
Next we have an article, "Women Deacons? Are They Possible?" by Duane L.C.M. Galles, With additional observations by Charles M. Wilson:
At its 1995 convention in Montreal the Canon Law Society of America (CLSA) voted to present to the American bishops a report on women deacons. The 53-page report suggested that the American bishops seek an apostolic indult to permit women to be ordained to the diaconate in the United States.
* * *
The CLSA report...skillfully turned [the] argument against the ordination of women to the priesthood into an argument in favor of the ordination of women deacons. In the case of women deacons the report asserts that there is no clear and convincing evidence that women had not in fact been "ordained" to the diaconate. So, the report goes on to say, by the same logic the church is not precluded from ordaining women deacons.
* * *
[Charles Wilson notes...] The first question to be answered by the Church is whether deaconesses, whose existence is unquestioned, were truly ordained according to the sense of cc. 1008 and 1009. If the answer is in the affirmative then, and only then, is the above assertion of CIOWPD tenable. And, in my opinion, an affirmative answer would have to rest upon far more evidence than was cited by CIOWPD.

If the answer to the historical question is negative, one must still deal with the question as to whether a baptized woman could validly receive diaconal ordination. That answer, like the answer to the question as to whether women can be ordained to the priesthood, would have to come from the highest level of ecclesiastical authority. Since c. 1024 repeats the language of c. 968 of the 1917 Code, I have checked all the commentaries on the earlier code (Abbo-Hannan, Augustine, Bouscaren-Ellis, Gasparri and Woywood) which we have in the Foundation's library and all say essentially the same thing. The following example is typical:

The two invalidating disqualifications arising from the subject himself are thus stated to be lack of baptism of water and lack of male sex. Ecclesiastical tradition, interpreting divine law, is witness that the latter excludes women from the diaconate and higher orders; as to the lower orders, the incapacity of women arises from ecclesiastical law. (John J. Abbo and Jerome D. Hannan, The Sacred Canons, B. Herder Book Co., St. Louis, 1952,Vol.II,p.93)

While I would not claim that the opinions of learned commentators are declarations of the teaching Church, I cannot see how they can be simply brushed aside, as [The Canonical Implications of Ordaining Women to the Permanent Diaconate] CIOWPD appears to do. If the Church does admit women to diaconal ordination, it seems to me that this action—given the definition of the sacrament of orders we see in c. 100—would give rise to the formidable challenge of performing the difficult mental gymnastics involved in asserting that women can validly be admitted to one grade of orders while at the same time reaffirming the infallible teaching of the Church that they cannot be admitted to the others.

Lastly (for the time being anyway), there is an article by David L. Alexander, titled "A Rose By Any Other Name, The Ordination of Women to the Diaconate" which is well worth reading.

Zagano states in her most recent comment to this blog:
I am disheartened by the lack of charity (and intelligence) displayed by the Imus-wannabes on this blog. Please read "Holy Saturday"--and if you notice any errors let me know. I worked with 43 canon lawyers, theologians, and other academics, and I am fairly sure we caught everything.

If she's "disheartened" by this blog, then she should read this. Referring to others as "Imus-wannabes" seems to me to be a rather blatant display of a lack of charity, but then I have not conferred with 43 canon lawyers, numerous theolgians and other academics - as if that lends credence to anything, especially considering the sorry state of the Church today in these areas. Frankly, I choose to trust the judgment of the Church in these matters.

Gospel for the 3rd Sunday of Easter

From: John 21:1-19

The Miraculous Draught of Fish


[1] After this Jesus revealed Himself again to the disciples by the Sea of Tiberias; and He revealed Himself in this way. [2] Simon Peter, Thomas called the Twin, Nathaniel of Cana in Galilee, the sons of Zebedee, and two others of His disciples were together. [3] Simon Peter said to them, "I am going fishing." They said to him, "We will go with you." They went out and got into the boat; but that night they caught nothing.

[4] Just as day was breaking, Jesus stood on the beach; yet the disciples did not know that it was Jesus. [5] Jesus said to them, "Children, have you any fish?" They answered Him, "No." [6] He said to them, "Cast the net on the right side of the boat, and you will find some." So they cast it, and now they were not able to haul it in, for the quantity of fish. [7] That disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, "It is the Lord!" When Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he put on his clothes, for he was stripped for work, and sprang into the sea. [8] But the other disciples came in the boat, dragging the net full of fish, for they were not far from the land, but about a hundred yards off.

[9] When they got out on land, they saw a charcoal fire there, with fish lying on it, and bread. [10] Jesus said to them, "Bring some fish that you have just caught." [11] So Simon Peter went aboard and hauled the net ashore, full of large fish, a hundred and fifty-three of them; and although there were so many, the net was not torn. [12] Jesus said to them, "Come and have breakfast." Now none of the disciples dared ask Him, "Who are you?" They knew it was the Lord. [13] Jesus came and took the bread and gave it to them, and so with the fish. [14] This was now the third time that Jesus was revealed to the disciples after He was raised from the dead.

Peter's Primacy

[15] When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of John, do you love Me more than these?" He said to Him, "Yes, Lord; you know that I love You." He said to him, "Feed My lambs." [16] A second time He said to him, "Simon, son of John, do you love Me?" He said to Him, "Yes, Lord, you know I love You." He said to him, "Tend My sheep." [17] He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you love Me?" Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, "Do you love Me?" And he said to Him, "Lord, You know everything; You know that I love You." Jesus said to him, "Feed My sheep. [18] Truly, truly I say to you, when you were young, you girded yourself and walked where you would; but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish to go." [19] (This He said to show by what death he was to glorify God.) And after this He said to him, "Follow Me."
_______________

Commentary:

1-3. There are some very significant things in this account: we find the disciples "by the Sea of Tiberias", which means they have done what the risen Christ had told them to do (cf. Matthew 28:7); they are together, which shows that there is a close fraternity among them; Peter takes the initiative, which in a way shows his authority; and they have gone back to their old jobs as fishermen, probably waiting for our Lord to give them new instructions.

This episode is reminiscent of the first miraculous draught of fish (cf. Luke 5:1-11), where our Lord promised Peter He would make him a fisher of men; now He is going to confirm his mission as visible head of the Church.

4-8. The risen Jesus goes in search of His disciples, to encourage them and tell them more about the great mission He has entrusted to them. This account describes a very moving scene, our Lord together with His own: "He passes by, close to His Apostles, close to those souls who have given themselves to Him, and they do not realize He is there. How often Christ is not only near us, but in us; yet we still live in such a human way!... They, the disciples, recall what they have heard so often from their Master's lips: fisher of men, apostles. And they realize that all things are possible, because it is He who is directing their fishing.

"Whereupon `the disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, It is the Lord!' Love, love is farsighted. Love is the first to appreciate kindness. The adolescent Apostle, who felt a deep and firm affection for Jesus, because he loved Christ with all the purity and tenderness of a heart that had never been corrupted, exclaimed: `It is the Lord!'"

"`When Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he put on his clothes and sprang into the sea.' Peter personifies faith. Full of marvelous daring, he leaps into the sea. With a love like John's and a faith like Peter's, what is there that can stop us?" ([St] J. Escriva, "Friends of God", 265-266).

9-14. We can sense here the deep impression this appearance of the risen Jesus must have made on the Apostles, and how sweet a memory St. John kept of it. After His resurrection Jesus showed the same tenderness as characterized His public ministry. He makes use of natural things--the fire, the fish, etc.--to show that He really is there, and He maintains the familiar tone typical of when He lived with the disciples.

The Fathers and Doctors of the Church have often dwelt on the mystical meaning of this episode: the boat is the Church, whose unity is symbolized by the net which is not torn; the sea is the world, Peter in the boat stands for supreme authority of the Church, and the number of fish signifies the number of the elect (cf. St. Thomas Aquinas, "Commentary on St. John, in loc.").

15-17. Jesus Christ had promised Peter that he would be the primate of the Church (cf. Matthew 16:16-19 and note on the same). Despite his three denials during our Lord's passion, Christ now confers on him the primacy He promised.

"Jesus questions Peter, three times, as if to give him a triple chance to atone for his triple denial. Peter has learned his lesson from the bitter experience of his wretchedness. Aware of his weakness, he is deeply convinced that rash claims are pointless. Instead he puts everything in Christ's hands. `Lord, You know well that I love You" ([Blessed] J. Escriva, "Friends of God", 267). The primacy was given to Peter directly and immediately. So the Church has always understood--and so Vatican I defined: "We therefore teach and declare that, according to the testimony of the Gospel, the primacy of jurisdiction over the universal Church of God was immediately and directly promised and given to Blessed Peter the Apostle by Christ our Lord. [...] And it was upon Simon Peter alone that Jesus after His resurrection bestowed the jurisdiction of chief pastor and ruler over all His fold in the words: "Feed My lambs; feed My sheep" ("Pastor Aeternus", Chapter 1).

The primacy is a grace conferred on Peter and his successors, the popes; it is one of the basic elements in the Church, designed to guard and protect its unity: "In order that the episcopate also might be one and undivided, and that [...] the multitude of the faithful might be kept secure in the oneness of faith and communion, He set Blessed Peter over the rest of the Apostles, and fixed in him the abiding principle of this twofold unity, and its visible foundation" ("Pastor Aeternus, Dz-Sch 3051"; cf. Vatican II, "Lumen Gentium", 18). Therefore, the primacy of Peter is perpetuated in each of his successors: this is something which Christ disposed; it is not based on human legislation or custom.

By virtue of the primacy, Peter, and each of his successors, is the shepherd of the whole Church and vicar of Christ on earth, because he exercises vicariously Christ's own authority. Love for the Pope, whom St. Catherine of Siena used to call "the sweet Christ on earth", should express itself in prayer, sacrifice and obedience.

18-19. According to Tradition, St. Peter followed his Master to the point of dying by crucifixion, head downwards, "Peter and Paul suffered martyrdom in Rome during Nero's persecution of Christians, which took place between the years 64 and 68. St. Clement, the successor of the same Peter in the See of the Church of Rome, recalls this when, writing to the Corinthians, he puts before them `the generous example of these two athletes': `due to jealousy and envy, those who were the principal and holiest columns suffered persecution and fought the fight unto death'" ([Pope] Paul VI, "Petrum Et Paulum").

"Follow Me!": these words would have reminded the Apostle of the first call he received (cf. Matthew 4:19) and of the fact that Christ requires of His disciples complete self-surrender: "If any man would come after Me, let him deny himself and take up the Cross daily and follow Me" (Luke 9:23). St. Peter himself, in one of his letters, also testifies to the Cross being something all Christians must carry: "For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in His steps" (1 Peter 2:21).
___________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.