He further obfuscates the necessity that one must have a properly formed conscience. He says:
In the letter to the Romans, St. Paul tells us that the law of God is written in our hearts (Romans 2:15). He also reminds us in the first letter to the Corinthians that conscience can be weak. It can even be wrong. But obeying such a conscience will still lead to salvation (1 Corinthians 8:10-12). (emphasis mine)How is it possible that following a malformed and defective conscience leads one to heaven?
But that's not all. He further confuses the issue of conscience by not listing the Church as the primary source of determination of the morality of an issue...Who does he list first?
When individuals try to make up their mind about a moral dilemma, they consult their own inner being, their families, their colleagues. If they are Christians, they will wisely look to see what theologians have said about the issue.That's right, let me see what my 'inner being' tells me, then if I am still unsure, I will consult with 'theologians'...And if I am Catholic, I will see what the Church has to say...
Unlike the clarity of Bishop Sheridan concerning appeals to conscience, Bishop Steib states:
Then, it is decision time. The person chooses what is true to him or her self. And we are judged by God according to what is in our hearts. We must follow our consciences.What !!?? The person chooses what is true???? What corrupted logic could lead one to this conclusion...
The faithful of Memphis are in need of prayers because they have a shepherd who confuses and bewilders them. Please pray for this man.
A link to Bishop Steib's muddled and erroneous philosophy.
No comments:
Post a Comment