You might recall when I blogged against using baptismal formulae contrived to avoid masculine nouns for Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. I said back in 2004 that such ‘baptisms’ were invalid, and that people who received ‘baptism’ under them were not even Christian, let alone Catholic.Read about today’s authentic doctrinal declaration from CDF here: http://www.canonlaw.info/2008/02/rules-on-baptism-are-meant-to-be.html
Looks like CDF agrees.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Dr Edward Peters: The CDF and Invalid Baptisms
Dr Peters writes: