About a year ago, WaPo made room for Joe "the-bishops-be-damned" Feuerherd's rant against the American episcopate for its articulation of pro-life ethics in politics.
I said then that Feueherd's contempt must not be allowed to go unchecked. The US bishops let the insults pass. But now, Feuerherdian contempt has been taken to a new level by Robert McElvaine.
Read why I believe that McElvaine’s column in the Washington Post has violated Canon 1369, and why I am calling for a canonical penal process to be undertaken against him, here:
This site is dedicated to promoting and defending the Catholic Faith, in union with Christ and His Church and in union with the authentic Holy Father, the faithful successor of St. Peter.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Dr Edward Peters: If Robert McElvaine hasn't violated Canon 1369, who has?
Dr Peters writes:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment