Send As SMS

Saturday, February 26, 2005

"Abort" the Academy Awards Sunday Evening

Christian and Pro-Life Groups Encouraged to "Abort" the Academy Awards Sunday Evening
By JILL STANEK

The divide between America's culture of life and Hollywood's culture of death will not be on any wider display than this Sunday night, via the Academy Awards.

From the movies the Academy has chosen to laud to its vulgar host, it is clear it has determined to spit in the faces of pro-lifers. Last week, Matt Drudge exposed what Chris Rock, this year's Oscar night emcee, quipped during a recent comedy act. "Abortion, it's beautiful, it's beautiful abortion is legal," joked Rock. "I love going to an abortion rally to pick up women, cause you know they are f---ing."
. . .
But I know how to get back at Hollywood, a society that is so narcissistic it becomes unglued if not given constant attention. Thus, the best way to get back at Hollywood is to ignore it: Abort Sunday night's Academy Awards from your television screen.
###
Jill Stanek fought to stop "live-birth abortion" after witnessing one as a registered nurse at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, Ill. In 2002, President Bush asked Jill to attend his signing of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. In January 2003, World Magazine named Jill one of the 30 most prominent pro-life leaders of the past 30 years. Her column appears regularly at the leading conservative news website www.worldnetdaily.com.
Source.

|

An Appeal from a Group of St. Stanislaus Kostka Parishioners

Parishioners of St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish
at Saint John, Apostle and Evangelist Church
15 Plaza Square Saint Louis, Missouri 63103-2318
Contact: (314) 781 4486, e-mail:stkostkaparish@sbcglobal.net

AN APPEAL THAT WILL NEVER MAKE THE NEWS
FROM A GROUP OF ST. STANISLAUS KOSTKA PARISHIONERS


February 21, 2005

Dear Friends in the Archdiocese of St. Louis:

Since March 2004 Catholics in the St. Louis area have been affected by a dispute between the Archdiocese of St. Louis, and the lay board of directors of the civil corporation of St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish which illegally took away control of the parish corporation from the Roman Catholic Church. The conflict escalated after the board refused to bring the parish civil structure into conformity with Church law that clearly states that the pastor appointed by the Archbishop, not a group of laymen who assign the pastor the role of an employee, has ultimate authority regarding parish life. As a result of the board’s defiance, manifested by offensive behavior of board members towards our priests, in August 2004 Archbishop Burke transferred the parish center to St. John, Apostle and Evangelist Church in downtown St. Louis. Parishioners who support Archbishop Burke continue to celebrate the Mass in Polish there and the parish continues to thrive.

Many Catholics in the St. Louis Archdiocese have initially expressed support for the board of directors of the civil corporation of St. Stanislaus Parish. This was a result of an intensive media campaign conducted by the board of directors and their supporters. The main objective of the board seems to be to discredit Archbishop Burke, damage his reputation, and portray the parish community as a victim of his demands. Secular media not only disregarded the existence of parishioners supporting Archbishop Burke, but also distorted the truth about the background of the conflict. One such distortion relates to the fact that St. Stanislaus Kostka parishioners supporting Archbishop Burke refused to participate in January 9th voting which was orchestrated as another publicity exploit by the board of directors and its media advisers. Although the board and their spokesmen loudly attempt to portray themselves as representatives of St. Stanislaus parish community, in reality they represent only a group of supporters who choose to affirm them. This critical distinction was never made by the media.

Support for the “Save St. Stan’s” campaign mounted by the board of directors is provided from many sources interested in destroying the unity of the Roman Catholic Church. The campaign slogan became even a City of St. Louis mayoral race issue, when one of the candidates publicly expressed support for the board of directors, while acknowledging no affiliation with the Catholic Church. The public scandal caused by the board, which has been instrumental in swaying the opinions of many of its supporters, and of the general public, has created much pain in the Archdiocese of St. Louis and in the community at large.

Unfortunately, the campaign proved to be very persuasive in deflecting the attention of many parishioners, as well as the public, from fundamental principles of operating a faith-based community. These include the structure and authority of the Church, respect for law, and accountability to parishioners and the public at large. Over the last several years members of the board fostered a culture of blatant disrespect for the Church as well as for many members of the parish community. There is ongoing speculation about the reasons the board of directors changed corporate by-laws and assumed control over the parish finances. It is apparent that this situation exempted the board from the strict accountability required of all other parishes of the Roman Catholic Church. Contrary to public declarations, the board refused to conduct an independent financial audit by a certified public accountant, and to disclose details of parish operations, including procedures for awarding contracts and service agreements. The change of corporate bylaws was done with premeditation through amendments in 2001 and 2004. This itself is a clear violation of the original 1891 corporate bylaws, which explicitly state that corporation bylaws must be in conformance with diocesan rules, regulations and requirements.

A few months ago, members of our congregation published an “Open Letter to Parishioners and Supporters of St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish”. The letter outlined details of the parish conflict, and expressed support for Archbishop Burke in his efforts to bring the parish structure into conformity with the governance model that is followed by all parishes in St. Louis diocese. These efforts were subsequently affirmed, and mandated, by the Vatican in its decree of November 11, 2004, rejecting the appeal against the Archbishop made on behalf of the board of directors. The full text of the open letter, as well as other documents related to this conflict, is available at the website of the Archdiocese of St. Louis: http://www.archstl.org/parishes/documents/st_stanislaus.html. Please contact us if you would like to receive a copy of our letter.

We are deeply concerned that the actions taken by the board of directors are clearly intended to weaken the authority of the Holy See and of Archbishop Burke. We reject the board’s rhetoric comparing their role to that of Solidarity in the fight for the freedom of Poland. This comparison is simply insulting to many of us who are parishioners, and who personally participated in the fight for the freedom of Poland, and drew our strength and inspiration from the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.

Resolution of this conflict will have a profound impact not only on the future of the St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish but on the entire Catholic community in the United States. We reject the notion of separating St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish from the Roman Catholic Church. We call on the board of directors of the parish civil corporation to stop the campaign of hostility and animosity towards the Catholic Church, and its leaders in Rome and in the Archdiocese of St. Louis, a campaign that knowingly, deliberately, and publicly has damaged seriously the unity of the Roman Catholic community.

None of us – Roman Catholics in St. Louis Archdiocese – should remain disinterested in this matter. This conflict is a test of our judgment as Catholics, a test of our ability to clearly comprehend the complexity of the situation, and of our courage to make a conscientious choice.

We appeal to all Catholics the in St. Louis Archdiocese to express strong support for Archbishop Burke in his efforts to resolve this matter. On the second Sunday of each month we invite you all to attend our monthly bi-lingual Mass of Solidarity with Archbishop Burke during which we will pray for the strength of our spiritual leaders, unity of the Catholic Church, and the future of our congregation. The first Mass of Solidarity will be celebrated on March 13th, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. at St. John, Apostle and Evangelist Church in Plaza Square in downtown St. Louis. We kindly ask for your support.

God Bless,
ST. STANISLAUS KOSTKA PARISH ADVISORY COMMITTEE

The Appeal Letter (PDF File)

|

Send "Best Wishes" & Prayers for the Holy Father

Vatican provides email address for people to send kind words to the Holy Father.
Go here and click on this picture:

|

Bishops Urged to Take Action, Uphold Church Teaching in Terri Schiavo Case

Washington DC, Feb. 24, 2005 (CNA) - The American Life League is urging Catholics bishops to take up the fight to save Terri Schiavo’s life. The Florida woman, who has been severely physically and mentally disabled for the last 13 years, is being kept alive by tube feedings.

“We implore Catholic bishops — and in particular, Bishop Robert Lynch of St. Petersburg — to take up Terri's fight in both prayer and action and to uphold Church teaching regarding the dignity of human life,” said Joe Starrs, director of American Life League's Crusade for the Defense of Our Catholic Church.

"The lack of clear, decisive action by Bishop Lynch and far too many of his brother bishops across Florida and across the nation has been more than disappointing," Starrs said in a press release. (Emphasis mine)
And quite a bit more than disappointing - Where is the strong vocal opposition and condemnation of the anticipated death sentence of this innocent woman whose parents wish to care for her? Where are the voices of those who wish to abolish the "Death Penalty"?

We should remember that we are guard against becoming accomplices to sin. One becomes an accomplice when one culpably assists another in the performance of an evil action. This assistance may come about by counsel, command, provocation, consent, praise, flattery, concealment, participation, silence, or defense of the evil act.

Source.

|

Illinois, Peoria Diocese Investigate Burial of Body Parts

DANVILLE, Ill. - State officials and the Catholic Diocese of Peoria are investigating an allegation that a central Illinois hospital used a Catholic cemetery to bury body parts.

The investigation stems from a suit filed earlier this month by Thomas and Carolyn Pichon, who say they saw a cemetery worker toss a box of medical waste into their loved one's open grave at Danville's Resurrection Catholic Cemetery.

According to the Peoria diocese, it oversees 128 cemeteries, and most are owned and operated by parishes and other Catholic institutions. The cemeteries must follow diocesan rules, which prohibit burying uncremated amputated body parts without permission from the diocese's director of cemeteries.
Source.

|

Pope isn't talking, at least for a few days

The Vatican says he is breathing on his own and writing notes.

VATICAN CITY - The voice that encouraged millions to revolt against communism, attracted Roman Catholic faithful in more than 100 countries to vast religious gatherings and captured the attention of leaders across the globe was silent Friday.

Vatican spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls said the pontiff was breathing without the aid of a respirator but would not be able to speak for at least a few days. The treatment included insertion of a tube into the pope's throat. It allows air to enter his lungs and bypass his mouth, nose and upper throat. While the trachea is open and the tube is attached, speaking is impossible.

"He's breathing on his own, and cardio-circulatory conditions remain good," Navarro-Valls said. He added that on the advice of his doctors, the pope would not speak for several days "so as to favor the functions of the larynx."
Article.

|

Archbishop Burke Moves Polish Masses Permanently

The decision Friday by the St. Louis Archdiocese to make St. Agatha's parish the permanent official Polish parish in St. Louis ratcheted up the continuing battle between parishioners at St. Stanislaus Kostka Church and the archdiocese.

The decision was made, according to an archdiocesan spokesman, to accommodate a group the archdiocese said was made up of 150 to 200 Polish Catholics who remained loyal to the archbishop in the struggle for control of St. Stanislaus.

"The archbishop decided it was necessary for them to have their own parish and, at the same time, help to save St. Agatha's," said Jamie Allman, the archdiocese spokesman. St. Agatha's was most recently used for the archdiocese's Tridentine, or Latin, Mass.

Robert Zabielski, a member of the St. Stanislaus board, said he was not surprised by Burke's decision to name another church as the official Polish church in the archdiocese. "We're still the Roman Catholic Polish church in St. Louis," said Zabielski. "It looks like he doesn't want to work this out. He's abandoned us. We have not abandoned him."
Mr Zabeielski is simply wrong! St. Stanislaus WAS the Roman Catholic Parish of Polish heritage....but that was BEFORE the board ABANDONED the Church and REJECTED the Archbishop.

Source.

|

Gospel for Saturday, 2nd Week of Lent

Luke 15:1-3; 11-32

Parables of God's Mercy

[1] Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear Him (Jesus). [2] And the Pharisees and the scribes murmured, saying, "This man receives sinners and eats with them."

The Prodigal Son

[3] So He told them this parable: [11] "There was a man who had two sons; [12] and the younger of them said to his father, `Father, give me the share of property that falls to me.' And he divided his living between them. [13] Not many days later, the younger son gathered all he had and took his journey into a far country, and there he squandered his property in loose living. [14] And when he had spent everything, a great famine arose in that country, and he began to be in want. [15]So he went and joined himself to one of the citizens of that country, who sent him into his fields to feed swine. [16] And he would gladly have fed on the pods that the swine ate; and no one gave him anything. [17] But when he came to himself he said, `How can many of my father's hired servants have bread enough and to spare, but I perish here with hunger! [18] I will arise and go to my father, and I will say to him, "Father, I have sinned against Heaven and before you; [19] I am no longer worthy to be called your son; treat me as one of your hired servants.'" [20] And he arose and came to his father. But while he was yet at a distance, his father saw him and had compassion, and ran and embraced him and kissed him. [21] And the son said to him, `Father, I have sinned against Heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to be called your son.' [22] But the father said to his servants, `Bring quickly the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet; [23] and bring the fatted calf and kill it, and let us eat and make merry; [24] for this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found.' And they began to make merry.

[25] "Now his elder son was in the field; and as he came and drew near to the house, he heard music and dancing. [26] And he called one of the servants and asked what this meant. [27] And he said to him, `Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fatted calf, because he has received him safe and sound.' [28] But he was angry and refused to go in. His father came out and entreated him, [29] but he answered his father, `Lo, these many years I have served you, and I never disobeyed your command; yet you never gave me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends. [30] But when this son of yours came, who has devoured your living with harlots, you killed for him the fatted calf!' [31] And he said to him, `Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours. [32] It was fitting to make merry and be glad, for this your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found.'"
**********************
Commentary:

1-32. Jesus' actions manifest God's mercy: He receives sinners in order to convert them. The scribes and Pharisees, who despised sinners, just cannot understand why Jesus acts like this; they grumble about Him; and Jesus uses the opportunity to tell these Mercy parables. "The Gospel writer who particularly treats of these themes in Christ's teaching is Luke, whose Gospel has earned the title of `the Gospel of mercy'" ([Pope] John Paul II, "Dives In Misericordia", 3).

In this chapter St. Luke reports three of these parables in which Jesus describes the infinite, fatherly mercy of God and His joy at the conversion of the sinner.

The Gospel teaches that no one is excluded from forgiveness and that sinners can become beloved children of God if they repent and are converted. So much does God desire the conversion of sinners that each of these parables ends with a refrain, as it were, telling of the great joy in Heaven over a sinner who repents.

1-2. This is not the first time that publicans and sinners approach Jesus (cf. Matthew 9:10). They are attracted by the directness of the Lord's preaching and by His call to self-giving and love. The Pharisees in general were jealous of His influence over the people (cf. Matthew 26:2-5; John 11:47) a jealousy which can also beset Christians; a severity of outlook which does not accept that, no matter how great his sins may have been, a sinner can change and become a saint; a blindness which prevents a person from recognizing and rejoicing over the good done by others. Our Lord criticized this attitude when He replied to His disciples' complaints about others casting out devils in His name: "Do not forbid him; for no one who does a mighty work in My name will be able soon after to speak evil of Me" (Mark 9:39). And St. Paul rejoiced that others proclaimed Christ and even overlooked the fact they did so out of self-interest, provided Christ was preached (cf. Philippians 1:17-18).

11. This is one of Jesus' most beautiful parables, which teaches us once more that God is a kind and understanding Father (cf. Matthew 6:8; Romans 8:15; 2 Corinthians 1:3). The son who asks for his part of the inheritance is a symbol of the person who cuts himself off from God through sin. "Although the word `mercy' does not appear, this parable nevertheless expresses the essence of the divine mercy in a particularly clear way" ([Pope] John Paul II, "Dives In Misericordia", 5).

12. "That son, who receives from the father the portion of the inheritance that is due him and leaves home to squander it in a far country `in loose living', in a certain sense is the man of every period, beginning with the one who was the first to lose the inheritance of grace and original justice. The analogy at this point is very wide-ranging. The parable indirectly touches upon every breach of the covenant of love, every loss of grace, every sin" ("Dives In Misericordia", 5).

14-15. At this point in the parable we are shown the unhappy effects of sin. The young man's hunger evokes the anxiety and emptiness a person feels when he is far from God. The prodigal son's predicament describes the enslavement which sin involves (cf. Romans 1:25; 6:6; Galatians 5:1): by sinning one loses the freedom of the children of God (cf. Romans 8:21; Galatians 4:31; 5:13) and hands oneself over the power of Satan.

17-21. His memory of home and his conviction that his father loves him cause the prodigal son to reflect and to decide to set out on the right road. "Human life is in some way a constant returning to our Father's house. We return through contrition, through the conversion of heart which means a desire to change, a firm decision to improve our life and which, therefore, is expressed in sacrifice and self-giving. We return to our Father's house by means of that sacrament of pardon in which, by confessing our sins, we put on Jesus Christ again and become His brothers, members of God's family" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ is Passing By", 64).

20-24. God always hopes for the return of the sinner; He wants him to repent. When the young man arrives home his father does not greet him with reproaches but with immense compassion, which causes him to embrace his son and cover him with kisses.

20. "There is no doubt that in this simple but penetrating analogy the figure of the father reveals to us God as Father. The conduct of the father in the parable and his whole behavior, which manifests his internal attitude, enables us to rediscover the individual threads of the Old Testament vision of mercy in a synthesis which is totally new, full of simplicity and depth. The father of the prodigal son is FAITHFUL TO THIS FATHERHOOD, FAITHFUL TO THE LOVE that he had always lavished on his son. This fidelity is expressed in the parable not only by his immediate readiness to welcome him home when he returns after having squandered his inheritance; it is expressed even more fully by that joy, that merrymaking for the squanderer after his return, merrymaking which is so generous that it provokes the opposition and hatred of the elder brother, who had never gone far away from his father and had never abandoned the home.

"The father's fidelity to himself [...] is at the same time expressed in a manner particularly charged with affection. We read, in fact, that when the father saw the prodigal son returning home `he had COMPASSION, ran to meet him, threw his arms around his neck and kissed him.' He certainly does this under the influence of a deep affection, and this also explains his generosity towards his son, that generosity which so angers the elder son" ("Dives In Misericordia", 6).

"When God runs towards us, we cannot keep silent, but with St. Paul we exclaim, "ABBA PATER": `Father, my Father!' (Romans 8:15), for, though He is the creator of the universe, He doesn't mind our not using high-sounding titles, nor worry about our not acknowledging His greatness. He wants us to call Him Father; He wants us to savor that word, our souls filling with joy [...].

"God is waiting for us, like the father in the parable, with open arms, even though we don't deserve it. It doesn't matter how great our debt is. Just like the prodigal son, all we have to do is open our heart, to be homesick for our Father's house, to wonder at and rejoice in the gift which God makes us of being able to call ourselves His children, of really being His children, even though our response to Him has been so poor" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 64).

25-30. God's mercy is so great that man cannot grasp it: as we can see in the case of the elder son, who thinks his father loves the younger son excessively, his jealousy prevents him from understanding how his father can do so much to celebrate the recovery of the prodigal; it cuts him off from the joy that the whole family feels. "It's true that he was a sinner. But don't pass so final a judgment on him. Have pity in your heart, and don't forget that he may yet be an Augustine, while you remain just another mediocrity" ([St] J. Escriva, "The Way", 675).

We should also consider that if God has compassion towards sinners, He must have much much more towards those who strive to be faithful to Him. St. Therese of Lisieux understood this very well: "What joy to remember that our Lord is just; that He makes allowances for all our shortcomings, and knows full well how weak we are. What have I to fear then? Surely the God of infinite justice who pardons the prodigal son with such mercy will be just with me `who am always with Him'?" ("The Story of a Soul", Chapter 8).

32. "Mercy, as Christ has presented it in the parable of the prodigal son, has THE INTERIOR FORM OF THE LOVE that in the New Testament is called AGAPE. This love is able to reach down to every prodigal son, to every human misery, and above all to every form of moral misery, to sin. When this happens, the person who is the object of mercy does not feel humiliated, but rather found again and `restored to value'. The father first and foremost expresses to him his joy, that he has been `found again' and that he has `returned to life'. This joy indicates a good that has remained intact: even if he is a prodigal, a son does not cease to be truly his father's son; it also indicates a good that has been found again, which in the case of the prodigal son was his return to the truth about himself" ("Dives In Misericordia", 6).
***************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Friday, February 25, 2005

Terri Schiavo and the Odd Silence of the St. Petersburg Diocese

An excerpt from the Crisis E-Letter by Brian Saint Paul:
Terri and her family are practicing Catholics in the diocese of St. Petersburg. However, even casual observers of this situation the past few years have noticed the odd silence from the diocese and Bishop Robert Lynch.

What's going on?

"To put it bluntly," Fr. Johansen told me, "Bishop Lynch has been invisible on this matter for the last couple years. He made a few statements in October 2003. But even those were, in my opinion, pretty weak. They basically expressed his sympathy and his feeling that this was a tragic situation."

A quick perusal of the bishop's three statements (available here: http://www.dioceseofstpete.org/news.php) gives us a bit of a mixed bag. While the bishop does articulate in several places the Catholic teaching on these matters, he nowhere applies it forcefully to Terri's specific situation.

For example, Bishop Lynch writes in his August 12, 2003, statement:
"Our Catholic teaching is also clear that 'nourishment or hydration may be withheld or withdrawn where that treatment itself is causing harm to the patient or is useless because the patient's death is imminent, as long as the patient is made comfortable. In general, the terms "death is imminent" and "terminally ill" imply that a physician can predict that the patient will die of the fatal pathology within a few days or weeks, regardless of what life prolonging methods are utilized.'"

Precisely. And this statement should be followed by Bishop Lynch noting that no one in the dispute claims that, barring the removal of her feeding tube, Terri will die "within a few days or weeks." Nor can anyone intelligently argue that the food and water are somehow harming her.

Sadly, that's not what the bishop does. Instead, he follows this statement by observing that "Terri Schiavo's case is especially difficult because her actual medical situation is in dispute."

And that's where Bishop Lynch misses an important teaching opportunity. Since no one is saying that Terri's death is "imminent," food and water must not be removed. When the authentic Catholic teaching is applied to Terri's specific case, the judgment is clear.

To be fair, the bishop also strongly recommends that "Terri's family be allowed to attempt a medical protocol which they feel would improve her condition." He also writes that "Catholic teaching notes that the proxy may not deliberately cause a patient's death or refuse ordinary and normal treatment, even if he or she believes a patient would have made such a decision."

The problem with Bishop Lynch's public statements is not that they are in themselves wrong, but that he doesn't go far enough in applying Catholic teaching to this specific case. As a result, he puts too much trust in the actions and motivations of Michael Schiavo -- Terri's husband and the main actor in the effort to halt her
feeding.

(As you may know, Schiavo has lived with another woman for years and stands to receive quite a bit of money upon Terri's death. What's more, after her accident, Prince Charming had her engagement ring and wedding band melted down to make a ring for himself...and had her cats put to sleep so he wouldn't have to take care of them.)

When I asked Fr. Rob what we can do to help Terri, he offered several suggestions:
1. "Pray, not just for Terri but for Michael Schiavo and his lawyer, George Felos. After all, people's hearts can be turned."

2. Since the ruling comes down today -- a Friday in Lent -- Catholics have a special opportunity to offer up a sacrifice. Don't underestimate the power of this season.

3. "Get informed about the real issues. Spread the word. The mainstream media continues to report that Terri is brain dead or comatose. No one has ever claimed that. Furthermore, contrary to media reports, this is NOT a right to die case. People need to spread the word on this. Call their talk radio stations, send e-mails to friends, and to Florida state representatives." One way to get informed is to read the article Fr. Rob wrote for us on the situation in our January 2004 issue. It's the single best overview of the debate that I've seen and is available for free on our website at: http://www.crisismagazine.com/january2004/johansen.htm.
(You have full permission to reprint, forward, link to, or quote the article any way you like. We need to get this information to as many people as possible.)

4. Finally, if you have the chance and the means, you could also donate money to www.Terrisfight.org. Due to high web traffic, the site is down right now (I just tried it), but should be up again soon.

This is a pivotal day in the fight for the Culture of Life. Let us pray that truth prevails.

|

Judge Greer Grants Permission for "Husband" to Murder Wife

"The court is no longer comfortable granting stays simply upon the filings of new motions," Greer wrote. "There will always be 'new' issues."
No longer comfortable granting stays?

|

Cdl. Arinze to Keynote St. Louis Liturgical Conference

Liturgists who want to perfect what they do or Catholics who just want to better understand the Church’s liturgy will benefit from attending this April’s Gateway Liturgical Conference, organizers say.

The conference will take place Thursday-Friday, April 7-8, at the Adam’s Mark Hotel Downtown. Events will run 1:15 to 8:30 p.m. Thursday and 8 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Friday.

This year’s keynote speaker will be the Church’s chief liturgist, Cardinal Francis Arinze. Cardinal Arinze is the prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of Sacraments. He has been traveling around the world to share the vision of the Church as outlined in its liturgical documents and is recognized as a master communicator and theologian, according to organizers. The cardinal is participating in the St. Louis conference at the invitation of Archbishop Raymond L. Burke.

For fees, registration materials and deadlines or other information, call the Office of Worship at (314) 792-7230.
Source.

|

A Little Story Worth Repeating - The Brick

Once again, I received an email which I would like to share. I apologize in advance if this is a repeat:
Read the next line very slowly and let it sink in...
"If God brings you to it, He will bring you through it. "

THE BRICK

A young and successful executive was traveling down a neighborhood street, going a bit too fast in his new Jaguar. He was watching for kids darting out from between parked cars and slowed down when he thought he saw something.

As his car passed, no children appeared. Instead, a brick smashed into the Jag's side door! He slammed on the brakes and backed the Jag back to the spot where the brick had been thrown.

The angry driver then jumped out of the car, grabbed the nearest kid and pushed him up against a parked car shouting, "What was that all about and who are you? Just what the heck are you doing? That's a new car and that brick you threw is going to cost a lot of money. Why did you do it?"

The young boy was apologetic. "Please, mister..please, I'm sorry but I didn't know what else to do," he pleaded. "I threw the brick because no one else would stop..."

With tears dripping down his face and off his chin, the youth pointed to a spot just around a parked car. "It's my brother," he said. "He rolled off the curb and fell out of his wheelchair and I can't lift him up."

Now sobbing, the boy asked the stunned executive, "Would you please help me get him back into his wheelchair? He's hurt and he's too heavy for me."

Moved beyond words, the driver tried to swallow the rapidly swelling lump in his throat. He hurriedly lifted the handicapped boy back into the wheelchair, then took out a linen handkerchief and dabbed at the fresh scrapes and cuts.

A quick look told him everything was going to be okay..."Thank you and may God bless you," the grateful child told the stranger.

Too shook up for words, the man simply watched the boy push his wheelchair-bound brother down the sidewalk toward their home. It was a long, slow walk back to the Jaguar.

The damage was very noticeable, but the driver never bothered to repair the dented side door. He kept the dent there to remind him of this message "Don't go through life so fast that someone has to throw a brick at you to get your attention!"

God whispers in our souls and speaks to our hearts. Sometimes when we don't have time to listen, He has to throw a brick at us.

It's our choice to listen or not.

Some other thoughts for the day:
If God had a refrigerator, your picture would be on it.
If He had a wallet, your photo would be in it.
He sends you flowers every spring.
He sends you a sunrise every morning.
Face it, friend - He is crazy about you!

God didn't promise days without pain, laughter without sorrow, sun without rain, but He did promise strength for the day, comfort for the tears, and light for the way.

|

The Consciousness of Christ

One of the books which I am currently reading is this one titled, "The Consciousness of Christ", by Fr. William Most. Some background on why:

After listening to a homily at the Christmas Vigil Mass in which the priest proclaimed to the packed church such things as Jesus not knowing that He was God, and other ramblings evidently appropriated from heterdox 'theologians', I felt that I was obligated to provide him whatever information I could so that he might come to understand what the Church actually teaches. I felt obliged to do this for a couple of reasons.

During the homily when these strange things were being said, some of the people who attended an adult catechism class which I facilitated, turned and looked at me with confusion. They had learned in the catechism class that what they were hearing was not what the Church teaches - God had provided them with the graces by which their minds were sufficiently enlightened with truths of the faith that they could recognize that something was wrong with what they were hearing. For the others in Church, as I had mentioned before, I felt sorrow and regret that their minds may have become confused without them even being aware of it.

This little episode led to me to do more in-depth research into this area of such great confusion, even among some priests. I turned first to two great theologians to get direction: Fr. John Hardon and Fr. William Most. As a consequence, I obtained the book, the title of which is the heading for this post.

I cannot recommend this book enough to anyone who wishes to understand what the Church teaches about the human knowledge of Christ and that relation with the divine mind of Christ and about the numerous errors that have become so prevalent today. It is a thoroughly easy book to read and understand, written so that those of us who are not 'theologians' can readily grasp its content.

What follows is the preface of the book, "The Consciousness of Christ."
"Can you show me now that I would not be killed in vain? Show me just a little of your omnipresent brain. Show me there's a reason for your wanting me to die. You were far too keen on where and how, and not so hot on why."

So speaks Jesus Christ Superstar, the day before the great Passover. Obviously He is presented as being quite ignorant not only of who He is-there is no trace of awareness that He is divine, if indeed the author of Superstar thought Jesus was divine; and Jesus does not even know the fundamental reason for His dying, to redeem and save mankind by atoning for sin.

Nor only popular rock musicals express such egregious error. Many scripture scholars today do much the same, e.g., "The New Testament gives us no reason to think that Jesus and Paul were not deadly serious about the demonic world.... I do not believe the demons inhabit desert places or the upper air, as Jesus and Paul thought... I see no way to get around the difficulty except by saying that Jesus and Paul were wrong on this point. They accepted the beliefs of their times about demons, but those beliefs were superstitious."1

The writer, Father Raymond Brown, thinks Jesus was so ignorant as to preach error based on superstitions. He also wonders if Jesus knew much about the future life: "Perhaps he had nothing new to say about the afterlife other than emphasizing what was already known, that God would reward the good and punish the wicked."2 As to whether Jesus knew who He was, we find Fr. Brown inclined to prefer the opinion that Jesus had "some sort of intuition or immediate awareness of what he was, but...that the ability to express this in a communicable way had to be acquired gradually."3 To put it simply: Jesus knew in some vague way who He was but somehow could not manage to say it!

This view is basically the same as that of Karl Rahner, who holds that the self knowledge of Jesus paralleled that of ordinary humans. We do not know our own soul directly; we get to know it indirectly by observing its actions. To express that information is, of course, something additional.4

In ancient times similar ideas were expressed in the aftermath of Nestorianism, a heresy propounding the presence of two persons in Jesus. That is the same as saying there were two he's in Him, a divine person and a human person. The divine person, Nestorians often said, took the human person and lived in him as in a temple. Another sect, the Agnoites, followed logically with the conclusion: the human in Jesus might not know he was bound up with a divine person, and might lack various other kinds of knowledge also. Their error was condemned, with an anathema, by Pope Vigilius in 553 A.D.5

The current storm about the consciousness of Jesus was sparked by a book written by P. Galtier in 1939.6 Without holding for two persons in the Nestorian sense, Galtier sought to distinguish a psychological self apart from the ontological self. So, he asserted, there can be a "real psychological autonomy" in the human soul of Jesus.

The heart of our modern problem, then, is this: without claiming two persons in the Nestorian sense, we can still ask, 'Did a given fact (e.g., the day and hour of the last judgment) register on the human mind of Jesus'? Unfortunately, even theologians are often very loose in their language. They say: He did not know that. Such a statement is heresy, for the He is a divine He. But it is not heresy to ask: Did that point register on His human mind?

To examine the question adequately, we must consider data from four different sources: Scripture, patrology, the magisterium, and speculative theology.

Before considering the Scriptural evidence, we must face the fact that in our day there are numerous challenges to the reliability of the Gospels. So before we can appeal to the Gospels, we must examine whether or not we can believe the Gospels. The introduction is devoted to this problem.
--------------------------
End Notes:
1 In St. Anthony's Messenger, May 1971, 47-48.
2 R. E. Brown, Jesus, God and Man, Macmillan, N.Y. 1967. 101.
3 Ibid, 100.
4 K. Rahner, "Dogmatic Reflections on the Knowledge and Self-Consciousness of Christ" in Theological lnvestigations, tr. K. H. Kruger, Helicon, Baltimore, 1966, 5,193-215.
5 DS 419.
6 P. Galtier, L Unité du Christ—Etre, Personne, Conscience, 3rd ed. Beauchesne, Paris, 1939.

|

St Agatha Church to Become Personal Parish of Polish Heritage

This was actually one of several surprises.

At least the faithful Catholics from St. Stanislaus who have been placed "in exile" by the actions of the board of directors will now have a parish of their own. And St. Agatha's is such a beautiful church.

I hope and pray that those from St. Agatha's will be comforted to know that the church will not be closed and that the Latin Mass will contine at St. Francis de Sales.

|

The "Right Way" of Fr. Luigi Giussani

The memorable interview in which the founder of Communion and Liberation recounted how popes Montini {Paul VI] and John Paul II saved the Church from disaster
by Sandro Magister

|

Archbishop Burke's Column on the Reorganization of the South City Deanery

In announcing the final decisions regarding the pastoral reorganization of the South City Deanery, I am deeply conscious of the pain which changes in parish and Catholic school life cause. I have the deepest compassion for the faithful of the South City Deanery and regret sincerely the pain which you are enduring. I assure you that the changes which I announce today are made to further the mission of the Church in the archdiocese. They represent prudential decisions, but they are made on the basis of the thorough work of the task force for the South City Deanery Pastoral Planning. I ask you to accept the suffering of change in your parishes and schools, asking that God bless the Church in the deanery and the archdiocese.
Part 1 of the Archbishop's Column
Continued to Part 2

After having briefly read this, I noticed several things of note:
St. Agatha Parish, which has been serving as a personal parish for the faithful attached to the celebration of the Mass and other sacred rites, according to the liturgical books in force in 1962, is to become the personal parish of the faithful of Polish language and heritage.

St. Francis de Sales Parish is to be suppressed, and its territory and faithful are to be united to St. Pius V Parish. The Archdiocesan Hispanic Ministry, presently located at St. Francis de Sales Parish, is to be transferred to St. Cecilia Parish. St. Francis de Sales Church is to be an oratory for the faithful attached to the celebration of the Mass and other sacred rites, according to the liturgical books in force in 1962. St. Francis de Sales Oratory is to be under the pastoral care and direction of the Institute of Christ the King, Sovereign Priest, a society of apostolic life.

|

Kathleen McChesney Steps Down

The first child-protection monitor for the U.S. Roman Catholic Church said in an interview the day before she steps down that the unrelenting focus on bishops' failures to rein in sexually abusive priests had obscured the efforts of countless diocesan workers and volunteers dedicated to helping victims.

McChesney is departing as the church reviews the policy she was hired to help implement. Included in its many provisions is a requirement that all guilty clerics be barred from church work, including saying Mass in public and working as parish priests.
Link.

|

Archdiocese Decides Which South St. Louis Parishes Will Close

The official list will come out on Friday, but Newschannel 5 has obtained the list of Catholic churches and schools that will be closed by the Archdiocese.

Debate over which parishes to close has gone on for months. Church leaders say the closings are necessary, due to a declining Catholic population in the area.
The list (per KTVI) of churches was listed last night here.

The closing list includes:
Holy Family Church and School
Immaculate Conception/St. Henry Church
St. Bonaface Church
St. John Nepomuk Church
Saints Mary and Joseph Church
St. Mary Of Victories Church
St. Hedwig Church
Resurrection of Our Lord Church and School
St. Mary Magdalen School (Church stays open)
St. Aloysius Gonzaga Church
St. Anthony School (Church stays open)

Sources tell Newschannel 5 the closing list would have been much longer, had the Archbishop not listened to the concerns of parishoners in the area.
Even though this should put to rest the scandalous allegations that Archbishop Burke does not listen, it probably won't for people, generally, only hear what they want to hear.

Source.

|

Pope Recovering from Surgery, Advised Not to Speak

ROME (Reuters) - Pope John Paul (news - web sites) spent a restful night in hospital after throat surgery and is now breathing unassisted, but doctors have advised him not to speak for several days, his spokesman said on Friday.

Joaquin Navarro-Valls said the Pontiff's heart and blood circulation remained good and he had no bronchial pneumonia infection -- a possible complication of the tracheotomy performed on him on Thursday to ease his breathing problems.
Please keep the Holy Father in your prayers. Tonight as many attend Stations of the Cross, offer those prayers for Pope John Paul that, if it be God's will, the Holy Father might make a full recovery.

Source.

|

Dominicans Under Fire in Oakland

Editor's note: The following story was to appear in our February issue. The day before deadline, however, I received a call from a Dominican priest asking me to pull the story. The priest told me he could give me information that would put the situation at St. Albert's Priory in perspective. I agreed I would at least hold the story for another month and arranged to talk with the priest in about a week and a half. When that time expired, I thrice called the priest, leaving messages both where he carries out his apostolate and at the Dominican house. After about a week, the priest contacted the Faith's publisher with a message that Dominican superiors directed him to refer me to Dominican spokeswoman Carla Hass. Calls to Hass went unanswered.
The story is here.

|

William Donohue Blasts NBC For Mocking the Blessed Sacrament

During the February 22 episode of the NBC-TV sitcom, “Committed,” two non-Catholics are mistakenly given Holy Communion at a Catholic funeral Mass. Nate, who is Jewish, and Bowie, a Protestant, don’t know what to do with the Eucharist, so they make several failed attempts to get rid of it. For example, they try slipping it into the pocket of a priest, dropping it on a tray of cheese and crackers, etc.

At one point, the priest, who is portrayed as not knowing the difference between the Host and a cracker, goes to grab the “cracker” from a tray of appetizers; he initially balks when he discovers that it is the last one. Then he changes his mind, saying, “Oh, what the hell.” By far the most offensive scene occurs when Nate and Bowie accidentally flush what they think is the Host down the toilet.
More here.

|

How wonderful it must be to live in LA.?

|

Mel Gibson to follow up 'The Passion' with Fatima film

Fittingly, just ten days after the death of Sr Lucia dos Santos, the last survivor to witness the appearances of the Virgin Mary at the Portuguese town of Fatima in 1517, Mel Gibson has bought the rights to the book ‘Stealing from Angels’.

‘Stealing from Angels’ is a work of fiction that tells the tale of a man who shoulders a huge secret and trusts no one.

One thing’s for sure; this film is destined to be a controversial box office blockbuster. But before the conspiracy theories get out of hand, not to mention individual reader interpretations, the author himself has the final say in an interview with The Tribune: “It’s a great story and that is that,” said Dullaghan.

Hollywood holds its breath…...
Source.

|

Gospel for Friday, 2nd Week of Lent

Matthew 21:33-43, 45-46

The Parable of the Wicked Tenants

(Jesus told the chief priests and the elders,) [33] "Hear another parable. There was a householder who planted a vineyard, and set a hedge around it, dug a wine press in it, and built a tower, and let it out to tenants, and went into another country. [34] When the season of fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the tenants, to get his fruit; [35] and the tenants took his servants and beat one, killed another, and stoned another. [36] Again he sent other servants, more than the first; and they did the same to them. [37] Afterward he sent his son to them, saying, `They will respect my son.' [38] But when the tenants saw the son, they said to themselves, `This is the heir; come, let us kill him and have his inheritance.' [39] And they took him and cast him out of the vineyard, and killed him. [40] When therefore the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?" [41] They said to Him, "He will put those wretches to a miserable death, and let out the vineyard to other tenants who will give him the fruits in their seasons."

[42] Jesus said to them, "Have you never read in the scriptures: `The very stone which the builders rejected has become the head of the corner; this was the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes'! [43] Therefore I tell you, the Kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruits of it."

[45] When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard His parables, they perceived that He was speaking about them. [46] But when they tried to arrest Him, they feared the multitudes, because they held Him to be a prophet.
*************
Commentary:

33-46. This very important parable completes the previous one. The parable of the two sons simply identifies the indocility of Israel; that of the wicked tenants focuses on the punishment to come.

Our Lord compares Israel to a choice vineyard, specially fenced, with a watchtower, where a keeper is on the look-out to protect it from thieves and foxes. God has spared no effort to cultivate and embellish His vineyard. The vineyard is in the charge of tenant farmers; the householder is God, and the vineyard, Israel (Isaiah 5:3-5: Jeremiah 2:21; Joel 1:7).

The tenants to whom God has given the care of His people are the priests, scribes and elders. The owner's absence makes it clear that God really did entrust Israel to its leaders; hence their responsibility and the account He demands of them.

The owner used to send his servants from time to time to collect the fruit; this was the mission of the prophets. The second despatch of servants to claim what is owing to the owner--who meet the same fate as the first--refers to the way God's prophets were ill-treated by the kings and priests of Israel (Matthew 23:37; Acts 7:42; Hebrews 11:36-38). Finally he sent his son to them, thinking that they would have more respect for him; here we can see the difference between Jesus and the prophets, who were servants, not "the Son": the parable indicates singular, transcendental sonship, expressing the divinity of Jesus Christ.

The malicious purpose of the tenants in murdering the son and heir to keep the inheritance for themselves is the madness of the leaders in expecting to become undisputed masters of Israel by putting Christ to death (Matthew 12:14; 26:4). Their ambition blinds them to the punishment that awaits them. Then "they cast him out of the vineyard, and killed him": a reference to Christ's crucifixion, which took place outside the walls of Jerusalem.

Jesus prophesies the punishment God will inflict on the evildoers: He will put them to death and rent the vineyard to others. This is a very significant prophecy. St. Peter later repeats to the Sanhedrin: "This is the stone which was rejected by you builders, but which has become the head of the corner" (Acts 4:11; 1 Peter 2:4). The stone is Jesus of Nazareth, but the architects of Israel, who build up and rule the people, have chosen not use it in the building. Because of their unfaithfulness the Kingdom of God will be turned over to another people, the Gentiles, who WILL give God the fruit He expects His vineyard to yield (cf. Matthew 3:8-10; Galatians 6:16).

For the building to be well-built, it needs to rest on this stone. Woe to him who trips over it! (cf. Matthew 12:30; Luke 2:34), as first Jews and later the enemies of Christ and His Church will discover through bitter experience (cf. Isaiah 8:14-15).

Christians in all ages should see this parable as exhorting them to build faithfully upon Christ and make sure they do not fall into the sin of this Jewish generation. We should also be filled with hope and a sense of security; for, although the building--the Church--at some times seem to be breaking up, its sound construction, with Christ as its cornerstone, is assured.
************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Thursday, February 24, 2005

Videoconference to Focus on Year of the Eucharist

A theologians videoconference, the 35th in the series organized by the Congregation for Clergy, will be held this Friday on the topic "The Year of the Eucharist."

The conference may be followed live, starting at noon (Roman time), and recorded through the Web page www.clerus.org.

|

Jesuit Gonzaga University Favours Gay and Pro-Abortion Campus Clubs

SPOKANE, February 24, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Gonzaga University, the Catholic college in Spokane, Washington, owned and run by the Jesuit order, has made its stand on the side of abortion supporters and homosexual activists against Catholic and pro-life groups on campus.

“We live in a strange age, indeed, when a Catholic, Jesuit university would deny a Christian pro-life group recognition because its religious nature is considered discriminatory,” said Greg Lukianoff, spokesman for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education in Philadelphia.

Dr. Adams [Mike S. Adams, a professor of criminology at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington and a columnist for Townhall.com] writes, “Gonzaga Law School’s deplorable conduct towards its Christian students should serve as a warning to Catholic parents everywhere: avoid sending your Catholic children to GU.”
More of the article here.

|

Cardinal Martino Appeals for Terri Schiavo

VATICAN CITY, FEB. 24, 2005 (Zenit.org).- A Vatican official launched an appeal to save Terri Schiavo, the brain-damaged Florida woman whose husband wants her off life-support care.

In statements on Vatican Radio, Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, said: "If Mr. Schiavo succeeds legally in causing the death of his wife, this not only would be tragic in itself, but would be a grave step toward the legal approval of euthanasia in the United States."

He added: "I would like to remind everyone in this connection, about all that the Holy Father has said in past days to the Pontifical Academy for Life, confirming that the quality of life is not interpreted as economic success, beauty and physical pleasure, but consists in the supreme dignity of the creature made in the image and likeness of God.

"No one can be the arbiter of life except God himself."
Source.

|

St. Stanislaus - Reasons for Not Appealing the Interdict

INTERDICT APPEAL

As announced in a previous News Release, the St. Stanislaus Board of Directors (BOD), who have received a most unjust form of punishment from the Archbishop of St. Louis, has after much consultation with Can Law experts and its attorney have decided not to appeal the Interdict.

The rationale for this decision is as follows:

1. The BOD must first appeal to the Archbishop, who imposed the Interdict (Canon Law)

2. The Archbishop of St. Louis must approve the (Canon Law) canon lawyer to defend the BOD against his actions.(Canon Law)

3. The BOD would be restricted from discussing the case in public. The archbishop does not have that restriction.

4. The BOD cannot consider, or speak to another religious order of priests or independent priest to provide religious guidance to our Parish.

5. The BOD cannot take any action that would be upsetting to the archbishop.

6. All public statements by any BOD member must be approved by the attorney before hand.

7. Actions by the parishioners may be construed as being initiated by the BOD, and thus hinder the appeal.

8. The canon lawyer advocate shall have the privilege and right to release any or all data at his discretion.

As the BOD has a primary responsibility to the parishioners of St. Stanislaus, it cannot accept these limitations that are tantamount to a gag-order during the appeal process.

As unjust as the Archbishop’s action is over a property dispute, the BoD as representatives of the parishioners stand firm in their conviction and pray that a Man of God steps forward and rights this wrong.

Board of Directors
Polish Roman Catholic St. Stanislaus Parish
For additional information contact Richard Bach at 314-518-5047
It basically comes down to the fact that "RULES" have to be followed if one wants to appeal...The "RULES" are judged to be unfair. Since the "RULES" are felt to be too restrictive and unbearable, there will be no participation.

How utterly sad and pathetic!

Source.

|

St Stanislaus Board Releases Letter to Parishioners

February 21, 2005

To all Parishioners and Friends:

The attempt to live in harmony with the Archdiocese in a similar role prior to their attempted takeover is finished. We must move on.

From all legal counsel, clergy, and lay people with expertise in Canon Law and prior dealings with the Archbishop we will be unable to reach a mutual resolution to the current situation; regardless of what is offered. The Archbishop’s sole interpretation of Canon Law and his continued demonstrated behavior in the matter continues to prevent this.

To deprive a parish and individuals of all religious guidance and celebrations over a property dispute is not in religious doctrine. Yet it is acceptable and enthusiastically embraced through clergy made law, called Canon Law.

The BOD, with advice from many has agreed that it is time to grasp the obvious that there is no hope for a timely mutual resolution. Our religious needs, time, support and funds will diminish our position, wear us down and continue to break and wreck havoc in our community. We, your representatives cannot allow that. After 2+ years of this struggle the insults to our Parish coupled with the disgrace, in depriving us of all religious guidance and celebrations are at an end.

That being said, the BOD has unanimously voted that during this most holy Easter season, to seek interim religious guidance and celebrations from an order of priests or an individual priest outside the authority of the Archbishop of St. Louis. We will do our best to obtain a Roman Catholic Priest with Polish Heritage and who speaks the Polish language. Please bear with us, as this will be difficult, but it may be our ultimate future.

We realize this is a major decision and may come as a shock to some but as the leaders in this conflict we believe it is for the good for the intermediate life of the parish.

We again want to emphasize it is only a temporary move. We will keep the door open to the Archdiocese for dialogue, but only as you direct.

If in the near future, a permanent move outside the Archdiocese is decided in the best interests of the parish, a parishioner vote will be required.

We solicit you religious understanding and continued support in this undertaking. God bless us in these momentous times. We must regain religious leadership and guidance and live with dignity. Mass schedules will be sent to you in the near future, but until then our religious service will continue to be at 9:30 AM in Polish and English.

Mr. Bill Bialczak
Chairman
Board of Directors
Source.

|

KTVI News Lists Parishes Which Will Close

The South City Deanery parishes that are to close according to KTVI
(from an advance copy of the St. Louis Review):

Holy Families
Holy Innocents
Immaculate Conception/St Henry
Resurrection of our Lord
St. Aloysius Gonzaga
St. Boniface
St. Hedwig
St. John Nepomuk
St. Mary of Victories
Sts. Mary & Joseph

|

Weakened Pope Struggles to Breathe

An email News Flash from Inside the Vatican:
Doctors attending Pope John Paul II have performed a tracheotomy

Inside the Vatican has learned, from reliable sources, that doctors attending the pope decided to insert a tube into the pope’s neck to assist his breathing. The operation is called a tracheotomy. "He is very weak; that is the problem," said one source. "I am very worried."

This morning I would still have said that he would still have had some years to live, however this evening I am no longer so sure. The Vatican has not yet officially commented on this matter. We will keep you updated on these very serious developments as the day progresses.

- by Dr. Robert Moynihan
Forwarded Email.

|

"Soundoff" Entries from the Chesterfield Journal

The Post Dispatch's edition of the Chesterfield Journal contained a few more nuggets of foolishness.
Allman and Burke
Catholics should question how much of their donated money is used to pay the salary of Jamie Allman, who left a good job to make a fool of himself as a voice for Archbishop Burke.
I wonder how it is that people who make these kinds of comments are even permitted to roam the streets of St. Louis without proper supervision. Clearly, this troubled individual is simply regurgitating what he has heard repeated by others.

First, monies which are freely given to the Church, unless designated for a special fund, are given with the understanding that the Archbishop is fully capable of disbursing those funds as he sees fit. He is aware of the needs of the Archdiocese where we, the faithful scattered about the Archdiocese, are not. Would Archbishop Burke be in a position to determine how this caller should spend his money? For food? For a new car? For utilities? For a charitable cause? Of course not!

Secondly, for those whose hold opinions similar to the above individual, one should know and understand the facts before speaking, lest one demonstrate his own foolishness. The Archdiocese has employed a spokesman and Director of Communications for quite some time. It is a position which was, in all likelihood, already budgeted for the current fiscal year and perhaps for years in the future. Mr. Allman was hired to REPLACE the man who held the position previously.

Why did we hear nothing about this spending of donated money then? Perhaps, because the previous spokesman was, to a great extent, silent, not well known, or rarely covered on the local news.

Mr Allman, as a well known public figure of the media and a vocal defender of the faith, is well suited, it seems to many, for the position for which Archbishop Burke hired him. Who are we to question his judgment in hiring a man with excellent credentials and experience? Our responsibility is to support our Archbishop and those whom he has chosen to speak in his behalf.
No role model
The archbishop of St. Louis is going against what he stands for. He is not acting as a role model for Catholics. He has done nothing but turn Catholics and others in St. Louis against him. He needs to leave St. Louis. He is out of control.
Those who are uncomfortable with being exposed to the light, quickly return to the darkness from whence they came. Their thinking is confused and their minds are cloudy. This is obvious in the caller's sentences.

The Archbishop courageously stands up for Christ, His Blessed Mother, the truth and for the teachings and disciplines of the Church. He stands up to help those who need his help and his direction. Those who turn away from him or turn against him do so, not because of him, but because they have problems with what he says to us, what he teaches us. He calls us, as does the Holy Father, and as Christ Himself calls us, to conversion - to become heroic examples of holiness and sanctity by following in the footsteps of out Lord and by responding to the graces He bestows on us. Sometimes, this call is hard to listen to and hard to accept, but that does not diminish its importance or its necessity.

Christ calls us "to be perfect as His Father is perfect." The Holy Father as the successor of St. Peter exhorts that we listen with attentiveness to the call of our Lord and respond obediently to it. Archbishop Burke, as a legitimate successor of the Apostles whom Christ chose to feed and tend His flock, reminds us over and over again of these same things. Numerous times, he has called upon us to, not only hear the words of the Mother of our Lord, but to open our hearts to her call, "Do whatever He tells you." Are we doing what Christ wants us to do?

It is unconscionable for one to suggest that this man needs to leave St. Louis. Those whose hearts are hardened, will no doubt, feel this way. Those, however, who are alive with hope and anticipation are thankful that he is here. In His Divine Providence, God has bestowed countless blessings and graces on the faithful of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, especially with the appointment of Raymond Burke as our Archbishop.

Maybe those who feel anger or bitterness or hatred toward the Archbishop or the Church will seek our Lord's assistance in overcoming their difficulties if we pray for them? We might pray as well, that the Post Dispatch will one day exhibit some fairness in what it chooses to put on its pages. Miracles do happen!

The Link is here.

|

Another Article on the Holy Father

Pope rushed to hospital with flu relapse

VATICAN CITY (AP) -- Pope John Paul II was rushed to the hospital in an ambulance for the second time in a month Thursday after suffering fever and congestion from a recurrence of the flu, the Vatican said.

The 84-year-old pontiff had the same symptoms of the breathing crisis that sent him to Gemelli Polyclinic on Feb. 1, a Vatican official said on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday, the pope made his longest public appearance since being discharged from the clinic two weeks ago.
...
"It appears the pope is suffering from pneumonia, likely a bacterial pneumonia, a serious problem for a man of his age with Parkinson's," said Dr. Barbara Paris, chairwoman of geriatrics and vice-chairwoman of Medicine at Maimonides Medical Center in New York.
Whatever the problems, let us pray for his speedy and complete recovery.

Full story here.

|

The LARK Program

I received this email, and while I normally post little to nothing which is not related in some way to the Faith, I thought I would share it nonetheless. Please forgive my indulgence - I felt the irony was well worth sharing.
LARK Program
A person wrote a letter to the White House complaining about the treatment of a captive taken during the Afghanistan war. Following is a copy of a letter they received back:

-------------------------
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20016

Dear Concerned Citizen:

Thank you for your recent letter roundly criticizing our treatment of the Taliban and Al Qaeda detainees currently being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Our administration takes these matters seriously, and your opinion was heard loud and clear here in Washington. You'll be pleased to learn that, thanks to the concerns of citizens like you, we are creating a new division of the Terrorist Retraining Program, to be called the "Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers" program, or LARK for short. In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided to place one terrorist under your personal care.

Your personal detainee has been selected and scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence next Monday. Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of admonishment. It will likely be necessary for you to hire some assistant caretakers. We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommended in your letter.

Although Ahmed is sociopathic and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his "attitudinal problem" will help him overcome these character flaws.

Perhaps you are correct in describing these problems as mere cultural differences. He will bite you, given the chance. We understand that you plan to offer counseling and home schooling. Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We do not suggest that you ask him to demonstrate these skills at your next yoga group. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless (in your opinion) this might offend him.

Ahmed will not wish to interact with your wife or daughters (except sexually) since he views females as a subhuman form of property. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him, and he has been known to show violent tendencies around women who fail to comply with the new dress code that Ahmed will recommend as more appropriate attire. I'm sure they will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the bhurka - over time. Just remind them that it is all part of "respecting his culture and his religious beliefs" - wasn't that how you put it?

Thanks again for your letter. We truly appreciate it when folks like you, who know so much, keep us informed of the proper way to do our job. You take good care of Ahmed - and remember - we'll be watching. Good luck!

Cordially,
Don Rumsfeld

|

Rift is hopeless, say St. Stanislaus leaders

|

Pope rushed to hospital with fever

VATICAN CITY (CNN) -- Pope John Paul II has been rushed to hospital by ambulance after suffering a recurrence of the flu that forced him to be hospitalized for 10 days earlier this month.

The Vatican said the 84-year-old pope had a relapse of the flu and was taken to Gemelli hospital at 10:45 a.m. (0945 GMT) on Thursday for "specialist treatment and further checks."
Please keep the Holy Father in your prayers.

|

Gospel for Thursday, 2nd Week of Lent

***** I apologize, I posted the wrong Gospel and commentary. I inadvertantly posted Thursday's Gospel for Wednesday... I will repost Wednesday's later this evening...Again, I apologize sincerely for the mistake.
***********************

From: Luke 16:19-31

Lazarus and the Rich Man

(Jesus told them this parable:) [19] "There was a rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen and who feasted sumptuously every day. [20] And at his gate lay a poor man named Lazarus, full of sores, [21] who desired to be fed with what fell from the rich man's table; moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. [22] The poor man died and was carried by the angels to Abraham's bosom. The rich man also died and was buried; [23] and in Hades, being in torment, he lifted up his eyes, and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus in his bosom. [24] And he called out, `Father Abraham, have mercy upon me, and send Lazarus to dip the end of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am in anguish in this flame.' [25] But Abraham said, `Son, remember that you in your lifetime received your good things, and Lazarus in like manner evil things, but now he is comforted here, and you are in anguish. [26] And besides in all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, in order that those who would pass from here to you may not be able, and none may cross from there to us.' [27] And he said, `Then I beg you, father, to send him to my father's house, [28] for I have five brothers, so that he may warn them, lest they also come into this place of torment.' [29] But Abraham said, `They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.' [30] And he said, `No, father Abraham; but if some one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.' [31] He said to him, `If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced if some one should rise from the dead.'"
***********
Commentary:

19-31. This parable disposes of two errors--that of those who denied the survival of the soul after death and, therefore, retribution in the next life; and that of those who interpreted material prosperity in this life as a reward for moral rectitude, and adversity as punishment. This parable shows that, immediately after death, the soul is judged by God for all its acts--the "particular judgment"--and is rewarded or punished; and that divine revelation is by itself sufficient for men to be able to believe in the next life.

In another area, the parable teaches the innate dignity of every human person, independently of his social, financial, cultural or religious position. And respect for this dignity implies that we must help those who are experiencing any material or spiritual need: "Wishing to come down to topics that are practical and of some urgency, the Council lays stress on respect for the human person: everyone should look upon his neighbor (without any exception) as another self, bearing in mind above all his life and the means necessary for living it in a dignified way lest he follow the example of the rich man who ignored Lazarus, the poor man" (Vatican II, "Gaudium Et Spes", 27).

Another practical consequence of respect for others is proper distribution of material resources and protection of human life, even unborn life, as Paul VI pleaded with the General Assembly of the United Nations: "Respect for life, even with regard to the great problem of the birth rate, must find here in your assembly its highest affirmation and its most reasoned defense. You must strive to multiply bread so that it suffices for the tables of mankind, and not rather favor an artificial control of birth, which would be irrational, in order to diminish the number of guests at the banquet of life" ("Address to the UN", 4 October 1965).

21. Apparently this reference to the dogs implies not that they alleviated Lazarus' sufferings but increased them, in contrast with the rich man's pleasure: to the Jews dogs were unclean and therefore were not generally used as domestic animals.

22-26. Earthly possession, as also suffering, are ephemeral things: death marks their end, and also the end of our testing-time, our capacity to sin or to merit reward for doing good; and immediately after death we begin to enjoy our reward or to suffer punishment, as the case may be. The Magisterium of the Church has defined that the souls of all who die in the grace of God enter Heaven, immediately after death or after first undergoing a purging, if that is necessary. "We believe in eternal life. We believe that the souls of all those who die in the grace of Christ-whether they must still make expiation in the fire of Purgatory, or whether from the moment they leave their bodies they are received by Jesus into Paradise like the Good Thief--go to form that people of God which succeeds death, death which will be totally destroyed on the day of the resurrection when these souls are reunited with their bodies" (Paul VI, "Creed of the People of God", 28).

The _expression of "Abraham's bosom" refers to the place or state "into which the souls of the just, before the coming of Christ the Lord were received, and where, without experiencing any sort of pain, but supported by the blessed hope of redemption, they enjoyed peaceful repose. To liberate these holy souls, who, in the bosom of Abraham were expecting the Savior, Christ the Lord descended into hell" ("St. Pius V Catechism", I, 6, 3).

22. "Both the rich man and the beggar died and were carried before Abraham, and there judgment was rendered on their conduct. And the Scripture tells us that Lazarus found consolation, but that the rich man found torment. Was the rich man condemned because he had riches, because he abounded in earthly possessions, because he `dressed in purple and linen and feasted sumptuously every day'? No, I would say that it was not for this reason. The rich man was condemned because he did not pay attention to the other man, because he failed to take notice of Lazarus, the person who sat at his door and who longed to eat the scraps from his table. Nowhere does Christ condemn the mere possession of earthly goods as such. Instead, He pronounces very harsh words against those who use their possessions in a selfish way, without paying attention to the needs of others[...]."

The parable of the rich man and Lazarus must always be present in our memory; it must form our conscience. Christ demands openness to our brothers and sisters in need--openness from the rich, the affluent, the economically advantaged; openness to the poor, the underdeveloped and the disadvantaged. Christ demands an openness that is more than benign attention, more than token actions or half-hearted efforts that leave the poor as destitute as before or even more so [...].

"We cannot stand idly by, enjoying our riches and freedom, if, in any place, the Lazarus of the Twentieth Century stands at our doors. In the light of the parable of Christ, riches and freedom mean a special responsibility. Riches and freedom create a special obligation. And so, in the name of the solidarity that binds us all together in a common humanity, I again proclaim the dignity of every human person: the rich man and Lazarus are both human beings, both of them equally created in the image and likeness of God, both of them equally redeemed by Christ, at a great price of the `precious blood of Christ' (1 Peter 1:19)" ([Pope] John Paul II, "Homily in Yankee Stadium", 2 October 1979).

24-31. The dialogue between the rich man and Abraham is a dramatization aimed at helping people remember the message of the parable: strictly speaking, there is no room in Hell for feelings of compassion toward one's neighbor: in Hell hatred presides. "When Abraham said to the rich man `between us and you a great chasm has been fixed...' he showed that after death and resurrection there will be no scope for any kind of penance. The impious will not repent and enter the Kingdom, nor will the just sin and go down into Hell. This is the unbridgeable abyss" (Aphraates, "Demonstratio", 20; "De Sustentatione Egenorum", 12). This helps us to understand what St. John Chrysostom says: "I ask you and I beseech you and, falling at your feet, I beg you: as long as we enjoy the brief respite of life, let us repent, let us be converted, let us become better, so that we will not have to lament uselessly like that rich man when we die and tears can do us no good. For even if you have a father or a son or a friend or anyone else who have influence with God, no one will be able to set you free, for your own deeds condemn you" ("Hom. on 1 Cor.").
*********
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

A List of Those Disciplined by the Holy See

In light of the recent censure of Fr. Roger Haight, some sent me a link to this list.
The list is located at the National Catholic Reporter...Caution is urged...
The List

Editor's note: Following is a list of Catholic theologians and others disciplined by the Vatican during the papacy of John Paul II. Though not an exhaustive list, it is a substantial representation of the range of people subject to papal discipline during the past 26 years. The list was compiled by Tara Harris, assistant to the editor.
See who these people are.

|

Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Catholic News Service Provides a Followup Article...

...of the recent National Catholic Reporter hit piece on "conservative Catholics" undermining "Faithful Citizenship".

Karl Keating, in his most recent "E-Letter", commented on "Faithful Citizenship":
There were two chief problems with "Faithful Citizenship."
First, at 8,000 words it was verbose. If you want people to take action, give them a guide, not a treatise.
Second, "Faithful Citizenship" was not structured as a voter's guide anyway.

A voter's guide helps voters narrow down their choices. Some guides name names and recommend particular candidates. The "Voter's Guide for Serious Catholics" didn't do that. Instead, it gave the Church's official teaching on five key moral issues and left it to readers to apply those teachings in the voting booth.

"Faithful Citizenship" was not designed to help voters eliminate unacceptable candidates. It did not indicate what to do if a candidate was wrong on one issue (such as abortion) and right on another issue (such as housing, assuming there is a "right" position for Catholics on such an issue). It did not make clear whether some issues were to be given more weight than other issues.

Instead of being a true voter's guide, "Faithful Citizenship" was a backgrounder, useful for small-group discussions but not for deciding how to cast a ballot.
Not only these, but the fact that this document comes from an administrative committee, and not the body of Bishops, is something which must be acknowledged as well.

Getting back to the CNS article, we now find that William A. Dinges, a professor of religious studies at The Catholic University of America, in his recent address at a national gathering of about 100 diocesan social action leaders stated that the U.S. Catholic community reached a new peak in the 2004 election season and that a
"more ominous" element of the election-year divisions was the "vitriolic and escalating" rhetoric and "uncivil behavior, characterized by confrontation, harassment and attempts at intimidation."
I'm not certain where these cases of harassment and intimidation occurred but I do not recall any stories of these "ominous" elements engaging in any such behavior, although I will admit it that such things could have happened. That being said, however, I believe that "vitriolic rhetoric" was used, to a large extent, by those who did their utmost to blur the distinctions of intrinsically evil acts with those issues for which legitimate disagreements of positions can occur. There were a number of email groups which were especially hostile to anyone who tried to 'dialogue' with them.

Mr. Dinges goes on to state:
"We have a 'blue faith,' if you will, and a 'red faith' as much as a community of faith. In significant ways our church remains a house divided against itself as interest groups, ideological factions and in some cases individual Catholics compete to control the narrative of the Second Vatican Council, to act as a de facto magisterium (teaching authority), to fill or exploit leadership voids and to define Catholicism on their own terms or in terms of single-issue politics."
Once again, while his statement(s) are partially correct (it appears that he sees things upside down or from an inverted perspective), he again points his finger at the wrong group of people. Those who are faithful (which I assume to be those of the "red faith") to the teachings of the Church are not the cause of the dissension within the Church.

The Second Vatican Council has been misinterpreted, it seems to me, not by those of the "red faith" but by those of the "blue faith", generally speaking. And to be blunt, the Magisterium "controls the narrative of the Second Vatican Council", despite attempts by those who seek to undermine or subvert its teachings. I have yet to hear of a faithful, orthodox group trying to "nuance" the documents of the Second Vatican Council to promote or teach things which are not in the documents or contrary to the perennial teachings of the Church.

He said his talk focused on Catholic groups of the right because it was from there, not the center or the left, that the social action leaders experienced opposition and contentious challenge during the election campaign.
Perhaps some people "from the right" questioned the social action leaders' fidelity to the Church?

Perhaps the time was ripe for Catholics to exercise the graces and gifts they received at Baptism and Confirmation to fight heterodoxy?

Perhaps this demand by the faithful for the fullness of the truth was, after so many years of apathy or fear, unexpected by the social action leaders.

Perhaps, concerned and faithful Catholics are becoming tired of the ambiguity and fluff from those who have engaged in 'teaching' their interpretations rather than what the Church teaches?
Dinges said the polarization among Catholics "mirrors polarization in our country at large, along with the general climate of rancor and incivility, coarseness, recrimination and name-calling" found in much political and social debate.
Again, I suspect that any instances of "name-calling" or such by any faithful Catholic group was extremely rare, and more than likely non-existent. However, one only need look at other groups (the "blues") to see the incivility, name-calling, and other acts of verbal violence...many examples could be cited, which is more than that which Mr. Dinges or CNS provides.

It seems to me that Catholic News Service, once again, does all of us a disservice by publishing this article.

|

Holy Thursday-Washing of Feet (Redux)

There is a document, to which many refer in justifying the washing of women's feet on Holy Thursday, titled Holy Thursday Mandatum . This document was authorized by the Chairman of the Bishops' Committee on the Liturgy of the NCCB/USCC, which is now known as the USCCB.

The document itself was printed in the Bishops' Committee on the Liturgy (BCL) Newsletter in February 1987. The document was not authorized or voted on by the body of Bishops nor was it approved by the Holy See. As such, I understand that the BCL response has no legislative force.
************

One of the current authoritative documents of the Church states unambiguously that those whose feet are to be washed by the priest on Holy Thursday shall be twelve chosen men. This 1988 document from the Holy See, refutes the BCL document from the previous year, and states::
The washing of the feet of chosen men which, according to tradition, is performed on this day, represents the service and charity of Christ, who came "not to be served, but to serve." This tradition should be maintained, and its proper significance explained. [Paschales Solemnitatis No. 51], (emphasis added).
************
Another authoritative source is the Sacramentary, the book that provides the instructions for the liturgy. The Sacramentary clearly states that the ritual is optional:
“Depending on pastoral circumstances, the washing of feet follows the homily… The general intercessions follow the washing of feet, or, if this does not take place, they follow the homily” (emphasis added).
These instructions allow no substitutions of the rite, such as the washing of hands. The only options are 1) to have it or 2) not to have it.

The Sacramentary continues by specifically requiring "men" to represent the Apostles during the ritual:
The men who have been chosen are led by the ministers to chairs prepared in a suitable place. Then the priest (removing his chasuble if necessary) goes to each man. With the help of the ministers, he pours water over each one’s feet and dries them. (emphasis added)
Notice as well that it is a priest who performs the washing of the feet - no deacon, no lay person.

While the following is not an authoritative source as the quotes from the preceding sources, Fr. Edward McNamara of the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical Athenaeum answered this question in a March 23, 2004 Zenit column, as follows, using the authoritative documents from the Holy See:
Question 2: I have learned today about the washing of the feet ceremony at Mass in my parish on Holy Thursday. To take the place of the twelve apostles, we are to have six gentlemen and six ladies. I would welcome your comments about this innovation. — M.R., Melbourne, Australia

Answer 2: The rubrics for Holy Thursday clearly state that the priest washes the feet of men ([Latin], viri) in order to recall Christ's action toward his apostles. Any modification of this rite would require permission from the Holy See. (my emphasis)

It is certainly true that in Christ there is neither male nor female and that all disciples are equal before the Lord. But this reality need not be expressed in every rite, especially one that is so tied up to the concrete historical circumstances of the Last Supper. (Source).
One should particulary note the phrases above which state:
"This tradition should be maintained, and its proper significance explained" and "in order to recall Christ's action toward his apostles".

There is also the added question and answer, which notes that deacons or the lay faithful DO NOT perform the foot washing rite in the place of the priest.
Questions 3: Each year I find it increasingly difficult to perform the washing of parishioners' feet at the celebration of the Lord's Supper because of stiffness in my knee joints which make it almost impossible to get back up on my feet when moving from one parishioner to the next. Is it permissible to delegate this function to an older server? — C.D., Archdiocese of New York

Answer 3: The rite of the washing of feet is not obligatory and may be legitimately omitted. However, this is usually not pastorally advisable.

While the rite may not be delegated to a non-priest, a concelebrant may substitute the main celebrant for a good reason.

The rubrics describing this rite are limited to the essentials (selected men sit in a suitable place) and so allow for practical adaptations to the realities of place, time and circumstances.

Thus, taking the example of our Holy Father, as he has grown older, and less able to bend over, the seats of those whose feet he washed were first elevated so that he could continue to perform the rite. But in the last year or so he has been substituted by a cardinal.

Thus, if possible, the seats used by those whose feet are to be washed should be elevated, so that an elderly priest need not stoop too much.

If this solution is not feasible, I do not think it is contrary to the overall sense of the rite to find other practical solutions resulting in a similar effect, provided the rite be carried out with decorum.
It is not extraordinarily difficult to understand why many have been disregarding the rubrics of this special rite on Holy Thursday for a number of years. Perhaps, some are unaware - perhaps, some assume to no better than the Church?

There have been instances of deacons washing feet, lay people washing others feet, priests having their feet washed by the laity, and people washing each others hands. Some have witnessed and been forced to endure, after the foot washing rite, men and women giving personal testimonies of their "service" to the community. The last time I was at Mass when this occurred, no mention was made of the institution of the Sacrament of Holy Orders or of the Sacrament of the Eucharist or Holy Communion. Thus, an important and essential aspect of the Holy Thursday liturgy is diminished if not entirely lost.

During these deviations from the norms, it is rare to hear that one of the reasons for Pope Pius XII's renewal of this rite was to bring to mind the idea of service. Even when it is mentioned, what seems to be lost is that the washing of feet during the Holy Thursday celebration of the Last Supper is a reminder primarily to the priest that he acts in the person of Christ and must serve God’s people in humility. We are to learn from the priest that humility is essential for for us in order to be of service to others - for without humility, we cannot truly serve others.

Something I did not know previously was this:
At their June 1996 meeting, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) proposed a change to emphasize that all are called to serve one another in love. “Those whose feet are washed should be chosen to represent various people who constitute the parish or community: the young and old, men and women.” The proposal would allow women and children to be among those whose feet would be washed. It would not allow the washing of hands, or some other substituted ritual. While approved by more than two-thirds of the U.S. Bishops, this norm requires the confirmation of the Holy See in Rome before becoming law for the United States of America.

This action by the NCCB is a recognition that changes can not take place without the approval of the Holy See. Until then, the current ritual remains the binding norm, and any changes express a violation of SC 22. (Catholics United for the Faith, Faith Facts)
Because of the failure to follow the liturgical guidelines and diminishing the sign value of this special rite, I now attend Holy Thursday Mass, not at my parish, but at another parish, where the priest celebrates Holy Mass in a sacred and reverent manner without any liturgical 'innovations'. What a blessing this is!!!

Maybe this year, depending on the schedule, I may attend one of the Latin Masses for Holy Thursday or attend Mass at the Cathedral...

|

A Temporary Reprieve for Terri Schiavo

CLEARWATER, Florida, February 23, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A state judge extended the stay of brain-disabled Terri Schiavo today, giving her until five pm Friday to consider new arguments presented by the Schindler’s attorney. They contend that further testing be conducted before her feeding tube is removed, and that her husband be dismissed as her legal guardian.

|

St. Stanislaus Board Cuts Ties to Archdiocese?

In a letter to parishioners, the chairman of the six-member lay board of St. Stanislaus Kostka church said its relationship with the archdiocese “is finished,” and that the board had voted to “seek interim religious guidance...from an order of priests or an individual priest outside the authority of the Archbishop of St. Louis” for the Easter season.
Surely the board knows that a priest coming into the Archdiocese must have faculties granted to him by the Archbishop.
In a separate statement, the board said Wednesday it would not appeal to the Vatican the penalty imposed on them by Burke that denies them access to the Roman Catholic sacraments, saying the board members “pray that a Man of God steps forward and rights this wrong.”
The board seems unable to recognize that a man of God, in the person of Archbishop Burke, is there for them, and he is trying to help them to understand and to recognize that the situation can be reconciled, if they merely follow the structures that all parishes must follow.

Of course, for many, this will involve a conversion of heart - as St John the Baptist tells us, "decreasing so that He may increase". This can be difficult, especially in our culture where the "spirit of freedom" and "primacy of conscious" is constantly invoked, yet many times, is not properly understood.

What is so troubling, is that it appears that many of the parishioners seem to be of the same mind as the Board, ready to reject the Church over a simple matter of conformity to the laws of the Church.

It cannot be stressed enough that prayers are needed for the Board members and the like-minded parishioners. Prayers are also needed for those parishioners who have been exiled, so to speak, because of their humility and willingness to follow the directives of Archbishop Burke.

Surely, the faithful parishioners have also helped ro contribute to the upkeep of the parish and such, yet because they have chosen to be faithful to the Church, they must suffer more because of the actions of the disobedient. These parishioners, perhaps more than the others, should be embraced with love and compassion as their parish has been taken from them, by a group which does not seem willing to embrace the Cross, and hear the words of our Saviour.

Article is here.

*** Updated
Does this mean that the 11:00 am Candlelight Vigil at the Cathedral scheduled for March 6 will be cancelled? Inquiring minds, you know...

|

Parish Closings to be Announced This Friday

From Fox2KTVI.com
We will know Friday, which Catholic churches and schools in south St. Louis are to be closed. That list was the topic of discussion Tuesday night in a meeting between Archbishop Raymond Burke and Mayor Francis Slay at St. Louis City Hall.

Burke said he wanted to inform the mayor of his plans before they were announced Friday. It also gave the mayor one last chance to persuade the Archbishop to reconsider.

As many as 16 churches and schools may be on the closure list in south St. Louis. Burke told FOX 2 News, "We're ready to announce the results on Friday, so I want to make sure the mayor is fully informed, because we are deeply conscious of the responsibility of the church in the city."

Slay said, "This was an opportunity for me to make a final appeal to the Archbishop in terms of whatever the plans may be for the city of St. Louis, the churches and the schools." The school closures will be printed Friday in the Archdiocese newspaper, The St. Louis Review.

|

An Urgent Email: Please Help Us Rescue Terri Schiavo

I received this email late last night:
The moment her feeding tube is removed, Terri Schiavo will begin a long, slow, painful death by starvation and dehydration.

WE NEED YOUR HELP NOW to rescue Terri from her cruel executioners. They've already tried to kill her once before, and she fought to stay alive. But this may be the last chance Terri gets.

Will you help save her life?

Please read a special appeal from Pro-Life Leaders working together to save Terri Schiavo.

Fr. Frank Pavone * Rev. Patrick Mahoney * Rev. Rob Schenck * Joe Scheidler * Troy Newman * Brandi Swindell * Mike McMonagle

Click here to read their important message.

Operation Rescue is committed to rescuing those unjustly sentenced to die. Action could be taken within a few days to remove Terri's feeding tube. Please click the link above and read how you can help us SAVE HER LIFE.

For the voiceless,

Troy Newman
Operation Rescue
---------------------------
email: info@operationrescue.org
phone: 800 705-1175
web: http://www.operationrescue.org

|

Lincoln Diocese says it had a right to skip child protection audit

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- The Diocese of Lincoln, Neb., said Feb. 21 that it had a right not to participate in the 2004 sexual abuse and child protection audits of dioceses across the country because the bishops' charter calling for such audits "is not a law of the Catholic Church requiring compliance but only an advisory document."

The diocese issued a statement on its position to Catholic News Service in Washington after it was publicly criticized for being the only diocese in the country not to participate in the 2004 audits. The audits were reviews by outside investigators of the Gavin Group, most of them former FBI agents, to assess whether dioceses had taken the steps needed to implement the "Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People" adopted by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in June 2002. The results of the 2004 audits were released at a press conference in Washington Feb. 18.
I don't fault Bishop Bruskewitz at all for his position. As a matter of fact, I believe he is to be commended for having few, if any, of these problems.

I recall vividly his intervention to get to the source of the issue (dissent and homosexuality) at the USCCB meeting in Dallas which was rejected by the majority of Bishops. Many Catholics were disappointed that his request was rejected, as dissent and rejection of Church teaching, among both the laity and the ordained, is viewed as a major contributing factor to the problems the Church faces.

|

Diocese probes allegations against priests

SPRINGFIELD — Catholic Bishop George Lucas and attorney Bill Roberts promised Thursday a "thorough, open-minded and unbiased" probe into allegations of misconduct involving priests of the diocese.

...this approach is uncommon in the church, but was used in the Albany, N.Y., diocese when another former U.S. attorney, Mary Jo White, was hired to investigate charges against Albany’s Bishop Howard Hubbard. According to stories in the Oneonta (N.Y.) Daily Star, White was hired a year ago. She billed the diocese’s sexual misconduct review board $770 an hour for her own work and lesser amounts for other lawyers and investigators. Four months later, White’s report cleared Hubbard of accusations of sexual misconduct.

Creation of the commission and Roberts’ appointment were criticized by Stephen Brady of Petersburg, president of Roman Catholic Faithful, a group that has made numerous allegations of priestly misconduct in the past nine years. Brady said the investigation would have "no credibility" if he were not a member of the commission.
Article.

|

It's Wednesday, and that means it's time for"Town Talk"...

Today, in Town Talk, the Post prints NO remarks in support of Archbishop Burke, but does happen to find SIX which are critical of either the Catholic Church or the Archbishop. A rational person is led to ask, is this the norm or the standard with respect to the calls coming into the Post? Or does the editor, selectively choose those which are the most demeaning to the Church? Surely, in this large Archdiocese, there would be at least a few calls of support rather than the barrage of complaints, whines, and calumnies we see here on a weekly basis?
Have mercy
I HOPE GOD has mercy on the souls of the Roman Catholic Church. It no longer stands for the love and salvation of the people. It's for its own self-preservation and protection of those who live off of the people. People fear that the church is the only way for salvation, but no man shall enter Heaven but through his own actions and beliefs in his or her own life.
Salavation by works?
Divine pope
THE FIRST OF God's Ten Commandments is "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me". The people of the Catholic faith as well as the media might want to keep this in mind the next time the pope becomes ill. He is a man in a high position in the Catholic Church, but he is just a man like the men in other faiths. He is a human being and like all other human beings will have illnesses and eventually death. But he is not a god to be worshipped.
It looks like we have entered the "Twilight Zone"...or maybe this call was made from another planet?
Where's the trust?
WHY SHOULD THE people at St. Stanislaus Church have any confidence in the word of Archbishop Raymond Burke when his dealings with other South Side city parishes is so difficult and so disingenuous? For example, Holy Family originally was supposed to remain open; their finances were just wonderful. Then his committee said, "No, we're going to close them." Then the archbishop's office announces that the South Side will learn of the closings by Jan. 15. Here we are into February and still no word. No, the people of St. Stanislaus have it right.
Let's see if I can understand this one.
The people of St. Stanislaus are right, because:
1. the notification dates of the closings and consolidations have been extended (prsumably to allow more time to study and review the issues),
2. the Archbishops's dealings with the South City parishes ae difficult and disingenuous, yet the vague ad hominems cite no examples to support the claim,
3. a decision was made to close Holy Family after a preliminary recommendation was made for it to stay open.

Well now, I can see it so much more clearly! These "facts" prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the people of St Stanislaus are correct (in rejecting the directives of the Church). The scales have fallen from eyes and I can now see!
Praying for a red hat
KEEP UP THE good work, you people from St. Stanislaus. I pray that the archbishop gets his red hat from the pope and then gets transferred from St. Louis and takes Jamie Allman along with him. I'll never give one red cent to the ADA (Archdiocesan Development Appeal) program as long as Burke and Allman are here.
There can be no doubt that many faithful Catholics, in addition to praying that Archbishop Burke will be granted extra graces for strength, courage, wisdom, etc., are also hopeful that he will be given the "red hat". But we pray for this, not that he be moved, but that he will remain here and continue to lead the faithful to a true and deeper understanding of our faith in Jesus Christ and His Church.

I have encouraged other Catholics to increase their ADA contributions, precisely because Archbishop Burke is here and because he is so committed to teaching and handing on the faith. But some, as we see in this "Town Talk" comment, appear to find the truth troubling, as did many of the disciples of Christ who said, "This is an intolerable teaching, who can accept these things?"

And how does Jamie Allman fit into this? I wonder if those who are close to these people (the Town Talk callers) notice, hear or see their spiritual anguish? One cannot possibly be at peace with God, with himself, or with anyone else, if their attitudes are as we see here. We must pray for them.
Words of wisdom
IF MEN ARE not governed by God, they will be ruled by tyrants.
This was with the others, and I included it as did the Post. Perhaps the caller was referring to our depraved society in general and not the Archbishop or the Church?
Where's your humility, archbishop?
I'M SURE CONCERNED about the archbishop's physical well being. With all the back-patting he does, one would think his arms and shoulders might be awfully sore. When I went to Catholic school, the nuns taught about humility and how all the clergy emulated the virtue. Archbishop Burke's demeanor weighs in as more pompous by far than humble.
Back patting? Where are the examples? This person is evidently seeing someone else, and not the Archbishop.

It is entirely to be expected, although we do not see it enough today, that a man can be be humble. Because humility is such a fertile ground for developing of other virtues and gifts, we should not be surprised to those who are humble possess and demonstrate a strong faith, firm convictions, and fidelity to the Church. These qualities and virtues become more apparent precisely because one is humble. Humilty is necessary for us to grow in holiness. There is, today, a gravely mistaken notion of the virtues, of grace, of fidelity, of many things far too numerous to mention. It is sad when Catholics cannot even recognize the virtue of humility...

I think I know who this caller might have seen. Based on the number of negative reports and calls (as evidenced by today's Town Talk), there must be an imposter, posing as Archbishop Burke, running loose in the greater St. Louis area.
Overlooked church
SINCE WHEN DID St. Boniface become the only Catholic church in Carondelet? St. Mary and Joe was the first one and they are still there. So I believe your caller is wrong.
It isn't the first time a caller has been wrong, and evidently, from today's list of calls, it won't be the last.

Link.

|

Buddhist peace prize for Swiss theologian, Hans Kung

The renowned Swiss theologian, Hans Küng, is to receive an award by the Japanese Niwano Peace Foundation.

The laureate said he would use the prize, which is worth SFr224,000 ($192,275), for his Global Ethic Foundation.

The panel said the understanding and insight of the Catholic theologian were indispensable for peace in the world, notably in the Middle East, Iraq and Sri Lanka.

Küng, an ordained priest, was professor of theology at Tübingen University, Germany.
He became the first major Catholic theologian to reject papal infallibility and repeatedly called for Pope John Paul II to step down for health reasons. Küng’s right to teach at Catholic universities was revoked by the Vatican in 1979.
Source.

|

Bishops’ Spokeswoman Applauds Supreme Court Decision ...

...To Review Oregon Assisted Suicide Ruling
WASHINGTON (February 22, 2005)– Today the Supreme Court agreed to review a decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals allowing the use of federally controlled drugs for assisted suicide in the state of Oregon. The question before the Supreme Court is whether Oregon doctors may "opt out" of federal standards governing the safe use of controlled substances and prescribe them with the intent to assist in suicides. The case is Gonzales v. Oregon.

"Federally controlled drugs should be used to heal and comfort patients, not to kill them," said Cathy Cleaver Ruse, Esq., Director of Planning and Information for the Pro-Life Secretariat of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Source.

|

Pope Calls Gay Marriage Part of 'Ideology of Evil'

ROME (Reuters) - Homosexual marriages are part of "a new ideology of evil" that is insidiously threatening society, Pope John Paul says in a new book published Tuesday.

In "Memory and Identity," the Pope also calls abortion a "legal extermination" comparable to attempts to wipe out Jews and other groups in the 20th century.

In following paragraphs he says that legally elected parliaments in formerly totalitarian countries were today allowing what he called new forms of evil and new exterminations.

"There is still, however a legal extermination of human beings who have been conceived but not yet born," he writes.

"And this time we are talking about an extermination which has been allowed by nothing less than democratically elected parliaments where one normally hears appeals for the civil progress of society and all humanity," he writes.

In Germany, a leader of the country's Central Council of Jews called the comparison unacceptable.
It can only be an unacceptable comparison in so far as the numbers are concerned, it seems. What we are witnessing, here in the United States for example, is nothing less than the wholesale slaughter of over 250,000,000 children. This number is based on all abortions from 1973 to the present by all means, including especially the abortions which occur due to contraception.

This is not meant to diminish, in any way, the horrendous atrocities committed by the Nazis during World War II. In fact, one can we see similarities such as the unrestrained murder of those who are not wanted or who are deemed burdensome or inconvenient and the evil experimentation of the defenseless for the acquisition of "knowledge". What was never to happen again, is happening again, and on a scale never before seen in human history.
[Cardinal] Ratzinger said the Pope "was not trying to put the Holocaust and abortion on the same plane" but only warning that evil lurked everywhere, "even in liberal political systems."
Source.

|

Gospel for Wednesday, 2nd Week of Lent

**********
This is the actual Gospel and commentary for Wednesday which I messed up.
**********

From: Matthew 20:17-28

Third Prophecy of the Passion

[17] And as Jesus was going up to Jerusalem, He took the twelve disciples aside, and on the way He said to them, [18] "Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem; and the Son of Man will be delivered to the chief priests and scribes, and they will condemn Him to death, [19] and deliver Him to the Gentiles to be mocked and scourged and crucified, and He will be raised on the third day."

The Mother of the Sons of Zebedee Makes Her Request

[20] Then the mother of the sons of Zebedee came up to Him, with her sons, and kneeling before Him she asked Him for something. [21] And He said to her, "What do you want?" She said to Him, "Command that these two sons of mine may sit, one at Your right hand and one at Your left, in Your Kingdom." [22] But Jesus answered, "You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I am to drink?" They said to Him, "We are able." [23] He said to them, "You will drink My cup, but to sit at My right hand and at My left is not Mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared by My Father." [24] And when the ten heard it they were indignant at the two brothers. [25] But Jesus called them to Him and said, "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. [26] It shall not be so among you; but whoever would be great among you must be your servant, [27] and whoever would be first among you must be your slave; [28] even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many."
**********************
Commentary:

18-19. Once again our Lord prophesies to His Apostles about His death and resurrection. The prospect of judging the world (cf. Matthew 19:28) might have misled them into thinking in terms of an earthly messianic kingdom, an easy way ahead, leaving no room for the ignominy of the cross.

Christ prepares their minds so that when the testing time comes they will remember that He prophesied His passion and not be totally scandalized by it; He describes His passion in some detail.

Referring to Holy Week, Monsignor Escriva writes: "All the things brought to our mind by the different expressions of piety which characterize these days are of course directed to the Resurrection, which is, as St. Paul says, the basis of our faith (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:14). But we should not tread this path too hastily, lest we lose sight of a very simple fact which we might easily overlook. We will not be able to share in our Lord's Resurrection unless we unite ourselves with Him in His Passion and Death. If we are to accompany Christ in His glory at the end of Holy Week, we must first enter into His holocaust and be truly united to Him, as He lies dead on Calvary" ("Christ Is Passing By", 95).

20. The sons of Zebedee are James the Greater and John. Their mother, Salome, thinking that the earthly reign of the Messiah is about to be established, asks that her sons be given the two foremost positions in it. Christ reproaches them for not grasping the true-spiritual-nature of the Kingdom of Heaven and not realizing that government of the Church He is going to found implies service and martyrdom. "If you are working for Christ and imagine that a position of responsibility is anything but a burden, what disillusionment awaits you!" ([St] J. Escriva, "The Way", 950).

22. "Drinking the cup" means suffering persecution and martyrdom for following Christ. "We are able": the sons of Zebedee boldly reply that they can drink the cup; their generous expression evokes what St. Paul will write years later: "I can do all things in Him who strengthens me." (Philippians 4:13).

23. "You will drink My cup": James the Greater will die a martyr's death in Jerusalem around the year 44 (cf. Acts 12:2); and John, after suffering imprisonment and the lash in Jerusalem (cf. Acts 4:3; 5:40-41), will spend a long period of exile on the island of Patmos (cf. Revelation 1:9).

From what our Lord says here we can take it that positions of authority in the Church should not be the goal of ambition or the subject of human intrigue, but the outcome of a divine calling. Intent on doing the will of His Heavenly Father, Christ was not going to allocate positions of authority on the basis of human considerations but, rather, in line with God's plans.

26. Vatican II puts a marked emphasis on this "service" which the Church offers to the world and which Christians should show as proof of their Christian identity: "In proclaiming the noble destiny of man and affirming an element of the divine in him, this sacred Synod offers to cooperate unreservedly with mankind in fostering a sense of brotherhood to correspond to this destiny of theirs. The Church is not motivated by an earthly ambition but is interested in one thing only-to carry on the work of Christ under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, for He came into the world to bear witness to the truth, to save and not to judge, to serve and not to be served" ("Gaudium Et Spes", 3 cf. "Lumen Gentium", 32: "Ad Gentes", 12; "Unitatis Redintegratio", 7).

27-28. Jesus sets Himself as an example to be imitated by those who hold authority in the Church. He who is God and Judge of all men (cf. Philippians 2:5-11; John 5:22-27; Acts 10:42; Matthew 28:18) does not impose Himself on us: He renders us loving service to the point of giving His life for us (cf. John 15:13); that is His way of being the first. St. Peter understood Him right; he later exhorted priests to tend the flock of God entrusted to them, not domineering over them but being exemplary in their behavior (cf. 1 Peter 5:1-3); and St. Paul also was clear on this "service": though He was "free from all men", He became the servant of all in order to win all (cf. 1 Corinthians 9:19 ff; 2 Corinthians 4:5).

Christ's "service" of mankind aims at salvation. The phrase "to give His life as a ransom for many" is in line with the terminology of liturgical sacrificial language. These words were used prophetically in Chapter 53 of Isaiah.

Verse 28 also underlines the fact that Christ is a priest, who offers Himself as priest and victim on the altar of the cross. The expression "as a ransom for many" should not be interpreted as implying that God does not will the salvation of all men. "Many", here, is used to contrast with "one" rather than "all": there is only one Savior, and salvation is offered to all.
********************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

The KSDK Interview with Archbishop Burke-Online

The interview with Archbishop Burke by Mike Bush was well done. Personally, I could have done without the clip of Richard Bach of St. Stanislaus. The video and interview during the nightly newscast lasted about 4.5 minutes...The entire interview (all segments) might be between 15 & 20 minutes, although I did not time it yet.

The entire interview has 4 video segments. It was nice to see Archbishop Burke smile, especially considering the issues he has had to deal with since coming here. One can only imagine the pain he must endure because of the letters and complaints he receives and the distortions that are hyped by certain members of the media.

As he says in the interview, he considers himself a faithful teacher - and faithful Catholics all over the country recognize him as such. And as Catholics in this Archdiocese, we should thank our Lord that we have been so blessed to have been given an Archbishop who is faithful to Christ and to the Church which He established.

So as not be outdone, the local Fox affiliate, KTVI, ran a segment lasting a little of 2 minutes, primarily focused on Archbishop Burke'e meeting with the mayor and other city officials regarding the parish closings and consolidations which are to be announced this Friday in the St. Louis Review. Dan Gray of Fox2KTVI was unable to get a "scoop" from the Archbishop, although he gave it a good effort.

The first segment of the interview is here.
Video segment 2 is here.
Video segment 3 is here.
And the final video segment is here.

The first segment of the interview carried a transcript (below).
He speaks softly but carries a controversial reputation. Archbishop Raymond Burke considers himself nothing more than a man with deep religious convictions.

"I would call myself a faithful teacher" says Burke.

His day begins very early. "I get about 4:30 in the morning and then around 5:30, I start a time of prayer," says Burke.

At 7:00, after vesting himself, he has mass in the chapel at the residence for the sisters who come into work there. After that it's usually a quiet breakfast while catching up on the day's news and by 8 a.m., he's usually in the office conducting the pastoral work of administrating the archdiocese.

"I feel very much home here in St. Louis. Personally, I like the fit very much. I find the people here to be wonderful really," says Burke.

He was installed as St. Louis' 8th Archbishop in January 2004 and he believes his first year here, has gone very well.

Others disagree.

Shortly after he arrived, he made headlines by saying he would not give Communion to Presidential candidate John Kerry or any Catholic politician that took a pro-choice stance.

He's also made news by settling 7 more cases of
clergy sex abuse, which has now cost the Archdiocese more than $2.4 million.

He's announced plans to consolidate parishes in South St. Louis and North County and to close four schools. Which, in some cases, has brought angry reaction.

"I understand it fully. I've had in my own experience Catholic institutions that were very dear to me, close and I know well the pain. It's a reality I wish it didn't have to be," says Burke.

But no issue has gotten more airtime this past year
than the battle for St. Stanislaus Kostka church.

"St. Stanislaus Kostka is run by a board of directors and that simply has never been the way the Catholic Church operates its parishes. It can't be, it's just contrary to out whole nature," Burke explained.

During the fight over control of the parish and its assets, the Archbishop has removed the priests and imposed the penalty of interdict on the board of directors, which means they are not allowed to take part in the sacraments of the church.

He's received many angry letters siding with St. Stanislaus.

"The sad thing for me is, it could be a temptation for an Archbishop not to give leadership, to avoid this kind of situation and simply I can't do that, it's against my conscience," says Burke.

The archbishop, who gave us a rare behind the scenes look at the residence in the Central West End,
which the archdiocese has owned since 1924. Church law guides him, which in most cases, he says, is not open to interpretation. And that is his compass.

"I'm a person that doesn't particularly enjoy a lot of public exposure. It's really not in my nature. I know I have to teach and this has public repercussions so
I end up being in the public light but personally it's not something I enjoy very much," says Burke.

Making sure St. Louis has good and dedicated priests is an ongoing goal, so the Archbishop got very involved with seminarians in year one. Introductions sometime take place during an afternoon walk.

"I take a walk and try also to combine that with an opportunity to get to know our seminarians and sometimes I walk with our priests too," says Burke.

He might prefer a quiet, contemplative life but Archbishop Raymond Burke's positions have been anything but quiet his first year in St. Louis. Since his positions are unlikely to change, the question is will the years to come be any different?

"I'm a person who is full of hope," says Burke. "It's not me, it's Christ and his church. And I just believe if I do faithfully as I can and my service and give my service as faithfully as I can, he will bring good results."
AMEN!

And during this Lenten season, especially, we must not forget to offer additional prayers and sacrifices for Archbishop Burke - we should be committed to doing all we can to help lighten the burdens he and others must carry for being faithful servants of our Lord.

|

A Reminder: Channel 5, KSDK Tonight at 10:00

A day in the life of Archbishop Raymond Burke


Let us pray that this report will be an accurate presentation of the man who is the spiritual leader of the people of the Archdiocese of St. Louis. We should pray also, that those whose hearts are hardened, for whatever reasons, might accept the graces God gives them and that they will see in Archbishop Burke, a gentle, humble man whose primary concern is for the salvation of souls.

|

Anti-Catholic Paper Allowed in 70% of London, Ontario Parishes

This article refers to the Canadian version of the National unCatholic Reporter:
LONDON, February 21, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - “The church’s teaching on homosexuality…seems to us out of touch with growing scientific evidence on the nature of homosexuality itself.”

“…Same-sex, loving and committed relationships and the sexual expression thereof can be holy and may even be sacramental.”

A reader might be forgiven for assuming that the above quotes come from a leader of a homosexual activist group lobbying Parliament to legalize same sex ‘marriage.’ It might be considered unusual however, coming from a Catholic publication, but the authors of the quoted editorial claim to be running a Catholic newspaper, the Catholic New Times (CNT), which is published in Toronto.

CNT’s casual but persistent decades long dissent from Catholic teaching on major issues such as abortion, same sex ‘marriage’ and a female priesthood, is not news, but it is a source of constant scandal to many laity and faithful clergy.

LifeSiteNews.com attempted to contact Bishop Fabbro and received the response from Ron Pickersgill, the diocesan media spokesman, that the diocese only officially endorses its own diocesan newspaper. “The Diocese of London, like most other dioceses, does not dictate to parishes what publications they may make available at the back of the church. The Diocese’s practice is to leave such decisions to its pastors and pastoral teams,” he said.

LifeSiteNews.com spoke with Msgr. Vincent Foy, the respected canon lawyer, who said that it is indeed the bishop’s job to ensure that the publications available in a parish are not hostile to Catholic teaching.
Much can be learned about a particular parish based upon what one sees inside the church, i.e., the tabernacle, crucifix, statues, etc., as well as the publications/pamphlets in the vestibule or the "gathering space" (in "progressive" parlance).

Full story here.

|

Supreme Court Leaves Abortion Alone

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court today rejected a challenge to its landmark 1973 ruling legalizing abortion by the woman once known as "Jane Roe," who was at the center of the historic case.

Without comment, justices declined to hear the appeal from Norma McCorvey and thus dodged a highly charged political debate for now. McCorvey's protest of Texas' abortion ban led to the Roe v. Wade ruling establishing a constitutional right to abortion [murder].
More.

|

Schiavo case: 11th hour, again

In a case that has seen years of twists and turns, observers think today's ruling might not be the last.
By WILLIAM R. LEVESQUE, Times Staff Writer
Published February 22, 2005

A lawyer for Terri Schiavo's husband said Monday the feeding tube that has kept the brain-damaged woman alive for 15 years will be removed at 1 p.m. today - unless a court stops him.

But after a chaotic round of legal jousting Monday, the only certainty by day's end was uncertainty, and no one knows if a court will step in to prevent an act that could end Schiavo's life within two weeks.

David Gibbs III, an attorney representing Schiavo's parents, said he is still optimistic he will find a way to thwart efforts to end Schiavo's life and saw no need for the courts to rush to do it.
Sentenced to an agonizing and horrible death, and deprived of legitimate due process, many prayers are needed fot Terri, her "husband" and "guardian", Terri's family, and for our country.

I have often wondered, if the intended slow and insidious murder were to begin, if one would be morally justified in recruiting a "rescue team" to remove her from her chamber of death? It seems to be morally repugnant to do nothing. What kind of person would do nothing, seeing an animal being systematically starved to death? Would he not be obliged to call the authorities or, in a dire circumstance, rescue the animal himself? And this would be for a creature which has no "rights". Is it not obligatory that one do the same for a fellow human being when the murder is occurring before our very eyes? Is it not even more pressing when legitimate authority has abandoned its duty to protect those who cannot protect themselves?

|

Bishop Olmsted: Knees to Love Christ

Some excerpts for consideration:
Knees symbolize both strength and humility. Athletes use strong knees to run for touchdowns in football and to block shots and to slam-dunk in basketball. Knees also bend in adoration of the Eucharistic King and in recognition of the grandeur and majesty of the Most High God.

What we do with our knees gives evidence of what we believe in our hearts. When we kneel down beside the bed of a dying person, when we stand up for the dignity of the unborn child, when we genuflect before Christ in the Blessed Sacrament, we say louder than any rhetoric what matters most in our lives. Knees express what we believe and make clear what we will live and die for.

Not surprisingly, then, knees play an important role in the Church’s Sacred Liturgy, especially during the season of Lent. What we do with our knees during worship is anything but trivial. It rivals in importance what we do with our voices and our ears, what we do with our hands and our hearts.

Kneeling is more than a gesture of the overly pious. It is a fundamental act of faith, a strong expression about Who stands at the center of one’s life and Who stands at the center of all creation. Bending the knee at the name of Jesus is a decisive act of those with athletic souls and humble hearts. There is nothing passive about kneeling in humility and adoration. When the knees act in response to a heart that loves Christ, there is unleashed a force so strong it can change the face of the earth. Grace is the name we give to this force.

The devil has no knees

According to Abba Apollo, a desert father who lived about 1,700 years ago, the devil has no knees; he cannot kneel; he cannot adore; he cannot pray; he can only look down his nose in contempt. Being unwilling to bend the knee at the name of Jesus is the essence of evil (Cf. Is 45:23, Rom 14:11). But when we kneel at Jesus’ name, when we bow down in service of others, and when we bend the knee in adoration, we are following in the footsteps of the Magi, we are imitating Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta, St. Maximillian Kolbe, and all the saints and angels in heaven.
Link to article here.

|

Founder of Communion and Liberation dies at 82

Milan, Feb. 22 (CWNews.com) - Msgr. Luigi Giussani, the founder of the Communion and Liberation movement, died early Tuesday morning, February 22, at the age of 82.

|

Abuse victim gets apology from [Archbishop] Burke

What Tim Fischer wanted more than anything else was an apology.

He wanted someone to say "I'm sorry" for the fact that when he was 11 years old he was raped by the late Rev. Norman Christian, a Roman Catholic priest in the Archdiocese of St. Louis who was removed from ministry in 1995.

So, in his settlement with the archdiocese, Fischer, now 43 and an electrician from Crystal City, asked for an apology, in writing, from Archbishop Raymond Burke. That was in mid-December. Fischer got his letter on Saturday. But more than 30 victims and their parents have been waiting for apologies from [Archbishop] Burke, some for a year or more.
First, before anything else: it is completely inappropriate and it demonstrates a lack of respect to refer to the Archbishop of St. Louis by merely his last name - Burke. This is a particular pet peeve of mine. Certainly the Post will not experience an insurmountable increase of ink and paper if its writers were to use the title of Archbishop? Perhaps, this is how 'jounalists' are taught these days? I find it offensive and unprofessional. Maybe it provides an insight into the story?

With respect to the story, are these victims and their families looking for an apology from the criminal perpetrator himself, the Archdiocese, previous episcopal leadership, or the current archbishop?

It would seem that all victims of crimes would prefer apologies from those who perpetrated the crimes as well as those who, by their actions or inactions, help to facilitate, in any way, the criminal's deviant and horrible offenses. It just seems like common sense (of which I make no claim), that an apology from my brother (or from my parents) for a wrong committed against me by my sister would be lacking somehow. This is not imply that the expression of sorrow or regret would not be welcomed as sign that one has been wronged and that others empathize with the victim.

It is certainly understandable, therefore, that Church leaders would express regret for the failings of others in the Church who caused such pain and grief. Expressing sorrow for the pains inflicted upon others by some criminal priests is an act of reconciliation for the victims, their families, the Church and the community. That being said, I was left with the impression from the article that Archbishop Burke is somehow responsible when, in fact, he had nothing to do with these acts of depravity. Perhaps, it is due to my somewhat jaundiced view of many media articles about Archbishop Burke these days?
Nevertheless, it seems the simplest, and perhaps the most meaningful, thing a bishop can provide - a note of apology - is surprisingly difficult to obtain.
No mention is made of the fact that there may have been legal reasons why "notes of apology" might have been delayed. But then again, in order to maintain a unreasonably critical view of the Archbishop or the Church, demands are made that an individual need not consider, or that one ignore, the pertinent facts or circumstances. Suggestion and innuendo make much better reading, it seems.

This article in the Post had the potential to be a story which could have helped in the healing process. Instead, it focused on things which can only result in delaying that process. Perhaps, an upcoming article will focus on the positive things which are being done to help victims , their families, and the general community. It would seem that more people would prefer aout the positive steps which are being taken rather than about problems or delays.

Link

|

Feast of the Chair of St. Peter

Today is the Feast of the "Cathedra" or Chair of St. Peter, a recurrence dating back to the fourth century that honors and celebrates the primacy and authority of St. Peter.

The word "cathedra" means seat or throne and is the root of the word cathedral, the church where a bishop has his throne and from whence he preaches. Another word for "cathedra" is "sede" (seat or see): the "see" is the place from which a bishop governs his diocese. Thus, for example, the Holy See is the see of the bishop of Rome, the Pope.

Last year, on this day, in reflections made during the Angelus, Pope John Paul remarked that "the liturgical feast of the Chair of Peter underscores the singular mystery, entrusted by the Lord to the leader of the Apostles, of confirming and guiding the Church in the unity of faith. This is what the 'ministerium petrinum' is, that particular service that the Bishop of Rome is called to render to all Christians. An indispensable mission that is not based on human prerogatives but on Christ Himself as the cornerstone of the ecclesial community. Let us pray that the Church, in the variety of cultures, languages and traditions, will be unanimous in believing and professing the truth of faith and morals transmitted by the Apostles."

The Chair of St. Peter is actually a throne that Charles the Bald, the grandson of the Emperor Charlemagne, gave to Pope John VIII at the former's coronation as emperor on Christmas Day 875. For many years the chair was used at liturgical events by Pope John and his successors: it was ensconced in Bernini's Altar of the Chair in 1666.

A mixture of tradition, legend and belief held for many years that this was actually a double chair, parts of which dated back to the early days of Christianity and to St. Peter himself. This chair or cathedra has been studied over the centuries and the last time it was removed from its niche in the Bernini altar was a six-year period from 1968 to 1974 where studies pointed to a single chair whose oldest parts date to the sixth century. What appeared to be an outer or second chair was a covering which served both to protect the throne and to carry it in procession.

Every year on this feast, the monumental altar housing the Chair of Peter is illuminated by scores of candles throughout the entire day. A number of Masses are celebrated at this altar, from early morning to early evening, concluding with the mass of the Canons of St. Peter.
Vatican Information Service

|

A Great $1 Flea Market Find

What was it? "A Brief Text-Book of Moral Philosophy" by Rev. Charles Coppens, S.J.

Somewhat regularly, we make the journey to the Belleville Flea Market. My wife looks for things that a woman normally looks for, I suppose - things which I would rarely, if ever, notice. I, on the other hand, look for religious books and religious articles, such as crucifixes, statues, rosaries, medals, pictures, and the like.

Once we enter the building in which all the vendors have assembled and set up their wares, we decide upon a time and place to meet, when we think we will be finished. I have two primary places to which I go first, ignoring everything else as if it did not exist: the first table I look for is one hosted by the Legion of Mary. Ususally, they would have some older Pre-Vatican II missals, a few older prayer books and bibles, some crucifixes, and medals. I could always find something which, for a small donation - they did not sell anything - I could pick up and later give to someone who might need it. Crucifixes, rosaries and prayer books make great gifts for people, especially Catholics who either don't have one or need an extra one or two for other family members.

Unfortunately, I have not seen them (the Legion of Mary volunteers), for the past few months. I miss them very much.

Since I am on a mission from which I am not to be distracted, I head directly to stop number 2, a used book merchant who has boxes upon boxes of books. I have been able to pick up a number of treasures here for a dollar or two. Many of the books and tapes from this seller have been instrumental in my study of the faith:

Ludwig Ott's "Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma",
Blue Army Tapes with Fr. John Hardon and other excellent speakers,
A book of the writings of St. Augustine, another of St. Thomas Aquinas,
Fr. Hardon's "The Catholic Catechism", and numerous other books.

This past trip of treasure hunting was not yielding great results, but I did find "The History of Herodotus" and "The Examined Life, Readings from Western Philosophers from Plato to Kant" - not exactly Catholic but, perhaps, useful, nonetheless.

After making these two stops, I always slow down and look at what other vendors are selling, of course, keeping my eyes open for other "treasures" I might find. Having recently acquired Fr. Hardon's "The Catholic Lifetime Reading Plan", I especially try to recall the numerous recommended books and authors from that book.

I passed a bookshelf for sale which had all sorts of books, and I was able to find one which looked to be fairly decent. It is the book named above by Fr. Coppens. It was in very good shape, especially considering it was printed in 1924.

Even better, it is a clear, concise, and easy to understand book. The Preface states, in part:
This "Brief Text-Book of Moral Philosophy" is a companion to Coppens' "Brief Text-Book of Logic and Mental Philosophy." The author's aim is to present to students and readers - to such, especially, as are unfamiliar with the Latin language - a brief yet clear outline of Ethics taught in Catholic Colleges, Seminaries, and Universities. (my editorial comment: our Church and our nation would be much better off had the institutions of higher learning not abandoned books such as this)
...
Extravagant notions of individual and social rights are circulated, while the rash specualtions of so-called scientists are sapping in many minds the cery foundations of morality. Never before has there been a more urgent call on the part of the people fot the lucid exposition and the correct application of sound moral principles. (my emphasis)

In this small confusion of thought, no small utility will be found in a clear, simple, systematic explanation of the ethical doctrines taught be the greatest minds of the past ages, and most highly recommended by the illustrious Pope Leo XIII. Such an exposition the author has endeavored to present in this volume.
I have found this book to be a great resource, especially in being able to more fully understand those things which, before, were not quite clear. If our Lord permits, I will, at some point, share some of the beauty that is contained in this treasure.

|

Gospel for Feb 22, Feast: The Chair of St. Peter, Apostle

From: Matthew 16:13-19:

Peter's Profession of Faith and His Primacy

[13] Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples, "Who do men say that the Son of Man is?" [14] And they said, "Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets." [15] He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" [16] Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." [17] And Jesus answered him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in Heaven. [18] And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My Church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. [19] I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in Heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in Heaven."
************

Commentary:

13-20. In this passage St. Peter is promised primacy over the whole Church, a primacy which Jesus will confer on him after His Resurrection, as we learn in the Gospel of St. John (cf. John 21:15-18). This supreme authority is given to Peter for the benefit of the Church. Because the Church has to last until the end of time, this authority will be passed on to Peter's successors down through history. The Bishop of Rome, the Pope, is the successor of Peter.

The solemn Magisterium of the Church, in the First Vatican Council, defined the doctrine of the primacy of Peter and his successors in these terms:
"We teach and declare, therefore, according to the testimony of the Gospel that the primacy of jurisdiction over the whole Church was immediately and directly promised to and conferred upon the blessed Apostle Peter by Christ the Lord. For to Simon, Christ had said, `You shall be called Cephas' (John 1:42). Then, after Simon had acknowledged Christ with the confession, `You are the Christ, the Son of the living God' (Matthew 16:16), it was to Simon alone that the solemn words were spoken by the Lord: `Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in Heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My Church, and the powers of Hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in Heaven, and what you loose on earth shall be loosed in Heaven' (Matthew 16:17-19). And after His Resurrection, Jesus conferred upon Simon Peter alone the jurisdiction of supreme shepherd and ruler over His whole fold with the words, `Feed My lambs....Feed My sheep' (John 21:15-17) [...]

"(Canon) Therefore, if anyone says that the blessed Apostle Peter was not constituted by Christ the Lord as the Prince of all the Apostles and the visible head of the whole Church militant, or that he received immediately and directly from Jesus Christ our Lord only a primacy of honor and not a true and proper primacy of jurisdiction: let him be condemned.

"Now, what Christ the Lord, Supreme Shepherd and watchful guardian of the flock, established in the person of the blessed Apostle Peter for the perpetual safety and everlasting good of the Church must, by the will of the same, endure without interruption in the Church which was founded on the rock and which will remain firm until the end of the world. Indeed, `no one doubts, in fact it is obvious to all ages, that the holy and most blessed Peter, Prince and head of the Apostles, the pillar of faith, and the foundation of the Catholic Church, received the keys of the kingdom from our Lord Jesus Christ, the Savior and the Redeemer of the human race; and even to this time and forever he lives,' and governs, `and exercises judgment in his successors' (cf. Council of Ephesus), the bishops of the holy Roman See, which he established and consecrated with his blood. Therefore, whoever succeeds Peter in this Chair holds Peter's primacy over the whole Church according to the plan of Christ Himself [...]. For this reason, `because of its greater sovereignty,' it was always `necessary for every church, that is, the faithful who are everywhere, to be in agreement' with the same Roman Church [...]

"(Canon) Therefore, if anyone says that it is not according to the institution of Christ our Lord himself, that is, by divine law, that St Peter has perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole Church; or if anyone says that the Roman Pontiff is not the successor of St Peter in the same primacy: let him be condemned.

"We think it extremely necessary to assert solemnly the prerogative which the only-begotten Son of God deigned to join to the highest pastoral office. "And so, faithfully keeping to the tradition received from the beginning of the Christian faith, for the glory of God our Savior, for the exaltation of the Catholic religion, and for the salvation of Christian peoples, We, with the approval of the sacred council, teach and define that it is a divinely revealed dogma: that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks "ex cathedra", that is, when, acting in the office of shepherd and teacher of all Christians, he defines, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, possesses through the divine assistance promised to him in the person of St. Peter, the infallibility with which the divine Redeemer willed His Church to be endowed in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals; and that such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are therefore irreformable because of their nature, but not because of the agreement of the Church.

"(Canon) But if anyone presumes to contradict this our definition (God forbid him to do so): let him be condemned" (Vatican I, "Pastor Aeternus", Chaps. 1, 2 and 4).
**********
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Monday, February 21, 2005

End times tribulation in light of the French Revolution

by Paul Rasavage
Does anyone remember (or care) what the French Revolution was all about? Well, maybe we should. It might well be worth the effort to refresh our collective memory.

Research on this unusual yet fascinating subject has surreptitiously exposed and brought into a clearer perspective many disturbing parallels that begin to emerge between the violent and traumatic socio-political events that occurred over two hundred years ago on a continent an ocean away, and the darkening trend of contemporary social and political events to which we bear witness in our own time.

The conclusion is presented here first, followed by the rationale that compels it.

From the inferences that can be made, it would seem that the so-called homosexual agenda has nothing to do with legitimizing the immoral behavior and perverse sexual preferences of 0.5% of the population.

The issue of "gay rights" is all about forcing the Catholic Church, indeed all of Christianity itself, into non-existence by means of a systematic effort to categorize and legally declare her ancient faith, morality and teachings, her ethics and principles, all firmly based in God-given Sacred Scripture and Tradition, to be "hate crimes" and therefore unlawful, punishable to the fullest extent of the law.

With such legislation in effect, as Canada is about to inaugurate, we will see ominous parallels between contemporary events and those that happened in the French Revolution some 200 years previous, in which laws were manipulated, transgressed and obliterated by a select minority with the singular purpose of bringing Christianity itself to extinction, in order to drive all visible remnants of God's Divine Laws, even His very Presence on Earth, into utter oblivion.

Satan's strategy has long been one of divide and conquer. He attacks Christianity from without and from within, seeking nothing less than its utter and complete destruction. Catholicism is not the only object of his malevolence and hatred. Our Constitution today stands in tatters from years of relentless attacks launched upon it from both internal and external forces.

So far, this demonic strategy has proven to be extremely effective and successful when considered within the context of the tremendous headway made of late in eliminating religion and its influence from contemporary society and the minds and hearts of men.

What happened so many years ago?
A Synopsis of a very complex Revolution

|

Human Dignity Doesn't Hinge on "Quality of Life," Says Pope

A person's dignity does not depend on his "quality of life," which nowadays is sometimes interpreted as merely the ability to experience pleasure, says John Paul II.

Increasingly "so-called quality of life is interpreted primarily or exclusively as economic efficiency, inordinate consumerism, physical beauty and pleasure, to the neglect of the more profound dimensions -- interpersonal, spiritual and religious -- of existence," stated the Pope in a message addressed to the participants in the general assembly of the Pontifical Academy for Life.
Source.

While reflecting on the words of the Holy Father and the teaching of the Church, please keep Terri Schiavo in your prayers pending her fight for life.

|

The Reality of Hell

Stories of Persons who Visited Hell and Apparitions of the Damned
One of the great dangers of this century, and thus one of the great triumphs of Satan, has been the growing disbelief in the existence of Hell.

For many, Hell has become a fable, a myth, an outdated holdover from "the Old Testament God of fire, brimstone and judgment." Urged on by false doctrines and a want to believe that there can be no such thing as eternal punishment for serious wrongs "when Jesus is a God of love and kindness," many have thrown Hell out the window - along with concern for sin. After all, if there is no Hell, then why need there be concern for sin? Unfortunately, they forget that "I the Lord do not change" (Malachi 3:6).

Hell has not suddenly evaporated because we would prefer it so. How subtle Satan is in these times. He increasingly tricks people into his web by disguising its very existence. He wants you to let your guard down.

Please do not be deceived. Hell, eternal punishment for serious sins, exists. Scripture, the Church and reports of modern-day visionaries all confirm that Hell is a reality - never-ending reality for those souls who must reside there with Satan and all the other damned forever, because by their own free will and choice they rejected God while on earth and excluded themselves from communion with Him.
Link

|

Telling it like it is...

The head of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications questioned why newspapers use unnamed Vatican sources when reporting on the Holy See.

"If a person expresses his view, his first and last names should appear," Archbishop John Foley said. "If this is not done and anonymity is requested, I think he either is afraid or wants to manipulate the journalist."
Fear or manipulation...Surely, many have wondered just who those "unamed Vatican sources" were. Will it change?

Source.

|

Feb 21 - St. Peter Damian

Considering the situation in which the Church finds herself today, infested with various sorts of insidious perversions, we can, nonetheless, look with hope as we ask for St. Peter Damian to intercede for us today as he did in his own time...

Among St. Peter Damian's most famous writings is his lengthy treatise, Letter 31, the Book of Gomorrah (Liber Gomorrhianus), containing the most extensive treatment and condemnation by any Church Father of clerical pederasty and homosexual practices. [2] His manly discourse on the vice of sodomy in general and clerical homosexuality and pederasty in particular, is written in a plain and forthright style that makes it quite readable and easy to understand.

In keeping with traditional Church teachings handed down from the time of the Apostles, he holds that all homosexual acts are crimes against Nature and therefore crimes against God who is the author of Nature.
------
Considering that the Book of Gomorrah was written in 1049 A.D. it borders on the miraculous to note how many of Damian's insights can be applied to the current pederast and homosexual debacle here in the United States and abroad, including the Vatican. His treatise certainly stands as a masterful refutation of contemporary homosexual apologists who claim that the early Fathers of the Church did not understand the nature or dynamics of homosexuality. Rather, as Damian's work demonstrates, the degradation of human nature as exemplified by sodomical acts is a universal phenomenon that transcends time, place and culture.

One of the main points of the Book of Gomorrah, is the author's insistence on the responsibility of the bishop or superior of a religious order to curb and eradicate the vice from their ranks. [7] He minces no words in his condemnation of those prelates who refuse or fail to take a strong hand in dealing with clerical sodomical practices either because of moral indifferentism or the inability to face up to a distasteful and potentially scandalous situation. [8]

Other issues tackled by St. Peter Damian which have a particular relevance today are:
The problems of homosexual bishops or heads of religious orders who engage their "spiritual sons" in acts of sodomy.

The sacrilegious use of the sacraments by homosexual clerics and religious.

The special problems for the Church related to the seduction of youths by clerical pederasts, and

The problem of overtly lax canons and penances for clerical and religious offenders that make a mockery of the seriously sinful nature of homosexual acts.
Read more here.

|

Holy Father: Mass Media Can and Must Promote Justice and Solidarity

1. The rapid development of technology in the area of the media is surely one of the signs of progress in today’s society. In view of these innovations in continuous evolution, the words found in the Decree of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Inter Mirifica, promulgated by my venerable predecessor, the servant of God Paul VI, December 4, 1963, appear even more pertinent: “Man’s genius has with God’s help produced marvelous technical inventions from creation, especially in our times. The Church, our mother, is particularly interested in those which directly touch man’s spirit and which have opened up new avenues of easy communication of all kinds of news, of ideas and orientations.”
Full Text of the Holy Father's Apostolic Letter "The Rapid Development" is here.

|

Dark allegations arise amid probe of nun's slaying

For Toledo police, it was a rare assignment: Search an abandoned house on the edge of a cornfield in western Lucas County where people reportedly took part in ritual abuse ceremonies.

No longer was the probe focusing solely on the man accused of killing Sister Margaret Ann Pahl, but was expanding into a new direction: accusations that children were molested and raped by priests in ritual services.

For the past year, police have embarked on one of the most unusual investigations in the department's history, spurred by leads emerging after the priest's arrest in April for the killing in the Mercy Hospital chapel more than 24 years ago
This is one of the most bizarre stories I've seen in quite some time. Prayers are needed for all those concerned.

Link.

|

Holy Father speaks of commitment to papal ministry

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- For the first time since his hospitalization in early February, Pope John Paul II delivered his regular Sunday talk to pilgrims and spoke about his commitment to the papal ministry.

The pope spoke from his apartment window Feb. 20 in a relatively strong but hoarse voice, interrupted once by a cough. He looked animated as he waved to the crowd and greeted several thousand people gathered in St. Peter's Square below.

When he finished the brief appearance, a wave of applause swept through the crowd along with cheers of "Long live the pope!"
...
The pope's comments were immediately seized upon in the Italian news media as evidence that he had rejected the possibility of resigning the papacy. (Emphasis added)
Source.

|

The Religious Geopolitics of Cardinal Ruini

Christians in Europe and in the world; the Islamic challenge; how to unite freedom and truth; the case of Italy and the American model. The manifesto by the pope's vicar on the Church of today and tomorrow
by Sandro Magister
-----------------------
ROMA, February 21, 2005 – Different visions of religious geopolitics coexist in the Catholic Church. But finding today's leading vision requires nothing more than reading the speeches of two cardinals: Joseph Ratzinger and Camillo Ruini.

Theirs is the leading vision because of the role they carry out at the side of John Paul II, who places complete trust in them. Ratzinger has been prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith since 1981. Ruini has been since 1991 the pope's vicar for the diocese of Rome and the president, by pontifical investiture, of the Italian bishops' conference.

But apart from their roles there is the unparalleled authoritativeness these two have achieved year after year, at the highest levels of the worldwide Church. It is an authoritativeness that will certainly have its weight in the next conclave.

Ratzinger spoke on matters of religious geopolitics last May 13, in a speech that also became a successful book in Italy.

But Ruini's latest "summa" is very recent: it is found in a speech he gave on February 11 at a meeting of the “Opera Romana Pellegrinaggi,” which is reproduced below in its entirety.
Complete article.

|

Gospel for Monday, 2nd Week of Lent

From: Luke 6:23-38

Love of Enemies (Continuation)

(Jesus said to his disciples,) [36] "Be merciful, even as your Father is merciful.
[37] "Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven; [38] give, and it will be given to you; good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be put into your lap. For the measure you give will be the measure you get back."
************
Commentary:

36. The model of mercy which Christ sets before us is God Himself, of whom St. Paul says, 'Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our afflictions" (2 Cor 1:3-4). "The first quality of this virtue", Fray Luis de Granada explains, "is that it makes men like God and like the most glorious thing in Him, His mercy (Lk 6:36). For certainly the greatest perfection a creature can have is to be like his Creator, and the more like Him he is, the more perfect he is. Certainly one of the things which is most appropriate to God is mercy, which is what the Church means when it says that prayer: 'Lord God, to whom it is proper to be merciful and forgiving...'. It says that this is proper to God, because just as a creature, as creature, is characteristically poor and needy (and therefore characteristically receives and does not give), so, on the contrary, since God is infinitely rich and powerful, to Him alone does it belong to give and not to receive, and therefore it is appropriate for Him to be merciful and forgiving" ("Book of Prayer and Meditation", third part, third treatise).

This is the rule a Christian should apply: be compassionate towards other people's afflictions as if they were one's own, and try to remedy them. The Church spells out this rule by giving us a series of corporal works of mercy (visiting and caring for the sick, giving food to the hungry, drink to the thirsty...) and spiritual works of mercy (teaching the ignorant, correcting the person who has erred, forgiving injuries...): cf. "St Pius X Catechism", 944f.

We should also show understanding towards people who are in error: "Love and courtesy of this kind should not, of course, make us indifferent to truth and goodness. Love, in fact, impels the followers of Christ to proclaim to all men the truth which saves. But we must distinguish between the error (which must always be rejected) and the person in error, who never loses his dignity as a person even though he flounders amid false or inadequate religious ideas. God alone is the judge and searcher of hearts; He forbids us to pass judgment on the inner guilt of others" (Vatican II, "Gaudium Et Spes", 28).

38. We read in Sacred Scripture of the generosity of the widow of Zarephath, whom God asked to give food to Elijah the prophet even though she had very little left; He then rewarded her generosity by constantly renewing her supply of meal and oil (1 kings 17:9ff). The same sort of thing happened when the boy supplied the five loaves and two fish which our Lord multiplied to feed a huge crowd of people (cf. Jn 6:9)-a vivid example of what God does when we give Him whatever we have, even if it does not amount to much.

God does not let Himself be outdone in generosity: "Go, generously and like a child ask Him, 'What can You mean to give me when You ask me for "this"?'" ([St] J. Escriva, "The Way", 153). However much we give God in this life, He will give us more in life eternal.
***************

Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Sunday, February 20, 2005

Tuesday, Feb 22: A day in the life of Archbishop Raymond Burke

From KSDK Channel 5:
From the St. Stanislaus battle to church closings, the St. Louis Catholic church has been under fire.

Now, a rare look at the man behind the headlines.

Join Mike Bush for an exclusive glimpse at a day in the life of Archbishop Raymond Burke, Tuesday on NewsChannel 5 at Ten O'clock.

|

Religious "storms" on the English throne

Courtesy of the AP
Here is a look at some of the strains between royal romance and religious rules in Britain since Henry VIII broke with the Vatican in the 16th century.

1625: Charles I takes the throne and marries Henrietta Maria, a Roman Catholic. A furor erupts over suspicion Charles would ease restrictions on Catholics and weaken Protestantism. Puritans and others continually accuse Charles of Vatican sympathies and criticize his interest in the elaborate High Anglican form of worship.

1785: The future George IV - then Prince of Wales - secretly weds a Roman Catholic, the twice-widowed Maria Anne Fitzherbert. But the bond is never legally recognized under the act that required monarch's approval for the prince's marriage. An earlier rule also banned those married to Catholics from succeeding to the throne. George winds up in loveless marriage with his cousin Caroline.

LATE 19TH CENTURY: The future King Edward VII begins affair with Alice Keppel, the great-grandmother of Camilla Parker Bowles.

1936: King Edward VIII relinquishes the throne in order to marry a twice-divorced American, Wallis Simpson. At the time, Church of England leaders steadfastly opposed idea of monarch marrying a divorced woman. In a farewell radio address, Edward told the nation: "I have found it impossible to carry the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge my duties as king as I would wish to do without the help and support of the woman I love."
Source.

|

Multiple Corrections-Allmon to Allman

This morning I corrected about a third of the post where I had referenced Jamie Allman as Jamie "Allmon"...I apologize for the error and the inconsistencies.

|

Gospel for Sunday, 2nd Week of Lent

From: Matthew 17:1-9

The Transfiguration

[1] And after six days Jesus took with Him Peter and James and John, his brother, and led them up a high mountain apart. [2] And He was transfigured before them, and His face shone like the sun, and His garments became white as light. [3] And behold, there appeared to them Moses and Elijah, talking with Him. [4] And Peter said to Jesus, "Lord, it is well that we are here; if You wish, I will make three booths here, one for You and one for Moses and one for Elijah." [5] He was still speaking, when lo, a bright cloud overshadowed them, and a voice from the cloud said, "This is My beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to Him." [6] When the disciples heard this, they fell on their faces, and were filled with awe. [7] But Jesus came and touched them, saying, "Rise, and have no fear." [8] And when they lifted up their eyes, they saw no one but Jesus only.

[9] And as they were coming down the mountain, Jesus commanded them, "Tell no one the vision, until the Son of Man is raised from the dead."
***********
Commentary:

1-13. Realizing that His death will demoralize His disciples, Jesus forewarns them and strengthens their faith. Not content with telling them in advance about His death and resurrection on the third day, He wants two of the three future pillars of the Church (cf. Galatians 2:9) to see His transfiguration and thereby glimpse the glory and majesty with which His holy human nature will be endowed in Heaven.

The Father's testimony (verse 5), expressed in the same words as He used at Christ's baptism (cf. Matthew 3:17), reveals to the three Apostles that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, the beloved, God Himself. To these words--also spoken at Christ's baptism--He adds, "Listen to Him", as if to indicate that Jesus is also the supreme prophet foretold by Moses (cf. Deuteronomy 18:15-18).

3. Moses and Elijah are the two most prominent representatives of the Old Testament-the Law and the Prophets. The fact that Christ occupies the central position points up His pre-eminence over them, and the superiority of the New Testament over the Old.

This dazzling glimpse of divine glory is enough to send the Apostles into a rapture; so happy are they that Peter cannot contain his desire to prolong this experience.

5. In Christ God speaks to all men; through the Church His voice resounds in all ages: "The Church does not cease to listen to His words. She rereads them continually. With the greatest devotion she reconstructs every detail of His life. These words are listened to also by non-Christians. The life of Christ speaks, also, to many who are not capable of repeating with Peter, `You are the Christ, the Son of the living God' (Matthew 16:16). He, the Son of the living God, speaks to people also as Man: it is His life that speaks, His humanity, His fidelity to the truth, His all-embracing love. Furthermore, His death on the Cross speaks--that is to say the inscrutable depth of His suffering and abandonment. The Church never ceases to relive His death on the Cross and His resurrection, which constitute the content of the Church's daily life [...]. The Church lives His mystery, draws unwearingly from it and continually seeks ways of bringing this mystery of her Master and Lord to humanity--to the peoples, the nations, the succeeding generations, and every individual human being" ([Pope] John Paul II, "Redemptor Hominis", 7).
************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|