Send As SMS

Saturday, December 24, 2005

Gloria in excelsis Deo

Gloria in excelsis Deo et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis.
Laudamus te. Benedicimus te. Adoramus te. Glorificamus te.
Gratias agimus tibi propter magnam gloriam tuam.
Domine Deus, Rex caelestis, Deus Pater omnipotens.
Domine Fili unigenite, Iesu Christe.
Domine Deus, Agnus Dei, Filius Patris.
Qui tollis peccáta mundi, miserere nobis.
Qui tollis peccáta mundi, suscipe deprecationem nostram.
Qui sedes ad dexteram Patris, miserere nobis.
Quoniam to solus Sanctus. Tu solus Dominus. Tu solus Altissimus.
Iesu Christe. Cum Sancto Spiritu + in gloria Dei Patris. Amen.

|

Gospel of the Nativity of the Lord (Christmas)

From: John 1:1-18

Prologue

[1] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God. [2] He was in the beginning with God; [3] all things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made. [4] In him was life, and the life was the light of men. [5] The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

[6] There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. [7] He came for testimony to bear witness to the light, that all might believe through him. [8] He was not the light, but came to bear witness to the light.

[9] The true light that enlightens every man was coming into the world. [10] He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet the world knew him not. [11] He came to his own home, and his own people received him not. [12] But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God; [13] who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.

[14] And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth; we have beheld his glory, glory as of the only Son from the father. [15] (John bore witness to him, and cried, "This was he of whom I said, 'He who comes after me ranks before me, for he was before me.'") [16] And from his fullness have we all received, grace upon grace. [17] For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. [18] No one has ever seen God; the only Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known.

********************
Commentary:

1-18. These verses form the prologue or introduction to the Fourth Gospel; they are a poem prefacing the account of Jesus Christ's life on earth, proclaiming and praising his divinity and eternity. Jesus is the uncreated Word, God the Only-begotten, who takes on our human condition and offers us the opportunity to become sons and daughters of God, that is, to share in God's own life in a real and supernatural way.

Right through his Gospel St John the Apostle lays special emphasis on our Lord's divinity; his existence did not begin when he became man in Mary's virginal womb: before that he existed in divine eternity as Word, one in substance with the Father and the Holy Spirit. This luminous truth helps us understand everything that Jesus says and does as reported in the Fourth Gospel.

St John's personal experience of Jesus' public ministry and his appearances after the Resurrection were the material on which he drew to contemplate God's divinity and express it as "the Word of God". By placing this poem as a prologue to his Gospel, the Apostle is giving us a key to understand the whole account which follows, in the same sort of way as the first chapters of the Gospels of St Matthew and St Luke initiate us into the contemplation of the life of Christ by telling us about the virgin birth and other episodes to do with his infancy; in structure and content, however, they are more akin to the opening passages of other NT books, such as Col 1:15-20, Eph 1:13-14 and 1 Jn 1-4.

The prologue is a magnificent hymn in praise of Christ. We do not know whether St John composed it when writing his Gospel, or whether he based it on some existing liturgical hymn; but there is no trace of any such text in other early Christian documents.

The prologue is very reminiscent of the first chapter of Genesis, on a number of scores: 1) the opening words are the same: "In the beginning..."; in the Gospel they refer to absolute beginning, that is, eternity, whereas in Genesis they mean the beginning of Creation and time; 2) there is a parallelism in the role of the Word: in Genesis, God creates things by his word ("And God said ..."); in the Gospel we are told that they were made through the Word of God; 3) in Genesis, God's work of creation reaches its peak when he creates man in his own image and likeness; in the Gospel, the work of the Incarnate Word culminates when man is raised--by a new creation, as it were--to the dignity of being a son of God.

The main teachings in the prologue are: 1) the divinity and eternity of the Word; 2) the Incarnation of the Word and his manifestation as man; 3) the part played by the Word in creation and in the salvation of mankind; 4) the different ways in which people react to the coming of the Lord--some accepting him with faith, others rejecting him; 5) finally, John the Baptist bears witness to the presence of the Word in the world.

The Church has always given special importance to this prologue; many Fathers and ancient Christian writers wrote commentaries on it, and for centuries it was always read at the end of Mass for instruction and meditation.

The prologue is poetic in style. Its teaching is given in verses, which combine to make up stanzas (vv. 1-5; 6-8; 9-13; 14-18). Just as a stone dropped in a pool produces ever widening ripples, so the idea expressed in each stanza tends to be expanded in later verses while still developing the original theme. This kind of exposition was much favored in olden times because it makes it easier to get the meaning across-- and God used it to help us go deeper into the central mysteries of our faith.

1. The sacred text calls the Son of God "the Word." The following comparison may help us understand the notion of "Word": just as a person becoming conscious of himself forms an image of himself in his mind, in the same way God the Father on knowing himself begets the eternal Word. This Word of God is singular, unique; no other can exist because in him is expressed the entire essence of God. Therefore, the Gospel does not call him simply "Word", but "the Word." Three truths are affirmed regarding the Word--that he is eternal, that he is distinct from the Father, and that he is God. ''Affirming that he existed in the beginning is equivalent to saying that he existed before all things" (St Augustine, "De Trinitate", 6, 2). Also, the text says that he was with God, that is, with the Father, which means that the person of the Word is distinct from that of the Father and yet the Word is so intimately related to the Father that he even shares his divine nature: he is one in substance with the Father (cf. "Nicean Creed").

To mark the Year of Faith (1967-1968) Pope Paul VI summed up this truth concerning the most Holy Trinity in what is called the "Creed of the People of God" (n. 11) in these words: "We believe in our Lord Jesus Christ, who is the Son of God. He is the eternal Word, born of the Father before time began, and one in substance with the Father, "homoousios to Patri", and through him all things were made. He was incarnate of the Virgin Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit, and was made man: equal therefore to the Father according to his divinity, and inferior to the Father according to his humanity and himself one, not by some impossible confusion of his natures, but by the unity of his person."

"In the beginning": "what this means is that he always was, and that he is eternal. [...] For if he is God, as indeed he is, there is nothing prior to him; if he is creator of all things, then he is the First; if he is Lord of all, then everything comes after him--created things and time" (St John Chrysostom, "Hom. on St John", 2, 4).

3. After showing that the Word is in the bosom of the Father, the prologue goes on to deal with his relationship to created things. Already in the Old Testament the Word of God is shown as a creative power (cf. Is 55:10-11), as Wisdom present at the creation of the world (cf. Prov 8:22-26). Now Revelation is extended: we are shown that creation was caused by the Word; this does not mean that the Word is an instrument subordinate and inferior to the Father: he is an active principle along with the Father and the Holy Spirit. The work of creation is an activity common to the three divine Persons of the Blessed Trinity: "the Father generating, the Son being born, the Holy Spirit proceeding; consubstantial, co-equal, co-omnipotent and co-eternal; one origin of all things: the creator of all things visible and invisible, spiritual and corporal." (Fourth Lateran Council, "De Fide Catholica", Dz-Sch, 800). From this can be deduced, among other things, the hand of the Trinity in the work of creation and, therefore, the fact that all created things are basically good.

4. The prologue now goes on to expound two basic truths about the Word--that he is Life and that he is Light. The Life referred to here is divine life, the primary source of all life, natural and supernatural. And that Life is the light of men, for from God we receive the light of reason, the light of truth and the light of glory, which are a participation in God's mind. Only a rational creature is capable of having knowledge of God in this world and of later contemplating him joyfully in heaven for all eternity. Also the Life (the Word) is the light of men because he brings them out of the darkness of sin and error (cf. Is 8:23; 9:1-2; Mt 4:15-16; Lk 1:74). Later on Jesus will say: "I am the light of the world; he who follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life" (Jn 8:12; cf. 12:46).

Vv. 3 and 4 can be read with another punctuation, now generally abandoned but which had its supporters in ancient times: "All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made; in so far as anything was made in him, he was the life and the life was the light of men." This reading would suggest that everything that has been created is life in the Word, that is, that all things receive their being and activity, their life, through the Word: without him they cannot possibly exist.

5. "And the darkness has not overcome it": the original Greek verb, given in Latin as "comprehenderunt", means to embrace or contain as if putting one's arms around it--an action which can be done with good dispositions (a friendly embrace) or with hostility (the action of smothering or crushing someone). So there are two possible translations: the former is that given in the Navarre Spanish, the latter that in the RSV. The RSV option would indicate that Christ and the Gospel continue to shine among men despite the world's opposition, indeed overcoming "it", as Jesus later says: "Be of good cheer: I have overcome the world" (Jn 16:33; cf. 12:31; 1 Jn 5:4). Either way, the verse expresses the darkness' resistance to, repugnance for, the light. As his Gospel proceeds, St John explains further about the light and darkness: soon, in vv. 9-11, he refers to the struggle between them; later he will describe evil and the powers of the evil one, as a darkness enveloping man's mind and preventing him from knowing God (cf. Jn 12:15-46; 1 Jn 5:6).

St Augustine ("In Ioann. Evang.", 1, 19) comments on this passage as follows: "But, it may be, the dull hearts of some cannot yet receive this light. Their sins weigh them down, and they cannot discern it. Let them not think, however, that, because they cannot discern it, therefore it is not present with them. For they themselves, because of their sins, are darkness. Just as if you place a blind person in the sunshine, although the sun is present to him, yet he is absent from the sun; in the same way, every foolish man, every unrighteous man, every ungodly man, is blind in heart. [...] What course then ought such a one to take? Let him cleanse the eyes of his heart, that he may be able to see God. He will see Wisdom, for God is Wisdom itself, and it is written: 'Blessed are the clean of heart, for they shall see God.'" There is no doubt that sin obscures man's spiritual vision, rendering him unable to see and enjoy the things of God.

6-8. After considering the divinity of the Lord, the text moves on to deal with his incarnation, and begins by speaking of John the Baptist, who makes his appearance at a precise point in history to bear direct witness before man to Jesus Christ (Jn 1:15, 19-36; 3:22ff). As St Augustine comments: "For as much as he [the Word Incarnate] was man and his Godhead was concealed, there was sent before him a great man, through whose testimony He might be found to be more than man" ("In Ioann. Evang.", 2, 5).

All of the Old Testament was a preparation for the coming of Christ. Thus, the patriarchs and prophets announced, in different ways, the salvation the Messiah would bring. But John the Baptist, the greatest of those born of woman (cf. Mt 11:11), was actually able to point out the Messiah himself; his testimony marked the culmination of all the previous prophecies.

So important is John the Baptist's mission to bear witness to Jesus Christ that the Synoptic Gospels stage their account of the public ministry with John's testimony. The discourses of St Peter and St Paul recorded in the Acts of the Apostles also refer to this testimony (Acts 1:22; 10:37; 12:24). The Fourth Gospel mentions it as many as seven times (1:6, 15, 19, 29, 35; 3:27; 5:33). We know, of course, that St John the Apostle was a disciple of the Baptist before becoming a disciple of Jesus, and that it was precisely the Baptist who showed him the way to Christ (cf. 1 :37ff).

The New Testament, then, shows us the importance of the Baptist's mission, as also his own awareness that he is merely the immediate Precursor of the Messiah, whose sandals he is unworthy to untie (cf. Mk 1:7): the Baptist stresses his role as witness to Christ and his mission as preparer of the way for the Messiah (cf. Lk 1:15-17; Mt 3: 3-12). John the Baptist's testimony is undiminished by time: he invites people in every generation to have faith in Jesus, the true Light.

9. "The true light..." [The Spanish translation of this verse is along these lines: "It was the true light that enlightens every man who comes into the world."] The Fathers, early translations and most modern commentators see "the Word" as being the subject of this sentence, which could therefore be translated as "the Word was the true light that enlightens every man who comes into the world...". Another interpretation favored by many modern scholars makes "the light" the subject, in which case it would read "the true light existed, which enlightens...". Either way, the meaning is much the same.

"Coming into the world": it is not clear in the Greek whether these words refer to "the light", or to "every man". In the first case it is the Light (the Word) that is coming into this world to enlighten all men; in the second it is the men who, on coming into this world, on being born, are enlightened by the Word; the RSV and the new Vulgate opt for the first interpretation.

The Word is called "the true light" because he is the original light from which every other light or revelation of God derives. By the Word's coming, the world is fully lit up by the authentic Light. The prophets and all the other messengers of God, including John the Baptist, were not the true light but his reflection, attesting to the Light of the Word.

A propos the fullness of light which the Word is, St John Chrysostom asks: "If he enlightens every man who comes into the world, how is it that so many have remained unenlightened? For not all, to be sure, have recognized the high dignity of Christ. How, then, does he enlighten every man? As much as he is permitted to do so. But if some, deliberately closing the eyes of their minds, do not wish to receive the beams of this light, darkness is theirs. This is not because of the nature of the light, but is a result of the wickedness of men who deliberately deprive themselves of the gift of grace (Hom. on St. John, 8, 1).

10. The Word is in this world as the maker who controls what he has made (cf. St Augustine, "In Ioann. Evang.", 2, 10). In St John's Gospel the term "world" means "all creation, all created things (including all mankind)": thus, Christ came to save all mankind: "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God sent the Son into the world, not to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him" (Jn 3:16-17). But insofar as many people have rejected the Light, that is, rejected Christ, "world" also means everything opposed to God (cf. Jn 17:14-15). Blinded by their sins, men do not recognize in the world the hand of the Creator (cf. Rom 1:18-20; Wis 13:1-15): "they become attached to the world and relish only the things that are of the world" (St John Chrysostom, "Hom. on St John", 7). But the Word, "the true light", comes to show us the truth about the world (cf. Jn 1:3; 18:37) and to save us.

11. "his own home, his own people": this means, in the first place, the Jewish people, who were chosen by God as his own personal "property", to be the people from whom Christ would be born. It can also mean all mankind, for mankind is also his: he created it and his work of redemption extends to everyone. So the reproach that they did not receive the Word made man should be understood as addressed not only to the Jews but to all those who rejected God despite his calling them to be his friends: "Christ came; but by a mysterious and terrible misfortune, not everyone accepted him. [...] It is the picture of humanity before us today, after twenty centuries of Christianity. How did this happen? What shall we say? We do not claim to fathom a reality immersed in mysteries that transcend us--the mystery of good and evil. But we can recall that the economy of Christ, for its light to spread, requires a subordinate but necessary cooperation on the part of man--the cooperation of evangelization, of the apostolic and missionary Church. If there is still work to be done, it is all the more necessary for everyone to help her" (Paul VI, General Audience, 4 December 1974).

12. Receiving the Word means accepting him through faith, for it is through faith that Christ dwells in our hearts (cf. Eph 3:17). Believing in his name means believing in his Person, in Jesus as the Christ, the Son of God. In other words, "those who believe in his name are those who fully hold the name of Christ, not in any way lessening his divinity or his humanity" (St Thomas Aquinas, "Commentary on St John, in loc.").

"He gave power [to them]" is the same as saying "he gave them a free gift"--sanctifying grace--"because it is not in our power to make ourselves sons of God" ("ibid."). This gift is extended through Baptism to everyone, whatever his race, age, education etc. (cf. Acts 10:45; Gal 3:28). The only condition is that we have faith.

"The Son of God became man", St Athanasius explains, "in order that the sons of men, the sons of Adam, might become sons of God. [...] He is the Son of God by nature; we, by grace" ("De Incarnatione Contra Arrianos"). What is referred to here is birth to supernatural life: in which "Whether they be slaves or freemen, whether Greeks or barbarians or Scythians, foolish or wise, female or male, children or old men, honorable or without honor, rich or poor, rulers or private citizens, all, he meant, would merit the same honor. [...] Such is the power of faith in him; such the greatness of his grace" (St John Chrysostom, "Hom. on St John", 10, 2).

"Christ's union with man is power and the source of power, as St John stated so incisively in the prologue of his Gospel: '(The Word) gave power to become children of God.' Man is transformed inwardly by this power as the source of a new life that does not disappear and pass away but lasts to eternal life (cf. Jn 4:14)" (John Paul II, "Redemptor Hominis", 18).

13. The birth spoken about here is a real, spiritual type of generation which is effected in Baptism (cf. 3:6ff). Instead of the plural adopted here, referring to the supernatural birth of men, some Fathers and early translations read it in the singular: "who was born, not of blood...but of God", in which case the text would refer to the eternal generation of the Word and to Jesus' generation through the Holy Spirit in the pure womb of the Virgin Mary. Although the second reading is very attractive, the documents (Greek manuscripts, early translations, references in the works of ecclesiastical writers, etc.) show the plural text to be the more usual, and the one that prevailed from the fourth century forward. Besides, in St John's writings we frequently find reference to believers as being born of God (cf. Jn 3:3-6; 1 Jn 2:29; 3:9; 4:7; 5:1, 4, 18).

The contrast between man's natural birth (by blood and the will of man) and his supernatural birth (which comes from God) shows that those who believe in Jesus Christ are made children of God not only by their creation but above all by the free gift of faith and grace.

14. This is a text central to the mystery of Christ. It expresses in a very condensed form the unfathomable fact of the incarnation of the Son of God. "When the time had fully come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman" (Gal 4:4).

The word "flesh" means man in his totality (cf. Jn 3:6; 17:2; Gen 6:3; Ps 56:5); so the sentence "the Word became flesh" means the same as "the Word became man." The theological term "incarnation" arose mainly out of this text. The noun "flesh" carries a great deal of force against heresies which deny that Christ is truly man. The word also accentuates that our Savior, who dwelt among us and shared our nature, was capable of suffering and dying, and it evokes the "Book of the Consolation of Israel" (Is 40:1-11), where the fragility of the flesh is contrasted with the permanence of the Word of God: "The grass withers, the flower fades; but the Word of our God will stand for ever" (Is 40:8). This does not mean that the Word's taking on human nature is something precarious and temporary.

"And dwelt among us": the Greek verb which St John uses originally means "to pitch one's tent", hence, to live in a place. The careful reader of Scripture will immediately think of the tabernacle, or tent, in the period of the exodus from Egypt, where God showed his presence before all the people of Israel through certain sights of his glory such as the cloud covering the tent (cf., for example, Ex 25:8; 40:34-35). In many passages of the Old Testament it is announced that God "will dwell in the midst of the people" (cf., for example, Jer 7:3; Ezek 43:9; Sir 24:8). These signs of God's presence, first in the pilgrim tent of the Ark in the desert and then in the temple of Jerusalem, are followed by the most wonderful form of God's presence among us--Jesus Christ, perfect God and perfect Man, in whom the ancient promise is fulfilled in a way that far exceeded men's greatest expectations. Also the promise made through Isaiah about the "Immanuel" or "God-with-us" (Is 7:14; cf. Mt 1:23) is completely fulfilled through this dwelling of the Incarnate Son of God among us. Therefore, when we devoutly read these words of the Gospel "and dwelt among us" or pray them during the Angelus, we have a good opportunity to make an act of deep faith and gratitude and to adore our Lord's most holy human nature.

"Remembering that 'the Word became flesh', that is, that the Son of God became man, we must become conscious of how great each man has become through this mystery, through the Incarnation of the Son of God! Christ, in fact, was conceived in the womb of Mary and became man to reveal the eternal love of the Creator and Father and to make known the dignity of each one of us" (John Paul II, "Angelus Address" at Jasna Gora Shrine, 5 June 1979).

Although the Word's self-emptying by assuming a human nature concealed in some way his divine nature, of which he never divested himself, the Apostles did see the glory of his divinity through his human nature: it was revealed in the transfiguration (Lk 9:32-35), in his miracles (Jn 2:11; 11:40), and especially in his resurrection (cf. Jn 3:11; 1 Jn 1:1) The glory of God, which shone out in the early tabernacle in the desert and in the temple at Jerusalem, was nothing but an imperfect anticipation of the reality of God's glory revealed through the holy human nature of the Only-begotten of the Father. St John the Apostle speaks in a very formal way in the first person plural: "we have beheld his glory", because he counts himself among the witnesses who lived with Christ and, in particular, were present at his transfiguration and saw the glory of his resurrection.

The words "only Son" ("Only-begotten") convey very well the eternal and unique generation of the Word by the Father. The first three Gospels stressed Christ's birth in time; St John complements this by emphasizing his eternal generation.

The words "grace and truth" are synonyms of "goodness and fidelity", two attributes which, in the Old Testament, are constantly applied to Yahweh (cf., e.g., Ex 34:6; Ps 117; Ps 136; Osee 2:16-22): so, grace is the __expression of God's love for men, the way he expresses his goodness and mercy. Truth implies permanence, loyalty, constancy, fidelity. Jesus, who is the Word of God made man, that is, God himself, is therefore "the only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth"; he is the "merciful and faithful high priest" (Heb 2:17). These two qualities, being good and faithful, are a kind of compendium or summary of Christ's greatness. And they also parallel, though on an infinitely lower level, the quality essential to every Christian, as stated expressly by our Lord when he praised the "good and faithful servant" (Mt 25:21).

As Chrysostom explains: "Having declared that they who received him were 'born of God' and 'become sons of God,' he then set forth the cause and reason for this ineffable honor. It is that 'the Word became flesh' and the Master took on the form of a slave. He became the Son of Man, though he was the true Son of God, in order that he might make the sons of men children of God. ("Hom. on St John", 11,1).

The profound mystery of Christ was solemnly defined by the Church's Magisterium in the famous text of the ecumenical council of Chalcedon (in the year 451): "Following the holy Fathers, therefore, we all with one accord teach the profession of faith in the one identical Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. We declare that he is perfect both in his divinity and in his humanity, truly God and truly man, composed of body and rational soul; that he is consubstantial with the Father in his divinity, consubstantial with us in his humanity, like us in every respect except for sin (cf. Heb 4:15). we declare that in his divinity he was begotten in this last age of Mary the Virgin, the Mother of God, for us and for our salvation" (Dz-Sch, n. 301).

15. Further on (On Jn 1:19-36) the Gospel tells us more about John the Baptist's mission as a witness to the messiahship and divinity of Jesus. Just as God planned that the Apostles should bear witness to Jesus after the resurrection, so he planned that the Baptist would be the witness chosen to proclaim Jesus at the very outset of his public ministry (cf. note on Jn 1:6-8).

16 "Grace upon grace": this can be understood, as it was by Chrysostom and other Fathers, as "grace for grace", the Old Testament economy of salvation giving way to the new economy of grace brought by Christ. It can also mean (as the-RSV suggests) that Jesus brings a superabundance of gifts, adding on, to existing graces, others--all of which pour out of the one inexhaustible source, Christ, who is for ever full of grace. "Not by sharing with us, says the Evangelist, does Christ possess the gift, but he himself is both fountain and root of all virtues. He himself is life, and light, and truth, not keeping within himself the wealth of these blessings, but pouring it forth upon all others, and even after the outpouring still remaining full. He suffers loss in no way by giving his wealth to others, but, while always pouring out and sharing these virtues with all men, he remains in the same state of perfection" (St John Chrysostom, "Hom. on St John", 14, 1).

17. Here, for the first time in St John's Gospel, the name of Jesus Christ appears, identified with the Word of whom John has been speaking.

Whereas the Law given by Moses went no further than indicate the way man ought follow (cf. Rom 8:7-10), the grace brought by Jesus has the power to save those who receive it (cf. Rom 7:25). Through grace "we have become dear to God, no longer merely as servants, but as sons and friends" (Chrysostom, "Hom. on St John", 14, 2).

On "grace and truth" see note on Jn 1:14.

18. "No one has ever seen God": in this world men have never seen God other than indirectly: all that they could contemplate was God's "glory", that is the aura of his greatness: for example, Moses saw the burning bush (Ex 3:6); Elijah felt the breeze on Mount Horeb--the "still small voice" (RSV)--(1 Kings 19:11-13). But in the fullness of time God comes much closer to man and reveals himself almost directly, for Jesus Christ is the visible image of the invisible God (cf. Col 1:15), the maximum revelation of God in this world, to such an extent that he assures us that "he who has seen me has seen the Father" (Jn 14:9). "The most intimate truth which this revelation gives us about God and the salvation of man shines forth in Christ, who is himself both the mediator and the sum total of Revelation" (Vatican II, "Dei Verbum", 2).

There is no greater revelation God could make of himself than the incarnation of his eternal Word. As St John of the Cross puts it so well: "In giving to us, as he has done, his Son, who is his only Word, he has spoken to us once and for all by his own and only Word, and has nothing further to reveal" ("Ascent of Mount Carmel", Book II, chap. 22).

"The only Son": the RSV note says that "other ancient authorities read "God" (for Son); the Navarre Spanish has "the Only-begotten God" and comments as follows: some Greek manuscripts and some translations give "the Only-begotten Son" or "the Only-begotten". "The Only-begotten God" is preferable because it finds best support in the codexes. Besides, although the meaning does not change substantially, this translation has a richer content because it again explicitly reveals Christ's divinity.

*******************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Gospel for Saturday, Dec 24, 4th Week of Advent

From: Luke 1:67-79

The Benedictus

[67] And his father Zechariah was filled with the Holy Spirit, and prophesied, saying, [68] "Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, for he has visited and redeemed his people, [69] and has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David, [70] as he spoke by the mouth of his holy prophets from of old, [71] that we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all who hate us; [72] to perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant, [73] the oath which he swore to our father Abraham, [74] to grant us that we, being delivered from the hand of our enemies, might serve him without fear, [75] in holiness and righteousness before him all the days of our life. [76] And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Most High; for you will go before the Lord to prepare his ways, [77] to give knowledge of salvation to his people in the forgiveness of their sins, [78] through the tender mercy of our God, when the day shall dawn upon us from on high [79] to give light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace."

********************
Commentary:

67. Zechariah, who was a righteous man (cf. v. 6), received the special grace of prophecy when his son was born--a gift which led him to pronounce his canticle, called the "Benedictus", a prayer so full of faith, reverence and piety that the Church has laid it down to be said daily in the Liturgy of the Hours. Prophecy has not only to do with foretelling future events; it also means being moved by the Holy Spirit to praise God. Both aspects of prophecy are to be found in the "Benedictus".

68- 79. Two parts can be discerned in the "Benedictus": in the first (vv. 68-75) Zechariah thanks God for sending the Messiah, the Savior, as he promised the patriarchs and prophets of Israel.

In the second (vv. 76-79) he prophesies that his son will have the mission of being herald of the Most High and precursor of the Messiah, proclaiming God's mercy which reveals itself in the coming of Christ.

72-75. Again and again God promised the patriarchs of the Old Testament that he would take special care of Israel, giving them a land which they would enjoy undisturbed and many descendants in whom all the peoples of the earth would be blessed. This promise he ratified by means of a covenant or alliance, of the kind commonly made between kings and their vassals in the Near East. God, as Lord, would protect the patriarchs and their descendants, and these would prove their attachment to him by offering him certain sacrifices and by doing him service. See, for example, Genesis 12:13; 17:1-8; 22:16-18 (God's promise, covenant and pledge to Abraham); and Genesis 5:11-12 (where he repeats these promises to Jacob). Zechariah realizes that the events resulting from the birth of John his son, the Precursor of the Messiah; constitute complete fulfillment of these divine purposes.

78-79. The "dawning", the "dayspring", is the Messiah, Jesus Christ, coming down from heaven to shed his light upon us: "the son of righteousness shall rise, with healing on its wings" (Mal 4:2). Already in the Old Testament we were told about the glory of the Lord, the reflection of his presence--something intimately connected with light. For example, when Moses returned to the encampment after talking with God, his face so shone that the Israelites "were afraid to come near him" (Ex 34:30). St John is making the same reference when he says that "God is light and in him there is no darkness" (1 Jn 1:5) and that there will be no light in heaven "for the glory of God is its light" (cf. Rev 21:23; 22:5).

The angels (cf. Rev 1:11) and the saints (cf. Wis 3:7; Dan 2:3) partake of this divine splendor; our Lady does so in a special way. As a symbol of the Church she is revealed to us in the Apocalypse as "clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feel, and on her head a crown of twelve stars" (12:1).

Even when we live in this world, this divine light reaches us through Jesus Christ who, because he is God, is "the true light that enlightens every man" (Jn 1:9), as Christ himself tells us: "I am the light of the world; he who follows me will not walk in darkness" (Jn 8:12).

Such is Christians' share in this light of God that Jesus tells us: "You are the light of the world" (Mt 5:14). Therefore, we must live as children of the light (cf. Lk 16:8), whose fruit takes the form of "all that is good and right and true" (Eph 5:9); our lives should shine oul, thereby helping people to know God and give him glory (cf. Mt 5:16).
**********************

Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Friday, December 23, 2005

Finding Christmas Peace

How to find Christmas peace in a world of unrest?

You cannot find peace on the outside but you can find peace on the inside, by letting God do to your soul what Mary let Him do to her body, namely, let Christ be formed in you.

As she cooked meals in her Nazarene home, as she nursed her aged cousin, as she drew water at the well, as she prepared the meals of the village carpenter, as she knitted the seamless garment, as she kneaded the dough and swept the floor, she was conscious that Christ was in her; that she was a living Ciborium, a monstrance of the Divine Eucharist, a Gate of Heaven through which a Creator would peer upon creation, a Tower of Ivory up whose chaste body He was to climb "to kiss upon her lips a mystical rose."

As He was physically formed in her, so He wills to be spiritually formed in you.

If you knew He was seeing through your eyes, you would see in every fellowman a child of God.

If you knew that He worked through your hands, they would bless all the day through.

If you knew He spoke through your lips, then your speech, like Peter's, would betray that you had been with the Galilean.

If you knew that He wants to use your mind, your will, your fingers, and your heart, how different you would be.

If half the world did this there would be no war! 

- Bishop Fulton J. Sheen





"The Eucharist began at Bethlehem in Mary's arms. It was she who brought to humanity the Bread for which it was famishing, and which alone can nourish it. She it was who took care of that Bread for us. It was she who nourished the Lamb whose life-giving Flesh we feed upon,"

- St. Peter Julian Eymard




"The shepherds - simple souls - came to adore the Infant Savior. Mary rejoiced at seeing their homage and willing offerings they made to her Jesus... How happy is the loving soul when it has found Jesus with Mary, His Mother! They who know the Tabernacle where He dwells, they who receive Him into their souls, know that His conversation is full of divine sweetness, His consolation ravishing, His peace superabundant, and the familiarity of His love and His Heart ineffable,"

- St. Peter Julian Eymard




More here.

|

A Blessed and Holy Christmas to All

And the Angel said to them, "Fear not; for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, that shall be for all the people; for this day is born a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord, in the city of David. And this shall be a sign unto you: you shall find the infant wrapped in swaddling cloths and laid in a manger." !

And suddenly there was with the Angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, "Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men of good will!"

The shepherds follow at once the voice of God which calls them to the manger; they exhort one another to do so; they seek the Redeemer and happily find Him; they make Him known to others, and heartily thank God for the grace given them.

Let us follow the inspirations of God with ready obedience; let us exhort one another to virtue by good example and edifying conversation; let us make good use of the knowledge given us by God, give it to others, and praise God for this and all He has given us.

Grant, we beseech Thee, Almighty God, that the new birth of Thine only begotten Son in the flesh may deliver us who are held by the old bondage under the yoke of sin.
Wishing all a Blessed & Holy Christmas

|

New Bishop for Reno

VATICAN CITY, DEC 23, 2005 (VIS) - The Holy Father appointed:
. . .
- Fr. Randolph Roque Calvo of the clergy of San Francisco, U.S.A., pastor of the parish of Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Redwood City, as bishop of Reno (area 183,506, population 607,459, Catholics 91,973, priests 42, permanent deacons 11, religious 50), U.S.A. The bishop-elect was born in Agana on the island of Guam in 1950 and ordained as a priest in 1977.

|

Pope Benedict XVI Certifies the Council – The Real One

In his pre-Christmas address to the Roman curia, Benedict XVI demolishes the myth of Vatican II as a rupture and new beginning. He gives another name “reform,” to the proper interpretation of the Council. And he explains why

by Sandro Magister
_________________
ROMA, December 23, 2005 – Benedict XVI has on two occasions satisfied the great curiosity about his comments on Vatican Council II, at the fortieth anniversary of its conclusion.
. . .in his address to the curia on December 22, Benedict XVI went to the heart of the most controversial question. He asked:

“Why has the reception of the Council been so difficult for such a great portion of the Church up until now?”

And he replied:

“The problems have arisen from a struggle between two conflicting forms of interpretation. One of these has caused confusion; the other, in a silent but increasingly visible way, has brought results, and continues to bring them.”
. . .
No one can deny that in large sections of the Church, the Council's reception has been carried out in a rather different manner, without even wanting to apply to what has happened the description that the great doctor of the Church, saint Basil, gave of the Church's situation after the Council of Nicaea: he compared it to a naval battle in the darkness of a storm, saying among other things: “Harsh rises the cry of the combatants encountering one another in dispute; already all the Church is almost full of the inarticulate screams, the unintelligible noises, rising from the ceaseless agitations that divert the right rule of the doctrine of true religion” (De Spiritu Sancto, XXX). It is not a dramatic description such as this that we would want to apply to the post-Council situation, but some of what has happened does reflect itself in it. The question arises: Why has the reception of the Council been so difficult for such a great portion of the Church up until now?
. . .
On one hand, there is an interpretation that I would like to call “hermeneutics of discontinuity and rupture”. It was frequently able to find favour among mass media, and also a certain sector of modern theology.
. . .
Hermeneutics of discontinuity risk leading to a fracture between the pre-Council and post-Council Church. It asserts that the Council texts as such would still not be the true expression of the spirit of the Council.
So that's what it is called - “hermeneutics of discontinuity and rupture”-a quite appropriate and accurate term, yes?

More here.

|

Gospel for Friday, Dec 23, 4th Week of Advent

From: Luke 1:57-66

The Birth and Circumcision of John the Baptist

[57] Now the time came for Elizabeth to be delivered, and she gave birth to a son. [58] And her neighbors and kinsfolk heard that the Lord had shown great mercy to her, and they rejoiced with her. [59] And on the eighth day they came to circumcise the child; and they would have named him Zechariah after his father, [60] but his mother said, "Not so; he shall be called John." [61] And they said to her, "None of your kindred is called by this name." [62] And they made signs to his father, inquiring what he would have him called. [63] And he asked for a writing tablet, and wrote, "His name is John." And they all marvelled. [64] And immediately his mouth was opened and his tongue loosed, and he spoke, blessing God. [65] And fear came on all their neighbors. And all these things were talked about through all the hill country of Judea; [66] and all who heard them laid them up in their hearts, saying "What then will this child be?" For the hand of the Lord was with him.

***************
Commentary:

59. Circumcision was a rite established by God under the Old Covenant to mark out those who belonged to His chosen people: He commanded Abraham to institute circumcision as a sign of the Covenant He had made with him and all his descendants (cf. Genesis 17:10-14), prescribing that it should be done on the eighth day after birth. The rite was performed either at home or in the synagogue, and, in addition to the actual circumcision, the ceremony included prayers and the naming of the child.

With the institution of Christian Baptism the commandment to circumcise ceased to apply. At the Council of Jerusalem (cf. Acts 15:1ff), the Apostles definitely declared that those entering the Church had no need to be circumcised.

St. Paul's explicit teaching on the irrelevance of circumcision in the context of the New Alliance established by Christ is to be found in Galatians 5:2ff; 6:12ff; and Colossians 2:11ff.

60-63. By naming the child John, Zechariah complies with the instructions God sent him through the angel (Luke 1:13).

64. This miraculous event fulfills the prophecy the angel Gabriel made to Zechariah when he announced the conception and birth of the Baptist (Luke 1:19-20). St. Ambrose observes: `With good reason was his tongue loosed, because faith untied what had been tied by disbelief" ("Expositio Evangelii Sec. Lucam. in loc.").

Zechariah's is a case similar to that of St. Thomas, who was reluctant to believe in the resurrection of our Lord, and who believed only when Jesus gave him clear proof (cf. John 20:24-29). For these two men God worked a miracle and won their belief; but normally He requires us to have faith and to obey Him without His working any new miracles. This was why He upbraided Zechariah and punished him, and why He reproached Thomas: "Have you believed because you have seen Me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe" (John 20:29).

*********************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Thursday, December 22, 2005

Bishops Discuss Mass Translations - A Transcript

Adoremus has posted a transcript of the US bishops’ discussion on the latest draft translation of the Order of Mass. This discussion took place on Monday afternoon, November 14, 2005, during the USCCB meeting held in Washington. The transcription, of Adoremus audio-tapes of the meeting, was made by Susan Benofy.

Thank God for Adoremus! Please consider a donation so that Adoremus can continue to provide such a wonderful service.

|

Vatican II Texts Were Misinterpreted, Says Pope

VATICAN CITY, DEC. 22, 2005 (Zenit.org).- The crisis that arose in the Church after the Second Vatican Council wasn't due to the conciliar documents, but rather in their interpretation, says Benedict XVI.

The Pope made a long analysis of the legacy left by the 1962-1965 gathering of the world's bishops, when he met today with his aides in the Roman Curia to express his Christmas greetings.
Continued here...

|

Prince Caspian in the Works?

With the big opening weekend box office success of the first Chronicles of Narnia film, rumors are already starting to circulate about the next film in the series. According to Narnia Web—and several other publications—anonymous sources are indicating that Prince Caspian has already been greenlighted.

|

Homosexual Activists Cheer Appointment of New San Francisco Archbishop

SAN FRANCISCO, December 22, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Archbishop George Hugh Niederauer, soon to be installed as the new Archbishop of San Francisco, has told a local news outlet that he is opposed to the Vatican’s prohibition of homosexuals in seminaries.

“Some who are seriously mistaken have named sexual orientation as the cause of the recent scandal regarding the sexual abuse of minors by priests,” Niederauer said Monday in an interview with the Intermountain Catholic News.
. . .
The evidence that Niederauer is a supporter of the “gay” cause in the Church and in civil society is overwhelming. Glowing recommendations from the homosexual activist movement are flooding the internet news sources.

Francis DeBernardo, who leads pro-gay New Ways Ministry, a movement that has been prohibited by the Vatican as opposed to Catholic teaching, said that he expects great things from Niederauer’s appointment to San Francisco.
Link to complete article.

|

For from the heart come forth evil...

...
[11] Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man: but what cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man. [12] Then came his disciples, and said to him: Dost thou know that the Pharisees, when they heard this word, were scandalized? [13] But he answering them, said: Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. [14] Let them alone: they are blind, and leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the pit. [15] And Peter answering, said to him: Expound to us this parable. [16] But he said: Are you also yet without understanding? [17] Do you not understand, that whatsoever entereth into the mouth, goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the privy? [18] But the things which proceed out of the mouth, come forth from the heart, and those things defile a man. [19] For from the heart come forth evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false testimonies, blasphemies. [20] These are the things that defile a man. But to eat with unwashed hands doth not defile a man.

From Matthew 15 (Douay-Rheims)

The Post-Dispatch Blog has been literally overrun by what appears to be those who harbor a venomous, vitriolic hatred of the Catholic Church and Archbishop Burke. While several faithful Catholics and others tried to shine light on the matter of the St Stanislaus schism, that light was met with fierce opposition...Some of those who should be commended for their efforts are Jim Russell, Ken, Mike, Fr. John Schweitzer, Romuleus, Hank Mulgravy, Charles V, Joeseminarian, Jeff, and some others.

For those who would like to both sickened and inspired, you can read the 340+ posts here. It's eye-opening to say the least!

|

Local Opportunities for Mortal Sin

The following opportunities exist (in addition to all of the normal, everyday temptations) for one to participate in grave sin and the furthering of the ecclesiastical crime of schism:
Saturday, December 24th 2005
Confessions 7:00pm-9:00pm
Koledy(Polish Christmas Carols) 9:30pm-10:00pm *
Mass (Polish and English) 10:00 pm

*All are invited to join us for coffee after the 10:00 pm mass to meet with Reverend Bozek and your friends in the Polish Heritage Center.

Sunday, December 25th 2005
Mass 8:00 am (English)
Mass 10:00 am (Polish)

Saturday, December 31st 2005
Mass (Polish and English) 5:30 pm

Sunday, January 1st 2006
Mass 10:00 am (English)
Mass 12:00 am (Polish)
This above schedule is from the St Stanislaus Web Site.

The following from Archbishop Burke is most important, especially for anyone who intends to receive the Sacraments, especially the Sacrament of Penance at St. Stanislaus on Christmas Eve.
The ordained priest who goes into schism...may not exercise the Sacrament of Holy Orders which he has received. Any Mass celebrated by a suspended and excommunicated priest is valid, but illicit. To knowingly and willingly celebrate the Holy Mass, when one is legitimately prohibited from doing so, is a most grave sin.

A priest under the penalty of excommunication does not give valid sacramental absolution (cf. can. 966, §1).

Neither can he validly officiate at a wedding (cf. can. 1108, §1).

The faithful who approach a schismatic priest for the reception of the sacraments, except in the case of danger of death, commit a mortal sin.

All of the faithful of the archdiocese should guard against any participation in the attempt to celebrate the sacraments or sacramentals at St. Stanislaus Kostka Church.

Also, they should caution visitors and others who are unaware of the status of St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish, lest they unknowingly participate in the schismatic acts.
Not only is the individual not absolved, does he not also commit, objectively, at least the mortal sin of sacrilege by approaching a schismatic priest for the Sacrament?

Is not another grave sin that of Scandal?

This is a Lose-Lose situation for everyone at St Stanislaus.

If the priest or anyone else advises the faithful in a manner contrary to Archbishop Burke's explanations and admonitions, he sets himself above the bishop, the Pope, and the Church.

In essence, he has usurped the authority given by Christ to the Apostles and their legitimate successors. He has made himself pope.

|

Prayers make better presents for priests than most items, say some

COLUMBUS, Ohio (CNS) -- How many rosaries, crucifixes and Bibles does a priest receive for Christmas? Answer: enough to open a Catholic book and gift shop.

Parish secretaries, administrators and family members of priests all agree -- priests do not need any more sacramentals as gifts.

Indeed, Catholic priests top many shoppers' "hard-to-buy-for" lists.

For many priests, prayers from the faithful are the only gifts they need.

Personal items, such as shaving and grooming items, are always welcome, and even a gift certificate for a car wash is a good idea, said Carolyn Smith, parish administrator at Immaculate Conception in Columbus...

Another favorite is giving a donation in a priest's name to a favorite charity or a parish's building fund.

But the best gift of all is to pray for vocations to the priesthood, said Amy Rohyas, office administrator at Our Lady Lourdes Parish in Marysville. "Our priests are exhausted," she said. "We really need more priests."
We should really be praying every day for our priests and for vocations. And don't forget or neglect your parish priest(s) this Christmas or your bishop...at least every priest that I know enjoys good food, home-made cookies, etc. I have yet to find a priest that did not like to eat. Invite them to your home for dinner sometime. He is, after all, a spiritual father for us. Make sure he is welcomed inro your home and family.

|

To the Sistine Chapel Choir: The Liturgy has Need of Beauty

"On the night the Savior was born," the Pope told members of the choir, "the Angels announced the birth of Christ to the shepherds with the words: 'Gloria in excelsis Deo et in terra Pax hominibus.' Tradition has always held that the angels did not simply speak as men do, but that they sung and that theirs was a song of celestial beauty revealing the beauty of heaven. Tradition also holds that choirs of unbroken voices can help us to feel the resonance of angelic song. And it is true that in the music of Sistine Chapel, in the great liturgies, we can feel the presence of a celestial liturgy, a small taste of the beauty by which the Lord wishes to communicate His joy.

"Indeed, praise of God calls for song," said the Holy Father. "For this reason, your contribution is essential to the liturgy; it is not some marginal adornment, quite the contrary, the liturgy requires this beauty, it needs song in order to praise God and to bring joy to the participants."

|

Here I come to save the day!








Mighty Mouse can fly, and is superstrong and invulnerable. He has X-ray vision, and has occasionally demonstrated a form of super-hypnosis which allows him to control inanimate objects and turn back time.


Mister Trouble never hangs around

When he hears this Mighty sound.

"Here I come to save the day"

That means that Mighty Mouse is on his way.

Yes sir, when there is a wrong to right

Mighty Mouse will join the fight.

On the sea or on the land,

He gets the situation well in hand."
______________________

And by the way, while I'm researching various superheroes, Fr. Marek Bozek has arrived to save St Stanislaus from the evil Archbishop...

|

Marek Bozek Arrives at St Stanislaus

New pastor arrives at St. Stanislaus
By Tim Townsend
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
12/21/2005

The day after he pulled into town, the Rev. Marek Bozek, the new pastor of St. Stanislaus Kostka church, introduced himself to the St. Louis media. Literally.

Minutes before a news conference at the church hall Wednesday, Bozek walked around the room and shook hands with every reporter, photographer and cameraman.

Bozek plans to celebrate his first Mass as St. Stanislaus' pastor on Christmas Eve. He has been declared excommunicated, along with the six members of the church board, by St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke.

His voice breaking with nerves, Bozek read a statement saying that he had received more than 200 letters, from both supporters and opponents. He said he had received "hate letters filled with insult and malice, accusing me of things I've never heard of, accusing me of being a heretic, a pedophile, a womanizer and a promiscuous homosexual."
. . .
Bozek said he had come to St. Stanislaus Kostka, "in order to be a parish priest and nothing else" and that he wants St. Stanislaus to be a normal Roman Catholic parish. "I will laugh with them when they laugh and I will cry with them when they cry," he said.

The priest will sit on the St. Stanislaus board, but he said he would not be occupied with parish finances. "I'm not a businessman, I'm a priest," he said. "A priest doesn't have to have all the answers."

Church law requires each parish to have a finance council to assist the pastor.

In his newspaper column, Burke said he will be obliged to "suppress" St. Stanislaus, meaning it will no longer be a parish in the St. Louis archdiocese, nor even Roman Catholic. Tony Huenneke, a spokesman for the St. Louis Archdiocese, said Wednesday that, as far as he knew, the archbishop had not yet signed the decree of suppression.

Bozek acknowledged he was scared by the excommunication, which he called "the death penalty of the Catholic church." But in making his decision to come to St. Stanislaus, he said, he listened only to "vox populi, vox dei," - that is, the voice of the people, the voice of God.
He listened to the voice of whom? How can he be certain? Maybe that 10 years of theology?
Post Dispatch Link

|

Extremists Drive Church Agenda...So says the Distorter

As much as I hate linking to the National Catholic Distorter, this editorial was "interesting"...For those who have followed the recent Catholic Charities fiasco in Boston, and the protest that ensued for allowing "Catholic" mayor, Thomas M. Menino, who has supported gay rights and the right of women to choose to murder their unborn babies, to be honored by Catholic Charities. And let's not forget the fact that Catholic Charities has allowed children to be adopted by gay/lesbian couples. It's quite "interesting" to see the Distorter "lose it"!
For what is going on in the Boston archdiocese is, in many ways, a case study of what is occurring in the larger body of the church in the United States and elsewhere.

For Menino is also, apparently, an outstanding (and increasingly rare these days) advocate for the poor and the downtrodden.
Except if one happens to be a defenseless unborn baby...
If, as we suggest, Boston serves as a kind of bellwether on these issues, one can take courage from the independent spirit that Boston Catholics are displaying in so many ways. Simultaneously, we can lose heart at the realization that we may face the future as a church more split and divided than whole.

Much depends on how bishops handle the controversies, on what voices are given credibility, on how broadly or narrowly they construe the church and those who constitute the church.
The voices of credibility are those who speak the truth!

The bishops have a policy of prohibiting Catholic organizations from honoring those in public life who oppose Church teaching. But NCR sees it differently:
Of course, as we all know from other matters, bishops are autonomous and can interpret and apply such directives as they see fit -- or simply ignore them. (emphasis added)
Everyone is entitled to his own personal interpretation. Each person can be his own arbitor of truth. Why, it's utopia!
Obvious as the point may be to some, it is worth noting here that such scrutiny is likely not to be applied to politicians who advocate slashing benefits for the poor and/or the ill; who vote for preemptive war and the development of weapons of mass destruction; who argue for exemptions to allow torture; or who support the death penalty. They will avoid scrutiny not because it is patently stupid to expect the activities and votes of a politician to match up line by line with church teaching but because gay issues and abortion, unfortunately, have become for many the only proof texts of Catholic orthodoxy.
Shall we mention the forbidden phrase?. . .Non-negotiable issues?
Reasonableness and rationality dissipate when the absolutes of religious teaching are applied in an arena where compromise is key.
Compromise is key? As we know from our catechesis from the Distorter, the only absolute is that there are no absolutes. And sin? We are lead to believe that the 'spirit' of Vatican II threw it out the opened window so we no longer need to be burdened by a guilty conscience.
Church leaders are being pushed and bullied by bands of extreme zealots who may refer to themselves as “authentic” Catholics but who have no bona fides beyond their small circles of discontent.
Keep in mind that if one strives to be faithful to Christ and His Church, he is, by NCR's definition, an "extreme zealot".
We can become the absolutists, the literalists who keep cutting off limbs and poking out eyes to fend off that which we find disagreeable. Or we can rediscover the robustness of true Catholicism.
The "true" Catholicism according to NCR? No thanks...I prefer unadulterated truth, that which has not been poisoned.

One who strives to follow Christ must be prepared to take up his cross and follow Him. He who abhors sin and strives for virtue will be labeled as an "extremist", "fanatic", "fundamentalist", "zealot" or worse. It's part of the program. We should be prepared for it as Jesus told us.

|

St Louis Cathedral Photos-Well Worth a Look

Here are some great pictures of our beautiful Cathedral by another St. Louis Blogger

|

Gospel for Thursday, Dec 22, 4th Week of Advent

From: Luke 1:46-56

The Magnificat

[46] And Mary said, "My soul magnifies the Lord, [47] and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, [48] for He has regarded the low estate of His handmaiden. For behold, henceforth all generations will call me blessed; [49] for He who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is His name. [50] And His mercy is on those who fear Him from generation to generation. [51] He has shown strength with His arm, He has scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts, [52] He has put down the mighty from their thrones, and exalted those of low degree; [53] He has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich He has sent empty away. [54] He has helped His servant Israel, in remembrance of His mercy, [55] as He spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his posterity for ever."
[56] And Mary remained with her about three months, and returned to her home.

*************************
Commentary:

46-55. Mary's "Magnificat" canticle is a poem of singular beauty. It evokes certain passages of the Old Testament with which she would have been very familiar (especially 1 Samuel 2:1-10).

Three stanzas may be distinguished in the canticle: in the first (verses 46-50) Mary glorifies God for making her the Mother of the Savior, which is why future generations will call her blessed; she shows that the Incarnation is a mysterious __expression of God's power and holiness and mercy. In the second (verses 51-53) she teaches us that the Lord has always had a preference for the humble, resisting the proud and boastful. In the third (verses 54-55) she proclaims that God, in keeping with His promise, has always taken care of His chosen people--and now does them the greatest honor of all by becoming a Jew (cf. Romans 1:3).

"Our prayer can accompany and imitate this prayer of Mary. Like her, we feel the desire to sing, to acclaim the wonders of God, so that all mankind and all creation may share our joy" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 144).

46-47. "The first fruits of the Holy Spirit are peace and joy. And the Blessed Virgin had received within herself all the grace of the Holy Spirit" (St. Basil, "In Psalmos Homilae", on Psalm 32). Mary's soul overflows in the words of the "Magnificat". God's favors cause every humble soul to feel joy and gratitude. In the case of the Blessed Virgin, God has bestowed more on her than on any other creature. "Virgin Mother of God, He whom the heavens cannot contain, on becoming man, enclosed Himself within your womb" ("Roman Missal", Antiphon of the Common of the Mass for Feasts of Our Lady). The humble Virgin of Nazareth is going to be the Mother of God; the Creator's omnipotence has never before manifested itself in as complete a way as this.

48-49. Mary's __expression of humility causes St. Bede to exclaim: "It was fitting, then, that just as death entered the world through the pride of our first parents, the entry of Life should be manifested by the humility of Mary" ("In Lucae Evangelium Expositio, in loc.").

"How great the value of humility!--"Quia respexit humilitatem.... It is not of her faith, nor of her charity, nor of her immaculate purity that our Mother speaks in the house of Zachary. Her joyful hymn sings: `Since He has looked on my humility, all generations will call me blessed'" ([St] J. Escriva, "The Way", 598).

God rewards our Lady's humility by mankind's recognition of her greatness: "All generations will call me blessed." This prophecy is fulfilled every time someone says the Hail Mary, and indeed she is praised on earth continually, without interruption. "From the earliest times the Blessed Virgin is honored under the title of Mother of God, under whose protection the faithful take refuge together in prayer in all their perils and needs. Accordingly, following the Council of Ephesus, there was a remarkable growth in the cult of the people of God towards Mary, in veneration and love, in invocation and imitation, according to her own prophetic words: `all generations will call me blessed, for He who is mighty has done great things for me'" (Vatican II, "Lumen Gentium", 66).

50. "And His mercy is on those who fear Him from generation to generation": "At the very moment of the Incarnation, these words open up a new perspective of salvation history. After the Resurrection of Christ, this perspective is new on both the historical and the eschatological level. From that time onwards there is a succession of new generations of individuals in the immense human family, in ever-increasing dimensions; there is also a succession of new generations of the people of God, marked with the sign of the Cross and of the Resurrection and `sealed' with the sign of the paschal mystery of Christ, the absolute revelation of the mercy that Mary proclaimed on the threshold of her kinswoman's house: "His mercy is [...] from generation to generation' [...].

"Mary, then, is the one who has the "deepest knowledge of the mystery of God's mercy". She knows its price, she knows how great it is. In this sense, we call her the "Mother of Mercy": Our Lady of Mercy, or Mother of Divine Mercy; in each one of these titles there is a deep theological meaning, for they express the special preparation of her soul, of her whole personality, so that she was able to perceive, through the complex events, first of Israel, then of every individual and of the whole of humanity, that mercy of which `from generation to generation' people become sharers according to the eternal design of the Most Holy Trinity" (John Paul II, "Dives In Misericordia", 9).

51. "The proud": those who want to be regarded as superior to others, whom they look down on. This also refers to those who, in their arrogance, seek to organize society without reference to, or in opposition to, God's law. Even if they seem to do so successfully, the words of our Lady's canticle will ultimately come true, for God will scatter them as He did those who tried to build the Tower of Babel, thinking that they could reach as high as Heaven (cf. Genesis 11:4).

"When pride takes hold of a soul, it is no surprise to find it bringing along with it a whole string of other vices--greed, self-indulgence, envy, injustice. The proud man is always vainly striving to dethrone God, who is merciful to all His creatures, so as to make room for himself and his ever cruel ways.

"We should beg God not to let us fall into this temptation. Pride is the worst sin of all, and the most ridiculous.... Pride is unpleasant, even from a human point of view. The person who rates himself better than everyone and everything is constantly studying himself and looking down on other people, who in turn react by ridiculing his foolish vanity" ([St] J. Escriva, "Friends of God", 100).

53. This form of divine providence has been experienced countless times over the course of history. For example, God nourished the people of Israel with manna during their forty years in the wilderness (Exodus 16:4-35); similarly His angel brought food to Elijah (1 Kings 19:5-8), and to Daniel in the lions' den (Daniel 14:31-40); and the widow of Sarepta was given a supply of oil which miraculously never ran out (1 Kings 17:8ff). So, too, the Blessed Virgin's yearning for holiness was fulfilled by the incarnation of the Word.

God nourished the chosen people with His Law and the preaching of His prophets, but the rest of mankind was left hungry for His word, a hunger now satisfied by the Incarnation. This gift of God will be accepted by the humble; the self-sufficient, having no desire for the good things of God, will not partake of them (cf. St. Basil, "In Psalmos Homilae", on Psalm 33).

54. God led the people of Israel as He would a child whom He loved tenderly: "the Lord your God bore you, as a man bears his son, in all the way that you went" (Deuteronomy 1:31). He did so many times, using Moses, Joshua, Samuel, David, etc., and now He gives them a definitive leader by sending the Messiah--moved by His great mercy which takes pity on the wretchedness of Israel and of all mankind.

55. God promised the patriarchs of old that He would have mercy on mankind. This promise He made to Adam (Genesis 3:15), Abraham (Genesis 22:18), David (2 Samuel 7:12), etc. From all eternity God had planned and decreed that the Word should become incarnate for the salvation of all mankind. As Christ Himself put it, "God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life" (John 3:16).

*************************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher .

|

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

After Excommunication, Some Leave St Stanislaus

After excommunication some parishioners from St. Stan's attend mass at St. Agatha's
Robert Townsend, News 4 KMOV TV
The day after Saint Louis archbishop Raymond Burke took drastic action against a local catholic church several parishioners from Saint Stanislaus still celebrate mass at an alternative parish.

Reportedly a number of parishioners have also since left Saint Stanislaus and moved their membership to Saint Agatha.

At Saint Agatha Catholic Church parishioners gathered for Saturday night Mass with the controversial excommunication at Saint Stanislaus Kostka church on their minds.

“I just think [the excommunication] is terrible,” said Richard Gleason, a St. Agatha parishioner.

Yesterday Archbishop Burke excommunicated Saint Stan's entire six member board of directors and Ffather Marek Bozek, a new priest, who was hired without approval from Archbishop Burke.

The severe penalty comes more than a year after the archbishop removed the parish's two priests.

The removal and excommunication are part of the bitter battle that Saint Stanislaus and Archbishop Burke have over finances and control of the church.

One parishioner told News 4, that during the crisis they will rely on faith and prayer.

Father Bozek, the priest who was ex-communicated, is expected to celebrate mass on Christmas Eve at Saint Stanislaus.
I had missed this story...It's good news, though. These people evidently are cooperating with God's grace.

|

New Priest Introduced At St. Stanislaus Kostka Church

KSDK) - Christmas mass will go on at St. Stanislaus Catholic Church, even though the archbishop has excommunicated the priest and the entire lay board.

Wednesday afternoon, Father Marek Bozek arrived in St. Louis and was introduced to the media. Father Bozek said he's been the target of hate mail, ever since he decided to leave the Springfied, Missouri, diocese without church permission.

Archbishop Burke and St. Stanislaus have been battling for years over who controls the church and its assets.

The Archbishop says defiance by the board and the priest led to ex-communication. The seven are banned from taking part in Roman Catholic sacraments and functions. And, church leaders say anyone to attends the mass will be commiting a mortal sin.

Despite that, St. Stanislaus is planning to have a 10:00 p.m. mass on Christmas Eve.
A video from KSDK can be seen here.

Fr Bozek says that the excommunication causes him a lot of pain and fear.

Well that's what it should do, as well as be a wakeup call to repentance.

He also said that he has taken 10 years of theology. This must his way of telling us that he is an expert.

With respect to Archbishop Burke's statement (which is the teaching of the Church, by the way) that receiving Holy Communion from this excommunicated priest, except in danger of death, would be a mortal sin, Fr. Bozek claims receiving Holy Communion would never be a sin. This leads one to wonder what schools he attended where he learned such nonsense.

In fact, contrary to Fr. Bozek's claim, the Catechism states:
1857. For a sin to be mortal, three conditions must together be met: "Mortal sin is sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent."

817. In fact, "in this one and only Church of God from its very beginnings there arose certain rifts, which the Apostle strongly censures as damnable. But in subsequent centuries much more serious dissensions appeared and large communities became separated from full communion with the Catholic Church - for which, often enough, men of both sides were to blame." The ruptures that wound the unity of Christ's Body - here we must distinguish heresy, apostasy, and schism - do not occur without human sin: Where there are sins, there are also divisions, schisms, heresies, and disputes. Where there is virtue, however, there also are harmony and unity, from which arise the one heart and one soul of all believers.

2089...schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him."
Schism, as the Catechism tells us, and as Archbishop Burke reminds us, is a mortal sin.

With respect to receiving Holy Communion:
1385. To respond to this invitation [of receiving the Body and Blood of our Lord] we must prepare ourselves for so great and so holy a moment. St. Paul urges us to examine our conscience: "Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself."(218) Anyone conscious of a grave sin must receive the sacrament of Reconciliation before coming to communion.

1457. According to the Church's command, "after having attained the age of discretion, each of the faithful is bound by an obligation faithfully to confess serious sins at least once a year." Anyone who is aware of having committed a mortal sin must not receive Holy Communion, even if he experiences deep contrition, without having first received sacramental absolution, unless he has a grave reason for receiving Communion and there is no possibility of going to confession...
And lastly having established some fundamentals, we read:
2120. Sacrilege consists in profaning or treating unworthily the sacraments and other liturgical actions, as well as persons, things, or places consecrated to God. Sacrilege is a grave sin especially when committed against the Eucharist, for in this sacrament the true Body of Christ is made substantially present for us.

2118 God's first commandment condemns the main sins of irreligion: tempting God, in words or deeds, sacrilege, and simony.

2139 Tempting God in words or deeds, sacrilege, and simony are sins of irreligion forbidden by the first commandment.

So, apparently it seems, Fr Bozek never learned of the sin of sacrilege. Being such an expert theologian (10 years of theology), how could he have missed this?

He also stated the his 'ministry' will be a 'ministry' of reconciliation. We can only hope and pray. He "believes" that the excommunication is a "very unjust decision", he "believes that he is a priest "rescuing a congregation in the midst of a war with the Archdiocese"...He is their "Savior", I suppose.

Please pray for them.

|

Inside the Vatican: "Nothing Extraordinary"?

An analysis of the new Vatican document on homosexuality and the priesthood, dated November 4 and published in Rome on November 29. [This article will appear in the January issue of "Inside the Vatican" which also contains the magazine's choices for the "Top Ten People of 2005."]
- by Inside the Vatican staff

Last month we published the text of the Congregation for Catholic Education's new Instruction dealing with the admission of homosexuals to seminaries, entitled Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with Regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in View of Their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders. This month we analyze the gestation, purpose, background and tone of the text, what it says and leaves unsaid, its significance, and reactions to it. - The Editor
More here.

|

Papal ceremonies must set liturgical standards, Pope says

Vatican, Dec. 21 (CWNews.com) - Pope Benedict XVI (bio - news) today said that papal ceremonies "must be exemplary liturgy for the entire world."
. . .
The importance of pontifical liturgy has become more pronounced, the Pope said. He noted that "today, with television and radio, many people, from all parts of the world, follow the liturgy." Those who follow the papal ceremonies are likely to use them as a yardstick against which liturgy should be measured, the Pope said. Thus the liturgy becomes a way in which the Pope teaches the Catholic faithful, giving them a proper idea of what they should expect.
. . .
Gregorian chant has a special place in liturgical music, the Holy Father continued. He reminded his listeners that the tradition of the Church has always suggested that angels chant rather than merely speaking, and that the beauty of their chant is "a celestial beauty, revealing the beauty of heaven."
Good news! More to come, I'll bet.

Source.

|

Christmas at the Filling Station

This little story was posted here two years ago...While searching for some heart warming stories, I came across this and decide to share it again...Enjoy.
_________________________

The old man sat in his gas station on a cold Christmas Eve. He hadn't been anywhere in years since his wife had passed away. He had no decorations, no tree, no lights. It was just another day to him. He didn't hate Christmas, just couldn't find a reason to celebrate. There were no children in his life. His wife had gone.

He was sitting there looking at the snow that had been falling for the last hour and wondering what it was all about when the door opened and a homeless man stepped through. Instead of throwing the man out, George, Old George as he was known by his customers, told the man to come and sit by the space heater and warm up.


"Thank you, but I don't mean to intrude," said the stranger. "I see you're busy. I'll just go"

"Not without something hot in your belly," George turned and opened a wide mouth Thermos and handed it to the stranger. "It ain't much, but it's hot and tasty. Stew. Made it myself. When you're done there's coffee and it's fresh."

Just at that moment he heard the "ding" of the driveway bell. "Excuse me, be right back," George said. There in the driveway was an old 53 Chevy. Steam was rolling out of the front. The driver was panicked.

"Mister can you help me!" said the driver with a deep Spanish accent. "My wife is with child and my car is broken."

George opened the hood. It was bad. The block looked cracked from the cold; the car was dead. "You ain't going in this thing," George said as he turned away.

"But mister. Please help...."The door of the office closed behind George as he went in. George went to the office wall and got the keys to his old truck, and went back outside. He walked around the building and opened the garage, started the truck and drove it around to where the couple was waiting.

"Here, you can borrow my truck," he said. "She ain't the best thing you ever looked at, but she runs real good."

George helped put the woman in the truck and watched as it sped off into the night. George turned and walked back inside the office.

"Glad I loaned 'em the truck. Their tires were shot too. That 'ol truck has brand new tires..." George thought he was talking to the stranger, but the man had gone. The thermos was on the desk, empty with a used coffee cup beside it.

"Well, at least he got something in his belly," George thought. George went back outside to see if the old Chevy would start. It cranked slowly, but it started. He pulled it into the garage where the truck had been. He thought he would tinker with it for something to do. Christmas Eve meant no customers. He discovered the block hadn't cracked, it was just the bottom hose on the radiator.

"Well, I can fix this," he said to himself. So he put a new one on. "Those tires ain't gonna get 'em through the winter either." He took the snow treads off of his wife's old Lincoln. They were like new and he wasn't going to drive the car.

As he was working he heard a shot being fired. He ran outside and beside a police car an officer lay on the cold ground. Bleeding from the left shoulder, the officer moaned, "Help me."

George helped the officer inside as he remembered the training he had received in the Army as a medic. He knew the wound needed attention. "Pressure to stop the bleeding," he thought. The laundry company had been there that morning and had left clean shop towels. He used those and duct tape to bind the wound.

"Hey, they say duct tape can fix anything," he said, trying to make the policeman feel at ease. "Something for pain," George thought. All he had was the pills he used for his back. "These ought to work." He put some water in a cup and gave the policeman the pills.

"You hang in there. I'm going to get you an ambulance." George said, but the phone was dead. "Maybe I can get one of your buddies on that there talk box out in your police car."

He went out only to find that a bullet had gone into the dashboard destroying the two way radio. He went back in to find the policeman sitting up.

"Thanks," said the officer. "You could have left me there. The guy that shot me is still in the area."

George sat down beside him. "I would never leave an injured man in the Army and I ain't gonna leave you." George pulled back the bandage to check for bleeding. "Looks worse than what it is. Bullet passed right through 'ya. Good thing it missed the important stuff though. I think with time your gonna be right as rain."

George got up and poured a cup of coffee. "How do you take it?" he asked.

"None for me," said the officer.

"Oh, yer gonna drink this. Best in the city." Then George added: "Too bad I ain't got no donuts."

The officer laughed and winced at the same time. The front door of the office flew open. In burst a young man with a gun.

"Give me all your cash! Do it now!" the young man yelled. His hand was shaking and George could tell that he had never done anything like this before.

"That's the guy that shot me!" exclaimed the officer.

"Son, why are you doing this?" asked George. "You need to put the cannon away. Somebody else might get hurt."

The young man was confused. "Shut up old man, or I'll shoot you, too. Now give me the cash!"

The cop was reaching for his gun.

"Put that thing away," George said to the cop. "We got one too many in here now."

He turned his attention to the young man. "Son, it's Christmas Eve. If you need the money, well then, here. It ain't much but it's all I got. Now put that pee shooter away."

George pulled $150 out of his pocket and handed it to the young man, reaching for the barrel of the gun at the same time.

The young man released his grip on the gun, fell to his knees and began to cry. "I'm not very good at this am I? All I wanted was to buy something for my wife and son," he went on. "I've lost my job. My rent is due. My car got repossessed last week..."

George handed the gun to the cop. "Son, we all get in a bit of squeeze now and then. The road gets hard sometimes, but we make it through the best we can."

He got the young man to his feet, and sat him down on a chair across from the cop. "Sometimes we do stupid things." George handed the young man a cup of coffee. "Being stupid is one of the things that makes us human. Comin' in here with a gun ain't the answer. Now sit there and get warm and we'll sort this thing out."

The young man had stopped crying. He looked over to the cop. "Sorry I shot you. It just went off. I'm sorry officer."

"Shut up and drink your coffee." the cop said.

George could hear the sounds of sirens outside. A police car and an ambulance skidded to a halt. Two cops came through the door, guns drawn.

"Chuck! You ok?" one of the cops asked the wounded officer.

"Not bad for a guy who took a bullet. How did you find me?"

"GPS locator in the car. Best thing since sliced bread. Who did this?" the other cop asked as he approached the young man.

Chuck answered him, "I don't know. The guy ran off into the dark. Just dropped his gun and ran."

George and the young man both looked puzzled at each other.

"That guy works here," the wounded cop continued.

"Yep," George said. "Just hired him this morning. Boy lost his job."

The paramedics came in and loaded Chuck onto the stretcher. The young man leaned over the wounded cop and whispered, "Why?"

Chuck just said, "Merry Christmas, boy. And you too, George, and thanks for everything."

"Well, looks like you got one doozy of a break there. That ought to solve some of your problems." George went into the back room and came out with a box. He pulled out a ring box.

"Here you go. Something for the little woman. I don't think Martha would mind. She said it would come in handy some day."

The young man looked inside to see the biggest diamond ring he ever saw. "I can't take this," said the young man. "It means something to you."

"And now it means something to you," replied George. "I got my memories. That's all I need."

George reached into the box again. A toy airplane, a racing car and a little metal truck appeared next. They were toys that the oil company had left for him to sell. "Here's something for that little man of yours."

The young man began to cry again as he handed back the $150 that the old man had handed him earlier. "And what are you supposed to buy Christmas dinner with? You keep that, too. Count it as part of your first week's pay." George said. "Now git home to your family."

The young man turned with tears streaming down his face. "I'll be here in the morning for work, if that job offer is still good."

"Nope. I'm closed Christmas day," George said. "See ya the day after."

George turned around to find that the stranger had returned. "Where'd you come from? I thought you left?"

"I have been here. I have always been here," said the stranger. "You say you don't celebrate Christmas. Why?"

"Well, after my wife passed away I just couldn't see what all the bother was. Puttin' up a tree and all seemed a waste of a good pine tree. Bakin' cookies like I used to with Martha just wasn't the same by myself and besides I was getting a little chubby."

The stranger put his hand on George's shoulder. "But you do celebrate the holiday, George. You gave me food and drink and warmed me when I was cold and hungry. The woman with child will bear a son and he will become a great doctor. The policeman you helped will go on to save 19 people from being killed by terrorists. The young man who tried to rob you will become a rich man and share his wealth with many people.

That is the spirit of the season and you keep it as good as any man."

George was taken aback by all this stranger had said. "And how do you know all this?" asked the old man."

Trust me, George. I have the inside track on this sort of thing. And when your days are done you will be with Martha again." The stranger moved toward the door. "If you will excuse me, George, I have to go now. I have to go home where there is a big celebration planned."

George watched as the man's old leather jacket and his torn pants turned into a white robe. A golden light began to fill the room.

"You see, George, it's My birthday. Merry Christmas."

Author Unknown

|

Follow the Law with Love...

I could not help but think that this sounds so much like "Follow the yellow brick road." And I was having 'visions' in my head of people skipping and flitting about - sort of like some halucinagenic 60's movie or something...

Anyway, we hear again from one Fr. William Forst, who in a previous letter asserted that he is a Catholic priest. The wisdom which we receive today is this:
Archdiocese of St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke is definitely and certainly following the law; but church law, unlike civil law, is to be interpreted with love. There is no love in the excommunication of the board of St. Stanislaus Kostka Catholic Church and its priest. The archbishops of the past 110 years all interpreted church law with love.

The Rev. William Forst
St. Louis
Here I sit scratching my head wondering "Huh?"...

Anyway, if one has not dulled his intellect with who-knows-what, one can see that Archbishop Burke exhibited enormous patience and charity in his handling of this rebellion...I suppose that the next time Archbishop Burke must take some sort of disciplinary action, who should do so in a tie-dyed t-shirt and wear flowers in his hair...Maybe this would please Fr. Forst?

True, authentic love desires the highest and best for the sake of the beloved. This would be eternal life with God in heaven. Those who have separated themselves from the Church are suffering under the slavery of sin to the extent that they have chosen excommunication. Archbishop Burke, in true charity, has advised the rest of the faithful to avoid the dangers and proximity to sin at St Stanislaus. Would he be a faithful shepherd if he advised us to support those at St Stanislaus in their rebellious efforts? Does true charity, true love, not require him to lead us away from the path of spiritual death and toward the path of eternal life?

__________________________
Ever notice how "assertive" ex-Catholics are? We also read the following from the same edition:
Wrongful punishment

Why isn't Archbishop Raymond Burke speaking as vehemently about pedophile priests as he is about the dispute with St. Stanislaus? Has an interdict been imposed on the abusive priests? Have they been excommunicated?

This dispute is yet another example of why membership and participation in the Catholic faith has waned. If I were still a practicing Catholic, I would worship at St. Stanislaus, with the Rev. Marek Bozek, who hasn't forgotten what worship is really about.

Cindy Feldhaus
Florissant
This letter brought to us by another "I did it my way" follower. Of whom? - we do not know, though one can be certain Who it is not.
They've seen worse

The Polish people survived Sept. 1, 1939, and Joseph Stalin. The Polish of St. Stanislaus Parish will survive Archbishop Raymond Burke.

Robert Zangas
Manchester
But Robert, the real question is how will they fare when they are judged by our Lord...? This is what really matters!
Bah, humbug!

I don't know who is the bigger Scrooge or Grinch: Archbishop Raymond Burke or Tim Dorsey of KTRS.

Pat Sullivan
St. Louis
My money would be on Tim Dorsey...


Link

|

So, who's been naughty and who's been nice?



Pope Benedict XVI, wearing the white fur-trimmed red bonnet known as a camauro reserved for Popes, arrives to celebrate his general audience in St. Peter's square at the Vatican December 21, 2005. REUTERS/Alessia Pierdomenico.

|

Local Catholics React To St. Stanislaus' Rebellion

From KSDK...:
...while St. Stanislaus Kostka Catholic Church has a unique Polish heritage, it is also unique in that it is likely the only ethnic, Catholic church in St. Louis that has not subjected to the authority of church officials.
And therein lies the problem.
St. James the Greater Catholic Church in Dogtown has Irish roots. Pastor John Johnson talked about what happens when a church subjects to the authority of the archdiocese.

"It's sort of a form of Christian community," said Johnson, "cooperative... like it was in the early church. (Church officials) see where we are financially, and it's another way of being accountable for spending your money."

But does subjecting to the authority of the Archdiocese means parish pastors have less control over church money?

"No, we have total control over our money," replied Johnson.

So if all these other national or at least ethnic Catholic churches eventually became a part of and make themselves subject to the authority of the Archdiocese, then why not St. Stanislaus.?
The KSDK reporter asks the $64,000 question...It's a simple question. It's a question whose simple answer has eluded the St Stanislaus board for years.
St. Stanislaus legal advisor Roger Krasnicki said the church was established as a civil corporation in 1891 by Archbishop Kenrick. Paraphrasing church canon laws, Krasnicki said that if something has existed and not been in contradiction of morals for thirty years then it should stand.
Still unable to answer the simple question "Why should you be different than others"?

There is one true answer...because they have renounced the Church and the Church's authority and are no longer in communion with her because of PRIDE - in reality, they are no more Catholic than any other schismatic sect is...They "feel" that they are "special" and "unique", and in a certain sense they probably are.

However, the Church is One - and schism ruptures that unity attempting to divide that which cannot be divided.

|

Latin Midnight Mass on radio/Live Internet Feed

The Christmas Midnight Mass from St Joseph's Oratory, which is an apostolate of the Institute of Christ the King, Sovereign Priest in Green Bay, Wisconsin, U.S.A., will be broadcast live on Relevant Radio, a Catholic network in the United States. Relevant Radio's web site offers a live feed here. Of course, that's midnight United States Central Standard Time, six hours behind Greenwich Mean Time.

Relevant Radio local stations and affiliates are listed here.

From the Institute's page on the liturgy:
The Institute, with the permission of the Holy Father, celebrates the classical Roman Liturgy in its traditional form according to the liturgical books promulgated in 1962 by Blessed Pope John XXIII.

|

Humility and Obedience in the Priest

Selected excerpts of a reflection by Fr John Hardon, S.J. All emphasis is mine.
It may seem a bit strange that all the major exhortations of the modern Popes to priests stress the importance of the virtues of humility and obedience, with no exception. . . I will take up each virtue separately and try to show why it is so important for priests, if they wish to be priestly priests, to be humble and obedient, and how they can grow in humility and obedience.
. . .
Every facet of the ministry [of the priesthood] is the exercise of such influence in the lives of others that no one under Heaven is more exposed to the temptation of pride than a priest...Most of the chaos in the Catholic Church today is due to the pride of priests.
. . .
What adds to the gravity of the situation is that the media give priests so much occasion for publicity and such opportunities for recognition, especially if they have strange ideas, that unless priests are extremely careful, their vanity and desire for praise will be exploited by the enemies of the Church to the detriment of the people of God.
. . .
How does the priest cultivate this indispensable humility? The simple answer would be, as everyone else cultivates humility: by humble prayer; by daily reflection on his failings and sins; by humbly performing the menial duties and not looking for positions or places where he can shine.
. . .
There is a long passage in the Second Vatican Council's Decree on the Life and Ministry of Priests that deals with the subject of their obedience, and it intertwines the practice of obedience with the virtue of charity. Certain key passages in that Decree bring to the surface important implications for priestly obedience.
. . .
Priests are told that, "The priestly ministry, being the ministry of the Church itself, can only be fulfilled in the hierarchical union of the whole body of the Church." Consequently, a priest is obedient and obediently working with and under and through the hierarchy, or his work will not be blessed by God.
. . .
There is no such thing as a priest going off on his own, independent of ecclesiastical obedience, and expecting God to grace his labors.
As I read Fr. Hardon's reflection this evening, I could not help but think of Fr. Bozek and the scandal caused by a failure to practice and live a life of humility and obedience.

Many question why such obedience is necessary. Fr Hardon tells us that
"Obedience is the sacrifice of the human will to God...There is nothing that man possesses that is more precious to him than his own will...But the one thing which the priest can most call his own, his own free will, is what he surrenders when he obeys. It is that surrender that is so pleasing to God and so demanded by God of the priest."
If a man, with a sincere heart which is receptive to the truth, would read this talk by Fr. Hardon, he could not be but changed by the wisdom so profoundly laid out before him.

While the reflection is for priests, the principles are applicable to all of us - we can all learn how we can cultivate the virtue of humility and grow in obedience.

The full article is here.

|

The War Against The Light

We elderly and semi-elderly people can still remember a time when nothing was less controversial than the words “Merry Christmas.” If you said them in July, of course, you might be regarded as more than a little eccentric, perhaps in need of professional help of some kind, but even then people would have been puzzled, not offended.

In my childhood, in the 1940s and 1950s, I used to go about town, at Christmastime, and wish everyone I saw a Merry Christmas, without having an anxiety attack over the possibility that I might be offending a Buddhist, or a Muslim, or an atheist. Everyone responded in kind. On one occasion, I ran into my Jewish uncle (by marriage) and, in all innocence, wished him a Merry Christmas. Amazingly, he did not report me to B’nai B’rith or to the ACLU for anti-Semitism or “hate speech,” but wished me a Merry Christmas back.

Well, the world has spent the last 40 years or so descending more and more deeply into insanity, one of the symptoms of which is the increasingly common phenomenon of people wanting to ban even the use of the word Christmas. Major department stores are telling their employees to wish everyone happy holidays or something of the sort and to absolutely eschew the word Christmas. It used to be that the big battles this time of year involved Christmas displays on government property.
Continued here...by George A Kendall at The Wanderer

|

Gospel for Wednesday, Dec 21, 4th Week of Advent

From: Luke 1:39-45

The Visitation

[39] In those days Mary arose and went with haste into the hill country, to a city of Judah, [40] and she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth. [41] And when Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit [42] and she exclaimed with a loud cry, "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! [43] And why is this granted me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? [44] For behold, when the voice of your greeting came to my ears, the babe in my womb leaped for joy. [45] And blessed is she who believed that there would be a fulfillment of what was spoken to her from the Lord."

***********************

Commentary:

39-56. We contemplate this episode of our Lady's visit to her cousin St. Elizabeth in the Second Joyful Mystery of the Rosary: "Joyfully keep Joseph and Mary company...and you will hear the traditions of the House of David.... We walk in haste towards the mountains, to a town of the tribe of Judah (Luke 1:39).

"We arrive. It is the house where John the Baptist is to be born. Elizabeth gratefully hails the Mother of her Redeemer: Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb. Why should I be honored with a visit from the mother of my Lord? (Luke 1:42-43).

"The unborn Baptist quivers...(Luke 1:41). Mary's humility pours forth in the "Magnificat".... And you and I, who are proud--who were proud--promise to be humble" ([St] J. Escriva, "Holy Rosary").

39. On learning from the angel that her cousin St. Elizabeth is soon to give birth and is in need of support, our Lady in her charity hastens to her aid. She has no regard for the difficulties this involves. Although we do not know where exactly Elizabeth was living (it is now thought to be Ain Karim), it certainly meant a journey into the hill country which at that time would have taken four days.

From Mary's visit to Elizabeth Christians should learn to be caring people. "If we have this filial contact with Mary, we won't be able to think just about ourselves and our problems. Selfish personal problems will find no place in our mind" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By," 145).

42. St. Bede comments that Elizabeth blesses Mary using the same words as the archangel "to show that she should be honored by angels and by men and why she should indeed be revered above all other women" ("In Lucae Evangelium Expositio, in loc.").

When we say the "Hail Mary" we repeat these divine greetings, "rejoicing with Mary at her dignity as Mother of God and praising the Lord, thanking Him for having given us Jesus Christ through Mary" ("St. Pius X Catechism", 333).

43. Elizabeth is moved by the Holy Spirit to call Mary "the mother of my Lord", thereby showing that Mary is the Mother of God.

44. Although he was conceived in sin--original sin--like other men, St. John the Baptist was born sinless because he was sanctified in his mother's womb by the presence of Jesus Christ (then in Mary's womb) and of the Blessed Virgin. On receiving this grace of God St. John rejoices by leaping with joy in his mother's womb--thereby fulfilling the archangel's prophecy (cf. Luke 1:15).

St. John Chrysostom comments on this scene of the Gospel: "See how new and how wonderful this mystery is. He has not yet left the womb but he speaks by leaping; he is not yet allowed to cry out but he makes himself heard by his actions [...]; he has not yet seen the light but he points out the Sun; he has not yet been born and he is keen to act as Precursor. The Lord is present, so he cannot contain himself or wait for nature to run its course: he wants to break out of the prison of his mother's womb and he makes sure he witnesses to the fact that the Savior is about to come" ("Sermo Apud Metaphr., Mense Julio").

45. Joining the chorus of all future generations, Elizabeth, moved by the Holy Spirit, declares the Lord's Mother to be blessed and praises her faith. No one ever had faith to compare with Mary's; she is the model of the attitude a creature should have towards its Creator--complete submission, total attachment. Through her faith, Mary is the instrument chosen by God to bring about the Redemption; as Mediatrix of all graces, she is associated with the redemptive work of her Son: "This union of the Mother with the Son in the work of salvation is made manifest from the time of Christ's virginal conception up to His death; first when Mary, arising in haste to go to visit Elizabeth, is greeted by her as blessed because of her belief in the promise of salvation and the Precursor leaps with joy in the womb of his mother [...]. The Blessed Virgin advanced in her pilgrimage of faith and faithfully persevered in her union with her Son unto the cross, where she stood (cf. John 19:25), in keeping with the Divine Plan, enduring with her only-begotten Son the intensity of His suffering, associating herself with His sacrifice in her mother's heart, and lovingly consenting to the immolation of this Victim which was born of her" (Vatican II, "Lumen Gentium", 57f).

The new Latin text gives a literal rendering of the original Greek when it says "quae credidit" (RSV "she who has believed") as opposed to the Vulgate "quae credidisti" ("you who have believed") which gave more of the sense than a literal rendering.

****************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Rationalism and Materialism

In the world to-day there are two specious classes of men who are opposed to Jesus Christ and to Christianity. They are called specious because they appear under the banner of enlightenment. They take their stand as thinkers and scientists, and in this form they make a strong appeal to persons who respect reason above all other endowments. Reason is our most valued endowment, and we should hold it in the highest consideration. Jesus Christ Himself so regarded it.

No scientist or philosopher in all history regarded reason as highly as Christ. No philosopher made such a strong appeal to it as did He. He told the Jews plainly to re­ject Him and His doctrine if He did not give them the best of reasons for their believing in Him. Do not believe me, He said, because I say a thing, but because I substantiate it. If you do not believe me, at least believe the works which I do. You can see and verify them. They speak for me.

You see, He gave an actual demonstration of His proposition as a mathematician does in a class-room. It is as if a man were to tell a native of South America that ether waves ex­isted and could be controlled by human con­trivances so as to send a message around the world. If the hearer denied or doubted, the speaker would forthwith send a message and demonstrate the truth of his statement.

So Jesus Christ did. When the Jews doubted His divinity and His mission, He said to them: I declare myself the true Son of God, the Messias. You hesitate to believe me. In­deed I know how wonderful my claims are, I realize your difficulty, I know how you regard the Almighty, and for this reason I am pre­pared to meet your difficulties. To demon­strate my statements, I consequently manifest the power which only God can exercise. Be­lieve my works, they give testimony of me. Be­fore your eyes you see men who were born blind now seeing as well as yourselves, you behold the leper cleansed, the cripple made whole, yea, there walk among you men who were dead and whom you were carrying out to burial and whom I by a word called back to life. These my works give testimony of me.

Is there any scientist or philosopher in the world who could show greater respect for reason than Jesus Christ! But once He gives His credentials, He speaks with authority. To listen to and believe one who is divine is not the surrendering of reason, but its' most noble exercise.

See how learned men listen to Edison and Marconi and accept wonderful things from them merely on their word for it. Do people consider that as unreasonable? Not at all. Yet a greater one than Edison, a millionfold greater, speaks, and rationalists say that it is unreasonable to believe Him. Scientists do not regulate our morals, Christ does; that is the difference.

In our discussions on the spirituality and im­mortality of the soul, we showed how unten­able is the position of materialists. We shall now proceed to demonstrate that the ration­alists, the worshippers of human reason, form but a specious cult, their mind and reason being swayed not by evidence, but by passion, in one form or another. Their principle is to submit everything to reason, and to reject whatever they do not understand. As they are unable to comprehend some of the teach­ings of Jesus Christ, they refuse to accept His religion.

It is true that, as rational beings, we should submit things to investigation and refuse to admit them if they are against reason. God gave us our intellects for that very purpose. But the doctrine of Jesus Christ, which is un­doubtedly above our comprehension, above our reason, is not opposed to reason. We do not accept it because we understand it, but because we know that He who declares it can not proclaim anything but the truth.

The most intelligent people act in a like manner every day. After they make sure by reasonable inquiry that a person is competent and trustworthy, they accept from him many things that they do not understand. It is thus we act with physicians, chemists, electricians, engineers, etc. But, you will say, if we do not understand, we know that those we trust understand, and we could, also, if we applied our minds to the matter. Very true. What I wish to emphasize is that in point of fact we take many vital things on the word of an­other in whom we trust, simply because of our confidence in his integrity and knowledge.

Now I ask you if Jesus Christ, who is divine truth, is not worthy of our trust? Can we doubt His integrity or knowledge? Is it not, then, the highest use of our reason to conclude that He who gave it to us can be trusted absolutely?

Reason all you wish about the divinity of Christ, but once that is admitted it is most reasonable to believe every word He utters. If He, out of His goodness or to give us the opportunity of exercising faith in Him, reveals things to us that our reason never could ex­cogitate, it is our loving duty to accept the revelation. If what He reveals mystifies us, it is only what we should expect when we contemplate divinity.

See how many natural things mystify us. Who can understand the law of gravitation? Who knows the nature of electricity? An ordinary student knows how to produce electricity and can utilize it, but all the scientists together cannot tell us what electricity is. The greatest minds among them have exer­cised their ingenuity for years, but all they can do is to theorize; they have nothing cer­tain to tell us of its nature.

And if we cannot understand nature, should we be amazed that we do not understand nature's God? Do rationalists reject gravita­tion and electricity, etc., because they cannot understand their nature? Why, then, should they reject the religion of Jesus Christ be­cause they cannot understand its sublime truths? If the religion of Christ did not re­quire man to shape his life by it, no one would reject it.

Take the matter of Jesus Christ, for example. Those opposed to the Christian religion, if they are logical and consistent, are obliged to admit that if He is God what He says is true. How, then, do they avoid it? They either deny that He is God, or affirm that He did not mean just what He said. In carrying out their purpose, they act differently in His case from what they do in any other. In any court of law, if a man's character is proved upright and his mind is sound, he is believed.

All the world agrees that Christ's character is the most perfect in the history of the human race, and that His mind is the loftiest and sanest of which we have record. Why, then, is He not accorded the same rational acceptance that is given others?

They call themselves rationalists, when in the very exercise of reason they act unreason­ably. Yet they regard with pity the poor believ­ers! There would be no rationalism if Christ did not demand along with belief also practice.

In conclusion, I should like a rationalist to consider the following points. It is histori­cally certain that Jesus Christ changed the face of the earth. He found the great Roman Empire pagan; He made it Christian. This was accomplished by means which were, humanly considered, absolutely inadequate. Christ was poor, His apostles were poor, His followers were poor. He had no army, no influential associates, no prestige, no human inducements. On the other hand, His religion was opposed to all that flatters human nature. It inculcated the loftiest virtue, the sternest morality, and demanded the greatest self­-sacrifice. For three hundred years imprisonment, exile, and death threatened the recruit to Christianity, yet it spread rapidly over the then known world.

How such a religion ever got a foothold in the world is as great a mystery as the Trinity. If you are looking for miracles, there is one. Well could St. Augustine exclaim: "The estab­lishment of the Catholic Church without mira­cles is a greater miracle than any recorded in Scripture. But if in its establishment there were miracles, you must acknowledge its divinity." Hence, with or without miracles, the Catholic Church stands forth a divine creation.

The Catholic Church, then, is divine. Is it any wonder that Catholics love it and live for it and, if need be, die for it? We know what we have; we do not merely opine. And realizing that our Church is divine, we listen to her as to Christ. If in the course of her history she has had human failings, we know that although she is divine, she is also human, and that Christ prepared us for scandals. But, above all, we know that, weak though she may be in her human element, she is supported by God Himself and guaranteed by Him to be a messenger of Truth always.

Her frailties make her sympathize with her children, and also give God an opportunity of showing that by the weak things of this world He confounds the strong. The weaker she is in herself, the more divine she proves herself to be. For during twenty centuries, all the power of the world has been employed against her only to leave her stronger after each struggle. All the passions of corrupt human nature have risen up against her, only to find her ever championing virtue and triumphing over evil.

This spectacle in the world is indeed a miracle. It is religion's reply to the challenge of unbelief. It is reason's answer to rationalists.
___________________________________
Adapted from God and Myself, An Inquiry into the True Religion (1917)
by Fr. Martin J. Scott, S.J.

|

Inside the Vatican "Man of the Year": Pope Benedict XVI

Last Year and This Year

[Inside the Vatican editorial for January 2006, by Dr. Robert Moynihan]

In this issue of Inside the Vatican, the cover photo is of our "Man of the Year," Pope Benedict XVI, walking in his white papal robes, waving. He looks very happy, joyful, serene. This is perhaps the most remarkable thing so far about his pontificate: that it has been quiet, serene, even, one might say, happy.

Who would have expected it? The "image" the world had of Joseph Ratzinger the "Grand Inquisitor," intransigent head of the former "Holy Office of the Inquisition," has been totally shattered by the reality of Benedict. And so we confront the issue of image and substance, of appearance and reality. Who was Joseph Ratzinger, really? And who is Benedict XVI? Are they the same man? Or has something changed?

One thing is clear: it is in the transition from "Jospeh Ratzinger" to "Benedict XVI" that the story of this pontificate will be written. Every Pope is two men. This is so because every Pope has two names. This Pope was Joseph Ratzinger (as previous ones were Karol Wojtyla, or Eugenio Pacelli). Now he is Benedict XVI (and Wojtyla was John Paul II, and Pacelli was Pius XII). As men, they have the name their parents gave them, the names they bore as children, their baptismal names; as successors of Peter, they have new names, the ones chosen at the moment of election to the papal throne.
More here

|

Ninth Circuit Appellate Court asked to Reconsider its Ruling ...

Ninth Circuit Appellate Court asked to Reconsider its Ruling that it is OK For Public Schools To Teach Seventh Graders “To Become Muslims”

ANN ARBOR, MI. – A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had ruled in a short unpublished memorandum opinion that it was constitutionally permissible for twelve-year-old public school students to be told they would “become Muslims,” has been asked to reconsider its decision by the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The Law Center has also asked all twenty-four active judges on the Ninth Circuit to decide the case.

For three weeks in 2001, impressionable twelve-year-old students were told that they would become Muslims, memorized verses from the Koran, took Islamic names, wore identification tags that displayed their new Islamic name and the Star and Crescent Moon, which is the symbol of Muslims, were handed materials that instructed them to “Remember Allah always so that you may prosper,” completed the Islamic Five Pillars of Faith, including fasting, and memorized and recited the “Bismillah” or “In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. Praise be to God,” which students also wrote on banners that were hung on the classroom walls.

Richard Thompson, Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, “This ruling is evidence of a double-standard when it comes to religion in public schools. If students had been instructed on Christianity, as they had on Islam, a Constitutional violation would have most likely been found. The appeals court should clarify in a published opinion just how far public schools can go in teaching about religion. Christians want to know.”

The Law Center represents several parents and their children who challenged the California Byron Union School District’s practice of teaching twelve-year-old students “to become Muslims.”

A federal district court judge in San Francisco had previously determined that the school district had not violated the constitution. Edward L. White III, a Law Center attorney, had asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ three-judge panel to overturn the district court’s decision.

The three-judge panel, however, affirmed the ruling of the district court in a short unpublished memorandum decision. In its unpublished decision, the three-judge panel overlooked, and did not rule on, the plaintiffs’ claims that their free exercise of religion rights and their parental rights had been violated.

The Law Center has asked the three-judge panel to reconsider its ruling and to rule on the free exercise and parental rights claims.
------------------------
An Email Update from the Thomas More Law Center

What's next? Will the public schools force children to "Become Christians?"

|

Examination of Conscience

Examination of Conscience

Here is a helpful examination of conscience, based on the Ten Commandments. Perform a brief examination every night, but go through a more thorough examination before confessing your sins to the priest.

DIRECTIONS
The Commandments of God

  1. Have I doubted in matters of faith? murmured against God because of adversity? despaired of His mercy? Have I believed in or consulted fortune tellers? Have I taken part in non-Catholic worship? Have I recommended myself regularly to God? Neglected my morning or evening prayers? Omitted my religious obligations because of human respect? Presumed upon God's mercy in committing sin? Have I read books or papers opposed to the Church and her teachings? Did I make use of superstitious practices; such as believing in dreams, and charms, and the like? Have I spoken irreverently of persons (priests or religious), places (e.g, the Church), or things (the sacred vessels) which especially represent God?
  2. Have I used the name of God or the saints with irreverence? Have I sworn (which means calling upon God to witness the truth of what I say) without a good reason, or falsely? Have I cursed (the calling down of some evil on a person, place, or thing)? Blasphemed (used insulting language to express contempt for God), the saints, or holy things?
  3. Did I miss Mass on Sunday or a Holy Day of Obligation? Have I done unnecessary servile work or been responsible for others doing it on these days?
  4. Have I been obedient to my parents and lawful superiors? Have I shown disrespect toward their God-given authority? Have I deceived them? Have I been a good citizen by voting? Have I shown respect toward aged parents? Have I used my authority over inferiors properly? As a parent, by good example in the home and by sending the children to a Catholic school? As a person in public office, by promoting the common welfare? As an employer, by being considerate of the employees?
  5. Have I been the occasion of another's sin through my bad example in word or deed? Have I been guilty of fighting, anger, hatred, revenge, or drunkenness? Did I refuse to speak to others? to forgive them? Did I use provoking language?
  6. and 9. Did I take pleasure in impure thoughts or desires? Say impure things? Listen to impure conversations? Did I touch others or let others touch me in an impure manner? Commit an impure act alone or with others? Want to look at impure things or pictures? Go to bad places? movies that were bad? Read bad books? Go with impure companions? Teach others to commit sins of impurity?
  7. and 10. Have I stolen anything? If so, of what value, and did I return the stolen goods? Have I been unjust in buying or selling? Have I damaged the property of others? accepted or kept stolen goods? paid my just debts as soon as possible? Has my daily work merited its pay check? Have I desired to steal anything or to damage my neighbor's property?
  8. Did I tell lies? Have I been guilty of rash judgment (believing something harmful to another's character without sufficient reason)? detraction (without a good reason, making known the hidden faults of another)? calumny (by lying, injuring the good name of another)?



The Precepts of the Church

  • Have I confessed my sins once a year? If not, how long is it since my last worthy confession? Have I received Holy Communion during Easter time?
  • Have I fasted according to my ability when obliged to do so by the Church?
  • Have I abstained from flesh-meat on the appointed days?
  • Have I contributed as well as I can to the support of the Church?
  • Have I attempted to contract marriage without the presence of a priest?
  • If there anything else of which my conscience feels guilty?



Sins Against the Holy Spirit

  1. Presuming to gain salvation without meriting it.
  2. Despair of salvation.
  3. Resisting truths which have been made known to us.
  4. Envy of another's spiritual good.
  5. Stubbornness in sin.
  6. Final obstinacy in one's sins.



Seven Deadly Sins

  1. Pride: An unrestrained appreciation of our own worth.
  2. Avarice or Greed: An immoderate desire for earthly goods.
  3. Lust: A hankering after impure pleasures.
  4. Anger: An inordinate desire for revenge.
  5. Gluttony: An unrestrained use of food and drink.
  6. Envy: Sorrow over the good fortune of our neighbor.
  7. Sloth: Laziness to do right, or carelessness to do right and to practice virtue because of the trouble attached to it.



Sins Crying to Heaven for Vengeance

  • Wilful murder
  • Sodomy
  • Oppression of the poor
  • Cheating laborers of their just wages



Nine Ways of Aiding Another in Sin

  1. Counseling or advising another to sin.
  2. Commanding another to sin.
  3. Provoking another to sin.
  4. Consenting to another's sin.
  5. Showing another how to sin.
  6. Praising another's sin.
  7. Concealing, remaining silent about, doing nothing to prevent another's sin.
  8. Taking part in, or enjoying the results of another's sin.
  9. Defending another's sin.


Activity Source:
Our Christian Home by Rev. Joseph A. Fischer, Seraphic Press, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1954


Props to freeper Salvation

|

Mo. parish defies 2 bishops, hires outside priest

Another article....
...This past summer the archdiocese moved its apostolate to Polish-heritage Catholics permanently to St. Agatha Parish in South St. Louis, where many of the city's more recent Polish immigrants attend Mass.

...St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish was formed in 1880 to meet the pastoral needs of an influx of Polish immigrants. In 1891, Archbishop Peter Kenrick deeded the parish property to the parish corporation with six directors and successive directors to be appointed by the archbishop. The bylaws were later amended to have directors elected by parishioners.

This one from Catholic Online...

|

The WSJ Picks Up on the St Stanislaus Rebellion

ST. LOUIS -- On the night before Christmas, parishioners of St. Stanislaus Kostka Polish Roman Catholic Church plan to join in what their archbishop considers a "gravely sinful" act.

After reciting Ojcze Nasz, the "Our Father" in Polish, hundreds of renegade parishioners expect to take Communion from their priest -- who has been stripped of his authority.
In the first two paragraphs we see "gravely sinful" and renegade...

Quite an article...Here are some more excerpts:

"Morally, everyone in our congregation knows they didn't do anything wrong," says William Bialczak, the board's chairman, who was married at St. Stanislaus and has now been excommunicated. "It's all about property and money."
Morally, this is about more than rejecting legitimate ecclesiastical authority - It involves the willful rejection of the Church and of Christ, Himself. But more on that later...
At stake are real estate, bank accounts and religious artwork valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars -- not to mention a hierarchy's frayed relationship with its flock.
I have heard for two years that the assets were roughly about 9.5 million - NOW we find out it's in the HUNDREDS of MILLIONS....Well, as the show goes..."That's a horse of a different color!"

But this is the true crux of the matter:
The effort to bring St. Stan's in line has never been about money, says Msgr. John Shamleffer, the diocesan canon lawyer. "We don't need their money," he says. "It's about who has governance over the parish."
There you go, folks - that's about as simple as it gets. If one goes back and reads the founding documents, it's quite clear that the Archdiocesan Bishop was to maintain governance of the parish...'nuff said. Don't believe me? Look here, here, and here.
Mr. Bialczak, the board chairman, says the parish won't yield. If it's drummed out of the Catholic Church, he says, St. Stan's will become independent. "When this priest comes here and we start having Mass and communion, I'll have it from him," he says. "He's still a man of God."
Yep...the parish won't yield...a true mark of obstinancy.

I bookmarked the article for reading later.

|

Want Some Fun? The Post-Dispatch's "God Beat" Blog

GOD BEAT

St. Stan’s priest and board excommunicated
By Tim Townsend
12/19/2005 9:24 am

If you haven’t heard yet, the six-member lay board of directors at St. Stanislaus Kostka church in St. Louis, and the priest from the Diocese of Springfield Cape-Girardeau they’ve hired to be their new pastor, have been declared excommunicated by Archbishop Raymond Burke. Burke has also said St. Stanislaus will no longer be recognized as a Roman Catholic parish in the archdiocese.

In our Saturday story, I wrote that the most recent U.S. excommunication we turned up was from 1996, but I’ve had some phone calls over the weekend with tips about more recent excommunications.

I’ll try to verify those, but in the meantime, does anyone else know of any recent excommunications?

Also - feel free to weigh in on the St. Stanislaus excommunications…
By all means, feel free to post...There's plenty of comments and some of them actually make sense.

Link here.

|

New Bishop of Nashville: Fr. David R. Choby

VATICAN CITY, DEC 20, 2005 (VIS) - The Holy Father appointed Fr. David R. Choby, of the clergy of the diocese of Nashville, U.S.A., diocesan administrator and pastor of St. John Vianney parish, as bishop of the same diocese (area 42,206, population 2,105,161, Catholics 71,188, priests 75, permanent deacons 52, religious 212). The bishop-elect was born in Nashville in 1947 and ordained as a priest in 1974.

|

Dr Ed Peters: Fr. Bozek should stop and think

Noted Canon Lawyer, Dr. Edward Peters, has updated his blog, not only to offer a perspective from a legal perspective according to ecclesiastical law, but to advise Fr. Bozek to reflect on a very grave matter.
Fair-minded readers of St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke’s December 16th letter declaring the excommunication of the St. Stanislaus Kostka parish leadership must conclude that the archbishop would rather have written about any of a hundred other topics during the last week leading up to Christmas. But once again, the lay board of the Polish personal parish—under interdict since February for obstructing the archbishop's authority to supervise the administration of the parish—has forced the archbishop’s hand, this time, by hiring a priest (himself already suspended for abandoning his pastoral post in the neighboring diocese of Springfield-Cape Girardeau) and announcing that he will celebrate Mass for them on Christmas Eve. That defiant act of schism (see 1983 CIC 751) won the lay board and priest they hired, Fr. Marek Bozek, excommunication under 1983 CIC 1364 § 1.
. . .
...what a pathetic way to mark one’s third anniversary of ordination: suspended by one bishop, excommunicated by a second.
. . .
...Fr. Bozek needs to know something here: contumacy for an excommunication imposed for an act of schism is itself punishable, this time, by penal dismissal from the clerical state (1983 CIC 1364 § 2). Moreover, once imposed, penal dismissal from the clergy—not being a censure (1983 CIC 1336 § 1, 5°)—is not reversible by what amounts to offering a sincere apology. Indeed, reinstatement of a “defrocked” priest is reserved to Rome (1983 CIC 293) and is so rare as to be non-existent.
Complete blog entry of Dr. Peters is here.

Dr Peters has provided great advice to those who will read his words...This unsolicited assistance is yet another work of mercy which should be considered thoughfully and prayerfully.

|

Gospel for Tuesday, Dec 20, 4th Week of Advent

From: Luke 1:26-38

The Annunciation and Incarnation of the Son of God

[26] In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, [27] to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary. [28] And he came to her and said, "Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you!" [29] But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and considered in her mind what sort of greeting this might be. [30] And the angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. [31] And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call His name Jesus. [32] He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to Him the throne of His father David, [33] and He will reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of His Kingdom there will be no end." [34] And Mary said to the angel, "How can this be, since I have no husband?" [35] And the angel said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God. [36] And behold, your kinswoman Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. [37] For with God nothing will be impossible." [38] And Mary said, "Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be done to me according to your word." And the angel departed from her.

*************************
Commentary:

26-38. Here we contemplate our Lady who was "enriched from the first instant of her conception with the splendor of an entirely unique holiness; [...] the virgin of Nazareth is hailed by the heralding angel, by divine command, as `full of grace' (cf. Luke 1:28), and to the heavenly messenger she replies, `Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it done unto me according to thy word' (Luke 1:38). Thus the daughter of Adam, Mary, consenting to the word of God, became the Mother of Jesus. Committing herself wholeheartedly to God's saving will and impeded by no sin, she devoted herself totally, as a handmaid of the Lord, to the person and work of her Son, under and with Him, serving the mystery of Redemption, by the grace of Almighty God. Rightly, therefore, the Fathers (of the Church) see Mary not merely as passively engaged by God, but as freely cooperating in the work of man's salvation through faith and obedience" (Vatican II, "Lumen Gentium", 56).

The annunciation to Mary and incarnation of the Word constitute the deepest mystery of the relationship between God and men and the most important event in the history of mankind: God becomes man, and will remain so forever, such is the extent of His goodness and mercy and love for all of us. And yet on the day when the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity assumed frail human nature in the pure womb of the Blessed Virgin, it all happened quietly, without fanfare of any kind.

St. Luke tells the story in a very simple way. We should treasure these words of the Gospel and use them often, for example, practising the Christian custom of saying the Angelus every day and reflecting on the five Joyful Mysteries of the Rosary.

27. God chose to be born of a virgin; centuries earlier He disclosed this through the prophet Isaiah (cf. Isaiah 7:14; Matthew 1:22-23). God, "before all ages made choice of, and set in her proper place, a mother for His only-begotten Son from whom He, after being made flesh, should be born in the blessed fullness of time: and He continued His persevering regard for her in preference to all other creatures, to such a degree that for her alone He had singular regard" (Pius IX, "Ineffabilis Deus," 2). This privilege granted to our Lady of being a virgin and a mother at the same time is a unique gift of God. This was the work of the Holy Spirit "who at the conception and the birth of the Son so favored the Virgin Mother as to impart fruitfulness to her while preserving inviolate her perpetual virginity" ("St. Pius V Catechism," I, 4, 8). Paul VI reminds us of this truth of faith: "We believe that the Blessed Mary, who ever enjoys the dignity of virginity, was the Mother of the incarnate Word, of our God and Savior Jesus Christ" ("Creed of the People of God", 14).

Although many suggestions have been made as to what the name Mary means, most of the best scholars seem to agree that Mary means "lady". However, no single meaning fully conveys the richness of the name.

28. "Hail, full of grace": literally the Greek text reads "Rejoice!", obviously referring to the unique joy over the news which the angel is about to communicate.

"Full of grace": by this unusual form of greeting the archangel reveals Mary's special dignity and honor. The Fathers and Doctors of the Church "taught that this singular, solemn and unheard-of-greeting showed that all the divine graces reposed in the Mother of God and that she was adorned with all the gifts of the Holy Spirit", which meant that she "was never subject to the curse", that is, was preserved from all sin. These words of the archangel in this text constitute one of the sources which reveal the dogma of Mary's Immaculate Conception (cf. Pius IX, "Ineffabilis Deus"; Paul VI, "Creed of the People of God").

"The Lord is with you!": these words are not simply a greeting ("the Lord be with you") but an affirmation ("the Lord is with you"), and they are closely connected with the Incarnation. St. Augustine comments by putting these words on the archangel's lips: "He is more with you than He is with me: He is in your heart, He takes shape within you, He fills your soul, He is in your womb" ("Sermo De Nativitate Domini", 4).

Some important Greek manuscripts and early translations add at the end of the verse: "Blessed are you among women!", meaning that God will exalt Mary over all women. She is more excellent than Sarah, Hannah, Deborah, Rachel, Judith, etc., for only she has the supreme honor of being chosen to be the Mother of God.

29-30. Our Lady is troubled by the presence of the archangel and by the confusion truly humble people experience when they receive praise.

30. The Annunciation is the moment when our Lady is given to know the vocation which God planned for her from eternity. When the archangel sets her mind at ease by saying, "Do not be afraid, Mary," he is helping her to overcome that initial fear which a person normally experiences when God gives him or her a special calling. The fact that Mary felt this fear does not imply the least trace of imperfection in her: hers is a perfectly natural reaction in the face of the supernatural. Imperfection would arise if one did not overcome this fear or rejected the advice of those in a position to help--as St. Gabriel helped Mary.

31-33. The archangel Gabriel tells the Blessed Virgin Mary that she is to be the Mother of God by reminding her of the words of Isaiah which announced that the Messiah would be born of a virgin, a prophecy whichwill find its fulfillment in Mary (cf. Matthew 1:22-23; Isaiah 7:14).

He reveals that the Child will be "great": His greatness comes from His being God, a greatness He does not lose when He takes on the lowliness of human nature. He also reveals that Jesus will be the king of the Davidic dynasty sent by God in keeping with His promise of salvation; that His Kingdom will last forever, for His humanity will remain forever joined to His divinity; that "He will be called Son of the Most High", that is that He really will be the Son of the Most High and will be publicly recognized as such, that is, the Child will be the Son of God.

The archangel's announcement evokes the ancient prophecies which foretold these prerogatives. Mary, who was well-versed in Sacred Scripture, clearly realized that she was to be the Mother of God.

34-38. Commenting on this passage John Paul II said: "`Virgo fidelis', the faithful Virgin. What does this faithfulness of Mary mean? What are the dimensions of this faithfulness? The first dimension is called search. Mary was faithful first of all when she began, lovingly, to seek the deep sense of God's plan in her and for the world. `Quomodo fiet?' How shall this be?, she asked the Angel of the Annunciation [...]."

"The second dimension of faithfulness is called reception, acceptance. The `quomodo fiet?' is changed, on Mary's lips, to a `fiat': Let it be done, I am ready, I accept. This is the crucial moment of faithfulness, the moment in which man perceives that he will never completely understand the `how': that there are in God's plan more areas of mystery than of clarity; that is, however he may try, he will never succeed in understanding it completely[...]."

"The third dimension of faithfulness is consistency to live in accordance with what one believes; to adapt one's own life to the object of one's adherence. To accept misunderstanding, persecutions, rather than a break between what one practises and what one believes: this is consistency[...]."

"But all faithfulness must pass the most exacting test, that of duration. Therefore, the fourth dimension of faithfulness is constancy. It is easy to be consistent for a day or two. It is difficult and important to be consistent for one's whole life. It is easy to be consistent in the hour of enthusiasm, it is difficult to be so in the hour of tribulation. And only a consistency that lasts throughout the whole life can be called faithfulness. Mary's `fiat' in the Annunciation finds its fullness in the silent `fiat' that she repeats at the foot of the Cross" ("Homily in Mexico City Cathedral", 26 January 1979).

34. Mary believed in the archangel's words absolutely; she did not doubt as Zechariah had done (cf. 1:18). Her question, "How can this be?", expresses her readiness to obey the will of God even though at first sight it implied a contradiction: on the one hand, she was convinced that God wished her to remain a virgin; on the other, here was God also announcing that she would become a mother. The archangel announces God's mysterious design, and what had seemed impossible, according to the laws of nature, is explained by a unique intervention on the part of God.

Mary's resolution to remain a virgin was certainly something very unusual, not in line with the practice of righteous people under the Old Covenant, for, as St. Augustine explains, "particularly attentive to the propagation and growth of the people of God, through whom the Prince and Savior of the world might be prophesied and be born, the saints were obliged to make use of the good of matrimony" ("De Bono Matrimonii", 9, 9). However, in the Old Testament, there were some who, in keeping with God's plan, did remain celibate--for example, Jeremiah, Elijah, Eliseus and John the Baptist. The Blessed Virgin, who received a very special inspiration of the Holy Spirit to practise virginity, is a first-fruit of the New Testament, which will establish the excellence of virginity over marriage while not taking from the holiness of the married state, which it raises to the level of a sacrament (cf. "Gaudium Et Spes", 48).

35. The "shadow" is a symbol of the presence of God. When Israel was journeying through the wilderness, the glory of God filled the Tabernacle and a cloud covered the Ark of the Covenant (Exodus 40:34-36). And when God gave Moses the tablets of the Law, a cloud covered Mount Sinai (Exodus 24:15-16); and also, at the Transfiguration of Jesus the voice of God the Father was heard coming out of a cloud (Luke 9:35).

At the moment of the Incarnation the power of God envelops our Lady--an __expression of God's omnipotence. The Spirit of God--which, according to the account in Genesis (1:2), moved over the face of the waters, bringing things to life--now comes down on Mary. And the fruit of her womb will be the work of the Holy Spirit. The Virgin Mary, who herself was conceived without any stain of sin (cf. Pius IX, "Ineffabilis Deus") becomes, after the Incarnation, a new tabernacle of God. This is the mystery we recall every day when saying the Angelus.

38. Once she learns of God's plan, our Lady yields to God's will with prompt obedience, unreservedly. She realizes the disproportion between what she is going to become--the Mother of God--and what she is--a woman. However, this is what God wants to happen and for Him nothing is impossible; therefore no one should stand in His way. So Mary, combining humility and obedience, responds perfectly to God's call: "Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be done according to your word."

"At the enchantment of this virginal phrase, the Word became flesh" ([St] J. Escriva, "Holy Rosary", first joyful mystery). From the pure body of Mary, God shaped a new body, He created a soul out of nothing, and the Son of God united Himself with this body and soul: prior to this He was only God; now He is still God but also man. Mary is now the Mother of God. This truth is a dogma of faith, first defined by the Council of Ephesus (431). At this point she also begins to be the spiritual Mother of all mankind. What Christ says when He is dying--`Behold, your son..., behold, your mother" (John 19:26-27)--simply promulgates what came about silently at Nazareth. "With her generous `fiat' (Mary) became, through the working of the Spirit, the Mother of God, but also the Mother of the living, and, by receiving into her womb the one Mediator, she became the true Ark of the Covenant and true Temple of God" (Paul VI, "Marialis Cultus", 6).

The Annunciation shows us the Blessed Virgin as perfect model of "purity" (the RSV "I have no husband" is a euphemism); of "humility" ("Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord"); of "candor" and "simplicity" ("How can this be?"); of "obedience" and "lively faith" ("Let it be done to me according to your word"). "Following her example of obedience to God, we can learn to serve delicately without being slavish. In Mary, we don't find the slightest trace of the attitude of the foolish virgins, who obey, but thoughtlessly. Our Lady listens attentively to what God wants, ponders what she doesn't fully understand and asks about what she doesn't know. Then she gives herself completely to doing the divine will: `Behold I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be done to me according to your word'. Isn't that marvellous? The Blessed Virgin, our teacher in all we do, shows us here that obedience to God is not servile, does not bypass our conscience. We should be inwardly moved to discover the `freedom of the children of God' (cf. Romans 8:21)" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 173).

**********************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Monday, December 19, 2005

Another Reason to Avoid Network TV

NBC Demeans Christian Faith

NBC is promoting the network's mid-season replacement series "The Book of Daniel" with language that implies it is a serious drama about Christian people and Christian faith. The main character is Daniel Webster, a drug-addicted Episcopal priest whose wife depends heavily on her mid-day martinis.

Webster regularly sees and talks with a very unconventional white-robed, bearded Jesus. The Webster family is rounded out by a 23-year-old homosexual Republican son, a 16-year-old daughter who is a drug dealer, and a 16-year-old adopted son who is having sex with the bishop's daughter.

At the office, his lesbian secretary is sleeping with his sister-in-law.

Network hype – and the mainstream media – call it "edgy," "challenging" and "courageous." The hour-long limited drama series will debut January 6 with back-to-back episodes and will air on Friday nights. The writer for the series is a practicing homosexual.

The homosexual son will be network prime-time's only regular male homosexual character in a drama series.
Dig out that VCR! Who would want to miss one of these shows? The American Family Association has an email campaign going to voice your displeasure with this, if you are so inclined...

Those at NBC responsible for this program consider it a good, religiously oriented show typical of Christian families.

Click Here to Email NBC Now!

|

Adeste Infidelis-An Updated Hymn for Voice of the Faithful...Courtesy of The Curt Jester

|

Fr. Marek Bozek's Letter to St. Agnes Parishioners

This is a link to a PDF file which has Fr. Bozek's letter to the St. Agnes parishioners informing them of his decision to renounce the promise he made to his bishop and follow a "call" to lead the St. Stanislaus parish into schism... Also included is the letter explaining his suspension from priesthood from Bishop Leibrecht as well as a statement from the Archdiocese of St. Louis that Fr. Bozek has no faculties in the Archdiocese.

|

America to publish apology on offensive Ad for Virgin Mary

America magazine will publish an apology on Today’s edition about an add for a offensive Virgin Mary statue.

The add [sic] which was published in its December 5th edition, was for a “Extra Virgin Mary” statue. It appeared on page 36 of the December 5 edition which displayed a virgin covered with “delicate veil of latex”, in English: a condom.
Link.

|

Voice of the 'Faithful' Supports St Stanislaus & Fr Bozek

The St Louis Affiliate of Voice of the 'Faithful' apparently supports schism if this letter in the Post Dispatch is any indication:
Solidarity with St. Stan

We commend the Rev. Marek B. Bozek for his ministry to the people of St. Stanislaus Parish. It is good to see someone concerned about spiritual well-being.

Few of us can know who is at fault in this dispute. It is clear, however, that Archbishop Raymond Burke's effort to force the board of St. Stanislaus to his will by denying the sacraments to members of St. Stanislaus was unfortunate. The sacraments of our church are the most sacred of our traditions. They unite us as people of God. While the archbishop may assert that challenge to his authority is a spiritual matter, this dispute is at its core a temporal one, and to deny the sacraments in such an instance is a source of scandal. His use of interdict in the face of the board's continued defiance is beyond the pale.

The archbishop said Rev. Bozek's decision "causes further damage to the Church, not only here in St. Louis, but in the diocese of Springfield-Cape Girardeau." Father Bozek said he is here to serve "the people of God in need of a spiritual leader and a pastor." If there is "damage" to the church, it is not because of Rev. Bozek's decision, or the actions of the people of St. Stanislaus. It is the result of the failure of our leaders to resolve disputes with their flock in humility.

We hope that all Catholics in the archdiocese will honor Rev. Bozek and his new parish by joining them for 10 p.m. Mass on Christmas Eve.

Robert Kaintz
St. Louis

Carol Williams
St. Louis

Voice of the Faithful St. Louis
Who could have imagined this?
Which group is next....?
Here's the list...
Let's wait and see, shall we?

|

Reflections on the Role of the Laity in the Church

VATICAN CITY, DEC 17, 2005 (VIS) - This morning, the Pope received the third group of prelates from the Conference of the Polish Episcopate, who have just completed their five-yearly "ad limina" visit. In remarks to them, he offered some reflections on the role of lay people in the Church.

After first highlighting how "the essential element in the structure of the Church is the parish," the Pope stated that "the first and most important requirement is that the parish should constitute an 'ecclesial community' and an 'ecclesial family'." Apart from the "indispensable role of priests, especially pastors, ... the active participation of the laity is also important in the formation of the community. ... Pastoral councils must collaborate with a spirit of common concern for the good of the faithful."

The Holy Father highlighted the need for pastors to maintain "active contact with the various communities dedicated to the apostolate within the parish," adding that such communities must "collaborate among themselves, never must there be any rivalry between them."
More here.

|

Who Is Fr. Marek Bozek...?

According to Fr. Marek Bozek's Bio which was on the St. Agnes Cathedral Website (added emphasis is mine):
Fr. Marek (Mark in English and Marcos in Spanish) is one of the youngest priests in our Diocese. However, being only 30 years old, he has lived quite an exciting life filled with extraordinary events.

He was born on December 18, 1974 in Poland and grew up in the middle of the forest, where his grandfather was a ranger. With nostalgia he recalls Sunday mornings, when together with all his family members he walked 5 miles to the closest church to attend the Mass. Altar server since the age of 9 and Boy Scout since 12, Father Marek has a special concern for the beauty of the liturgy and social issues. Growing up in a communistic regime, as a teenager he was involved in the underground movement and actively participated in preparations for the first democratic elections in Eastern Europe, which took place in his homeland on June 4, 1989. This first hand experience of struggle for freedom has deeply shaped his outlook on social concerns.

Having graduated from high school in 1993, he begun his formation toward the catholic priesthood in the Society of Catholic Apostolate (Pallottine Fathers) and attended the Catholic University in Warsaw (1994-1998) majoring in philosophy. At the same time he also studied protestant theology at the Christian Theological Academy in Warsaw. While studying in Warsaw, he was involved in the college theater writing, directing and acting in two plays.

The summer semester of 1995 he spent in London, England studying English at Saint Giles College. Summers of 1996 and 1997 he worked at the mission assignment in the post Soviet countries of Belarus and Ukraine. In 1998 he transferred to his home Archdiocese of Varmia and attended the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn studying catholic theology in the seminary which was an integral part of that University.

August 2, 2000 was the day when Father Marek came to the United States for the first time. He stayed in our parish while taking intensive English classes at Southwest Missouri State University. From January 2001 until December 2002 he attended Saint Meinrad School of Theology in Saint Meinrad, Indiana, where he completed his Masters of Divinity program. In 2001-2002 in addition to his regular classes he studied Liberation Theology at Louisville Presbyterian Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. On December 18, 2002, which was also his 28th birthday, he was ordained a priest by Bishop John Leibrecht right here, in Saint Agnes Cathedral in Springfield, Missouri. [Note: after 1 1/2 years here, he was ordained by Bishop Leibrecht]

His first priestly assignment was the three parishes of Neosho, Noel and Seneca. In August 2004 he joined our parish staff as an Associate Pastor. Father Marek is also responsible for the Hispanic Ministry in Branson. He celebrates a Mass in Spanish there every other Sunday. He also serves our local community as a chaplain for Springfield Police Department.
Why was he not ordained in Poland?

Was he dismissed from the seminary of the Pallottine Fathers as some have suggested, and if so why?

Was he also asked to leave another seminary, Hosianum in northern Poland?http://www.hosianum.edu.pl

There was no mention of him doing his year of transitional diaconate at the St Agnes Cathedral Web Site? Did he?

How is it that he was ordained in such a short time in the Springfield-Cape Girardeau diocese?

|

A Recent Letter to Fr. Bozek

Subject: You have been deceived...

Dear Fr. Bozek:

One would certainly hope and pray that you would eventually come to your senses before you discover that it is too late and that you have been used by Satan and others to divide Christ's Church. Since it appears (from your statements) that you are confused about Canon Law, it would seem to be ill advised for you to be discussing your thoughts, feelings, and interpretations of the law with others. It makes you look foolish - not a good image for a priest.

However, have you considered and given serious thought to these questions?:

1. How long will it be before the board decides that you are not "obedient" enough to them for them to keep you around, that they don't like something you are doing or saying?....

2. Do you think they are going to be faithful to you when they cannot be faithful to Christ or His Bishops?

3. How long do you think you will be at St Stanislaus, especially if somewhere along the line you upset 'parishioners' with certain remarks or deeds?

Long enough, perhaps, until they find some gullible, reckless, immature or rebellious 'priest' to satisfy their arrogance and pride and who will follow their dictates and commands?

Are you not rejecting your promise of obedience to your bishop and exchanging it for a promise of obedience (and more) to a lay board?

Many are praying that you accept God's grace and His will. While you may not understand why things are such as they are at this particular moment in time, do you not believe that Jesus will take care of things in His time? He certainly does not desire another Judas to betray Him and His Church. Jesus does not desire that you or others divide His Church as the Roman soldiers divided His garments.

Just as Our Lady at Cana told the servants (as you are) to "Do whatever He tells you!", all of us are obliged to do His Will rather than our own. Jesus was quite clear that He knows His sheep and His sheep know Him and that we are to listen to those whom He has established, ordained and permitted to be our pastors. If we reject those, we reject Him and He Who sent Him.

No matter how you attempt to justify your "feelings" about the matter and your desire to "do something", does Jesus want YOU - is He asking YOU - to rupture the unity of His Church? Do you really think you will be a hero in God's eyes for sowing disunity and dissension? I hope and pray that you are wise enough to understand that you will be following, not the path of Joan of Arc or Padre Pio, but the path of schismatics and heretics such as Luther and other revolutionists. Is this what Our Lord want from you? The clear and unambiguous answer is NO! Please don't try and deceive yourself or others with some other answer or justification.

Please reconsider your plans, not only for the good of the Church and for the souls of those who are now confused by your actions, but also for your own soul. Please return to your bishop and ask his forgiveness!

May our Blessed Mother protect you in this moment of crisis and guide you to her Son, Our Lord. May Mary Immaculate urgently remind you and move you to "DO WHATEVER HE TELLS YOU"! so that you will follow God's will and not your own will or the will of a rebellious board of directors. I pray for the Blessed Virgin's intecession on your behalf and your return to Christ and His Church!
Minor corrections, slightly edited...

|

Service as usual for St. Stanislaus

The Sunday service at St. Stanislaus Kostka Church drew a regular crowd of more than 100 parishioners and included the usual prayers and psalms - in English and in Polish - with little hint that anything was amiss.
...
This, apparently, is what excommunication looks like at the embattled and defiant church: business as usual.
Even the media sees the defiance.
Comments from 'parishioners' are telling:
"Our feeling is we didn't do anything wrong."

"It's difficult to understand how people, who have done horrific things to children, are still part of the church. . .they haven't been excommunicated."

"I just can't believe this is happening to us"

"I don't feel like I'm committing a mortal sin. I feel good. My conscience is clear."

"Christmas Eve Mass is going to be crowded this year."
"My conscience is clear"...One person says, in effect, that Satan has convinced him what to think and do and that he believes in his own will rather than that of our Lord...How sad!

If one can claim that his conscience is clear and that attending a schismatic church and receiving Communion from a schismatic priest is NOT a mortal sin despite what Archbishop Burke has told us, then we are witnessing an example of a truly malformed conscience. It's worse though, especially when one relies on 'feelings' to determine what is right and wrong. I may never understand how one can feel "good" about committing mortal sin...Perhaps, if it be God's will, Fr. Bozek may yet return to his bishop in obedience and repentance.

Article link is here.

|

Gospel for Monday, 4th Week of Advent

From: Luke 1:5-25

The Birth of John the Baptist Foretold

[5] In the days of Herod, king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, of the division of Abijah; and he had a wife of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth. [6] And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless. [7] But they had no child, because Elizabeth was barren, and both were advanced in years.

[8] Now while he was serving as priest before God when his division was on duty, [9] according to the custom of the priesthood, it fell to him by lot to enter the temple of Lord and burn incense. [10] And the whole multitude of the people were praying outside at the hour of incense. [11] And there appeared to him an angel of the Lord standing on the right side of the altar of incense. [12] And Zechariah was troubled when he saw him, and fear fell upon him. [13] But the angel said to him, "Do not be afraid, Zechariah, for your prayer is heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name John. [14] And you will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth; [15] for he will be great before the Lord, and he shall drink no wine nor strong drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother's womb. [16] And he will turn many of the sons of Israel to the Lord their God, [17] and he will go before him in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, to make ready for the Lord a people prepared."

[18] And Zechariah said to the angel, "How shall I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife is advanced in years." [19] And the angel answered him, "I am Gabriel, who stand in the presence of God; and I was sent to speak to you, and to bring you this good news. [20] And behold, you will be silent and unable to speak until the day that these things come to pass, because you did not believe my words, which will be fulfilled in their time." [21] And the people were waiting for Zechariah, and they wondered at his delay in the temple. [22] And when he came out, he could not speak to them, and they perceived that he had seen a vision in the temple; and he made signs to them and remained dumb. [23] And when his time of service was ended, he went to his home.

[24] After these days his wife Elizabeth conceived, and for five months she hid herself, saying, [25] "Thus the Lord has done to me in the days when He looked on me, to take away my reproach among men."

**********************
Commentary:

6. After referring to the noble ancestry of Zechariah and Elizabeth, the evangelist now speaks of a higher type of nobility, the nobility of virtue: "Both were righteous before God." "For not everyone who is righteous in men's eyes is righteous in God's; men have one way of seeing and God another; men see externals but God sees into the heart. It can happen that someone seems righteous because his virtue is false and is practiced to win people's approval; but he is not virtuous in God's sight if his righteousness is not born of simplicity of soul but is only simulated in order to appear good.

"Perfect praise consists in being righteous before God, because only he can be called perfect who is approved by Him who cannot be deceived" (St. Ambrose, "Expositio Evangelii Sec. Lucam, in loc.").

In the last analysis what a Christian must be is righteous before God. St. Paul is advocating this when he tells the Corinthians, "But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by any human court. It is the Lord who judges me. Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart. Then every man will receive his commendation from God" (1 Corinthians 4:3ff). On the notion of the just or righteous man, see the note on Matthew 1:19.

8. There were twenty-four groups or turns of priests to which functions were allocated by the drawing of lots; the eighth group was that of the family of Abijah (cf. 1 Chronicles 24:7-19), to which Zechariah belonged.

9-10. Within the sacred precincts, in a walled-off area, stood the temple proper. Rectangular in form, there was first a large area which was called "the Holy Place", in which was located the altar of incense referred to in verse 9. Behind this was the inner sanctum, called "the Holy of Holies", where the Ark of the Covenant with the tablets of the Law used to be kept; only the high priest had access to this, the most sacred part of the temple. The veil or great curtain of the temple separated these two area from one another. The sacred building was surrounded by a courtyard, called the courtyard of the priests and outside this, at the front of the temple, was what was called the courtyard of the Israelites, where the people stayed during the ceremony of incensing.

10. While the priest offered incense to God, the people in the courtyard joined with him in spirit: even in the Old Testament every external act of worship was meant to be accompanied by an interior disposition of self-offering to God.

With much more reason should there be this union between external and internal worship in the liturgical rites of the New Covenant (cf. "Mediator Dei", 8), in the liturgy of the Church. Besides, this consistency befits the nature of man, comprised as he is of body and soul.

11. Angels are pure spirits, that is, they have no body of any kind; therefore, "they do not appear to men exactly as they are; rather, they manifest themselves in forms which God gives them so that they can be seen by those to whom He sends them" (St. John Damascene, "De Fide Orthodoxa," 2, 3).

In addition to adoring and serving God, angelic spirits act as God's messengers and channels of His providence towards men; this explains why they appear so often in salvation history and why Sacred Scripture refers to them in so many passages (cf., e.g. Hebrews 1:14).

Christ's birth was such an important event that angels were given a very prominent role in connection with it. Here, as at the Annunciation to Mary, the archangel St. Gabriel is charged with delivering God's message.

"It is no accident that the angel makes his appearance in the temple, for this announces the imminent coming of the true Priest and prepares the heavenly sacrifice at which the angels will minister. Let it not be doubted, then, that the angels will be present when Christ is immolated" (St. Ambrose, "Expositio Evangelii Sec. Lucam, in loc.").

12. "No matter how righteous a man be, he cannot look at an angel without feeling afraid; that is why Zechariah was alarmed: he could not but quake at the presence of the angel; he could not take the brightness that surrounded him" (St. John Chrysostom, "De Incomprehensibili Dei Natura"). The reason for this is not so much the angels' superiority to man as the fact that the grandeur of God's majesty shines out through the angel: "And the angel said to me, `Write this: Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.' And he said to me, `These are true words of God.' Then I fell down at his feet to worship him, but he said to me, `You must not do that! I am a fellow servant with you and your brethren who hold the testimony of Jesus. Worship God'" (Revelation 19:9-10).

13. Through the archangel God intervenes in an exceptional way in the married life of Zechariah and Elizabeth; but the message he brings has much wider reference; it has significance for the whole world. Elizabeth is already quite old but she is going to have a son who will be called John ("God is gracious") and he will be the forerunner of the Messiah. This showed that "the fullness of time" (cf. Galatians 4:4) was imminent, for which all righteous people of Israel had yearned (cf. John 8:56; Hebrews 11:13).

"Your prayer is heard," St. Jerome comments, "that is to say, you are given more than you asked for. You prayed for the salvation of the people, and you have been given the Precursor" ("Expositio Evangelium Sec. Lucam, in loc."). Our Lord also sometimes gives us more than we ask for: "There is a story about a beggar meeting Alexander the Great and asking him for alms. Alexander stopped and instructed that the man be given the government of five cities. The beggar, totally confused and taken aback, explained, `I didn't ask for that much.' And Alexander replied, `You asked like the man you are; I give like the man I am" ([Blessed] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 160). Since God responds so generously and gives us more than we ask for, we should face up to difficulties and not be cowed by them.

14-17. The archangel St. Gabriel gives Zechariah three reasons why he should rejoice over the birth of this child; first, because God will bestow exceptional holiness on him (verse 15); second, because he will lead many to salvation (verse 16); and third, because his whole life, everything he does, will prepare the way for the expected Messiah (verse 17).

In St. John the Baptist two prophecies of Malachi are fulfilled; in them we are told that God will send a messenger ahead of Him to prepare the way for Him (Malachi 3:1; 4:5-6). John prepares the way for the first coming of the Messiah in the same way as Elijah will prepare the way for His second coming (cf. St. Ambrose, "Expositio Evangelii Sec. Lucam, in loc."; St. Thomas Aquinas, "Commentary on St. Matthew", 17, 11, "in loc."). This is why Christ will say, "What did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet. This is he of whom it is written, `Behold, I send My messenger before Thy face, who shall prepare Thy way before Thee'" (Luke 7:26-27).

18. Zechariah's incredulity and his sin lie not in his doubting that this message has come from God but in forgetting that God is almighty, and in thinking that he and Elizabeth are past having children. Later, referring to the conception of John the Baptist, the same angel explains to Mary that "with God nothing will be impossible" (Luke 1:37). When God asks us to take part in any undertaking we should rely on His omnipotence rather than our own meagre resources.

19-20. "Gabriel" means "might of God". God commanded the archangel Gabriel to announce the events connected with the incarnation of the Word; already in the Old Testament it was Gabriel who proclaimed to the prophet Daniel the time of the Messiah's coming (Daniel 8:15-26, 9:20-27). This present passage deals with the announcement of the conception and birth of Christ's Precursor, and it is the time same angel who will reveal to the Blessed Virgin the mystery of the Incarnation.

24. Elizabeth hid herself because of the strangeness of pregnancy at her age and out of a holy modesty which advised her not to make known God's gifts prematurely.

25. Married couples who want to have children, to whom God has not yet given any, can learn from Zechariah and Elizabeth and have recourse to them as intercessors. To couples in this situation [St] Monsignor Escriva de Balaguer recommended that "they should not give up hope too easily. They should ask God to give them children and, if it is His will, to bless them as He blessed the Patriarchs of the Old Testament. And then it would be advisable for both of them to see a good doctor. If in spite of everything God does not give them children, they should not feel frustrated. They should be happy, discovering in this very fact God's will for them. Often God does not give them children because He is `asking more'. God asks them to put the same effort and the same kind and gentle dedication into helping their neighbors as they would have put into raising their own children, without the human joy that comes from parenthood. There is, then, no reason for feeling they are failures or for giving way to sadness" ("Conversations", 96).

Here is the authoritative teaching of John Paul II on this subject: "It must not be forgotten, however, that, even when procreation is not possible, conjugal life does not for this reason lose its value. Physical sterility in fact can be for spouses the occasion for other important services to the life of the human person--for example, adoption, various forms of educational work, assistance to other families and to poor or handicapped children" ("Familiaris Consortio", 14).

***************************

Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

Sunday, December 18, 2005

4th Sunday in Advent- The Necessity of the Virtue of Penance

4th Sunday in Advent- The Necessity of the Virtue of Penance
By Fr. Ferdinand Heckman, O.F.M.

"The word of the Lord was made unto John, the son of Zachary in the desert. And he came into all the country about the Jordan, preaching the baptism of penance unto the remission of sins."-Luke 3:2-3.

SYNOPSIS.-Introduction.-St. John the Baptist preached the Virtue of Penance which is so necessary to all at all times.
I. We must do penance by reason of our faith.
1. Our faith is founded upon penance.
a) According to the teaching of the Old Law.
b) According to the teaching and example of Jesus Christ.
c) According to the teaching and example of the Apostles.
2. Our faith has always taught the necessity of penance.

II. We must do penance by reason of our sinfulness.
1. We all without exception are sinners.
2. We must make satisfaction to God for the insult offered to Him by sin.
3. We can only do this by words of penance.
4. The example of David.

Conclusion.-An exhortation to penance.


The time, in which the redemption of fallen mankind was to be accomplished, had come. The Redeemer had already been born in an humble stable at Bethlehem. He had already spent the days of His childhood, boyhood, and youth and had passed into the years of vigorous manhood. Now the hour was at hand, in which He was to manifest Himself to the world in order to proclaim the good tidings of His Gospel of joy, peace and happiness. Then there appeared in Judea a man who caused a great stir and commotion among the people. For it had been prophesied of him that he would be great before the Lord; that he would drink no wine nor strong drink; that he would be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother's womb; that he would convert many of the children of the Israel to the Lord their God; that he would go before Him in the spirit and power of Elias; that he might turn the hearts of the fathers unto the children, and the incredulous to the wisdom of the just, to prepare unto the Lord a perfect people.

He came out of the desert, where he had spent many years in the performance of hard work of penance. His feet were bare and his head uncovered, and he was clothed with camel's hair and a leathern girdle about his loins, and his meat was locusts and wild honey. "And he came into all the country about the Jordan, preach­ing the Baptism of penance for the remission of sins; as it was writ­ten in the book of the sayings of Isaias the prophet: A voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight His paths. Every valley shall be filled; and every moun­tain and hill shall be brought low; and the crooked shall be made straight; and the rough ways plain; and all flesh shall see the Salvation of God" (Luke 3:3-6). "Then went out to him Jerusalem and all Judea, and all the country about the Jordan." And he said to them: "Do penance: for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand." And seeing many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them: "You brood of vipers, who has shown you to flee from the wrath to come? Bring forth, therefore, fruit worthy of penance. For now the ax is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not yield good fruit, shall be cut down, and cast into the fire" (Matt. 3:5, 2, 7, 8, 10). These, his words, like a two-edged sword, penetrated the hearts of his hearers, and many struck their breasts -and shed tears of repentance, "and were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins" (Matt. 3: 6).

This great preacher of penance was St. John the Baptist, the precursor of our Lord. The baptism of penance which he preached, was not the Sacrament of Baptism, nor the Sacrament of Penance, instituted by our Lord for the remission of sins, but the Virtue of Penance, the necessity of bringing forth worthy fruits of penance for the sins that have been committed, in order to make due satis­faction to God's outraged majesty and justice. This virtue of penance, the performance of works of penance for the sins we have committed, is as necessary to us now, as it was to the Jews in the days of John the Baptist. We must perform works of penance by reason of our faith, and of our sinfulness.

What do we understand by the virtue of penance? Penance is a supernatural, moral virtue whereby the sinner is disposed to hatred of his sins as an offence against God, and to a firm purpose of amendment and of due satisfaction for them. The principal act in the exercise of this virtue is the detestation of one's own sins. The motive of this detestation must be that sin offends God. To regret sin on account of the mental or physical suffering, the social loss or human punishment which it entails, is natural, and such a sorrow does not suffice for the exercise of the virtue of penance.

On the other hand the resolve to amend, while certainly necessary, is not sufficient without hatred of sin, already committed, and due satisfaction for it by the performance of works of penance. Such a resolve would profess obedience to God's law in the future, bur would disregard the claims of God's justice for past transgressions. "Be converted, and do penance for all your iniquities," says the prophet. "Cast away from you all your transgressions, and make yourselves a new heart, and a new spirit" (Ezech. 18:30, 31). "He converted to Me," says God through the mouth of his prophet Joel, "with all your heart, in fasting, and in weeping, and in mourning. And rend your hearts, and' not your garments, and turn to the Lord your God: for he is gracious and merciful, patient and rich in mery, and ready to repent of evil" (Joel ii, 12, 13). And the prophet Jeremias says of God: "I attended, and hearkened; no man speaketh what is good, there is none that doth penance for his sin, saying: What have I done? They are all turned to their own course, as a horse rushing to the battle" (J er. viii, 6).

Our Divine Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, after fasting forty days and forty nights in the desert, and singly defeating Satan in his threefold temptation, began his missionary life with the same exhortation to penance as His precursor. "From that time," says the Evangelist of Him, "Jesus began to preach, and to say: Do penance, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand" (Matth. iv, 17). And how often did He not repeat the same exhortation in His Gospel of penance. Contempt of the world, self-denial, mortification of the spirit and flesh, and the Cross, are the quintessence of His teaching. "If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me" (Matth. 16:24).

In the parables of the Prodigal Son and of the Publican, He proclaims the same doctrine of the necessity of penance and repentance for sins committed, and He has held up for all coming ages Mary Magdalen, who "washed out her sins with her tears" of sorrow, as the true type of a repentant sinner. In the present order of Divine Providence, God Himself cannot, and will not forgive sin, if there be no real penance and repentance.

In the Old Law eternal life is denied to the man who does iniquity. "But if a man turn himself away from his justice," says the prophet, "and do iniquity according to all of the abominations which the wicked man useth to work, shall he live? all his justices which he hath done, shall not be remembered: in the prevarication, by which he hath prevaricated, and in his sin which he hath committed, in them he shall die. And when the wicked turneth himself away from his wickedness, which he hath wrought, and doeth judgment, and justice, i. e., judgeth himself and doeth penance according to his guilt, he shall save his soul" (Ezech. xviii, 24, 27).

And Christ but restates this doctrine of the Old Law, when He says: "Unless you shall do penance, you shall all likewise perish" (Luke xiii, 3). In the New Law, therefore, penance and repentance are as necessary as it was in the Old Law; a penance and repentance that includes reformation of life, grief for sin, and willingness to make satisfaction for it by works of penance.

Jesus Christ has confirmed His words by His example. Although holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners and made higher than the heavens, He practiced the severest penance. From the Manger to the Cross His Life was one of continual prayer and fasting, of privation, suffering and humiliation.

When St. Peter, on the Day of Pentecost, preached to the multitude that had gathered about the house in which the Holy Ghost, in the form of fiery tongues had descended upon the Apostles, he so moved them to repentance that when they had heard his words "they had compunction in their heart, and said to Peter and to the rest of the Apostles: What shall we do men and brethren? But Peter said to them: Do penance, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of your sins" (Act. Apos1. ii, 37, 38).

St. Paul, speaking to the Athenians, said: "And God, indeed, having winked at the times of this ignorance, now declares unto men, that all should everywhere do penance, be­cause He has appointed a day, wherein He will judge the world in equity by the man whom He has appointed; giving faith to all, by raising him up from the dead" (Act. Apos1. xvii, 30, 31).

The Apostles also practiced what they preached. St. Peter so be­wailed his threefold denial of our Lord that from the constant flow of his tears furrows appeared upon his cheeks, and St. Paul tells us that "in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils from his own nation, in perils from the Gentiles, in perils in the cities, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils from false brethren, in labor and painfulness, in much watching, in hunger and thirst, in fasting, often, in cold and nakedness," he did preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

In another passage he says: "I do all things for the Gospel's sake: that I may be made partaker thereof. Know you not that they that run in the race, all run indeed, but one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain. And every one that strives for the mastery, restrains himself from all things: and they, indeed, that they may receive a corruptible crown, but we an incorruptible one. I therefore so run, not as at an uncertainty. I so fight, not as one beating the air; but I chastise my body and bring it into subjection: lest perhaps, when I have preached to others, I myself should become a castaway" (I. Cor. ix, 23-27).

Our holy Mother the Church teaches that all who wish to save their soul, must subdue and conquer their passions and inclinations to evil, and must lead an humble and mortified life; that he who has fallen into mortal sin, can cleanse himself from it only by bringing forth worthy fruits of penance. "For the sorrow which is according to God," says the Apostle, "works penance unto Salvation which is lasting" (II. Cor. vii, 10). "Be penitent, therefore, and be converted, St. Peter admonishes us, that your sins may be blotted out" (Act. Apost. iii, 19). This doctrine the Church has received from her Divine Founder, proclaimed in her councils, defended against heretics, taught in her schools, and from her pulpits, and applied in her confessionals, without penance, the Church, the pillar and foundation of truth tells us, there is and can be no Salvation, but there remains only the expectation of eternal damnation.

If then our faith is founded upon penance, and has always considered penance necessary for Salvation, the practice of the virtue of penance cannot be a matter of choice with us, left to our own discretion, but is a stern duty which we cannot shirk. Therefore, St. Augustine says that man, although not conscious of any sin, should not dare to depart from this life without having done penance.

We are born in sin and are liable to fall so easily into sin. One of the pernicious consequences of original sin is that it established the domination of concupiscence in man, the domination of the law of the members which battles against the law of the mind. "The imagination and thought of man's heart are prone to evil from his youth," says Holy Writ (I. Mos. viii, 21). "Every man," says St. James, "is tempted by his own concupiscence, being drawn away and allured. Then when concupiscence hath conceived, it brings forth sin. But sin, when is it completed, begets sin" (James i, 14, 15). This concupiscence is not sinful, but it entices and allures us into sin. Since man is weak, he often succumbs to temptation. For this reason sin is so frequently committed by .
man that, as the Scriptures tell us, all men, without exception, are sinners. "There is no man that sins not," says the wise man (III Reg. viii, 46). . And again: "Who can say: My heart is clean; I am pure from sin? (Prov. xx, 9). "For there is no just man upon earth, that does good and sins not" (Eccles. vii, 2 I ) . "There is not any man just," says St. Paul. "All have turned out of the way; they are become unprofitable together: there is none that doth good, there is not so much as one" (Rom. iii, 10, 12). "If we say," says S1. John, "that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us" (I. John i, 8). If we examine our past life, must we not truthfully say that we have sinned, that we have offended God by transgressing His commandments? Even those who lead a pure and holy life are not altogether free from sin. "For a just man shall fall seven times," says Holy Scripture (Prov. xxiv, 16). Everyone of us must, therefore, confess with David: "I have sinned against the Lord" (II. Kings xii. 13). "My iniquities are gone over my head: and as a heavy burden are heavy upon me" (Ps. xxxvii, 5).

For every sin, mortal or venial, we must make satisfaction to God. To understand the doctrine of satisfaction, we must remember that every sin has two evil consequences, the guilt or stain which sin leaves on the soul, and the debt of punishment, i.e., the satisfaction which must be rendered to God in atonement for the outrage and insult offered to Him by sin. The guilt of sin is blotted out by sincere repentance in the Sacrament of Penance, or by an act of contrition, perfect or imperfect according as the sin is mortal or venial, if the Sacrament of Penance cannot be received. To the perfect contrition for mortal sin must in such a case necessarily be joined the desire of receiving the Sacrament of Penance. When God pardons the sin, He always remits the eternal punishment due to it, and at least a part of the temporal punishment.. But God, after the sin has been forgiven, generally requires some temporal punishment or satisfaction for sin which either He Himself imposes upon man by sending him temporal afflictions, or which man must impose upon himself and which consists in voluntary acts of mortification and penance.

We have examples of this in Holy Writ. Moses for the sin of diffidence which he committed in striking the rock twice, was punished by Almighty God, even after his sin had been forgiven, by not being allowed to enter into the Promised Land. Although God forgave the sin of our first parents in paradise, He nevertheless inflicted on them severe temporal punishments, and continues still to inflict them upon all His posterity. David's sin of vanity in numbering the people was punished, even after he repented, by the destruction of 70,000 of his subjects through a pestilence.

These examples of Holy Writ show that God does not pardon our sins, except on condition that we do penance for them. Hence the sinners of the Old Testament, when begging of God to pardon their sins, never asked to be entirely exempted from punishment, but only not to be chastised according to the full rigor of Divine Justice. "Rebuke me not, Lord, in Thy indignation," said the royal prophet, "nor chastise me in Thy wrath," but he declared him­self ready to do penance for his sins: "I am ready for scourges." "There is no doubt," says St. Eucherius, "that God pardons sin, when the sinner repents of it; but He does not leave it unpunished, for either the sinner must punish himself or God will have to punish him. "We satisfy, therefore, divine justice for sin com­mitted, either by patiently bearing the crosses, trials and sufferings that God sends us, or by performing voluntary acts of mortifica­tion and penance in this life, else we will have to endure long and indescribable pains in purgatory. David had committed the grievous sins of murder and adultery. He repented of his sin with so much contrition that God sent the prophet Nathan to him with the message: "The Lord hath taken away thy sin, thou shalt not die. Nevertheless, because thou hast given occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, for this thing, the child that is born to thee shall surely die. The sword shall never depart from thy house, because thou hast despised me" (II. Kings xii, IO, 13, 14). Such was the penance imposed on him by Almighty God, after his sin had been forgiven. But David was not satisfied with this penance and hence performed other penitential works. "I am ready for scourges," he says, "and my sorrow is continually before me. For I will declare my iniquity, and I will think of my sin" (Ps. xxxvii, 18, 19). "Every night I will wash my bed: I will water my couch with my ears" (Ps. vi, 7). His fasting was so severe that ashes were his food and tears of contrition his drink. "I did eat ashes like bread, and mingled my drink with weeping" (Ps. ci, 10).

To confess our sins, therefore, and to perform the light penance imposed upon us by the confessor is not sufficient to atone for the outrage and insult offered by sin to Almighty God, but voluntary acts of mortification and penance should justly follow the performance of the slight penance enjoined on us in the confessional. Unless we atone for our sins by self-imposed acts of penance in this world, we will have to render involuntary satisfaction for them in the next world, in a prison out of which we shall not be delivered till we have paid the last farthing of our debt.

Let us, then, take the safer and easier part, and anticipate the Divine punishments by voluntary mortifications and penances. "What you have done," says St. Augustine, "cannot remain unpunished; and wherein a man has sinned, he shall also be chastised; so that you must either punish yourself, or God will punish you." Prudence teaches us to choose the lesser of these two evils. If you wish, therefore, to avoid the Divine chastisements, chastise yourselves in this world, for in the next world punishment will be meted out to you in the all fullness and severity of Divine Justice.

The slight voluntary penances and mortifications that we impose upon ourselves in this life, are of more value in the sight of God than the longest and severest sufferings endured against our will in the other life. "That we may not be punished in the other world," says St. John Chrysostom, "let us chastise ourselves with tears of contrition, with fasting, and other bodily mortifications." "For as you have yielded your members," writes St. Paul to the Romans, "to serve uncleanness and iniquity unto iniquity, so now yield your members to serve justice unto sanctification" (Rom. vi, 19). "Be converted to me with all your heart," God admonishes us through the mouth of His prophet. Cleanse, therefore, your souls from the stains of sin in the Blood of the Lamb in the Sacrament of Penance. A good confession is the foundation and first requisite of a life of penance. But be not satisfied with going to Confession and performing the slight penance imposed on you, but "make your ways and your doings good." Your thoughts, desires, words and actions must become pleasing in the sight of God. Bring forth worthy fruits of penance. It is not an easy thing to lead a penitential life, but its fruits are precious and enduring. It will reconcile us with God and avert from us his punishments, it will console us in the hour of death and open to us the gates of the heavenly paradise. There are only two roads that lead to this heavenly paradise: the road of innocence and the road of penance. If, then, we have left the former, we must walk the latter. But, unless we do penance for our sins, we shall all likewise perish. Amen.
_________________________
From Plain Sermons by Practical Preachers (1916)

|

Origin of the Twelve Days of Christmas

Remember to check out Catholic Culture for some great activities and guides for children for Advent and Christmas such as this:
DIRECTIONS
You're all familiar with the Christmas song, "The Twelve Days of Christmas" I think. To most it's a delightful nonsense rhyme set to music. But it had a quite serious purpose when it was written.
It is a good deal more than just a repetitious melody with pretty phrases and a list of strange gifts.

Catholics in England during the period 1558 to 1829, when Parliament finally emancipated Catholics in England, were prohibited from ANY practice of their faith by law — private OR public. It was a crime to BE a Catholic.

"The Twelve Days of Christmas" was written in England as one of the "catechism songs" to help young Catholics learn the tenets of their faith - a memory aid, when to be caught with anything in *writing* indicating adherence to the Catholic faith could not only get you imprisoned, it could get you hanged, or shortened by a head — or hanged, drawn and quartered, a rather peculiar and ghastly punishment I'm not aware was ever practiced anywhere else.

Hanging, drawing and quartering involved hanging a person by the neck until they had almost, but not quite, suffocated to death; then the party was taken down from the gallows, and disembowelled while still alive; and while the entrails were still lying on the street, where the executioners stomped all over them, the victim was tied to four large farm horses, and literally torn into five parts - one to each limb and the remaining torso.

The songs gifts are hidden meanings to the teachings of the faith.

The "true love" mentioned in the song doesn't refer to an earthly suitor, it refers to God Himself.

The "me" who receives the presents refers to every baptized person.

The partridge in a pear tree is Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

In the song, Christ is symbolically presented as a mother partridge which feigns injury to decoy predators from her helpless nestlings, much in memory of the expression of Christ's sadness over the fate of Jerusalem: "Jerusalem! Jerusalem! How often would I have sheltered thee under my wings, as a hen does her chicks, but thou wouldst not have it so..."

The other symbols mean the following:

Two (2) Turtle Doves = The Old and New Testaments

Three (3) French Hens = Faith, Hope and Charity, the Theological Virtues

Four (4) Calling Birds = the Four Gospels and/or the Four Evangelists

Five (5) Golden Rings = The first Five Books of the Old Testament, the "Pentateuch", which gives the history of man's fall from grace.

Six (6) Geese A-laying = the six days of creation

Seven (7) Swans A-swimming = the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit, the seven sacraments

Eight (8) Maids A-milking = the eight beatitudes

Nine (9) Ladies Dancing = the nine Fruits of the Holy Spirit

Ten (10) Lords A-leaping = the ten commandments

Eleven (11) Pipers Piping = the eleven faithful apostles

Twelve (12) Drummers Drumming = the twelve points of doctrine in the Apostle's Creed

by Fr. Hal Stockert, 12/17/95

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Postscript:
"Over the years since this was written, in about 1982, and first put out for the online world to enjoy, I have been deluged every year with hundreds of "you can't prove this!" kinds of letters. Obviously, I cannot prove *anything* to anyone who doesn't care to believe.

However, for those who ARE interested in the provenance of the data, and to save myself the burden of having my inbox filled with notes asking for evidence to beat debunkers over the head with, I will simply add this and leave it to the reader to accept it or reject it as he or she may choose.

I found this information while I was researching for an entirely unrelated project which required me to go to the Latin texts of the sources pertinent to my research. Among those primary documents there were letters from Irish priests, mostly Jesuits, writing back to the motherhouse at Douai-Rheims, in France, mentioning this purely as an aside, and not at all as part of the main content of the letters. In those days, even though there are those who will deny this, too, it was a sufficient crime between 1538 and nearly 1700 just to BE a Jesuit in England to find oneself hanged, drawn and quartered if he fell into the hands of the authorities. Edmund Campion was not the sole Jesuit in England during the period. And there are places in England itself which, if you visit them, will attest to the antiquity and veracity of the article.

Whether you believe it or not is irrelevant to me. You can enjoy it or not, as you choose. I hadn't written it as a doctoral thesis, simply as some delicious tidbit I thought the world would be delighted to share over a holiday season. It seems, however, that there is more than one grinch, and I am not at all interested in feeding the others who remain past the one in the Christmas cartoons. Believe if you will. Dissent if you choose. Let the rest enjoy the story.

Fr. Hal 12/15/00

Activity Source: Origin of the "Twelve Days of Christmas": An Underground Catechism by Fr. Hal Stockert, 1995

|

Gospel for the 4th Sunday of Advent

From: Luke 1:26-38

The Annunciation and Incarnation of the Son of God

[26] In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, [27] to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary. [28] And he came to her and said, "Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you!" [29] But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and considered in her mind what sort of greeting this might be. [30] And the angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. [31] And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call His name Jesus. [32] He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to Him the throne of His father David, [33] and He will reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of His Kingdom there will be no end." [34] And Mary said to the angel, "How can this be, since I have no husband?" [35] And the angel said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God. [36] And behold, your kinswoman Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. [37] For with God nothing will be impossible." [38] And Mary said, "Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be done to me according to your word." And the angel departed from her.

*************************
Commentary:

26-38. Here we contemplate our Lady who was "enriched from the first instant of her conception with the splendor of an entirely unique holiness; [...] the virgin of Nazareth is hailed by the heralding angel, by divine command, as `full of grace' (cf. Luke 1:28), and to the heavenly messenger she replies, `Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it done unto me according to thy word' (Luke 1:38). Thus the daughter of Adam, Mary, consenting to the word of God, became the Mother of Jesus. Committing herself wholeheartedly to God's saving will and impeded by no sin, she devoted herself totally, as a handmaid of the Lord, to the person and work of her Son, under and with Him, serving the mystery of Redemption, by the grace of Almighty God. Rightly, therefore, the Fathers (of the Church) see Mary not merely as passively engaged by God, but as freely cooperating in the work of man's salvation through faith and obedience" (Vatican II, "Lumen Gentium", 56).

The annunciation to Mary and incarnation of the Word constitute the deepest mystery of the relationship between God and men and the most important event in the history of mankind: God becomes man, and will remain so forever, such is the extent of His goodness and mercy and love for all of us. And yet on the day when the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity assumed frail human nature in the pure womb of the Blessed Virgin, it all happened quietly, without fanfare of any kind.

St. Luke tells the story in a very simple way. We should treasure these words of the Gospel and use them often, for example, practising the Christian custom of saying the Angelus every day and reflecting on the five Joyful Mysteries of the Rosary.

27. God chose to be born of a virgin; centuries earlier He disclosed this through the prophet Isaiah (cf. Isaiah 7:14; Matthew 1:22-23). God, "before all ages made choice of, and set in her proper place, a mother for His only-begotten Son from whom He, after being made flesh, should be born in the blessed fullness of time: and He continued His persevering regard for her in preference to all other creatures, to such a degree that for her alone He had singular regard" (Pius IX, "Ineffabilis Deus," 2). This privilege granted to our Lady of being a virgin and a mother at the same time is a unique gift of God. This was the work of the Holy Spirit "who at the conception and the birth of the Son so favored the Virgin Mother as to impart fruitfulness to her while preserving inviolate her perpetual virginity" ("St. Pius V Catechism," I, 4, 8). Paul VI reminds us of this truth of faith: "We believe that the Blessed Mary, who ever enjoys the dignity of virginity, was the Mother of the incarnate Word, of our God and Savior Jesus Christ" ("Creed of the People of God", 14).

Although many suggestions have been made as to what the name Mary means, most of the best scholars seem to agree that Mary means "lady". However, no single meaning fully conveys the richness of the name.

28. "Hail, full of grace": literally the Greek text reads "Rejoice!", obviously referring to the unique joy over the news which the angel is about to communicate.

"Full of grace": by this unusual form of greeting the archangel reveals Mary's special dignity and honor. The Fathers and Doctors of the Church "taught that this singular, solemn and unheard-of-greeting showed that all the divine graces reposed in the Mother of God and that she was adorned with all the gifts of the Holy Spirit", which meant that she "was never subject to the curse", that is, was preserved from all sin. These words of the archangel in this text constitute one of the sources which reveal the dogma of Mary's Immaculate Conception (cf. Pius IX, "Ineffabilis Deus"; Paul VI, "Creed of the People of God").

"The Lord is with you!": these words are not simply a greeting ("the Lord be with you") but an affirmation ("the Lord is with you"), and they are closely connected with the Incarnation. St. Augustine comments by putting these words on the archangel's lips: "He is more with you than He is with me: He is in your heart, He takes shape within you, He fills your soul, He is in your womb" ("Sermo De Nativitate Domini", 4).

Some important Greek manuscripts and early translations add at the end of the verse: "Blessed are you among women!", meaning that God will exalt Mary over all women. She is more excellent than Sarah, Hannah, Deborah, Rachel, Judith, etc., for only she has the supreme honor of being chosen to be the Mother of God.

29-30. Our Lady is troubled by the presence of the archangel and by the confusion truly humble people experience when they receive praise.

30. The Annunciation is the moment when our Lady is given to know the vocation which God planned for her from eternity. When the archangel sets her mind at ease by saying, "Do not be afraid, Mary," he is helping her to overcome that initial fear which a person normally experiences when God gives him or her a special calling. The fact that Mary felt this fear does not imply the least trace of imperfection in her: hers is a perfectly natural reaction in the face of the supernatural. Imperfection would arise if one did not overcome this fear or rejected the advice of those in a position to help--as St. Gabriel helped Mary.

31-33. The archangel Gabriel tells the Blessed Virgin Mary that she is to be the Mother of God by reminding her of the words of Isaiah which announced that the Messiah would be born of a virgin, a prophecy which will find its fulfillment in Mary (cf. Matthew 1:22-23; Isaiah 7:14).

He reveals that the Child will be "great": His greatness comes from His being God, a greatness He does not lose when He takes on the lowliness of human nature. He also reveals that Jesus will be the king of the Davidic dynasty sent by God in keeping with His promise of salvation; that His Kingdom will last forever, for His humanity will remain forever joined to His divinity; that "He will be called Son of the Most High", that is that He really will be the Son of the Most High and will be publicly recognized as such, that is, the Child will be the Son of God.

The archangel's announcement evokes the ancient prophecies which foretold these prerogatives. Mary, who was well-versed in Sacred Scripture, clearly realized that she was to be the Mother of God.

34-38. Commenting on this passage John Paul II said: "`Virgo fidelis', the faithful Virgin. What does this faithfulness of Mary mean? What are the dimensions of this faithfulness? The first dimension is called search. Mary was faithful first of all when she began, lovingly, to seek the deep sense of God's plan in her and for the world. `Quomodo fiet?' How shall this be?, she asked the Angel of the Annunciation [...]."

"The second dimension of faithfulness is called reception, acceptance. The `quomodo fiet?' is changed, on Mary's lips, to a `fiat': Let it be done, I am ready, I accept. This is the crucial moment of faithfulness, the moment in which man perceives that he will never completely understand the `how': that there are in God's plan more areas of mystery than of clarity; that is, however he may try, he will never succeed in understanding it completely[...]."

"The third dimension of faithfulness is consistency to live in accordance with what one believes; to adapt one's own life to the object of one's adherence. To accept misunderstanding, persecutions, rather than a break between what one practises and what one believes: this is consistency[...]."

"But all faithfulness must pass the most exacting test, that of duration. Therefore, the fourth dimension of faithfulness is constancy. It is easy to be consistent for a day or two. It is difficult and important to be consistent for one's whole life. It is easy to be consistent in the hour of enthusiasm, it is difficult to be so in the hour of tribulation. And only a consistency that lasts throughout the whole life can be called faithfulness. Mary's `fiat' in the Annunciation finds its fullness in the silent `fiat' that she repeats at the foot of the Cross" ("Homily in Mexico City Cathedral", 26 January 1979).

34. Mary believed in the archangel's words absolutely; she did not doubt as Zechariah had done (cf. 1:18). Her question, "How can this be?", expresses her readiness to obey the will of God even though at first sight it implied a contradiction: on the one hand, she was convinced that God wished her to remain a virgin; on the other, here was God also announcing that she would become a mother. The archangel announces God's mysterious design, and what had seemed impossible, according to the laws of nature, is explained by a unique intervention on the part of God.

Mary's resolution to remain a virgin was certainly something very unusual, not in line with the practice of righteous people under the Old Covenant, for, as St. Augustine explains, "particularly attentive to the propagation and growth of the people of God, through whom the Prince and Savior of the world might be prophesied and be born, the saints were obliged to make use of the good of matrimony" ("De Bono Matrimonii", 9, 9). However, in the Old Testament, there were some who, in keeping with God's plan, did remain celibate--for example, Jeremiah, Elijah, Eliseus and John the Baptist. The Blessed Virgin, who received a very special inspiration of the Holy Spirit to practise virginity, is a first-fruit of the New Testament, which will establish the excellence of virginity over marriage while not taking from the holiness of the married state, which it raises to the level of a sacrament (cf. "Gaudium Et Spes", 48).

35. The "shadow" is a symbol of the presence of God. When Israel was journeying through the wilderness, the glory of God filled the Tabernacle and a cloud covered the Ark of the Covenant (Exodus 40:34-36). And when God gave Moses the tablets of the Law, a cloud covered Mount Sinai (Exodus 24:15-16); and also, at the Transfiguration of Jesus the voice of God the Father was heard coming out of a cloud (Luke 9:35).

At the moment of the Incarnation the power of God envelops our Lady--an ____expression of God's omnipotence. The Spirit of God--which, according to the account in Genesis (1:2), moved over the face of the waters, bringing things to life--now comes down on Mary. And the fruit of her womb will be the work of the Holy Spirit. The Virgin Mary, who herself was conceived without any stain of sin (cf. Pius IX, "Ineffabilis Deus") becomes, after the Incarnation, a new tabernacle of God. This is the mystery we recall every day when saying the Angelus.

38. Once she learns of God's plan, our Lady yields to God's will with prompt obedience, unreservedly. She realizes the disproportion between what she is going to become--the Mother of God--and what she is--a woman. However, this is what God wants to happen and for Him nothing is impossible; therefore no one should stand in His way. So Mary, combining humility and obedience, responds perfectly to God's call: "Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be done according to your word."

"At the enchantment of this virginal phrase, the Word became flesh" ([St] J. Escriva, "Holy Rosary", first joyful mystery). From the pure body of Mary, God shaped a new body, He created a soul out of nothing, and the Son of God united Himself with this body and soul: prior to this He was only God; now He is still God but also man. Mary is now the Mother of God. This truth is a dogma of faith, first defined by the Council of Ephesus (431). At this point she also begins to be the spiritual Mother of all mankind. What Christ says when He is dying--`Behold, your son..., behold, your mother" (John 19:26-27)--simply promulgates what came about silently at Nazareth. "With her generous `fiat' (Mary) became, through the working of the Spirit, the Mother of God, but also the Mother of the living, and, by receiving into her womb the one Mediator, she became the true Ark of the Covenant and true Temple of God" (Paul VI, "Marialis Cultus", 6).

The Annunciation shows us the Blessed Virgin as perfect model of "purity" (the RSV "I have no husband" is a euphemism); of "humility" ("Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord"); of "candor" and "simplicity" ("How can this be?"); of "obedience" and "lively faith" ("Let it be done to me according to your word"). "Following her example of obedience to God, we can learn to serve delicately without being slavish. In Mary, we don't find the slightest trace of the attitude of the foolish virgins, who obey, but thoughtlessly. Our Lady listens attentively to what God wants, ponders what she doesn't fully understand and asks about what she doesn't know. Then she gives herself completely to doing the divine will: `Behold I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be done to me according to your word'. Isn't that marvellous? The Blessed Virgin, our teacher in all we do, shows us here that obedience to God is not servile, does not bypass our conscience. We should be inwardly moved to discover the `freedom of the children of God' (cf. Romans 8:21)" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 173).
*********************
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

|

4th Sunday of Advent - Relics and Images

"Make ready the way of the Lord, make straight his paths." St. Luke, 3:4.

A famous British poet and novelist died in 1928. His name was Thomas Hardy. The following story was told by Hardy's barber. It seems that an American who was extremely fond of Hardy's writings accidentally stopped in the shop where the great novelist used to get his hair cut.

"Have you ever seen Thomas Hardy?" asked the American.

"Oh, yes," replied the barber, "he sat in the chair you're sitting in."

"In this chair?" shouted the American excitedly.

"Yes," repeated the barber, "I cut Mr. Hardy's hair."

"Did you keep the hair you cut off?" eagerly questioned the customer, putting his hand into his pocket.

"No, I didn't. Why?" queried the hair cutter.

"Well, that's a pity," fairly moaned the Yankee, "because if you had, I'd have bought it."

In this incident we see the extreme veneration which a man of a different country had for a famous writer of novels and poems. So highly did the American esteem the literary power of the Britisher that he was ready to buy some of the hair that was cut from his literary head. In a word, he wanted a relic of his idol, Thomas Hardy.

Much more reasonable and profitable is the Catholic practice of venerat­ing relics. A relic can be the body or part of the body of some holy person. I t can be something that belonged to a saint: a book, rosary, article of clothing or piece of furniture he used. A relic may also mean something that touched the body of a saint, as a handkerchief, such as that spoken about St. Paul. (Acts, 19 :12)

It is a natural instinct to honor anything that had anything to do with a great person. Everyone with common sense knows that a son does not worship the picture of his mother or sweetheart which he keeps on his desk. Everybody with a grain of grey matter knows that no man worships the locket or watch left him by his mother or some loved one.

In the same way no Catholic worships the relics of the saints. On the contrary, we honor those keepsakes of the heroes and heroines of God to remind us of the heroic things they did in the service of the Lord. God Himself has approved such devotion both in the Old and the New Testaments. The body laid in the prophet's tomb came to life. (4 Kings, 13 :21) A woman was healed upon touching our Lord's garment. (St. Mat­thew, 9 :21) The very shadow of St. Peter healed those who were sick. (Acts, 5 :15) The linen cloths from St. Paul's body had a similar power to cure. (Acts, 19 :12)

Christian history is filled with the wonders God worked through things which had been used by His special friends.

Relics are also the source of many spiritual benefits. Who that venerates a relic of St. Anthony of Padua does not think of the purity of his apostolic heart, and imitate it? Who that honors something from the life of St. Francis of Assisi, does not find inspiration to follow his life of love?

Always it must be remembered that the relics themselves do not perform these physical and spiritual miracles. Every Catholic knows that God works these wonders. Accordingly, it is not superstition when we keep and honor some piece of bone from a saint, some leaf from his prayer­book, some remnant of his holy habit. We do not adore and serve these relics.

The same applies to the Catholic practice of honoring images, statues and pictures of Christ, His Blessed Mother, His saints, and the truths of our glorious religion.

Here, too, the Bible backs up the practice of God's Church. From the very infancy of Christianity the Catholic Church, the only Christian Church at the time, used pictures and statues to teach and to inspire. We read in the Old Testament of the two golden cherubim, that is, statues of two angels, one on each side of the Holy of Holies. (Exodus, 25:18) We read of the brazen serpent upon which the Israelites were commanded to look that they might be healed. (Numbers, 21 :8)

We honor the images of the saints by giving them a prominent place in our churches and homes, by saying prayers before them, by saluting them respectfully, by adorning them with flowers and other decorations, and by making pilgrimages to their shrines.

Everybody knows that we do not honor the wood and glass of the picture itself, but we honor the individual represented. When we kneel before the ~ross or crucifix we do not adore the wood and plaster of Paris of which it is made, but we adore the adorable Christ whom it represents.

Neither is it from the images themselves that we ask favors of body and soul. It is from God, through the request of His special friends, from whom we ask the favors.

Furthermore, by venerating the images of saints we often obtain great graces, we are helped in keeping our minds on holy things, and we are reminded of their heroic lives. Weare inspired to follow them. Even the American of our story had sense enough to realize that he would not honor the hair of Hardy if he had been lucky enough to secure some of it. That hair simply would have been a reminder of the literary greatness of the man upon whose head it had grown.

Every relic and image in the Catholic Church is a means to honor God, a means to remember God. Every relic and image should and does help us to "make straight the way of the Lord." It is a human thing, a material thing, a dead thing, that helps us to think of the living Lord and to make our way to him. Amen.
_____________________________________________
Adapted from Talks on the Commandments by Fr. Arthur Tonne

|

4th Sunday of Advent-Fast and Abstinence

"Make ready the way of the Lord, make straight his paths." St. Luke, 3:4.

King Ferdinand of Naples had to make a hasty trip to Rome with his small son. They traveled in disguise. They stopped at an inn for a meal. It happened to be Friday. A number of Catholics were eating meat. One young man, however, was eating fish, despite the ridicule of the others.

"You may do as you choose," he declared, "but I am going to keep the law as long as I live."

Hearing this, the king joined in the conversation, praised the youth, and asked him where he was going.

"I am going td Naples," the young man answered, "to join the army of King Ferdinand. Although I was born in Florence, I don't want to join the army of my native city, because the soldiers are so careless about their religious duties."

The king took out his note-book, wrote a few lines, sealed the note and gave it to the youth: "Take this letter to the address on it; perhaps it will help you when you reach Naples."

The letter was addressed to the commander-in-chief of the king's army. Every honor was shown the boy, and the rank of lieutenant was conferred upon him, as the king had directed in the few lines he had hurriedly written.

If an earthly king rewarded so generously the keeping of the Church law regarding fast and abstinence, how much more will the King of kings reward such obedience. Fasting and abstinence are two distinct things, though often confused. Fasting means that we eat only one full meal on a certain day. Abstinence means that we do not eat flesh-meat on certain days.

Both are pleasing to God when done for the right reasons. God commanded fasting in the Old Testament. (Joel, 2:12) Christ said that His followers would fast; He even laid down rules:
"When you fast, do not look gloomy like the hypocrites." St. Matthew, 6:16.

"When thou dost fast, anoint thy head and wash thy face, so that thou mayest not be seen by men to fast, but by thy Father." St. Matthew, 6:17.

"And thy Father," Christ promises, "who sees in secret, will reward thee." St. Matthew, 6:18.
We see the servants of God, Moses, David, Elias, Judith, Esther and Daniel fasting. Our Lord Himself fasted forty days and forty nights. The Apostles fasted. In their footsteps followed the Fathers and saints and practical Catholics of all time. Mother Church made this law:
1. Because of the authority God gave her.
2. Because of the general inclination to avoid what is painful.
3. In order to make definite the keeping of Christ's command that we do some sort of penance.
All who are twenty-one years old and who have not yet completed their 59th year must fast, under pain of mortal sin. Here are some excuses:
1. Physical inability: the sick, weak or convalescent; nurses and those attending the sick; the extremely poor.
2. Wives and children are excused if the head of the house is violently 'opposed to fasting.
3. Persons in public institutions; soldiers; sailors.
4. Those doing hard manual labor.
S. Those engaged in intense infellectual labor.
6. Those dispensed by lawful authority. Don't take it upon yourself to dispense yourself. Ask your confessor.

Fasting means eating but one full meal, and that not before midday. Coffee and bread are allowed in the morning with a small meal in the evening.

Fast days are generally announced from the pulpit, and are indicated on your Catholic calendar. The fast days of the year are [at the time of this writing] as follows:
1. The week days of Lent, in memory of our Lord's forty day fast, and in honor of His passion and death.
2. The vigils of Christmas, Pentecost, Assumption, and All Saints. This week we keep the vigil of Christmas.
3. The Ember days, to ask God's pardon for the sins of that season; to thank Him for graces; to seek His blessing on planting and harvest; to beg His grace for those ordained at these four seasons.
On days of abstinence we abstain from flesh-meat and soups made from meat. There are plenty of examples in Scripture of the friends of God ab­staining from certain foods for a religious reason. This law binds all who are seven years old or more. To eat meat wilfully on a day of abstinence like Friday is a mortal sin.

The following are excused from abstinence: the poor, who depend on others; the sick, who need support and attention; soldiers and sailors; travelers who cannot obtain other food. The days of abstinence are:
1. All Fridays, except Fridays which happen to be holy days of obligation. If Christmas falls on Friday you may eat meat.
2. The Wednesdays of Lent, excluding, in this country, the Wednesday of Holy Week.
3. All Ember days.
4. The vigils of Christmas, Pentecost, Assumption, and All Saints.
These laws of fasting and abstinence are made to tame and subdue the evil inclinations of the flesh, and to satisfy God for our sins and the sins of the world. To fast and abstain makes good to God for our disobedience to Him; it gives us spiritual power; it strengthens us against temptation; it helps us persevere; it obtains many blessings; and it helps the body. Too many overeat. The second law of the Church teaches and trains us to control the appetite.

Generally people who do not fast or abstain, do no penance at all. They never make themselves worthy of the rewards Christ promises. They do not make straight His paths; they do not make ready His way.

King Ferdinand rewarded richly a young man who kept this law. God will reward, you can be sure, even more richly the keeping of His Church's law, when it is done out of love for Him. Amen.
________________________________
Adapted from Prayer, Precepts, and Virtues (1949)
by Fr. Arthur Tonne

|