Pro- Kerry Catholic Website Says Bush is the "Antichrist"

The Catholics for Kerry 04 website has been blasted by the Catholic League for referring to President George W. Bush as the Antichrist. Under the heading "President Bush?", the website says "Antichrist?" and links to comments by Wayne Madsden, who says, "George W. Bush's blood lust, his repeated commitment to Christian beliefs and his constant references to 'evil doers,' in the eyes of many devout Catholic leaders, bear all the hallmarks of the one warned about in the Book of Revelations-the anti-Christ."

Article.

I'm unclear if this is the site started by Ono Ekeh, a USCCB employee who was asked to resign AFTER he was exposed by Deal Hudson and others - it appears that there at least a couple of these "Catholics for Kerry" around...

Pope's Emissary Shuts Down Austrian Seminary

Cardinal Klaus Kueng said he regrets that the seminary had veered away from its mission of training young men to serve the Roman Catholic Church.

“I am closing the seminary right away,” he said.

This action certainly was fast!

Article here.

Church law governs parishes

Here is yet another letter to the editor which clarifies rather than confuses - a tactic used by so many today. Unfortunately, the ability of people to move beyond the 'straw men' and 'red herrings' to get to the facts is, many times, lacking. But that is not the case in this letter. Mr. Capellupo has done a great service for the Catholics in the Archdiocese by providing factual information about the St. Stanislaus issue which effectively destroys the falsehoods promoted as truth by some whose agenda has yet to be determined.

The Aug. 8 editorial regarding St. Stanislaus Kostka Catholic Church says that Archbishop Raymond L. Burke "has shown himself to be a strict constructionist when it comes to church law." Unfortunately, the editorial writer did not display a clear knowledge of church law regarding financial matters.

Each parish is required by church law to have a finance council of parishioners knowledgeable in financial matters to assist the pastor. Additionally, the archbishop is required to have a finance council for that archdiocese that he must consult before making major financial decisions. In decisions involving more than $3 million, he must obtain the consent of the finance council before he can act.

The St. Louis Archdiocesan Trust Fund, which holds the funds of all other parishes, is established as a trust that the archbishop cannot access for his use or that of others. The funds belong to the parishes that deposit them.

I am chair of the Archdiocesan Audit Committee and a member of the Archdiocesan Finance Council. Our council members predominantly are business people who meet regularly and who enjoy an excellent working relationship with Archbishop Burke.

The issues at St. Stanislaus are not about "punishing the most dedicated and loyal believers," as your editorial states. Rather, they are about conforming the parish to the model that works so well for all the other parishes of the archdiocese, so the pastor can exercise his pastoral ministry without hindrance or interference.

Recent actions of the Stanislaus parish board of directors have made that impossible.

John P. Capellupo
St. Louis

Source.

A Bishop Slams The Questionnaire

CRISIS Magazine - e-Letter
August 11, 2004
Dear Friend,

I'll keep it short today -- I just have a quick but important update to share with you.

You'll remember that two weeks ago, I told you about the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) sending their presidential questionnaire to the candidates for review. The questionnaire covered just about every topic under the sun, from
abortion to immigration to broadcast communication, asking the candidates to give a "support or oppose" response so that the bishops could determine which candidate was most in line with Catholic teaching.

It all sounded pretty straightforward. Unfortunately, the questionnaire made no moral distinction between any of the topics, burying critical life issues -- abortion, euthanasia, cloning, and fetal stem-cell research -- among scores of other issues that simply don't have the same moral weight and on which faithful Catholics are free to disagree.

Well, it looks like at least one bishop shares our concerns. Just yesterday, Bishop Rene Henry Gracida, the bishop emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas, published a statement wondering about the usefulness of a questionnaire that doesn't make a distinction between imperative life issues and debatable social policy issues.

Bishop Gracida makes some excellent points that I want to share with you, but rather than just quote bits and pieces of his statement, I thought I'd print the whole thing. (Don't worry, it's short.)

Believe me: You want to read this.

I only hope that his brother bishops -- and those in charge at the USCCB -- will make the same distinctions clear when the questionnaire is finally released to the public.

I'll talk to you again soon,
Deal
-----------------------------------------------------------

STATEMENT OF BISHOP RENE HENRY GRACIDA
ON THE 2004 PRESIDENTIAL QUESTIONNAIRE

I have had an opportunity to review a copy of the 2004 Presidential
Questionnaire submitted by the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops to President George Bush and Senator John Kerry. I am
disappointed that the Questionnaire is so broad and covers so many
issues that are before the American public today that its value in
helping to show the differences between the positions of the two
candidates on the really important issues will be minimal.

While certainly there could be and should be a "Catholic" position
on most, if not all, of the issues covered by the Questionnaire, from
the perspective of the Church's teaching some issues far outweigh
others in importance. For instance, there is no moral equivalence
between the issue of abortion-on-demand and farm subsidies. The
Questionnaire should have been much shorter and should have been
limited to questions on those issues on which there is a clear
unequivocal teaching of the Church, e.g., abortion, cloning, assisted
suicide, embryonic stem-cell research and marriage.

There is no clear unequivocal position of the Church on such issues
as the minimum wage, immigration, farm subsidies, etc. The inclusion
of questions in the Questionnaire can only result in confusion in the
minds of Catholic voters who do not understand that there is no moral
equivalence between these two groups of issues. I can only hope that
both presidential candidates will refuse to reply to the
Questionnaire, or, if they do reply, that the leadership of the
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops will recognize the
danger to Catholic voters and will publish those replies with a clear
teaching on the greater importance which should be attached to the
replies to the first group of questions I have listed above that have
far greater moral implications for the Nation.

+Rene Henry Gracida
Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi
10 August 2004

In addition to innundating the USCCB with letters of protest about its ambivalence in the questionaire, we should also flood heaven with prayers asking God to help them and to help us.

Bishop urges parishes to hire lawyers as diocese bankrutpcy looms

Bishop Gerald Kicanas suggested yesterday each southern Arizona parish hire a lawyer to protect its interests in case he decides the Tucson Diocese must file bankruptcy.

Article here.

St. Louis' Catholic schoolteachers are ready to rap some knuckles

Instead of rapping Archbishop Raymond Burke on the knuckles, Catholic elementary school teachers are socking him in the wallet. The union that represents the Archdiocese of St. Louis' 125 parish elementary school teachers is asking area labor unions to withhold donations of money and volunteers to the church until Burke agrees to negotiate with the Association of Catholic Elementary Educators (ACEE), Local 1312.

While ACEE may have some legitimate concerns, it seems that the most important issue is one of salary - Catholics school teachers don't make as much as they could if they were working in public schools. One has to wonder then, why do those people staty, if they could earn more money elsewhere? Most people that I know who have an urge to pursue the best paying jobs will do so, provided they possess the qualifications to land the higher paying job. There are also some who are not concerned with making the most money, but are contented with other aspects of a job. It seems disingenuous for some of these teachers to complain about the arrangement the archdiocese has made especially since the teachers claim to be able to make more money elsewhere.

I understand this is old news as I have indicated that ACEE is a group supported by Catholic Action Network. Here I think is the real crux of the issue:

"Aside from the fact that we're women and we're asking them to be equals with us," she says, "we are also asking them to be accountable -- and they do believe they are above accountability."

Article is here.

Women wed Jesus in ancient rite

I, too, was surprised at the headine, but I recognized Carol Lankford's name once I started reading the article.

Like many women, Carol Lankford fell in love with someone she had previously thought of as a good friend. When she finally received a proposal, Lankford set a date, bought a white dress and invited friends and family to a ceremony and reception.

But on July 10, 1996, those witnessing the ceremony at St. Brendan's church in Mexico, Mo., could see only the bride, because Lankford's bridegroom was Jesus.

These are the lead paragraphs in an article in the Post-Dispatch discussing "consecrated virgins". For those who may be unaware, Archbishop Burke is the official representative of the USCCB assigned to oversee the vocations here in the U.S. This is a decent article and well worth the read. Archbishop Burke provides some thoughts on the vocation and Carol Lankford and others provide insights to their calling.

Article here.

Latin Mass on EWTN on October 6, 9 & 10, 2004

Mark your calendars:

Latin Mass on EWTN on October 6, 9 & 10, 2004
EWTN Highlights (newsletter) | October 2004

Gate of Heaven: the Solemn Consecration of St. Mary's Roman Catholic Oratory of the Immaculate Conception

On May 31, 2003, this solemn Consecration was performed by the Most Rev. Bishop of Lacrosse, Raymond L. Burke. Witness the entire beautiful ceremony--the purification and dedication of the Church, translocation of the relics, consecration of the Church, and celebration of the first pontifical high Mass, using the traditional Latin rite of the Liturgy. Airs on EWTN October 6 at 10PM, October 9 at 1 PM, October 10 at 10 AM.

See the booklet of the consecration here.

Catholic bishops' survey criticized as partisan

Here's yet another article regarding the survey of the USCCB. I would really be interested to know who the people are that put the survey together and whether they are even Catholic, and if they are Catholic, are they faithful to the teachings of the Church?

Article here.

More Letters regarding St. Stanislaus

An Aug. 8 editorial about the standoff between Archbishop Raymond Burke and St. Stanislaus Kostka Church's lay board suggests that Burke is somehow punishing "the most dedicated and loyal believers" by his actions.

That is an astonishing conclusion. If the lay board members are truly dedicated and loyal, wouldn't their virtues also include obedience to their bishop?

I'm still waiting for an explanation from the lay board why St. Stanislaus is entitled to special treatment, while every other parish in the archdiocese obeys the bishop and conforms to modern church law. On this issue, dedication and loyalty seems to be found everywhere in the archdiocese except at St. Stanislaus Kostka.

Jim Russell
Florissant

I think answers to the questions that Jim asked would be welcome, if not revealing. I doubt, however, that anyone will respond.

More letters here.

Andrew Greeley has lost his mind

John Kerry's stance on abortion - he opposes it personally but would do nothing to roll back the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision that legalized it - has brought him under attack from some American bishops. That raises a question for many Catholics about what to do in November.
The answer is that Catholics can vote for Kerry. They don't have to, but it would not be a sin to do so...

Of course, one CAN vote for whomever...however, to state that it would not be a sin is clearly wrong and misleading - but should one expect anything less from Fr. Greeley?

...Catholics are not obliged to vote on one issue, no matter how important the issue might be. They may vote for Kerry "for other reasons" so long as they are not supporting him merely for his pro-choice stance.

Wrong again! One may not support a person such as Kerry by invoking "proportionate reasons" when no "proportionate reasons" exist. Kerry supports a non-existent "right" of women to murder their children and has stated that he will ensure that that "right" is not diminished. He has also called for an increase in the murder of children by his demands that embryonic stem cell research be advanced. By these two examples alone, he has disqualified himself as a viable candidate for whom a faithful Catholic may vote.

That ought to settle the matter. Catholics who have been confused by the insistence of a few bishops, some priests and some pro-life laity that they must vote against Kerry now know that they are free to make their choice balancing all issues - just as they always have been.

He accurately recognizes the sad state of affairs in the Church in America today in that only a FEW bishops, and SOME priests have the courage and fortitude to instruct the faithful on their duties to abide by moral principles when voting. And of course, Catholics have free will to vote for whom they wish - however, Catholics also have a responsibility to follow God's laws and to do His will. They are never free to choose that which is evil.

The theory of "indirect material cooperation" is traditional Catholic moral teaching. Apparently, the few bishops who threaten to exclude Catholics from Communion if they vote for Kerry don't know much traditional moral theology, which shows what the qualifications are for the bishopric these days.

Catholic theologian 'extraordinaire' Fr. Greeley, has cleared the matter based solely upon his interpretation of Cardinal Ratzinger's latest letter to the Bihsops. And yet, he is much wiser in the area of Catholic moral theology than those bishops who have spoken out in truth and justice so openly regarding those who publicly support the murder of innocent children. Fr Greeley has done a great disservice to Catholics and to non-Catholics alike by causing further confusion in his "teaching." It is well past time for Cardinal George to step in a reign in this wayward priest.

Article

Bishops' Presidential Questionnaire Object of Criticism

Dear Colleague,

Today we report on the presidential questionnaire just released to the
major party presidential candidates by the government relations staff of
the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. The document is not without
controversy.

Spread the word.

Yours sincerely,

Austin Ruse
President

Action item: For what might be a less confusing voter guide for Catholics,
go here: http://www.catholic.com/library/voters_guide.asp

CULTURE & COSMOS
August 10, 2004 Volume 2, Number 1

Bishops' Presidential Questionnaire Object of Criticism
A political questionnaire issued by the government relations staff of
the US Conference of Catholics Bishops and distributed to both major-party
presidential candidates has received criticism from prominent Catholics
who say most of the questions take the Democratic side of non-binding
policy issues such as immigration and gun control. Bill Ryan, spokesman
for the US Conference of Catholic Bishops acknowledged that Catholics are
not bound by many of the policies promoted in the questionnaire. "No. On
issues like that people can take different stances," he told Culture and
Cosmos.

The questionnaire contains 41 questions asking the candidates to answer
"support" or "oppose" to statements on issues as divergent as child-safety
gun locks and the redistribution of farm subsidies. A copy of the
questionnaire obtained by Culture & Cosmos reveals that the topic
receiving the most attention is immigration and refugees, which garnered
seven queries. Abortion and school choice were each given three questions.
Receiving two questions each are capital punishment, gun control,
agriculture and rural development, economic help for low income families,
housing, federal education programs, and marriage. Fourteen other topics
received one question each including health care, decreasing nuclear
weapons, cloning, physician assisted suicide, and embryonic stem cell
research.

Patrick F. Fagan, a research fellow on cultural and family issues at
the Heritage Foundation, says that many of the questions involve policies
over which Catholics may properly disagree, but that this official
questionnaire gives the impression that these are the only acceptable
Catholic positions. "On immigration, on housing, on welfare, there are
many ways to skin these cats. These are all very valid areas of real
differences on what is the prudent way to achieve the good." Fagan says
Catholic social teaching provides the principles, but that laymen are
permitted a wide berth in choosing between "practical applications."

What's more, many of the questions take what are traditionally
associated with policy positions of the Democratic Party. Robert Royal,
president of the Faith and Reason Institute, said that many of the
questions, such as those calling for more gun control and public funding
of health care, are written in such a way as to endorse the Democratic
Party approach. He says this gives the appearance of bias and therefore
undermines the usefulness of the questionnaire. Royal said, "Even if it is
not intended to be biased, it gives the impression of bias. Some Catholics
may just reject the whole thing out of hand."

Frank Monahan, director of the Office of Government Liaison at the
USCCB, told Culture and Cosmos that the questionnaire "reflects the
Bishops' public policy agenda."

What may be a less confusing and more useful voter guide has been
issued by the group Catholic Answers. Their guide leaves out prudential
issues, like gun control and the minimum wage, focusing instead on what
they call the "five non-negotiable issues" of abortion, euthanasia, fetal
stem cell research, human cloning, and homosexual marriage.

Copyright, 2004 --- Culture of Life Foundation.
Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required.

Culture of Life Foundation
1413 K Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington DC 20005
Phone: (202) 289-2500 Fax: (202) 289-2502
E-mail: clf@culture-of-life.org
Website: http://www.culture-of-life.org

Bishop Sheridan to meet all comers in marriage debate

Bishop Michael J. Sheridan's August column decrying same-sex unions did more than sound a warning note. After sketching the Catholic Chrch's teaching about marriage, the Colorado Springs prelate extended an open invitation to a series of in-depth explanations on the issue. The issue is certainly crucial to the bishop's vision of Church and society, as he refuses to delegate the sessions to co-workers. All are welcome to attend Bishop Sheridan's talks at four locations throughout the diocese over the course of the next three months.

More info.

U.S. Bishop Carlson: Faith Compels Catholics to Make Abortion Prime Vote Consideration

Released today is a statement by Bishop Robert J. Carlson of Sioux Falls, South Dakota which explains clearly the moral obligations of Catholics in voting for political candidates. The bishop refutes those who suggest that a politician's stand on abortion is only one consideration among many when deciding for whom to cast your vote.

"There is a faulty thinking today that all life issues are equal or the same. Even some priests and religious and a few politicians try to promote this," writes Bishop Carlson. He stresses that, "teaching of the church, which corresponds with reality and the natural law, is that all life issues are not equal or the same. In fact, there is one which is primary, life itself. It is so basic and foundational that if it is not upheld, all other issues and rights are meaningless. Opposition to abortion binds every Catholic under pain of mortal sin and admits of no exceptions."

Article here.

Kerry Renews Calls for Tax-Funded Embryonic Stem Cell Research

I heard Kerry's address on the radio on Saturday morning after having attended Mass and a catechetical lesson on the subject at the cathedral.

Over the weekend, Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry renewed his call for taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research that observers say hasn't been effective and doesn't hold the potential to cure the kinds of diseases some advocates believe.

What a juxtaposition - from being at the cathedral, immersed in the truth and stepping outside where the airwaves were permeated with the poisonous air of Kerry's lies and deceit. As distasteful as it may seem at times, we should pray for his conversion and the for the conversion of others like him.

Link.

Keyes Rips Obama's Views on Abortion

A day after jumping into the Illinois Senate race, two-time presidential hopeful Alan Keyes ripped into Democratic rival Barack Obama, saying his views on abortion are "the slaveholder's position."

The conservative former diplomat said Obama's vote against a bill that would have outlawed a form of late-term abortion denied unborn children of their equal rights.

Obama said he voted against the late-term abortion ban as a state senator because it contained no exception to protect the life of the mother.

For a man who is so educated, one would think he would understand that there is never any medical reason to kill the baby to protect the life of the mother. But then, the facts are irrelevant when one is opposed to life.

Article.

"New guy" Burke tackles sticky issues in fight over church

FEW ISSUES AROUSE passion like politics, religion and ethnic heritage.

That's why the controversy surrounding the Archdiocese of St. Louis and a local church is a no-win situation.

Bernard Huger, legal counsel for the archdiocese, told me all Catholic churches will eventually be brought under a unified corporate structure. Funds from each church will be placed in a charitable trust earmarked for individual churches. The archdiocese will appoint the board, and committees made up of parishioners will oversee church operations.

Article here.

Update on ICD's "Mini-Mission with Brendan Case"

*** UPDATED ***

This post has been temporarily moved to review it to determine if anything previously written is in error. However, if anything is determined to be false or in error, it will be corrected with appropriate apologies.

I apologize for any inconvenience.

*** Updated again ***

Emails are being exchanged in which we are discussing the issues and concerns. I notice several accesses to this page, but as I said above, I believe that our dialogue will clear up any misunderstandings.

As I mentioned to Brendan recently, "I have no doubt that you are a faithful and loyal Catholic. This is quite obvious by your strong advocacy of praying before and promoting devotion to the Blessed Sacrament!"

U.S.Rep David Obey accuses Archbishop Burke of political coercion

U.S. Rep. David Obey says he won’t let Roman Catholic Archbishop Raymond Burke "coerce" him into imposing the church’s abortion philosophies on all of America.

In his first detailed public response to Burke, Obey writes an article titled "My Conscience, My Vote" in the Aug. 16-23 issue of America, a widely read weekly Jesuit magazine. Burke is now archbishop of St. Louis; he was formerly the bishop of the La Crosse, Wis., diocese.

"In my view, Bishop Burke attempted to use his interpretations of theology to coerce me into taking specific positions on matters that I believe are matters of constitutional law," writes Obey, D-Wis. "The difference between us is that I am not trying to force him to agree with my judgments, but he is attempting to force me to agree with his. That in conscience I cannot do."

One must wonder if 'America' purposely sought or 'coerced' David Obey to write an article slamming Archbishop Burke or not...Being somewhat skeptical, I suspect that it (America), rather than using its pages to teach the fullness of the faith, seeks to balance that which is right with opposing opinions, thereby resulting in confusion in the minds of Catholics.

It is shameful that America gives a voice to those who propose to justify stances on the abortion issue that are opposed to the teachings of the Church.

Article here.

Alan Keyes: "[T]he victory is for God."

Keyes Steps Into Illinois Senate Race

Alan Keyes, a two-time presidential candidate who lives in Maryland, announced Sunday that he would accept the Illinois Republican Party's nomination and run for the U.S. Senate.


With less than three months before the election, Keyes acknowledged it would be difficult to beat Barack Obama, 43, the state senator whose speech at the Democratic National Convention in Boston gained him national prominence. This is the first U.S. Senate race in history where both candidates from the two major parties are African American, assuring that the Senate will seat its fifth black member ever.


"We do face an uphill battle, there's no doubt," said Keyes, 54, who promotes a Christian philosophy. He accepted the nomination Sunday at a rally in this Chicago suburb.

Article here.

An article on Cardinal Ratzinger

In a 1995 interview, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Catholic Church's doctrinal czar, was asked to describe what Pope John Paul II meant when he said the third millennium would be a "springtime of the human spirit." Ratzinger sketched the pope's hopeful vision that, after two millenniums of division, the third millennium would be one of unity among peoples and religions, in which the entire human family would come together to build God's kingdom.

Then Ratzinger added dryly: "At the moment, I do not yet see it approaching."

Link.

Tug of war over church draws hundreds to prayer service

"We just want our tradition to be here."

"It is strictly, strictly, money and power," said Ben Krauze, 64, of St. Louis, a church member for more than 50 years. "It's religious extortion."

Quite a charge from Mr. Krauze...

"We're not backing down," Baras said. Burke "may be the shepherd, but that's not the way to run the flock."

"I know that we won't give up this church," [Grzegorz Koltuniak] said in an interview. "This is my heritage."

Article here.

Archbishop transfers Polish ministry

Here is today's article from the St. Louis Review about St. Stanislaus.

More Letters...

Archbishop has wrong priorities
The Aug. 4 article on the temporary closing of St. Stanislaus Catholic Church was one of the most disturbing pieces I've read recently.

I am dumbfounded that Archbishop Raymond Burke places greater emphasis on the financial protocols of the archdiocese than on the importance of people coming together to worship God.

Although I am not a parishioner of St. Stanislaus, I recognize the value of the church and the role it plays in our community.

First, it is one of the remaining sanctuaries in north St. Louis. Second, it binds those of Polish decent closely to their traditions and beliefs, yet welcomes those of other nationalities to worship as well.

Most important, the people of St. Stanislaus have worked together to sustain the church through the years for the sole purpose of having a place to worship together, which is a testament to what faith can accomplish.

I'm struggling to comprehend how focusing on financial procedures ties in with the mission of Jesus and the Catholic Church. I think Archbishop Burke needs to re-evaluate his priorities and remove the obstacles he is establishing to prevent people from worshipping.

Berta Simic
Kirkwood

A lack of one's comprehension of the issue does not indicate that the Archbishop is incorrect. Archbishop Burke fully addressed the issue here.

And then we have this:

Using religion
I am insulted at the statement in the Aug. 4 article about President Bush visiting the Knights of Columbus Convention in Dallas that John Kerry "does better with less-observant Catholics."

I am Catholic, and consider myself "observant." However, I support Kerry for president. The reasons are many and are not really important. I go to Mass every week, I say my prayers just as well as any other Catholic.

Just because I believe in the separation of church and state does not mean I am "less-observant." I also do not believe in the death penalty, a fact that Bush conveniently has forgotten, I guess.

I am sickened at Bush's latest attempt to use whatever it takes - in this case religion - to divide our country.

Tamara Whitman
Collinsville

And as a matter of fact, "I'm more Catholic than the Pope!" Poor woman. She apparently believes in whatever happens to be convenient and easy - Following Christ requires sacrifice. It's more than making a weekly Sunday appearance at church. It means following the way of the Cross with all the hardships and struggles that go with it. It means abiding in God's truth. It means accepting all of the truth - even that which we may find difficult.

'It is clear that the Catholic voter has to be opposed to procured abortion. Anybody who votes for a candidate who supports or favors procured abortion because the candidate favors procured abortion cooperates in evil." (Archbishop Burke)

Letters here.

Bishops' abortion decision sparks debate (poll)

Roman Catholics took sides Thursday, the day after three Southeastern bishops barred politicians who support abortion rights from receiving Holy Communion.

All that priests, politicians and parishioners have in common is passion for their position.

Article and an online Poll here.

POLL Results as of this morning.
Should Catholics allow abortion supporters to receive communion?
Yes 191 votes (51%)
No 182 votes (49%)

373 people have voted so far.

Archbishop Raymond L. Burke, the new ‘John Fisher’

Barbara Kralis conducted an interview recently with Archbishop Burke while he was on vacation and she asked six questions which he answered:

Question:  Dear Archbishop Burke, regarding Cardinal Ratzinger’s June 2004 memorandum, were the contents of the memo made known to you and the other bishops at the Denver meeting?

 

Archbishop Burke:  “It certainly was not made known to me and I do not believe it was given to the other bishops.  Cardinal McCarrick referred to the memorandum.  We were told that, according to Cardinal Ratzinger, the application of the Canon 915 was up to the prudent judgment of each bishop.  The text of the memorandum would have been very helpful at the meeting in Denver.  Knowing now about the memo, I am disappointed it was not given to us at the meeting of the Bishops’ Conference,” said Archbishop Burke.

 

Question:  The Bishops’ Denver Statement reads:

 

“Bishops can legitimately make different judgments on the most prudent course of pastoral action.” 

 

Does this mean that one Bishop can deny Senator John Kerry Holy Communion and another Bishop can give Kerry Communion and both Bishops are correct?

 

Archbishop Burke:  “No, in fact, Canon 915 must be applied.  It does not give an option.  Canon 915 says that those persons who obstinately persist in grave manifest sin must be denied the Eucharist.  I strongly believe that if a bishop has spoken to someone who obstinately persists in grave manifest sin and he still presents himself for Holy Communion, he should be refused.”

 

Question:  Cardinal McCarrick received a letter dated July 9, 2004, from Cardinal Ratzinger saying:

 

“The ‘Statement’ is very much in harmony with the memorandum’s general principles, ‘Worthiness to receive Holy Communion,’ sent as a fraternal service – to clarify the doctrine of the Church on this specific issue – in order to assist the American Bishops in their related discussion and determinations.” 

 

Is it your understanding that Cardinal Ratzinger agreed that some ‘ministers of Holy Communion’ should admit John Kerry and that some should not admit him?

 

Archbishop Burke:  “That is not my understanding.” [vi]

 

Question:  In the Denver Statement, the fifth paragraph reads: 

 

“Our obligation as bishops at this time is to teach clearly.” 

 

Can one bishop admit and another bishop not admit?  Is this teaching clearly?  Is it not a contradiction of Canon 915, for one bishop to refuse John Kerry the Eucharist in one diocese and for another bishop to give John Kerry the Eucharist in another diocese?

 

Archbishop Burke:  “Yes, it would be a source of confusion.  I have refused to talk about individual candidates, but when a ‘Catholic’ pro-abortion politician knows the actions he has taken are gravely sinful in a public matter like supporting abortion, the only way to uphold church teaching is to withhold Holy Communion.  It is not right for one ‘minister of Holy Communion’ to give the Eucharist and another not to.”

 

Question:  Is it your understanding that the ‘Task Force’s’ work is completed.  Cardinal Ratzinger’s July 9 letter assumed that the ‘Task Force’ has not decided yet.[vii]

 

Archbishop Burke:  “I understood from the meeting that the work of the ‘Task Force’ was not completed and we would be given another report at our November 2004 meeting.  I do not know if there will be another vote.  Normally there is a vote to accept and not to accept.”

 

Question:  What can you tell us now about the ‘Note Bene’ statement of Cardinal Ratzinger’s at the end of his June memorandum?  In it, he states that ‘proportionalism’ or voting for ‘the lesser of two evils’ is acceptable.  Do you think it is possible to end abortion by always voting for the lesser evil candidate?  How would this apply to Pope Paul VI who stated? 

 

“Though it is true that sometimes it is lawful to tolerate a lesser moral evil in order to avoid a greater evil or in order to promote a greater good," it is never lawful, even for the gravest reasons, to do evil that good may come of it [viii]—in other words, to intend directly something which of its very nature contradicts the moral order, and which must therefore be judged unworthy of man, even though the intention is to protect or promote the welfare of an individual, of a family or of society in general.” [ix]

 

Archbishop Burke:  “It is clear that the Catholic voter has to be opposed to procured abortion.  Anybody who votes for a candidate who supports or favors procured abortion because the candidate favors procured abortion cooperates in evil.[x]

 

“A host of considerations enter in the decision to vote for a particular candidate.  The voter must be opposed to procured abortion and do everything as a voter to decrease the evil of abortion and eliminate it.

 

“If the Catholic voter votes for a candidate who is in favor of procured abortion, while the voter is clearly opposed to it, there must be some serious reason to justify such a vote.

 

“As Cardinal Ratzinger said, in his June memorandum, such a vote is ‘remote material cooperation,’ which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons. 

 

His position is not proportionalism, for the voter remains steadfastly opposed to procured abortion and works to eliminate abortion in society and its protection by the law.”

 

Question:  Thank you very much for granting this interview.

 

Archbishop Burke:  You are welcome, and please pray for me.

Complete article here.

St. Stanislaus Update

Members of the St. Stanislaus church in North St. Louis say they will not go without a fight. A meeting is scheduled Thursday night for members to decide how to respond to this week's temporary shutdown. That meeting is at the Polish Heritage Center at the church.

Organizers tell FOX 2 News it will be between the board of directors at St. Stanislaus and the congregation. The main topic of discussion will be what to do this Sunday.

The Archdiocese on Tuesday removed the two priests at the church effectively shutting down the church temporarily. The move after an ongoing controversy between St. Stanislaus and the Archdiocese over how the parish is run including financial control.

The boiling point apparently came after the board of directors ordered the Archdiocesan priest to turn over anything related to the church's finances to them--from priests (sic) stipends to parish electrical bills.

The church has always operated independent of the Archdiocese. Archbishop Raymond Burke says that can't continue. The Archdiocese has arranged for [M]ass to be held in [P]olish this Sunday at St. John the Apostle and Evangelist downtown for the congregation. St. Stanislaus has controlled its own finances since 1891.

Just a reminder that the traditional Sunday mass in polish is no longer being held at St. Stanislaus. It's been moved to St. John the Apostle and Evangelist downtown. St. Stanislaus church members will still meet at their church Sunday morning for a prayer service and support meeting at 10:00am.

Source Fox2KTVI.

On the report this evening, there was talk by some in the congregation to leave the Catholic Church. There was also some discussion of trying to get a couple of Franciscan priests from Poland to come here. Please pray for Archbishop Burke and the people of St. Stanislaus so that God may allow reason to prevail and that the church may be fully incorporated into the archdiocese.

Judge Legalizes Same-Sex "Marriage" for Washington State

This is precisely one of the primary reasons that Missouri voters were given the chance to vote on a constitutional amendment - to prevent judicial activists from usurping the rights of the people of the state.

A Seattle judge ruled Wednesday that denying same-sex couples the right to marriage defies the constitution.

The decision by King County Superior Court Judge William Downing will be stayed until the Washington State Supreme Court studies the ruling. No marriage licences will be issued until the Supreme Court review.

Washington state's current official definition of marriage is the union of a man and woman.

But we were told by the homosexual lobby that we didn't need a constitutional amendment as Missouri Law specified the same thing. The smokescreen didn't work here, praise God!

Article.

Various Letters regarding the Amendment to protect marriage...

...which many are calling the "Gay" marriage ban. Merely because the constitutional amendment affirms the natural law in that marriage is a union of a man and a woman, some see the word 'ban' where it does not exist. Some claim that their 'rights' are being denied - rights which appear to include the crime of sodomy.

Here are some excerpts from the letters:

How embarrassing that Missouri put bigotry into our state constitution.

As a new Missourian, I am disappointed in the passage of the same-gender marriage ban.

I mean if we're going to legislate morality, let's just do the whole thing. No divorce, criminalize adultery, ban drinking, ban swearing or working on Sundays.

For the first time in my life, I am ashamed to be have been born and raised in this state.

Read them here. The letters are decent examples of one's inability to reason or think in a rational manner.

Church plans to meet on Burke's action

Members of St. Stanislaus Kostka Catholic Church plan to meet at 7 p.m. today to discuss Archbishop Raymond Burke's removal of its two priests in the continuing dispute over operations of the parish.

Spokesmen for the parish's lay board of directors said Wednesday that it will hold a prayer service at 10 a.m. Sunday at the church, at 1413 North 20th Street, just northwest of downtown. Because Burke removed both priests, the parish cannot celebrate Mass.

Burke sent a letter to parishioners on Tuesday informing them that the Rev. Philip J. Bene, the pastor, and the Rev. Adam Hurbanczuk will reside at St. John the Apostle and Evangelist downtown until St. Stanislaus' board "conforms to church law." Burke did so after the parish board told Bene that it had "reclaimed its authority" over parish funds.

Burke contends that St. Stanislaus' structure as a nonprofit group run by a lay board is contrary to church law. The board and some parishioners have resisted Burke's instructions to reform in a standard parish structure, saying they operated with the Catholic church's approval since 1891.

Roger Krasnicki, parish board spokesman, said the board plans to appeal Burke's instructions and is considering legal action.

The canonical structure has always been a problem but some would think that if a problem is ignored, it will disappear. News reports have indicated that the board is to retain a lawyer to fight the Archdiocese over this.

Archbishop Burke explained the entire situation in an article in the St. Louis Review some time ago in which the concerns the board keeps bringing up were addressed by him - but that seems to mean nothing for some who are more concerned with 'control' rather than obedience.

Source.

Reactions to Bishops' statement

"I am Catholic, but I am also a Democrat, so . . . it puts me in a tough position," said Georgia state Rep. Pedro Marin (D-Duluth). "I have to be pro-choice because that's the Democratic position."

Why doesn't he just say, "Because the devil made me do it." This is an excuse a child would use, not an adult. And this is to say nothing about the fact that his party loyalty is more important than his fidelity to Christ.

Marin said he was not sure whether he would continue to try to take Communion. "I will have to see if the Catholic religion still fills me up, spiritually," he said.

Again, it's all about "ME"...too many have forgotten why they even attend Mass.
Source.

And here's another:

National pro-choice Catholic groups called the Southern bishops' statement shocking because it goes beyond denying Communion. They found especially troublesome the requirement that politicians must publicly disavow abortion and get a bishop's permission to resume taking Communion.

"This is pretty draconian," said Frances Kissling, president of the Washington-based Catholics For a Free Choice.

"It certainly does not seem to be a mainstream strategy. The overwhelming majority of Catholic people do not believe it is appropriate for a bishop to use Communion as a political sledgehammer to gain obedience."

I don't understand why this woman is not formally and publicly excommunicated as an apostate of the faith.

This article here.

Worthy to Receive the Lamb: Catholics in Political Life and the Reception of Holy Communion

The full text of the letter from Archbishop Donoghue, Bishop Baker and Bishop Jugis can be viewed here at the Archdiocese of Atlanta web site.

Bishop Sheridan bishop urges protection of marriage

Marriage was created by God and must not be used to promote a "homosexual political agenda," Colorado Springs Bishop Michael Sheridan writes in the August issue of the diocesan newspaper.

What's more, civil authorities "should consider it a sacred duty" to acknowledge man-woman marriage and protect it against the movement to legalize same-sex unions, Sheridan writes in his monthly column, which appears today in The Catholic Herald.

Article here.

Institute of Christ the King to St. Louis?

I have been hearing more and more rumors that the Institute of Christ the King, Sovereign Priest is coming to St. Louis. I have also heard that the Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem are coming here.

Hopefully, this will be confirmed soon...I will pass along any confirmed information as soon as I receive it.

Some "Catholics" opposed to Amendment 2

In reviewing the "Constitiution Defense League" web site and looking over the names of the "Faith Community Opposed to Amendment 2", the constitutional amendment to preserve marriage as an institution reserved to a man and a woman, I was more than a bit surprised to see the names of some Catholics on the list, particularly after the Missouri Bishops had, in recent weeks, expressed their concerns about upholding the sanctity of marriage.

Some of the more obvious names I saw were:

Rev. Gerald J. Kleba
(Pastor of St. Cronan's Catholic Church, St. Louis, a past Senior Associate Pastor at my parish)

Sister Barbara Ann Barbato
Sisters of Loretto

Claire McCaskill
State Auditor

Mayor Francis Slay
St. Louis, MO

Source

Have a look and see who I missed.

More Absurdities from the Sound Off Column

Church and voting

If the Catholic Church can tell its members not to vote for those politicians who support pro-choice, mainly Democrats, then it should also tell its members not to vote for those who support the concealed gun laws, mainly Republicans. Actually, the Catholic Church has no right at all to tell anyone how to vote.

Link

The individual fails to distinquish anything which is intrinsically evil about guns or about carrying a concealed gun. But then, there is confusion in the individual's assertion about "how to vote". Even the polling place workers instruct new voters "how to vote". The Church informs the faithful how to apply Catholic moral teaching in voting - not for whom to vote.

It's unfortunate that so many people do not follow through to the logical conclusions in their thinking - if they did, perhaps, they might be less prone to speak out.

Detroit parish to celebrate Tridentine Mass

Detroit Cardinal Adam Maida is reaching back 40 years to revive a traditional form of the Latin mass, and he's hoping its unusual appeal will help save one of Detroit's most famous Catholic churches, St. Josaphat.

Starting Oct. 3, Sunday morning worship will jump back to an earlier era in this church whose soaring steeple is framed against the Renaissance Center from the perspective of thousands of commuters each day on southbound I-75 at Canfield.

How long have some people waited?

"When the pope authorized bishops to allow this mass in 1984, the idea was that this was a pastoral response to older people who still are so attached to this older mass that they need it," Rev. Thomas Reese, editor of America Magazine, said Monday. "The idea was never to create a new desire in people for this mass."

Hmmm....His version of Ecclesia Dei must have been a different than the one I read. I'm certain that some in Detroit are truly thankful. Perhaps this will be an impetus of things to come?

Article here

Three more Bishops forbid Holy Communion to politicians supporting abortion

Because of the influence that Catholics in public life have on the conduct of our daily lives and on the formation of our nation's future, we declare that Catholics serving in public life espousing positions contrary to the teaching of the Church on the sanctity and inviolability of human life, especially those running for or elected to public office are not to be admitted to Holy Communion in any Catholic church within our jurisdictions: the Archdiocese of Atlanta, the Dioceses of Charleston and Charlotte. Only after reconciliation with the Church has occurred, with the knowledge and consent of the local bishop, and public disavowal of former support for procured abortion, will the individual be permitted to approach the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist.

We undertake this action to safeguard the sacred dignity of the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar, to reassure the faithful, and to save sinners.

Most Reverend John F. Donoghue
Archbishop of Atlanta

Most Reverend Robert J. Baker
Bishop of Charleston

Most Reverend Peter J. Jugis
Bishop of Charlotte

Article here.

Missouri voters protect Marriage

Missouri voters gave resounding approval to an amendment to the state constitution banning gay marriage, putting the nation on notice that similar proposed bans in other states could be difficult to defeat.

The Missouri Constitution will now state that ``to be valid and recognized in this state a marriage shall exist only between a man and a woman.''

Article

Archbishop Burke removes St. Stanislaus priests

Archbishop Raymond Burke said he had temporarily removed two priests from St. Stanislaus Kostka Catholic Church in a letter to parishioners today...

In his letter, Burke said previously scheduled weddings and funeral Masses will be allowed to continue at St. Stanislaus, but that no priest may celebrate Mass in the church without his consent. He said he will not assign another priest to the parish until the board "conforms to Church discipline."

Link here.

There is a copy of the letter floating around somewhere - maybe one of the media outlets will post it later.

St Stanislaus Kostka Catholic Church temporarily shut down

From Fox 2 KTVI Television:

There is a startling development in the battle over a historic St. Louis Polish Catholic Church. Archbishop Raymond Burke has in effect temporarily shut down St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish, moving it's priests to another church.

In a letter to parishioners on Tuesday, the Archbishop says the move is in response to recent actions by the St. Stanislaus board. Unlike other parishes, that board owns the church and runs its finances independently of the Archdiocese. [Archbishop] Burke says the board's recent demand that the parish priests immediately turn over any and all financial matters from priest stipends to electrical bills is an affront to the Archdiocese and "common decency".

So the priests and the Catholic [M]asses are moving. The Archdiocese will continue its parish ministries at St. John the Apostle and Evangelist Church downtown beginning this Sunday. [Archbishop] Burke is out of town attending religious conferences through Thursday.

They had to know this was coming. Archbishop Burke is committed to bringing all parishes into conformity with canonical regulations. It is unfortunate that the board of St. Stanislaus has rejected attempts to regularize the parish within the archdiocese.

This issue has been in and out of the news for at least the last five months. Certainly if nothing was done, it might have continued for many more years. It is an issue which should have resolved many years ago, but like so many other 'hard decisions', it appears to have been left to someone who had the courage to do what is required of him.

Illinois Usurps Rights of Parents

Dom Bettinelli had posted an article on "More Nanny Government".
This intrusion into the legitimate rights of parents is, frankly, orwellian.

This past spring, the Illinois General Assembly passed a new bill requiring compulsory mental health screening for children and pregnant women; it was signed into law by Governor Blagojevich. This program will require all pregnant women and children through the age of 18 be tested for mental health needs.

Source.

Something is wrong with the government bureaucracy there, or with the people of the state, or both.

Join a Prayer List for Archbishop Burke

I received this email this morning and I am passing it on for those who may be interested in offering prayers for Archbishop Burke.

We are forming a perpetual prayer list of people who are willing to dedicate one day each month for Archbishop Burke. The idea is to create an entire day of prayer specifically for His Excellency, offered through Our Lady of Guadalupe. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (if possible), our work, sufferings, joys, and prayers would be offered on a scheduled date, once each month, especially for Archbishop Burke.

If you are interested in helping us surround His Excellency with continuous prayers, GREAT! Please e-mail Mary Kroening at olfhvp@gdinet.com (If e-mail is not an option, please feel free to call Mary at home at ***.) If you would like to request a particular date each month, please let us know. Otherwise, we will contact you and let you know which date has been arranged for you.

His Excellency will be given a list of each day of the month with the name(s) of the person(s) praying for him.

Please forward this e-mail to anyone who might be interested. Our goal is to begin our monthly schedule on September 1, 2004.

Thank you for considering this important effort and may God bless you as we rally behind A TRUE SHEPHERD.

Mary Kroening

Marian Catechist Apostolate
La Crosse, Wisconsin
Phone: 608-782-0011
Website: www.MarianCatechist.com

*** I removed the phone number above but it is available on request.

Please consider joining in this act of charity for Archbishop Burke.

Vatican's Call for Broad Roles for Women Labeled 'Anti-Feminist' by Media

The media has an anti-Catholic tendency, but then you know that. The Vatican recently issued a very profound and positive letter on women and men in society. The media portrayed the document as an attack on "feminism," though that word is never used in the document. What the document focuses on is the inherent genius of women, and how men and women compliment each other in all aspects of their lives.

Spread the word.
Yours sincerely,
Austin Ruse
President

======================================
A letter published last week by the Vatican celebrates what Pope John Paul II calls the feminine genius and calls for women to have access to positions of national leadership. But the document received a largely negative reception in the mainstream press where it was characterized as "slamming feminism."

"Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Men and Women in the Church and in the World" was issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and made public on Saturday. As its title indicates, the letter's thrust is that women and men have complementary roles to play in the Church and in society. The letter warns against a tendency in "new approaches to women's issues" that make women and men adversaries in a struggle for power.

The document is critical of the idea, gaining traction in academic and public policy circles, that there are no differences in nature between the sexes and that apparent gender differences are the result of social conditioning. "According to this perspective, human nature in itself does not possess characteristics in an absolute manner: all persons can and ought to constitute themselves as they like, since they are free from every predetermination linked to their essential constitution."

The 7,000-word letter says that man and woman were created with differences that are complimentary and that both family and society benefit from feminine "values." Chief among such feminine values is what the document calls the "capacity for the other" which it defines as the ability to "elicit life, and contribute to the growth and protection of the other." While this feminine attribute is closely linked to a woman's ability to bear children, the letter stresses that "this does not mean that women should be considered from the sole perspective of physical procreation." The close link between motherhood and female identity does not require that a woman give physical birth, according to the document.

Women have a special role to play in the life of the family, the letter says, but her sphere of influence ought not to be limited to that role. "[W]omen should be present in the world of work and in the organization of society, and . . . women should have access to positions of responsibility which allow them to inspire the policies of nations and to promote innovative solutions to economic and social problems." The letter calls on society to not discriminate against those women who want to work exclusively in the home and to make it possible for those women "who wish also to engage in other work . . . to do so with an appropriate work-schedule, and not have to choose between relinquishing their family life or enduring continual stress."

Despite its calls for women to be treated equally, headlines from both the national and international press claimed the letter condemned feminism and this despite the fact that the word "feminism" never appears in the text of the document. Many reports, including the Washington Post's, claimed that document accused feminism of undermining the traditional family and paving the way for homosexual "marriage." In reality it is the blurring of the differences between the sexes that the letter said was having this affect. "This theory of the human person, intended to promote prospects for equality of women through liberation from biological determinism" calls into question "the family, in its natural two-parent structure" and makes "homosexuality and heterosexuality virtually equivalent . . ."

Copyright, 2004 --- Culture of Life Foundation.
Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required.

Culture of Life Foundation
1413 K Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington DC 20005
Phone: (202) 289-2500 Fax: (202) 289-2502
E-mail: clf@culture-of-life.org Website: http://www.culture-of-life.org

Why Communion Won't Be Withheld

Dr. Jeffrey A. Mirus, Founder and President of Catholic Culture, has posted an interesting and timely article here.

In this week's Highlights article, Dr. Mirus discusses the reasons why pro-abortion politicians won't be refused communion in the United States.
This riveting article shows why communion should be withheld, but also why the prevailing culture won't permit it to happen.

I happen to believe that he is tight on target in his analysis - here are some excerpted highlights:

Although I am in favor of denying Communion to pro-abortion politicians, I am sadly convinced this issue's day has not yet come. Considerations of culture, spiritual discernment, prudence, fidelity, feasibility, jurisdiction, law and courage all enter the discussion. Let’s take a look at a few of the difficulties.

Reluctance to Discipline
Consider how much this reluctance to discipline is reflected in the life of the Church. The 1983 revision of the Code of Canon Law dramatically reduced the number of disciplinary canons and, according to a recent report from the St. Joseph Foundation, the Roman Rota decided just three penal cases over the fifteen-year period following the revision. The Foundation’s analysis suggests that the Church is “overdosing on the medicine of mercy”.

A Worldview at Stake
None of this is surprising. Modern Western culture is characterized by both a reflexive distrust of authority and a reflexive insistence that religious authority is irrelevant to affairs outside Church walls—so irrelevant, in fact, that most people would be astonished to see an ecclesiastical leader even attempt to exercise authority beyond the corporate structure of the Church.

The Match and the Fuse
These aren’t arguments; they are cultural facts. You may say that all it takes is sufficient courage to strike the match and light the fuse, and you may be right. But now we come across another cultural fact. The kind of men who are made bishops, for better or worse, are not generally dogmatic isolationists.

Canon Law and Ratzinger
Still, if you want greater discipline, you are in very good company. Canon Law, despite the fact that its remaining disciplinary provisions have been unused for nearly a generation, is on your side. Canon 915 still provides that persons who “obstinately persist in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.”

Authority and Escape
One might well have wished for a stronger statement [from the USCCB], but we do well to remember that USCCB statements are themselves problematic. The Conference of Catholic Bishops has no magisterial authority.

Alternatives?
If the bishops were to decide unanimously to withhold Communion from pro-abortion politicians, one is still left to wonder whether the decree could be enforced among the lesser clergy. Refer to the discussion of reluctance to discipline, above. There are so many leaks in this boat that we are left begging for alternatives.

In the long run, it is also extremely important for all bishops and even the Holy See to clarify Catholic social teaching. Cardinal Ratzinger’s distinctions concerning abortion and euthanasia on the one hand, and capital punishment and war on the other, need to become the centerpiece of effective social catechesis. It must become increasingly impossible to make the argument that if I oppose capital punishment and favor abortion I am just as Catholic (and just as pro-life) as someone who opposes abortion and favors capital punishment—or any other argument of this kind. Sorry, but having a particular position on health insurance isn’t enough.

Alone Again, Naturally
Of course, since not all bishops accept Cardinal Ratzinger’s distinctions about what constitutes certain Catholic teaching (as no few have shown by repeated comments on capital punishment, war and even this particular issue), it is clear that we won’t have a chorus of statements “singling out” pro-abortion politicians. All we have gained this year, then, is a slight raising of consciousness.

Incredible as it may seem, the time is still not ripe. Therefore, Catholic Americans will have to fight the battle for the Presidency without significant moral support from their bishops.

Again.

The bottom line is that most Catholics can expect little leadership from their bishops. Some of us are more fortunate than others in being so blessed to have Archbishop Burke as our shepherd. Because he will teach the truth amid cries of rebellion and dissent, he will need our prayers and support as will other bishops and priests who stand firm for the truth.

Full Article here.

Overdosing on the Medicine of Mercy

In a remarkable article published last spring, James Hitchcock argued that an unrealistic spirit of “compulsory optimism” has pervaded the Church since the Second Vatican Council and that the effects of this compulsory optimism have been to cause the faithful to ignore the devastating internal crisis afflicting the Church and to disable the hierarchy from taking any action effectively to address that crisis or the scandals associated with it [“The End of Gaudium et Spes?” Cath. World Rpt. (May 2003)]. The debilitating spirit of optimism identified by Hitchcock has been at least as present in canon law as in any other aspect of the Church’s life. The most striking example of this phenomenon in the legal realm has been the near abandonment of the Church’s penal or criminal law in the decades since Vatican II. The post-conciliar decline in penal law is not only a symptom of the problem described by Hitchcock, but it is also a major cause of a host of other problems, especially the sexual abuse crisis in America.

The post-conciliar aversion to the use of penal processes has become almost an aversion to correction itself, regardless of the form...This aversion to correction extends even to actions in other contexts that only resemble penal action. Thus, when Archbishop Raymond Burke notified unrepentant pro-abortion politicians that they would be denied communion, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and Cardinal Roger Mahony criticized his action. McCarrick referred to Burke’s action as a “sanction” and Mahony stated that such a step was improper unless the politicians had been found guilty of a crime. However, the cardinals were wrong to assume that Burke’s action was a penal sanction or that it had anything at all to do with penal law.

Rather, as Archbishop Burke already had explained, the question is one of sacramental discipline. The law of the Church states that persons who “obstinately persist in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion” (can. 915). Note that the canon states not that such persons may be denied communion, but rather that they are not to be admitted. Despite the obligatory nature of this canon, however, few bishops have attempted to correct the proabortion Catholic politicians in their dioceses or even have spoken out against the phenomenon of public promoters of abortion continuing to receive communion in Catholic churches week after week and year after year.

Complete Article here.

Getting Married in St. Peter's

A wonderful story about a St. Louis couple.

Most St. Louisans are familiar with traditional Catholic weddings. After all, the Gateway City is known for its rich Catholic heritage. But for Brian Roy and Sara Spalding, who met during confirmation class years ago, it couldn't get much more Catholic than getting married in the Vatican — and having their marriage blessed by Pope John Paul II himself.

Brian and Sara, both 31, got the idea to get married in the holy city when Brian's good friend, the Rev. Gene Morris, a priest, was sent by the archbishop of St. Louis to Rome to get his license in sacramental theology.

Article here.

Ashcroft Appeals Calif. Judge's Abortion Ruling

The U.S. Justice Department on Monday will appeal a San Francisco federal judge's ruling that a 2003 law banning late-term abortions was unconstitutionally broad, court documents show.
Justice department attorneys filed a notice of appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal, challenging the June 1 ruling by U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton.

Hamilton sided with plaintiff Planned Parenthood in barring U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft from enforcing the ban on late-term abortions at Planned Parenthood's 900 U.S. clinics.

We should pray that God will enlighten the minds of those judges who will decide not only this case, but the future lives of those who would be most affected by their rulings.

Article.

Voting Today in Missouri

The headline reads: Missouri to Vote on Gay Marriage Ban when it should actually state: Missouri to Vote to Define Marriage.

The issue is not to ban homosexual 'marriage' as such a thing does not exist. The issue is to preserve Missouri's definition of marriage as the union between a man and a woman - and to do so via a Constitutional Amendment to prevent errant judges from overturning Missouri law.

Article here.

Mesa AZ Vice-Mayor Upset with Courageous Bishops

We have yet another disturbing story about an apparent crackdown by some Catholic bishops on lay Catholic activities.

Will we be next?

I studied theology as part of my courses at St. Louis University. The Jesuits there taught me to have an inquiring mind on religious issues. I have my own thoughts and opinions. Does this mean I am unworthy to continue my lay ministry as a lector?

I thought I was safe from the new inquisition when I retired as an elected official in June and that I could receive Communion without fear of cross-examination.

Well...now we see his problem. The always faithful Jesuits taught him how to have a dissident mind. How refreshing! But that's not all.

I thought loyalty oaths went out with the fall of the Berlin wall.

What does our new bishop think about Bishop Vasa's ultimatum? I'm really not sure I want to know given the tenor of so many of his recent pronouncements that have so profoundly disturbed many longtime Arizona Catholics.

Stay tuned.

I believe God would like us to be loyal and He wants us to be resolute in our affirmation of Him and His revealed truth.

And, of course, being a Jesuit trained, professed Catholic politician, he has no problem twisting the facts by claiming that Bishop Vasa's "Affirmation of Faith" is an ultimatum. I suspect he has read "about" it but has not read it. Maybe Mr Kavanaugh should discuss his "problems" with Bishop Olmsted before airing his opinions in the media, especially since Bishop Olmsted has 'disturbed so many longtime Arizona Catholics?

Link.

Kerry's Sister Angers Abortion Foes

A Catholic antiabortion group sharply questioned the propriety of John F. Kerry's sister, Peggy Kerry, giving a speech to "a campaign crowd of feminists" in Boston and telling them that, if elected, her brother would overturn various Bush policies -- such as barring funds for U.N. population control efforts.

Everyone is aware that Kerry will spread the crime of abortion everywhere he possibly can - even though he's 'personally opposed' to it.

Not surprising that she'd be campaigning for her brother, the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute noted, but she "works for George W. Bush" as part of the U.S. mission to the United Nations.

Traitors are everywhere - we must expect it if we are to follow in Christ's footsteps. Even He was surrounded by those who would betray him.

Article

"I'm Christian. I'm Catholic. It's important to me."

Who said these words? St Augustine? St Thomas More? G.K. Chesterton? Here are some more clues:

"Praise the Lord. Praise him in his sanctuary. Praise him in his mighty heaven. So it is written in the psalms."

"We look around us in this country, and we see God's work yet to be done." That is what is bringing us here." "Faith without works is dead."

There's the clue - "Faith without works..." St. James?

"It's time to stop talking about valuing families, and value families," he said. "You don't value families when you cut kids from after-school programs and you cut cops so that Enron can get another tax cut."

These are quotes of remarks at the nondenominational Greater Grace Temple Church in Springfield, Ohio and at an afternoon rally in Bowling Green yesterday. These are quotes from the lips of John Kerry.

One cannot possibly claim to be pro-family and support direct abortion, euthnasia, same-sex 'unions', or fetal stem cell research - and do so truthfully. One who claims as much is either totally ignorant of right and wrong or that person is a liar.

Yes, we see "God's work yet to be done" and some of us tremble at the consequences of invoking God's name, feigning praises to Him, while murdering His unborn little ones whose blood flows like swollen rivers and whose cries of anguish have yet to be answered.

But this is not all.

"I'm Christian. I'm Catholic. It's important to me," Kerry said. "But as I said in my speech, I'm not going to say God is on my side and I'm not going to go out and divide people. I want to pray that we are on God's side."

Saying it doesn't make it so! May God have mercy on him and all who support and promote the murder of the most defenseless little ones in should be the safest place on earth. May their heart be converted and moved to true compassion and charity. Lord, have mercy on those of us who have failed You!

Link.

From the ICD Sunday Bulletin:

The Mission Continues…

As Part of Inspiration Quest Series

Inspiration Quest, our adult Christian learning series, will hold a two-day August "Mini Mission" beginning Thursday, August 5 through Friday, August 6th. By popular demand, we welcome back Brendan Case, who directed a parish mission at Immaculate Conception this past April. Brendan is a dynamic lay missionary and preacher of the Word. He will be presenting three special events:


Thursday, Aug. 5, 2004, 7:00 p.m.
"The Healing Choice of Forgiveness"
Come to Church at 7:00 p.m. for praise and worship and a presentation on choosing forgiveness in your everyday relationships as a way to healing, wholeness, freedom and joy! From 8:30 until 10:00 p.m. there will be prayer before the Blessed Sacrament. Confession will be offered throughout the evening.


Friday, Aug. 6, 2004, 8:30 - 10:00 a.m.
Morning Bible Study -
"The Wedding of the Lamb"
At 8:30 a.m. bring your Bible and come to the Parish Hall! Explore the rich images of the Jewish wedding in the time of the Lord Jesus to come to a greater understanding of the Gospel and the beauty of the Sacraments.


Friday, Aug. 6, 2004, 7:00 - 9:00 p.m.
"Transfigured by the Father's Love"
At 7:00 p.m. in Church, Mass will be celebrated for the Feast of the Transfiguration, followed by Brendan's talk on ones' relationship with their Father-God. "The greatest of all empowering and affirming experiences is available to us, but few have tasted it - the experience of our Father in heaven's personal love for each of us - his children." Come for an evening of renewal.

Sounds great, but I guess we'll have to see.

Knights of Columbus Battle To Expel Pro-Abort Politician Members

As the American Catholic Church hierarchy contends with notorious pro-abortion Catholic politicians — who publicly defy Church teaching in their political lives while flaunting their Catholicism by receiving Communion — state delegates of the Knights of Columbus are contending with a proposal to expel member Knights in politics who support abortion rights.

This issue has been simmering in the Knights of Columbus for decades. But this year, as delegates meet in Dallas from August 3 to 5 for their national convention, a determined group of Knights from California and other states was expected to force the issue at the national convention.

Resolution N. 48 was submitted by ten KC councils in California; it was passed at the California KC State Convention in May. The resolution requires ipso facto forfeiture of membership for any public official who promotes abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, or assisted suicide.

As The Wanderer went to press on July 29, proponents of the measure were planning to go public to the international media covering the conference, and even to engage in public demonstrations to denounce any efforts to suppress the measure.

Hopefully, this effort will succeed!

Wanderer article here

Archbishop Burke's Pastoral Letter

The information is from an email - I am told that we can expect Archbishop Burke's pastoral letter sometime this week or next.

I look forward to it. Please pray for Archbishop Burke. As a faithful shepherd, he will be under constant attack.

CWNews links 9 perspectives to new CDF document

Catholic World News ha a good list of 9 links to the reactions of the recent document on feminism from the Sacred Congregation for Divine Faith.

A pleasant account of Cardinal Arinze's visit to Providence, RI

This is a good article about Cardinal Arinze's recent vistit here in the US.

The Bishops' Questionable Questionnaire

I'm passing this on...

Dear Friend,

I was afraid of this.

You'll probably remember that a few weeks ago, I told you that the
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) was working on
its presidential questionnaire. If you recall, the form asks the two
candidates where they stand on a number of issues important to
Catholics.

I had noted that the Left-leaning USCCB might try to bury the
pro-life questions in with a bunch of irrelevant issues... thereby
hiding Senator John Kerry's extreme pro-abortion voting record. They
did something similar with the 2000 presidential questionnaire
(wherein, they actually let Al Gore get away with claiming to be
"pro-life"!).

Unfortunately, it seems that the same thing is happening again this
election. The questionnaires are with the candidates right now, but
CRISIS has been able to get an early look at the document.

Here's what we discovered...

First, the questionnaire makes no distinction between life issues --
clearly of primary importance to Catholics -- and particular policies
that the conference supports on issues as wide-ranging (and
non-binding) as rural development, housing, and immigration.

The document has 41 questions, broken down into sections by topic.
The largest single section of the questionnaire is on... immigration.
Yes, immigration. That category gets a full six questions.

The next-largest section is education (five questions). Abortion
gets a total of three questions (tied with aid to low income
families).

In fact, in the entire questionnaire, only eight questions deal with
life issues -- including abortion, capital punishment,
physician-assisted suicide, cloning, and embryo research. Amazingly
enough, the section on broadcast communication had more questions
than any of the life sections except abortion and capital punishment.

But there's more.

The structure of the questions is such that they only ask for a
"support/oppose" response, which says nothing about the particular
details of a candidate's position. Nowhere is there room for the
candidate to explain, say, why he voted for partial-birth abortion
(as Kerry did) or voted against the Defense of Marriage Act (another
Kerry vote). In fact, neither are mentioned at all!

Of course, the conference did include this vital question:

"Will you support or oppose legislation to strengthen the reputation
of broadcasters to ensure that they meet their public service
broadcast license obligations?"

Look, it's not that I object to the questions per se. The problem is
that they ignore the hierarchy in Catholic values and issues.
Furthermore, this sweeping approach keeps the candidates --
particularly Kerry, who is almost always on the wrong side of the
life issues -- from having to defend themselves or explain any of
their choices.

Once again, the bishops conference has mixed up prudential issues
(like the particular points of broadcast law) with hard moral
absolutes (like the ban on abortion). In doing so, they've given
ardently pro-abortion candidates political cover.

Hopefully, when they eventually release the results of the
questionnaire, the conference will include some kind of commentary
that assigns real weight to the life issues. Without that, this
document is simply deceptive.

I'll talk to you again early next week,

Deal

The USCCB needs a thorough cleansing!

Sam Donaldson Vows to "Never" Tell the Truth About Abortion

ABC veteran reporter Sam Donaldson was confronted by a huge photos of aborted babies posted on trucks on the first day of the Democratic National Convention in Boston.

ORW president Troy Newman pulled out his bullhorn and said to Donaldson, "Look at the babies," referring to the graphic images of aborted children that were displayed on the Truth Truck's billboard-sized panels. "It's time to tell the truth about abortion. Tell the truth that abortion kills babies." According to Newman, Donaldson turned, thrust his right arm into the air and shouted, "Never!"

Lifesite Link.

Communion bans bring politics to church

[T]he politicians argue their case is different because they haven't directly violated church law, according to Kenneth Pennington, a church-law historian at the Catholic University of America in Washington.

"A few bishops are trying to selectively bar Catholic politicians from Communion for upholding the law of the land," he said. "This is a new idea among the bishops."

As an historian, Pennington does a poor job. The new "idea" among some bishops, is to perform their duty which is in Canon Law - both the 1983 code as well as the Pio-Benedictine Code of 1917.

"These politicians are making a mockery of the Catholic faith," said Amarillo Bishop John Yanta. "A lot of these politicians feel like if you go to church, you're a good Catholic. But actions speak, too. They should not come forward for Holy Communion."

But will he follow through with this as he should?

And Dallas Bishop Charles Grahmann argues that CEOs of media corporations that support abortion rights, anti-immigration policies, the death penalty and gay marriage should also refrain from Communion.

"These individual CEOs are as much of a threat to society as politicians who vote for abortion," he wrote in a column for the diocesan newspaper. "Neither should present him/herself for Communion."

This is flat out wrong for the bishop to equate things that are intrinsically evil with what is morally licit (Capital punishment) - he further confuses Catholics and he needs to be called to account for this.

Article

The same confused rhetoric from a professed Catholic politician

At my mother's Catholic funeral last fall a priest denied me communion. No warning, no comments, just a refusal to give me the sacrament as I stood in line next to my mother's coffin. He needed no direction from a bishop to put himself in the place of God in making earthly judgment on me.

I am -- and will remain -- a prochoice, Catholic elected official. I don't advocate for abortion. I believe it should be rare and safe and that alternatives should be available. But I fully support a woman's right to make that decision herself, without government -- or my -- interference. And, for some women, there is no realistic alternative.

There are alternatives, but they require that one do what is right. The baby's father gets no choice. The only person so-called "pro-choicers" want to have anything resembling a choice is the mother. And that choice is murder.

Because of the panoply of Catholic moral issues, it is a mistake to choose one issue as the sole guideline for Catholics or their leaders to judge an elected official. Not only abortion, but economic justice and other concerns make up the menu in deciding where a public official or candidate stands on "moral" issues.

The effort to use a political litmus test in providing communion is wrong, and the tie to abortion-related issues alone is misguided.

John Hottinger, DFL-St. Peter, is a member of the Minnesota Senate.

The all-knowing, professed Catholic politician who believes that that one may live two separate and distinct lives - one of faith and one of politics.

Article here

Daschle's Bishop: Don't Vote for Pro-Abortion Politicians

This recent article from Most. Rev. Robert J. Carlson Bishop of Sioux Falls will be published in Monday's "Bishop's Bulletin".

The letters to the editor and statements I have received in a few private letters are clear examples of the erosion in Catholic formation for the last two generations.

I join the bishops of the United States in committing myself to teaching clearly, persuading and mobilizing Catholics and all people of good will to defend human life and support policies that protect human life from conception to natural death.

In the Diocese of Sioux Falls, those who act in defiance of these fundamental principles of life should not be honored or invited to speak at Catholic colleges, schools or parishes, or hold any office such as lector, Eucharist Minister, usher, parish council member or religious education teacher.

Article