Sunday, March 02, 2008

No Action Taken Against Bozek

KTVI -- MyFOXstl.com) -- A former St. Stanislaus church board member is calling for the resignation of the churches priest.

He calls the father anti Catholic.

But a majority of parishioners show up to praise their priest at Sunday’s church board meeting.
It confirms suspicions that many of these people have no conception of what being Catholic and following Christ really mean...

St. Stanislaus Pastor Father Marek Bozek said…”I have never and will never question a single dogma of the Catholic faith, are we clear on that? Yes, and what I am questioning, and I am not ashamed, I am questioning some of the issues that have not and ever been declared to be dogmas.”
Let's not forget that Marek Bozek thinks he is a "theologian" but his understanding of theology is truly at odds with what the Church teaches. By his very own actions, he supports the ordination of women to the priesthood when this matter has been definitively declared that it is a theological impossibility - it will never happen.

His time is running out - laicization proceedings will begin in earnest, it appears, in a couple more days, unless he repents and returns to his diocese and bishop. Chances are, though, that this 'Judas' prefers receiving his pieces of silver...


Just for Today, March 3

Thou must not depend too much on this affection, which may be quickly changed into the contrary. When thou hast grace, think with thyself how miserable and poor thou art wont to be when thou art without it.

Nor does the progress of a spiritual life consist so much in having the grace of consolation, as in bearing the want of it with humility, resignation, and patience; so as not to grow remiss in the exercise of prayer at that time, nor to suffer thyself to omit any of thy accustomed good works.
-Bk. III, ch. vii.
________________

How sweet and easy it is to serve Our Lord upon earth, and how happy He has made me! He gives me all I want, or rather, He has always made me desire that which He intends to give me. Not long before the beginning of my terrible temptation against faith, I said to myself: I have no great exterior trials, and as for interior ones, Almighty God would have to alter my way of serving Him before that could happen, and I see no likelihood of a change. And yet, I cannot go on living in absolute peace; I wonder what He will do?

The answer was not long in coming, and taught me that our loving Lord is never short of expedients, for without changing the way of my spiritual life, He allows this great trial to temper with gall the sweetness of my consolation.
-The Story of a Soul (L'Histoire d'une Âme)
_________________
For more information, see this post.
Adapted from Just For Today(©1943 Burns & Oates)
Nihil Obstat: Reginaldus Phillips, S.T.L.,Censor deputatus
Imprimatur: Edwardus Myers, Vic. Cap.

Thoughts and Counsels - March 3

It often happens that when we take less care of our body, we have better health than when we be­stow upon it too much care.

-St. Teresa­
________________________
From Mary, Help of Christians
Part VI, Thoughts and Counsels of the Saints for Every Day of the Year
Compiled by Fr. Bonaventure Hammer, OFM (© 1909, Benziger Brothers)

Meditation for March 3, The Use of Grace

Previously we read a pressing invitation from St. Paul to the Corinthians exhorting them not to receive the grace of God in vain. (II Cor. VI. 1-10)

The Apostle enumerates the conditions necessary to the efficient fulfillment of one's duties so as to act in all things as a true servant of God. The conditions St. Paul lays down are the following:

Patience, in tribulations, in necessities, in distress, in stripes, in prisons, in labors, in fastings;
Chastity, sweetness, charity, fortitude and justice;
Poverty, and joy in poverty, need and absolute destitution.

These are priceless virtues; they are austere virtues.

How am I to acquire them? Or if I already possess them in some small degree how am I to increase them?

The season of Lent is a time of preparation for Holy Week. Is it not the acceptable time to meditate on the Passion? Without neglecting other devotions, I will devote myself until Good Friday to thoughtful meditation on the Sufferings of our Savior. Many of its aspects will escape me, but I will penetrate thoroughly those at least on which I do meditate. I am so cowardly when con­fronted with even a slight sacrifice or the simplest demands of religious life. I will take courage from the example of my good Master.

The whole world claims my thoughts. Redemption through suffering is not for me alone but for all. How few profit by it! I must incite myself to participate more efficaciously in the salva­tion of the world, to be a more significant help to Christ. I will adopt the program of St. Paul in Epistle to the Corinthians and reolutely set myself to the task.
_________________
Adapted from Meditations for Religious
by Father Raoul Plus, S.J. (© 1939, Frederick Pustet Co.)

Gospel for the 4th Sunday of Lent (Laetare Sunday)

John 9:1-41

The Cure of the Man Born Blind

[1] As He (Jesus) passed by, He saw a man blind from his birth. [2] And His disciples asked Him, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" [3] Jesus answered, "It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be made manifest in him. [4] We must work the works of Him who sent Me, while it is day; night comes, when no one can work. [5] As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world." [6] As He said this, He spat on the ground and made clay of the spittle and anointed the man's eyes with the clay, [7] saying to him, "Go, wash in the pool of Siloam" (which means Sent). So he went and washed and came back seeing. [8] The neighbors and those who had seen him before as a beggar, said, "Is not this the man who used to sit and beg?" [9] Some said, "It is he"; others said, "No, but he is like him." He said, "I am the man." [10] They said to him, "Then how were your eyes opened?" [11] The man called Jesus made clay and anointed my eyes and said to me, 'Go to Siloam and wash'; so I went and washed and received my sight." [12] They said to him, "Where is He?" He said, "I do not know."

[13] They brought to the Pharisees the man who had formerly been blind. [14] Now it was a Sabbath day when Jesus made the clay and opened his eyes. [15] The Pharisees again asked him how he had received his sight. And he said to them, "He put clay on my eyes, and I washed, and I see." [16] Some of the Pharisees said, "This Man is not from God, for He does not keep the Sabbath." But others said, "How can a man who is a sinner do such things?" There was a division among them. [17] So they again said to the blind man, "What do you say about Him, since He has opened your eyes?" He said, "He is a prophet."

[18] The Jews did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight, until they called the parents of the man who had received his sight, [19] and asked them, "Is this your son, who you say was born blind? How then does he now see?" [20] His parents answered, "We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind; [21] but how he now sees we do not know, nor do we know who opened his eyes. Ask him; he is of age, he will speak for himself." [22] His parents said this because they feared the Jews, for the Jews had already agreed that if any one should confess Him to be Christ, he was to be put out of the synagogue. [23] Therefore his parents said, "He is of age, ask him."

The Blindness of the Jews

[24] So for the second time they called the man who had been blind, and said to him, "Give God the praise; we know that this Man is a sinner." [25] He answered, "Whether He is a sinner, I do not know; one thing I know, that though I was blind, now I see." [26] They said to him, "What did He do to you? How did He open your eyes?" [27] He answered them, "Ihave told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hearit again? Do you too want to become His disciples?" [28] And they reviled him, saying, "You are His disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. [29] We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this Man, we do not know where He comes from." [30] The man answered, "Why, this is a marvel! You do not know where He comes from, and yet He opened my eyes. [31] We know that God does not listen to sinners, but if any one is a worshipper of God and does His will, God listens to him. [32] Never since the world began has it been heard that any one opened the eyes of a man born blind. [33] If this Man were not from God, He could do nothing." [34] They answered him, "You were born in utter sin, and would you teach us?" And they cast him out.

[35] Jesus heard that they had cast him out and having found him, He said, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?" [36] He answered, "And who is He, Sir, that I may believe in Him?" [37] Jesus said to him, "You have seen Him, and it is He who speaks to you." [38] He said, "Lord, I believe"; and he worshipped Him. [39] Jesus said, "For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind." [40] Some of the Pharisees near Him heard this, and they said to Him, "Are we also blind?" [41] Jesus said to them, "If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, 'We see', your guilt remains."
_________________

Commentary:

2-3. The disciples' question echoes general Jewish views on the causes of illness and of misfortunes in general: they regarded them as punishment for personal sins (cf. Job 4:7-8; 2 Maccabees 7:18), or as the sins of parents being visited on their children (cf. Tobit 3:3).

We know through Revelation (cf. Genesis 3:16-19; Romans 5:12; etc.) that the origin of all the misfortunes which afflict mankind is sin--Original Sin and later personal sin. However, this does not mean that each misfortune or illness has its immediate cause in a personal sin, as if God inflicted or allowed evils to happen in direct proportion to every sin committed. Suffering, which is so often a factor in the life of the just man, can be a resource God sends him to cleanse him of his imperfections, to exercise him in virtue and to unite him to the sufferings of Christ the Redeemer, who although He was innocent, bore in Himself the punishments our sins merited (cf. Isaiah 53:4; 1 Peter 2:24; 1 John 3:5). For example, our Lady and St. Joseph and all the Saints have experienced intense suffering, thereby sharing in the redemptive suffering of Christ.

4-5. The "day" refers to Jesus' life on earth. Hence the urgency with which He approaches the task of doing the will of the Father until He reaches His death, which He compares with "night". This "night" can also be understood as referring to the end of the world; in this passage it means that the Redemption of men brought about by Christ needs to be continued by the Church throughout the centuries, and also that Christians should strive to spread the Kingdom of God.

"Time is precious, time passes, time is a phase of experiment with regard to our decisive and definitive fate. Our future and eternal destiny depends on the proof we give of faithfulness to our duties. Time is a gift from God; it is a question posed by God's love to our free and, it can be said, fateful answer. We must be sparing of time, in order to use it well, in the intense activity of our life of work, love and suffering.Idleness or boredom have no place in the life of a Christian! Rest, yes,when necessary (cf. Mark 6:31), but always with a view to vigilance, which only on the last day will open to a light on which the sun will never set" ([Pope] Paul VI, "Homily", 1 January 1976).

Jesus proclaims that He is the Light of the world because His life among men has given us the ultimate meaning of the world, of the life of every man and every woman, and of mankind as a whole. Without Jesus all creation is in darkness, it does not understand itself, it does not know where it is going. "Only in the mystery of the Incarnate Word does the mystery of man take on light. [...] Through Christ and in Christ, the riddles of sorrow and death grow meaningful; apart from His Gospel they overwhelm us" (Vatican II, "Gaudium Et Spes", 22). Jesus warns us--as He will do more clearly in John 12:35-36--of the need to let ourselves be enlightened by the Light, which is He Himself (cf. John 1:9-12).

6-7. This cure is done in two stages-Jesus' action on the eyes of the blind man, and the man being told to go and wash in the pool of Siloam. Our Lord also used saliva to cure a man who was deaf and dumb (cf. Mark 7:33) and another blind man (cf. Mark 8:23). The pool of Siloam was a reservoir built by King Hezekiah in the seventh century B.C., to supply Jerusalem with water (cf. Kings 20:20; 2 Chronicles 32:30); the prophets regarded these waters as a sign of divine favor (cf. Isaiah 8:6; 22:11). St. John, using the broader etymology of the word Siloam, applies it to Jesus who is the "One sent" by the Father. Our Lord works through the medium of matter to produce effects which exceed anything matter can do. Something similar will occur with the Sacraments: through His word He will confer on material media the power of spiritually regenerating man.

Our Lord's instruction to the blind man is reminiscent of the miracle of Naaman, the Syrian general who was cured of leprosy when, on the instruction of the prophet Elisha, he washed seven times in the waters of the Jordan (cf. 2 Kings 5:1ff). Naaman had hesitated before obeying; whereas the blind man obeys promptly without asking questions or raising objections.

"What an example of firm faith the blind man gives us! A living, operative faith. Do you behave like this when God commands, when so often you cannot see, when your soul is worried and the light is gone? What power could the water possibly contain that when the blind man's eyes were moistened with it they were cured? Surely some mysterious eye salve, or a precious medicine made up in the laboratory of some wise alchemist, would have done better? But the man believed; he acted upon the command of God, and he returned with eyes full of light" ([St] J. Escriva, "Friends of God", 193).

8-34. After recounting the miracle, the Evangelist reports the doubts of the man's friends and neighbors (verses 8-12) and inquiry made by the Pharisees: they question the man (verses 13-17), his parents (verses 18-23), and then the man again, whom they end up condemning and expelling from their presence (verses 24-34). This passage is so full of detail that it looks like an eyewitness account.

The Fathers and Doctors of the Church have seen this miracle as symbolizing the Sacrament of Baptism in which, through the medium of water, the soul is cleansed and receives the light of faith: "He sent theman to the pool called the pool of Siloam, to be cleansed and to be enlightened, that is, to be baptized and receive in Baptism full enlightenment" (St. Thomas Aquinas, "Commentary on St. John, in loc.").

This episode also reflects the different attitudes of people to our Lord and His miracles. The blind man, a straightforward person, believes in Jesus as envoy, prophet (verses 17, 33) and Son of God (verses 17, 33, 38); whereas the Pharisees persist in not wanting to see or believe, despite the clear evidence before them (verses 24-34).

In this miracle Jesus once again reveals Himself as the light of the world. This bears out the statement in the prologue: "The true light that enlightens every man was coming into the world" (1-9). Not only does He give light to the eyes of the blind man: He enlightens his soul, leading him to make an act of faith in His divinity (verse 38). At the same time we can see the obvious drama of those whose blindness darkens their minds, as our Lord said in His dialogue with Nicodemus: "The light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil" (John 3:19).

14-16. The Pharisees bring up the same accusation as they did when the paralyzed man was cured beside the pool (John 5:10) and as on other occasions Jesus has broken the Law because He cures the sick on the Sabbath (cf. Luke 13:16; 14:5, etc.). Christ had often taught that observance of the law of Sabbath rest (cf. Exodus 20:8, 11; 21:13; Deuteronomy 5:14) was compatible with the duty to do good (cf. Matthew 12:3-8; Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5). Charity, the good of others, takes precedence over all the other commandments (cf. note on Matthew 12:3-8). If rules are given precedence in a blind sort of way over the inescapable obligations of justice and charity, the result is fanaticism, which always goes against the Gospel and even against right reason--as happens in this instance with the Pharisees. Their minds are so closed that they do not want to see God's hand in something which simply could not be done without divine power. The dilemma they pose themselves--is He a man of God, as His miracles imply; or a sinner, because He does not keep the Sabbath (cf. Mark 3:23-30)?--can only arise in people whose outlook is that of religious fanatics. Their mistaken interpretation of how certain precepts should be kept leads them to forget the essence of the Law--love of God and love of neighbor.

To avoid accepting Jesus' divinity, the Pharisees reject the only possible correct interpretation of the miracle; whereas the blind man--like all unprejudiced people open to the truth--finds solid grounds in the miracle for confessing that Christ works through the power of God (John 9:33): "He supported and confirmed His preaching by miracles to arouse faith of His hearers and give them assurance, but not to coerce them" (Vatican II, "Dignitatis Humanae", 11).

24. "Give God the praise": a solemn declaration, like an oath, exhorting a person to tell the truth. But the Pharisees are not looking for the truth: they want to intimidate the man to get him to withdraw his statement. They try to pressurize him by warning him: "We know this Man is a sinner". St. Augustine comments: "What do they mean, Give God the praise? They mean, deny what you have received. Clearly, this is not to give God the praise, but rather to blaspheme against God" ("In Ioann. Evang.", 44, 11).

25-34. This interrogation shows that the miracle was so patent that not even His enemies could deny it. Our Lord worked many miracles during His public ministry, showing that He had complete power over everything, in other words that He was divine.

Rationalism, basing itself on an erroneous philosophical principle, refuses to accept that God can intervene in a supernatural way in this world; it therefore denies the possibility of miracles: but the Church has always taught that miracles do happen and that they serve a purpose: "If any one shall say that miracles are impossible, and therefore all the accounts regarding them, even those contained in Holy Scripture, are to be dismissed as fabulous or mythical; or that miracles can never be knownwith certainty, and that the divine origin of Christianity cannot be proved by them--let him be "anathema" (Vatican I, "Dei Filius", Chapter 3, and Canon 4).

29. Everyone saw the miracle, but the Pharisees are so stubborn that they will not accept the significance of the event, not even after questioning the man himself and his parents. "The sin of the Pharisees did not consist in not seeing God in Christ, but in voluntarily shutting themselves up within themselves, in not letting Jesus, who is the light, open their eyes" ([St] J. Escriva, "Christ Is Passing By", 71).

As this episode proceeds, the faith of the man himself deepens. He begins by recognizing Jesus as a prophet (verse 17) and he ends up acknowledging His divinity (verse 35); whereas over the same course of events the authorities become more and more obstinate--moving from doubt (verse 16), through the blasphemous assertion that Jesus is a sinner, to eventually expelling the beggar (verse 34)--a useful warning about the danger of pride which can blind one to the obvious.

34. After the Babylonian exile (sixth century B.C.), a Jewish custom developed of expelling from the synagogue those who had committed certain crimes. This took two forms--temporary expulsion for thirty days as a disciplinary measure, and permanent expulsion, which later was often imposed on Jews who became Christians. What is being referred to here is probably permanent expulsion, which was what was planned (verse 22) and which is noted elsewhere in the Gospels (cf. 12:42; 16:2; Luke 6:22).

35-38. This does not seem to have been an accidental meeting. ThePharisees have cast the man out of the synagogue; our Lord not only receives him but helps him make an act of faith in His divinity: "Now with the face of his heart washed and with his conscience cleansed, he acknowledges Him to be not only the Son of Man but Son of God" (St. Augustine, "In Ioann. Evang.", 44, 15). This dialogue reminds us of Jesus' conversation with the Samaritan woman (cf. John 4:26).

39. This judgment which our Lord pronounces follows on the act of faith of the man who has been cured, and the persistent obstinacy of the Pharisees. He has not come to condemn the world but to save it (cf. John 3:17), but His presence among us already involves a judgment, because each of us has to take a stand on whether to reject or accept Jesus. Christ's coming implies the fall of some and the salvation of others (cf. Luke 2:34). In this sense, we will fall into one of two categories (cf. John 3:18-21; 12:47-48): on the one hand, the humble of heart (cf. Matthew 11:25), who recognize their failings and who go to Jesus in search of forgiveness (these will receive the light He is speaking of); on the other hand, those who are satisfied with themselves and think that they do not need Christ or His word (they say they see but they are blind). Thus we ourselves decide our ultimate fate, depending on whether we accept or reject Jesus.

40-41. Jesus' words sting the Pharisees, who are always looking to catch Him out in something He says. They realize that He is referring to them and they ask Him, "Are we also blind?" Jesus' answer is quite clear: they can see but they do not want to: therefore they are unworthy. "If you realized you were blind, if you admitted you were blind and ran to the physician, you would have no sin, for I have come to take away sin; but because you say that you can see, you remain in your blindness" (St. Augustine, "In Ioann. Evang.", 45, 17).
___________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

2nd Reading for the 4th Sunday of Lent

From: Ephesians 5:8-14

Walking in the Light


[8] For once you were darkness, but now you are light in the Lord; walk as children of light [9] (for the fruit of light is found in all that is good and right and true), [10] and try to learn what is pleasing to the Lord. [11] Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. [12] For it is a shame even to speak of the things that they do in secret; [13] but when anything is exposed by the light it becomes visible, for anything that becomes visible is light.

[14] Therefore it is said, "Awake, O sleeper, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give you light."
______________

Commentary:

8-9. In contrast to the Christian's previous situation, which St. Paul describes as "darkness", he now goes on to speak about the proper course for a believer, for someone enlightened by faith. The Christian is in a different position from that of a pagan; he knows our Lord Jesus Christ and he has a new way of thinking: he is a "child of light", because Christ has given him insight into the criteria which should govern his behavior. In his new life, he should be light; he has been reborn to be the "light of the world" (cf. Matthew 5:14-16; John 1:5; 8:12), a pursuer of all that is good and right and true; this means that he has a new way of being and thinking and acting, and is an example and a help to those around him. There is no room for excuses when what is at stake is the salvation of souls to whom we could be giving a helping hand: "Do not say, I cannot help others," St. John Chrysostom preached, "if you are truly a Christian, it is impossible for you not to be able to do so [...]. If we act properly, everything else will follow as a natural consequence. Christians' light cannot be hidden, a lamp so brilliant cannot fail to be seen" ("Hom. on Acts", 20).

10. Created in the image and likeness of God, man is guided by reason, which can lead him to recognize his Creator and shape his life in line with the moral law God has impressed upon creation itself. He should always be trying to grow in wisdom and knowledge: that is an essential feature of the human spirit. The Second Vatican Council explained this in these terms: "The intellectual nature of man finds at last its perfection, as it should, in wisdom, which gently draws the human mind to look for and to love what is true and good. Filled with wisdom man is led through visible realities to those which cannot be seen" ("Gaudium Et Spes", 15). If a person uses his natural intellect properly, it will bring him closer to God; moreover, the light of faith gives one a supernatural capacity to obtain better insight into the nature of God and His plans, and greater discernment as to what to do to please God.

A person who is in love tries to discover what the loved one likes, in order to do what pleases the loved one. The love of God should also lead one to prove that love with deeds, and not leave it at the level of words. If one is to offer God actions which are pleasing to Him, one needs to have a good grasp of His commandments, of Christian doctrine and moral teaching. A first sign of the sincerity of a person's love of God is the effort he makes to obtain good spiritual and doctrinal training; that shows that he is at least making an effort in the right direction.

11-13. By his word and example, a Christian sheds light on all human realities, and thereby helps others to distinguish right from wrong. Anything that becomes visible is "light": that is, when things are properly identified--when good is shown to be good, and evil exposed for what it is (charitably but unambiguously)--the result is to dispel the confusion and moral relativism which does such harm to society. Hence the Second Vatican Council's exhortation to all Christians, especially lay people: "At a time when new questions are being put and when grave errors aiming at undermining religion, moral order and human society itself are rampant, the Council earnestly exhorts the laity to take a more active part, each according to his or her talents and knowledge and in fidelity to the mind of the Church, in the explanation and defense of Christian principles and in the correct application of them to the problems of our times" ("Apostolicam Actuositatem", 6).

14. St. Paul seems to be quoting from an early liturgical hymn, which depicts Baptism as true enlightenment (cf. Hebrews 6:4; 10:32). By their good works--the light of the world--Christians can help "the dead", that is, those separated from God by sin, to move out of darkness into the light, where they will attain through Baptism that new life which membership of Christ begins. The Apostle is comparing this situation to the luminous clarity a person obtains when he awakens from a deep sleep, in contrast to the profound darkness experienced by one who remains asleep. A sinner's conversion is the equivalent of rising up out of the sleep of death into a new existence, life in a new world illuminated by Christ, who possesses and radiates the glorious light of God (cf. Hebrews 1:3).
___________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

1st Reading for the 4th Sunday of Lent

From: 1 Samuel 16:1b, 6-7, 10-13b

David is Anointed


[1b] The Lord said to Samuel, "Fill your horn with oil, and go; I will send you to Jesse the Bethlehemite, for I have provided for myself a king among his sons."

[6] When they came, he looked on Eliab and thought, "Surely the Lord's anointed is before him." [7] But the Lord said to Samuel, "Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature because I have rejected him; for the Lord sees not as man sees; man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart." [10] And Jesse made seven of his sons pass before Samuel. And Samuel said to Jesse, "The Lord has not chosen these." [11] And Samuel said to Jesse, "Are all your sons here?" And he said, "There remains yet the youngest, but behold, he is keeping the sheep." And Samuel said to Jesse, "Send and fetch him; for we will not sit down till he comes here." [12] And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and had beautiful eyes, and was handsome. And the Lord said, "Arise, anoint him; for this is he." [13] Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brothers; and the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon David from that day forward. And Samue rose up and went to Ramah.
______________

Commentary:

16:1-31:13. This, the last section of 1 Samuel, begins with an account of the gradual decline of Saul until his eventual death in the battle of Gilboa against the Philistines (chap. 31); it also deals with the tortuous and sometimes slow rise to power of the new king, David. Strictly speaking, this section should also take in the final chapter of 2 Samuel. From a literary point of view we can see that the text is very much in the style of a court chronicle focusing only on episodes in which the kings play the leading role. Many of the events covered here are repeated twice--for example, David's entry into Saul's service (16:14-23; 18:1-2), Saul's attempt on David's life (18:10-11; 19:9-10), Saul's promise to give David his daughter's hand in marriage (18:17-19; 18:20-27), Jonathan's pleading on David's behalf (19:1-7; 20:25-34), David's flight (19:10-18; 20:1-21) and the opportunity he gets to take Saul's life (24:7-8; 26:11-12). All this goes to show that the editor has used material from a variety of sources and not made any great effort to merge them properly.

In the episodes recounted here there are few religious references, whereas the tensions between Saul and David are exposed in all their starkness; in fact, even though these chapters deal with the most famous of kings, David, and stress God's special love for him, no effort is made to gloss over his failings and transgressions (contrary to what happens in 1 and 2 Chronicles). David comes across as a shrewd politician, capable of allying himself with the eternal enemies of his people, the Philistines, in order to save himself (chap. 27); as a usurper of Saul's throne (chaps. 19 and 21); as a man of strong passions capable of slaughter on a grand scale (21:12; 22:17) and other human weaknesses (18:17-27; 25:32-44), yet capable, too, of great loyalty to the Lord's anointed king (chaps. 24-26) and to his own friends (chap. 20). So, these accounts expose the most human side of the personalities involved, but they also allow us to see that the Lord God of Israel is the main protagonist even though he is in the background--mainly because it is he who chooses David and stays with him, from the first moment that he enters the picture (16:1) and through all the crises of his career: witness the constant refrain "the Lord is with him" (16:18; 18:14, 28). Saul, David and the rest of the players in this history are not guided by a blind destiny: they are all playing their part in God's plan of salvation The great lesson contained in these accounts is that the Lord does not normally intervene by way of miracles or amazing actions; he guides the course of history through lights and shadows until he attains his key
objective--to make himself known to all mankind and lead it to salvation. The other great lesson is that this salvific history steadily advances, amidst ups and downs--acts of heroism, human weaknesses--until it reaches its fully developed stage in Jesus Christ.

16:1-13. Samuel's anointing of David, in a private, familial setting, is reminiscent of Saul's anointing, which was also done in secret (cf. 10:1-16). The narrative emphasizes that David does not in any way merit his election: he is a nobody, from a family of no importance: no genealogy is provided, apart from the name of Jesse, his father (v. 5); he is the youngest of his brothers (vv. 11-12) and, like the rest of his family, he works as a shepherd: he doesn't come from a noble or military or priestly family. He could have no claim to be anointed king.

God's gratuitous choice of this shepherd boy gives deep, religious meaning to his reception by Saul (16:14-23) and by the people, when he later kills Goliath (17:55-18:5). David's qualities and feats would not have been enough to advance him, had not God first singled him out. David is a type of those who in the Christian dispensation are called to offices in the Church: what matters is not background, personal qualities or material resources but the realization that one is called by God. Also, one needs to bear in mind that "man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart" (v. 7); from this derives the requirement to live and act in keeping with the call one is given. "For by his power to know himself in the depths of his being he rises above the whole universe of mere objects. When he is drawn to think about his real self, he turns to those deep recesses of his being where God who probes the heart awaits him, and where he himself decides his own destiny in the sight of God" (Vatican II, "Gaudium Et Spes", 14).
___________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Saturday, March 01, 2008

Just for Today, March 2

An internal man quickly recollects himself, because he never pours forth his whole self upon outward things. Exterior labour is no prejudice to him, nor any employ­ment which for a time is necessary; but as things fall out, he so accommodates himself to them. As much as a man draws things to himself, so much is he hindered by them.
-Bk. II, ch. i.
_______________

You become too much absorbed in your work, and worry over it as though you bore the whole respon­sibility. Do you wonder what is going on at the present moment on other Carmels, and whether the nuns are busy or not? Do their labours prevent you from making your prayer? You must learn to dissociate yourself from your work in the same way, giving the prescribed time to it, but maintaining detachment of heart.
-Conseils et Souvenirs.
__________________
For more information, see this post.
Adapted from Just For Today(©1943 Burns & Oates)
Nihil Obstat: Reginaldus Phillips, S.T.L.,Censor deputatus
Imprimatur: Edwardus Myers, Vic. Cap.

Thoughts and Counsels - March 2

A most powerful and efficacious remedy for all evils, a means of correcting all imperfections, of triumphing over temptation, and preserving our hearts in an undisturbed peace, is conformity with the will of God.

-St. Vincent de Paul
________________________
From Mary, Help of Christians
Part VI, Thoughts and Counsels of the Saints for Every Day of the Year
Compiled by Fr. Bonaventure Hammer, OFM (© 1909, Benziger Brothers)

Meditation for March 2, Jesus Afflicted

4th Sunday of Lent, Laetare Sunday

The Collect of the day bids me ask for compunction of heart, Grant, we beseech Thee, O Almighty God, that we who justly suffer for our deeds may be relieved by the comjort of Thy grace, through Christ Our Lord.

Sorrow, joy! Sorrow for my sins, joy for my salvation! Sorrow for having been a cause of the sufferings of Jesus, joy for having been the beneficiary of the redeeming suffering!

It seems that the Church dare not leave her children too long in the throes of the sorrowful mysteries without sounding at least one note of joy, one word of comfort; that is why on Gaudete Sunday in Advent and on Laetare Sunday in Lent, the violet vestment is replaced by the rose vestment.

Today's entire liturgy is a hymn of joy, from the first word of the Introit to the last word of the Col­lect, and even throughout the Epistle and Gradual: I was glad when they said to me: Let us go into the House of the Lord. The Gospel tells of the multiplication of the loaves.

But I feel that it is more fitting to make sorrow dominant. I cannot see my Savior approach His crucifixion without sharing His grief. For me that part of the Redemption is infinitely rich and for Him that portion of suffering is most overwhelming.

Justly afflicted, says the Collect. Oh! how justly! I shall go into the House of tke Lord, but at what a cost to the divine Guide who leads me there. The bread will be multiplied on my way and nothing will be wanting to my sanctification, but at what a cost to Him, the Divine Wheat, who has been crushed for love of me.
_________________
Adapted from Meditations for Religious
by Father Raoul Plus, S.J. (© 1939, Frederick Pustet Co.)

Gospel for Saturday, 3rd Week of Lent

Old Calendar: Wales and England: St. David

Luke 18:9-14

Parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector

[9] He (Jesus) also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and despised others: [10] "Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. [11] The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, `God, I thank Thee that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. [12] I fast twice a week, I give tithes of all that I get.' [13] But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to Heaven, but beat his breast, saying, `God, be merciful to me a sinner!' [14] I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other; for every one who exalts himself will be humbled, but he who humbles himself will be exalted."
_______________

Commentary:

9-14. Our Lord here rounds off His teaching on prayer. In addition to being persevering and full of faith, prayer must flow from a humble heart, a heart that repents of its sins: "Cor contritum et humiliatum, Deus, non despicies" (Psalm 51:19); the Lord, who never despises a contrite and humble heart, resists the proud and gives His grace to the humble (cf. Peter 5:5; James 4:6).

The parable presents two opposite types--the Pharisee, who is so meticulous about external fulfillment of the Law; and the tax collector, who in fact is looked on as a public sinner (cf. Luke 19:7). The Pharisee's prayer is not pleasing to God, because his pride causes him to be self-centered and to despise others. He begins by giving thanks to God, but obviously it is not true gratitude, because he boasts about all the good he has done and he fails to recognize his sins; since he regards himself as righteous, he has no need of pardon, he thinks; and he remains in his sinful state; to him also apply these words spoken by our Lord to a group of Pharisees on another occasion: "If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, `We see,' your guilt remains" (John 9:41). The Pharisee went down from the temple, therefore, unjustified.

But the tax collector recognizes his personal unworthiness and is sincerely sorry for his sins: he has the necessary dispositions for God to pardon him. His ejaculatory prayer wins God's forgiveness: "It is not without reason that some have said that prayer justifies; for repentant prayer or supplicant repentance, raising up the soul to God and re-uniting it to His goodness, without doubt obtains pardon in virtue of the holy love which gives it this sacred movement. And therefore we ought all to have very many such ejaculatory prayers, said as an act of loving repentance and with a desire of obtaining reconciliation with God, so that by thus laying our tribulation before our Savior, we may pour out our souls before and within His pitiful heart, which will receive them with mercy" (St. Francis de Sales, "Treatise on the Love of God", Book 2, Chapter 20).
___________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Friday, February 29, 2008

Just for Today, March 1

Rest on the Passion of Christ, and willingly dwell in His sacred wounds. For if thou fly devoutly to the wounds and precious stigmas of Jesus, thou shalt feel great comfort in tribulation; neither wilt thou much regard the being despised by men, but wilt easily bear up against detracting tongues.

Suffer with Christ and for Christ, if thou desirest to reign with Christ.
-Bk. II, ch. i.
_______________

My God, I thank Thee for all the graces Thou hast bestowed on me, and in particular for having made me pass through the crucible of suffering. With what joy I shall see Thee on the last day bearing the Cross as the emblem of royalty. As Thou hast made me a partaker of Thy holy Cross, grant that I may one day be like to Thee, and bear upon my glorified body the imprint of Thy sacred wounds.
-The Story of a Soul (L'Histoire d'une Âme)
__________________
For more information, see this post.
Adapted from Just For Today(©1943 Burns & Oates)
Nihil Obstat: Reginaldus Phillips, S.T.L.,Censor deputatus
Imprimatur: Edwardus Myers, Vic. Cap.

Thoughts and Counsels - March 1

It seems as if God granted to other saints to free us from some particular needfulness; but I know by experience that the glorious St. Joseph assists us generally in all our necessities.

-St. Teresa
________________________
From Mary, Help of Christians
Part VI, Thoughts and Counsels of the Saints for Every Day of the Year
Compiled by Fr. Bonaventure Hammer, OFM (© 1909, Benziger Brothers)

Meditation for March 1, Relics of the Cross

One day when St. Gertrude was gazing affectionately upon a relic of the True Cross and seeking to win for herself a more tender love of our Savior, Jesus said to her:

"You want some relics that will draw my heart to the one who pos­sesses them. Read the story of My Passion and cling to those words which I have spoken with so much love.... Write them, keep them as a relic.... Meditate on them often....They are the most precious relics of Me that one can possess; they are an expression of the deepest love of My Heart."

I will follow this counsel of our Lord. From now until Good Friday! will read and meditate eagerly and attentively on the Passion in order to learn the lessons my soul needs. I will not only linger on the words but I will try to reach Your very Heart, O Jesus. I will contemplate Your every act and live with You each sorrowful event from Gethsemane to Golgotha.

Except for one short vision of joy on Laetare Sunday, I shall now know only Christ and Christ crucified.

As though she feared that the wounds of Christ might distress us too much, the Church will cover them on Passion Sunday. In my heart I will try to look upon the unveiled Cross.

On Palm Sunday, I shall hear women and children cry Hosanna, but I shall not be deceived. The priest knocking on the door of the church with the foot of the cross will remind me forcibly that Calvary is coming nearer and nearer.
_________________
Adapted from Meditations for Religious
by Father Raoul Plus, S.J. (© 1939, Frederick Pustet Co.)

Dr Edward Peters: The CDF and Invalid Baptisms

Dr Peters writes:
You might recall when I blogged against using baptismal formulae contrived to avoid masculine nouns for Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. I said back in 2004 that such ‘baptisms’ were invalid, and that people who received ‘baptism’ under them were not even Christian, let alone Catholic.

Looks like CDF agrees.
Read about today’s authentic doctrinal declaration from CDF here: http://www.canonlaw.info/2008/02/rules-on-baptism-are-meant-to-be.html


Stanislaus Board Asked to Remove Marek Bosek as Pastor?

Developing...

As heard on local radio this morning, it appears that some parishioners of St Stanislaus Church are requesting that Board members vote to remove hired priest, Marek Bozek, from his job as pastor.

This request is being made because Bozek is espousing ideas that are inconsistent with the Catholic faith. Specifically mentioned was open or intercommunion. Certainly his open advocacy for women's ordination to the priesthood is another?

More as additional information becomes available. His date with destiny is March 5.

*** Updated ***
From the Post Dispatch:

ST. LOUIS — Two members of St. Stanislaus Kostka church say they will ask Sunday for the removal of its pastor, the Rev. Marek Bozek, on grounds that he is promoting ideas contrary to Roman Catholicism, such as his offer to give Communion to people who aren't Catholic.
[...]

Roger Krasnicki, former spokesman for the St. Stanislaus board, and Alice Kaminski of St. Peters said they plan to attend the board meeting Sunday afternoon to press for Bozek's removal. They said they speak for many members of the parish.

William Bialczak, board chairman, said they were welcome to speak. As for sentiment to remove Bozek, Bialczak said, "This is the first I've heard of it."

Reached Thursday evening, Bozek said he was aware of the criticism and said his detractors "make up a small group of maybe a dozen, against 400 who are very happy with the parish. ... I am not changing any matter of our faith."

Krasnicki and Kaminski, both of whom say they no longer attend Sunday Mass at St. Stanislaus, said Bozek upset many parishioners when he recently announced during Mass his support for the ordination of women as priests and for offering Communion to anyone who approaches the altar, not just Catholics. Bialczak confirmed that Bozek took those stands.

Bozek, infected with the deadly sin of pride, places himself above Christ and the Church when he decides what is and is not truth. The sooner the imposter is laicized, the better for all.

Krasnicki said there was concern "that Father Bozek is straying far afield from Roman Catholicism." Said Kaminski, "We're still a Catholic church, and we should be following the rules and dogma of the church."

It's encouraging to see that Krasnicki and others are taking this stand. Pray that they might also come to see that obedience in matters of discipline is also part of the Church's tradition and which was exemplified by our Savior, Jesus Christ.

Link to Post article.

Gospel for Friday, 3rd Week of Lent

Mark 12:28-34

The Greatest Commandment of All

[28] One of the scribes came up and heard them disputing with one another, and seeing that He (Jesus) answered them well, asked Him, "Which commandment is the first of all?" [29] Jesus answered, "The first is, `Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one; [30] and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.' [31] The second is this, `You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' There is no other commandment greater than these." [32] And the scribe said to Him, "You are right, Teacher; You have truly said that He is one, and there is no other than He; [33] and to love with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the strength, and to love one's neighbor as oneself, is much more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices." [34] And when Jesus saw that he answered wisely, He said to him, "You are not far from the Kingdom of God." And after that no one dared to ask Him any question.
__________________

Commentary:

28-34. The doctor of the law who asks Jesus this question is obviously an upright man who is sincerely seeking the truth. He was impressed by Jesus' earlier reply (verses 18-27) and he wants to learn more from Him. His question is to the point and Jesus devotes time to instructing him, though he will soon castigate the scribes, of whom this man is one (cf. Mark 12:38ff).

Jesus sees in this man not just a scribe but a person who is looking for the truth. And His teaching finds its way into the man's heart. The scribe repeats what Jesus says, savoring it, and our Lord offers him an affectionate word which encourages his definitive conversion: "You are not far from the Kingdom of God." This encounter reminds us of His meeting with Nicodemus (cf. John 3:1ff). On the doctrinal content of these two commandments cf. note on Matthew 22:34-40.

[Note on Matthew 22:34-40 states:
In reply to the question, our Lord points out that the whole law can be condensed into two commandments: the first and more important consists in unconditional love of God; the second is a consequence and result of the first, because when man is loved, St. Thomas says, God is loved, for man is the image of God (cf. "Commentary on St. Matthew", 22:4).

A person who genuinely loves God also loves his fellows because he realizes that they are his brothers and sisters, children of the same Father, redeemed by the same blood of our Lord Jesus Christ: "This commandment we have from Him, that he who loves God should love his brother also" (1 John 4:21). However, if we love man for man's sake without reference to God, this love will become an obstacle in the way of keeping the first commandment, and then it is no longer genuine love of our neighbor. But love of our neighbor for God's sake is clear proof that we love God: "If anyone says, `I love God', and hates his brother, he is a liar" (1 John 4:20).

"You shall love your neighbor as yourself": here our Lord establishes as the guideline for our love of neighbor the love each of us has for himself; both love of others and love of self are based on love of God. Hence, in some cases it can happen that God requires us to put our neighbor's need before our own; in others, not: it depends on what value, in light of God's love, needs to be put on the spiritual and material factors involved.

Obviously spiritual goods take absolute precedence over material ones, even over life itself. Therefore, spiritual goods, be they our own or our neighbor's, must be the first to be safeguarded. If the spiritual good in question is the supreme one for the salvation of the soul, no one is justified in putting his own soul into certain danger of being condemned in order to save another, because given human freedom we can never be absolutely sure what personal choice another person may make: this is the situation in the parable (cf. Matthew 25:1-13), where the wise virgins refuse to give oil to the foolish ones; similarly St. Paul says that he would wish himself to be rejected if that could save his brothers (cf. Romans 9:3)--an unreal theoretical situation. However, what is quite clear is that we have to do all we can to save our brothers, conscious that, if someone helps to bring a sinner back to the way, he will save himself from eternal death and cover a multitude of his own sins (James 5:20). From all this we can deduce that self-love of the right kind, based on God's love for man, necessarily involves forgetting oneself in order to love God and our neighbor for God.]

30. This commandment of the Old Law, ratified by Jesus, shows, above all, God's great desire to engage in intimate conversation with man: "would it not have sufficed to publish a permission giving us leave to love Him? [...]. He makes a stronger declaration of His passionate love for us, and commands us to love Him with all our power, lest the consideration of His majesty and our misery, which make so great a distance and inequality between us, or some other pretext, divert us from His love. In this He well shows that He did not leave in us for nothing the natural inclination to love Him, for to the end that it may not be idle, He urges us by His general commandment to employ it, and that this commandment may be effected, there is no living man He has not furnished him abundantly with all means requisite thereto" (St. Francis de Sales, "Treatise on the Love of God", Book 2, Chapter 8).
___________________________
Source: "The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries". Biblical text taken from the Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries made by members of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Navarre, Spain. Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Reprinted with permission from Four Courts Press and Scepter Publishers, the U.S. publisher.

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Just for Today...February 29

No reflection for today...will resume tomorrow.
__________________
For more information, see this post.
Adapted from Just For Today(©1943 Burns & Oates)
Nihil Obstat: Reginaldus Phillips, S.T.L.,Censor deputatus
Imprimatur: Edwardus Myers, Vic. Cap.

Thoughts and Counsels - February 29

There is nothing richer, nothing surer, noth­ing more agreeable than a good conscience.

-Bl. Bartholomew of Martyrs
________________________
From Mary, Help of Christians
Part VI, Thoughts and Counsels of the Saints for Every Day of the Year
Compiled by Fr. Bonaventure Hammer, OFM (© 1909, Benziger Brothers)

Meditation for February 29, Jesus, Infinite Mercy

Several of the saints who have been granted visions of the Pas­sion agree on one distressing detail.

When Jesus, freed from the pillar, fell in His own blood, His first concern was to drag Himself over the ground to recover His loin cloth, which lay at some distance with His other garments; but those drunken brutes who had beaten Him wished to prolong their inhuman game and sneeringly kicked Him from side to side. Just as He was about to reach for His loin cloth one of the base cads caught it up on his foot and sent it flying still farther, forcing our Good Master to even greater exertion. This boorishness, we are told, cut Jesus more deeply than the iron whips.

O Jesus, when Thy martyr, St. Felicitas, was hurled into the air by the horns of the mad bull, her clothing was so torn that it no longer covered her sufficiently, and while falling to the ground she tried to cover herself better-a beautiful gesture of purity.

"I love to contemplate You, my sweet Savior, Infinite Purity, seeking as soon as You have been released, to recover Your garments in spite of Your utter exhaustion.

"And how I wish to make atonement for all immodesty and sinful exposure, for all impurities...as well as for all insults heaped upon those who try to serve You."
_________________
Adapted from Meditations for Religious
by Father Raoul Plus, S.J. (© 1939, Frederick Pustet Co.)